Flesh, TX

gawwd i cant believe i have wasted my precious time watching this one ...the only pain is i really don't think it deserves 10 lines of review coz its so crappy n awful ....just don't waste your time on this one coz even if u watch it fast forwarding you will puke ...yes its that awful the acting the less i write the better it is coz there is nothing to write ....we were better than this as kids when we use to try n act i m sure it was better than what they have done ....

i m sure a law should be there to punish these people for making this crap and tormenting us like that grrrr ...

all i can say is AAARGH!!!!puke !!! don't waste your time on this please ...a humble request 2 all of u out there

Usually even the worst kind of films have SOME sort of redeeming feature, but this is just painful from go to woe.

Special mention must go to the appalling acting which is mostly caricature and NOT in a humorous or clever way. It's just pathetic and completely embarrassing.

The terrible direction which has no idea about pace and timing.

The awful sound which is consistently flawed and technically amateur.

And then there's the abysmal script which should never have been written in the first place.

Honestly, I've seen some crap in my time, but this takes the damn cake.

The Barleys, a tight-knitted family of cannibals living in a small town in Texas, send out Sugar, one of their kin, out for some of their special form of 'take-out'. This, of course, causes trouble when she abducts the daughter of Donna (who gets understandable peeved, only more so when the local sheriff won't help much), who decides to take in into her own hands to find her abducted daughter.

This movie's main plot doesn't even start up until half an hour into to film and even then the movie seems content to leisurely move slowly along. What could have been a reasonably OK short is stretched so thin that it's merely boring.

Eye Candy: Davina Joy gets topless

My Grade: D

Joe Estevez does it again! Five bags of popcorn 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 for his performance.

What always amazes me when I read non-professional reviews (and yes, I am non-professional, too) of B-movies is that they usually fall into one of two categories. The ones give it a complete bashing, complain about everything from acting to post-production, the others try hard to squeeze it into the somewhat outworn so-bad-it's-good category. A minority sometimes tries to regard them as hidden gems that are bound to become cult movies.

Yes, cast was definitely overacting, possibly on purpose, I am not so sure about this. I am non-native in English but this sheriff character left me wondering if people in Texas really speak like this. And yes, the inbred family could have used better costumes and/or wigs, the plot could have been more coherent and logical and the sound could have been better, but hey, this is a low-budget horror movie of which species I have certainly witnessed worse specimens. The movie makers made sure it did not lack any of the stereotypical ingredients, some gore, some T & A (hot Davina Joy, who looked too good for the role) and not failing to throw in the odd corrupt small-town sheriff.

I actually somewhat enjoyed this movie. It was certainly odd and would have benefited from a higher budget, but as low-budget slasher movies go it was watchable. Just don't expect a polished, coherent Hollywood production with a budget to cover all those flaws that my co-reviewers and me so ruthlessly point out.