Avaliações de usuários

Good first season. Some of the events feel skimmed through because of the time skip, some of the consequences to what happens during the course of the show take place off air because of the abruptly timed time skip. One of the main examples for this would be Viserys' reaction to the illicit relationship between his daughter and Daemon on multiple occasions when she was a child or Lord Corlys' long term response to Viserys' rejection of his proposal. And the relationship between Rhanerya and Daemon itself seemed under developed, the only possible reason Rhanerya had to wed him was it would strengthen her claim to the throne, other than their whole relationship was built on cryptic conversation that takes place in the Valryian language. Other than that the show is too immersive and it's hard to take sides as both of them have done many wrongs and are good in certain instances, it was nice to see all that slow burn drama that took place to unfold.

Game of Thrones was one of my favorite shows of all-time so I couldn't wait for House of the Dragon. I've now caught up and seen every episode so far and my main takeaway is...this should be and could've been a lot better. While it's already another hit for HBO I think that has to be on name alone. If this wasn't a spin-off I don't think it would be doing so well. People have to be watching because they liked GoT and are waiting for this to be as good. Well, we're now two seasons into it and this is not GoT quality. I've never read the books to these shows so I had no expectations when it came to that but I wouldn't care if it varied from the source material even if I did. I don't get why so many people care if a movie/show is different from the source material. As long as it's entertaining...who cares? They have to adapt these books for the screen. Well, this is not entertaining. Sure, there are a few minutes here and there but overall disappointing.

House of the Dragon is a prequel to Game of Thrones. The television series was created by George R. R. Martin and Ryan Condal for HBO. It's the second series in Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire franchise. It is based on parts of Martin's 2018 book Fire & Blood.

The series begins about 100 years after the Seven Kingdoms are united by the Targaryen conquest, nearly 200 years before the events of Game of Thrones, and 172 years before the birth of the Daenerys Targaryen caricature featured in Game of Thrones.

House of the Dragons portrays the events leading to the decline of House Targaryen, and the devastating war of succession known as the "Dance of the Dragons".

As I stated in my review of The Game of Thrones, I was not that interested in watching Game of Thrones for several years. And, after watching a bit of one episode, Game of Thrones did not look very interesting to me. But, once I decided to find out what all the hoopla and massive fan base was all about, I decided give it a try. I not only purchased the complete series of Game of Thrones on DVDs, but I also purchased House of the Dragon Season 1, and then Season 2, when it came out, all on DVDs as well.

And, yes, also as I previously stated, I subscribe to several streaming services, and could watch most of the TV series I want much more easily by streaming them. But, I'm a collector, and I love collecting, and I'm collecting TV series DVDs. Don't hate me.

Anyway, before watching Game of Thrones, I checked online regarding whether I should watch House of the Dragon first before watching Game of Thrones, since House of the Dragon is a Prequel. I read several opinions that stated that it was best to watch Game of Thrones first, because I would better understand the story in House of the Dragon given it is the same of the fantasy world creation in which both series exist.

Therefore, I watched Game of Thrones first, and thoroughly enjoyed it, and then watched the first two seasons of House of the Dragon and enjoyed that story as well.

After watching both series however, I gotta disagree with those opinions I read on the Internet about which series to watch first. I think watching House of the Dragon first would have better prepared me for watching Game of Thrones. I was easily able to grasp the story, characters, and what was going on in House of the Dragon fairly easily.

Season 1 of House of the Dragon, was more what I would have called a game of thrones than anything else. The intrigue, suspense and political rivalries of the characters in the different kingdoms, and they're quest for power and riches was interesting yet complex. I felt it was similar to watching the intrigue, suspense and political rivalries of the Borgia TV series', or even the political chess game of the Trump administration.

The story in Season 1 of House of the Dragon was mostly about the Targaryen King trying to keep his rule all the while trying to maintain the peace. It was entertaining in a way, but, after episode after episode, it sometimes proved a little boring. That was at least until the last few episodes where... Bammm upside your head and your side blinded by what happens in the story, leaving your mouth haning open. And, of course, the season ends in a cliff hanger, prompting me to immediately begin to watch Season 2.

Season 2 of House of the Dragon is more similar to the Game of Thrones series in that there is still that suspense and political intrigue, but there also seems to be non-stop action, adventure, war and bloodshed. And, of course... Dragons!!!

The writing is equally as good as Game of Thrones, except for the slower pace and some of the more anguishing relationship based episodes in Season 1, which like I said, proved to be kind of boring. But, what was never boring was Season 2, which I spent many hours binge watching. The acting, production, direction, cinematography and special effects were all also excellent and equal to that of Game of Thrones.

My review seems to be, in some ways, the opposite of many other reviewers who seemed to love Season 1, but hated Season 2. But, I guess everyone's got a right to their opinion, right.

However, now I'm faced with the problem I hate. And that is that when I begin watching a series before all the seasons have been released, I'm left having to wait, sometimes years, before I can get back to the story to see what happens.

So, I now have to wait until sometime in 2026 to watch the release of House of the Dragon Season 3!

Being a huge fan of Game of Thrones I couldn't wait until House of the Dragon came out. Then when it did I actually enjoyed it. Season 1 was pretty good, not GoT good but still good. Well, it didn't last because season 2 was a major drop off in quality. The thing I disliked the most was the time jump came, it just came way too early. I would've liked to seen more of the earlier episode years before they jumped ahead. I'm hoping season 3 will be better but I'm adjusting my expectations.

As with others on here, I am a huge fan of GoT. This came as a but of a disappointment by comparison.

Season 1 was decent. Not as good as GoT but compared to the reality show tripe on TV these days, decent.

Fast forward to season 2..... it's a boring watch. The action is very infrequent. The characters are very shallow and difficult to build a rapport with. Episodes tend to meander around.

I've fallen asleep through several episodes. It's okay though as the plot is so obvious it is easy to pick up from where I left it. Lots of talking, meaningless conversations that don't seem to matter.

All in all, hope the John Snow spin-off is better than this. That shouldn't be difficult.

I loved Game of Thrones but wasn't really sure what to expect when I first heard about this but the trailers looked pretty good so I gave it a chance. Then after reading the critics reviews and listening to all hype that was surrounding the show I was expecting this to be the next great series. It's not. I should have known since the reviews are so mixed but people were hyping it up for months and again the trailers were pretty good. I'm a few episodes into season 2 right now and it's going to be a struggle to finish the rest of the season. It definitely hasn't been nearly as good as I thought it would be and judging by the mixed reviews I'm guessing the rest of the season will be much of the same.

I really loved it everything from the beginning to the end is just awesome. Game of Thrones is one of my favorite or my favorite series and them coming up with this one gives you the backstory of how Game of Thrones came out. I love how it keeps you in the edge always guessing thinking you know what's going on but then there's a twist I just love the show can't wait to see more.

House of the Dragon is not merely a prequel; it's a masterfully crafted tragedy that complements Game of Thrones very well by filling in the rich historical tapestry of Westeros. Instead of trying to replicate the sprawling, world-spanning chaos of the original series, it wisely chooses a more focused and intimate approach, zeroing in on a single, doomed family. This laser-like focus allows for a deeper exploration of its characters and their devastating political machinations, driven by ambition, legacy, and patriarchal expectations. It successfully captures the same moral ambiguity and high-stakes political intrigue that made its predecessor a global phenomenon.

A significant part of the show's success lies in its excellent CG, which brings the age of dragons to vivid and terrifying life. The dragons here are not just CGI props; they are fully realized characters with their own personalities and relationships to their riders. Each one, from the ancient and colossal Vhagar to the fierce Caraxes, is rendered with stunning detail and a sense of weight that makes every flight and every fiery breath feel truly epic. The visual effects team deserves immense credit for making these mythical beasts feel so grounded in the world, allowing the story's spectacle to feel both grand and emotionally resonant.

While a few pacing choices in the first season felt rushed, House of the Dragon is an undeniable triumph. It is a compelling, beautiful, and faithful return to a world we thought we knew, proving that even a story we know the end of can still be an unforgettable journey.

Summary: A beautifully shot and compelling prequel that enriches the lore of Westeros, featuring stunning visuals and a more contained, character-driven plot. A must-watch for any fan.

House of the dragons is one of the greatest made television series even with just two seasons aired. Based on the book of Ice and Fire,Set 172 years before the birth of Daenerys targaryen,this show portrayed the internal conflicts and civil war in the Targaryen reign. In an astonishing Fantasy world,a series of many events led one by another handled brilliantly with no hustle and no compromise in the Screenplay for audience's expectations. Every single actor who played in this have given a life to it,they're perfect and the developments of few lead characters felt turnaround and interesting. The Dragon's part in this whole felt relevant and Captivating. Can't wait for the surprises that is yet to unfolded in the upcoming seasons believing that they would maintain the standard they set till now.

Season 2 was a catapulted storm-not as great as Season 1, but still a brutal, calculated build-up to chaos. The ending was fire-Triarchy's fleet advancing, Velaryons ready, dragons unleashed, and the Arryns, Starks, Lannisters, Riverlands, and Hightowers all racing toward a bloody collision. Every episode was like a slow tightening of the noose, building toward something massive. This wasn't just a setup-it was the start of annihilation.

And to the GoT fanboys stuck worshipping Seasons 4-6: wake up. Your so-called "peak TV" was just budget battles, sexposition, and Tyrion recycling the same drunk jokes. House of the Dragon has already outclassed that overrated mess in depth, tension, and storytelling.

House of the Dragon pulled me back into the world of Westeros with all the politics, betrayal, and fire-breathing spectacle I was craving after Game of Thrones. The focus on the Targaryens makes the story feel both intimate and grand, showing how fragile power really is when dragons are involved.

The writing is sharp, the production feels cinematic, and some performances truly shine.

At times, the pacing drags, and the time jumps can feel jarring, but the tension and looming tragedy keep it compelling. It's not quite on the same level as Thrones in its prime, but it's a worthy prequel that sets the stage for something epic.

House of the Dragon carried the legacy of GOT in the best possible way.

It has every element you loved about Game of Thrones.

It's cinematic, beautifully shot, wonderfully acted with amazing writing & direction.

A lot of grey characters which makes story interesting through out.

Season 1 was one of the best first seasons of tv, it brought back GOT fans together once again.

Season 2 was amazing but it was more of a set up season which will eventually pay off in the upcoming final two seasons.

I love this show, cast & characters.

It was amazing to experience Peak GOT once again in its full glory.

House of the Dragon, the prequel to Game of Thrones, is a masterclass in political intrigue, family conflict, and high-stakes drama. Set 200 years before the events of its predecessor, the series dives deep into the Targaryen dynasty, exploring their rise, power struggles, and the seeds of internal conflict that eventually lead to civil war. The show expertly balances sweeping visuals with intimate character moments, ensuring that viewers are invested not only in the dragons and battles but also in the nuanced human dynamics.

Matt Smith as Prince Daemon delivers a magnetic, unpredictable performance, while Emma D'Arcy's portrayal of Rhaenyra Targaryen captures a mix of vulnerability, ambition, and defiance. The show's writing emphasizes moral ambiguity; characters are rarely purely heroic or villainous, reflecting the harsh realities of a world driven by power. The dragons themselves are visually stunning, with CGI that feels both realistic and awe-inspiring, adding weight to the narrative rather than overshadowing it.

The pacing, though deliberate, allows tension to build gradually, making political maneuvers and personal betrayals more impactful. Cinematography and production design immerse viewers in a richly detailed Westeros, from the opulent Red Keep to the vast, fiery landscapes of dragon flights.

While comparisons to Game of Thrones are inevitable, House of the Dragon establishes its own identity, focusing on the fragility of family bonds and the intoxicating allure of power. It's a compelling, visually breathtaking series that captures the essence of George R. R. Martin's world while promising an epic saga of ambition, loyalty, and betrayal.

The show is good, even though most people know how it all ends up, as it's a sequel.

But... almost FOUR YEARS between seasons 2-3? I've lost all interest and connection with the story and characters. That's entirely too long, even if it's a big show.

Probably won't watch anymore, I can just read the histories and books.

First of all, I don't want to give this series a 10/10, especially right now, but I'm going to keep it at 10 because I still have hopes for a third season, and that's only because it's a Game of Thrones spin-off, and I hope the directors don't screw it up. The funny thing is, they still have a source book and writer alive! Wow, this is a complete and utter disaster. The reason I'm so upset is because they're dragging out a second season just to make money, making scenes from the books pointlessly ineffective and absurd. That's the only thing that bothers me, and I feel like the first season is slowly losing its quality.

Season 1 had such a great pace. We moved through years in 2 or 3 episodes, which allowed for the story to move along and milestones to be achieved. This season we are 4 episodes in and the story has only moved a few weeks. This show is eerily slow and nothing is happening. The Dameon story line is boring and useless. Rhanerya has been absent in most of the episodes and not making any decisions. The show writers listened to wasteful criticism from some of last year's audience members, who complained the pace was too fast and now they have destroyed the show!!!! You can't take everyone's critique too serious. This show is way tooo slow and it has lost it magic from last year.

It was best way it could have been adapted.. season 1 is really good 👍 i really liked the dialogues by Olivia cooke and other actors too..heard season 2 is poor..but we'll see..hoped that there are more characters of the books..though you could argue show is biased against greens but still manage to remain balanced.

After more than solid with some excellent parts first season, season 2 went downhill badly. No matter with or without those two episodes, still, entire season as it was made, was made bad. Poor, pretentious dialogue, practically no story, characters' hands and mouths ful of exposition, and more. Two additional episodes can never fix all that.

Still 6/10 because of good first season, and maybe season 3 will be better, and maybe even make it better all together..

Let's see what will it be..

Tell you what happened:

NOTHING HAPPENED!

What a waste of 200 million and 8 hrs of screen time. What a waste of a season..

Looking back to, for example, Game of Thrones season 7, Tyrion and Varys cock jokes, Ninja Arya, Dragons, the Night King, Ice Spears, the North, The Wall, Beyond the Wall.., what the hell were they even doing beyond the wall, and how clever idea of going there was.., either way, no matter how nonsensical plots were, and teleporting across Westeros, Dragonstone - King's Landing Fast Travel, Winterfell - Dragonstone Bullet Train/Concorde, at least it all had soul. Characters mattered, and we, the audience, cared about them, even dragons were characters with a soul, as we all remember how sad things went upon facing Night King's Air Defense..

House of the Dragon is, different to that, completely BLEAK, and while at least season 1 was solid/average, dull nothingness wrapped in low tier dialogue that took over season 2, pushed the show into a struggle for keeping itself just below mediocre..

(To the first season) It has a promising story, a lot of money and an interesting epoch to talk about. It starts really good, but suddenly jumps a lot of years with no notice, and later a lot of years more.

What was disgusting to me was the acting: the youngest stars take a fresh view of the character, while the older ones just cry, and cry, and cry.

They've only 2 faces: brave (as they're going to war) or crying because they've lost something.

I just hope that this doesn't become to a simple hight budget soap opera. While I saw the previous series from the very first chapter, this one is becoming tedious to follow. And worst of all, you know what will happen.

Really they couldn't do something bigger with this rich world? Really?

I was scared to watch for so long because in my head I thought it's no way this could be as good as Game of Thrones and I would be disappointed. Sad to say I was prolonging a show just as good if not better than the original! Great show not a let down! It's like two extra seasons of GOT! Great character build up! Even better storyline and execution! Amazing series!

No emotional connection whatsoever with characters, and this is why it is not working. In 'House of the Dragon,' the narrative struggles to engage viewers on a deeper level. The characters, while visually striking and well-portrayed, lack the development needed to foster genuine attachment. Unlike 'Game of Thrones,' where complex backstories and evolving relationships drew audiences in, 'House of the Dragon' fails to provide sufficient depth. Without this emotional investment, viewers find it challenging to care about the fates and motivations of the characters. The intricate political plots and spectacular battles cannot compensate for the absence of heartfelt connections. Consequently, the show risks becoming a mere spectacle, losing the compelling human element that once captivated fans. For 'House of the Dragon' to succeed, it must cultivate richer character arcs and more intimate storytelling. Adding more personal stakes and emotional dilemmas could help bridge this gap, making the audience genuinely care about the characters' journeys.