Avaliações de usuários

How wonderfully old fashioned this drama is, we haven't had a good Political drama for years, in 2020 we needed one.

It focuses on Peter Laurence, a Government Minister with Political ambition, and a checkered past. Everything in his private life seems to start spiralling out of control, at a time where opportunities for career development seem to be there.

It's good, it starts off fairly slow, but it gathers momentum as it progresses, you have expectations ahead of the finale, make your own minds up whether it succeeds or not.

Superbly acted throughout, Hugh Laurie is incredible, his ability to switch from conniving liar to Politician and man of the people is incredible. Other performances of note are Pippa Bennett-Warner, Pip Torrens and of course Helen McCrory.

I'm sure many will look at Helen McCrory's character Dawn, and be reminded of a former PM, possibly even two.

Beautifully produced, it's slick, sharp, with good music throughout.

The Politics, I say this as someone say in the centre, I'm not a Tory voter, and never have been, but.... There is a lot of political bias here, it's very anti Tory, we have Ministers wanting to sell of the NHS for one, Ministers in possession of I'll gotten gains, and we have the old boys network plotting against the female PM, it's not for me to comment, but come on, you need to be a little more impartial.

I would argue it's well worth seeing, but I know full well it will irritate some of a certain political persuasion 8/10.

...And after watching it you can judge it yourself, not based on your political opinion, but on the serie. It deserves more than a 6 on Imdb, for sure.

I find it humorously ironic that the consumer reviews section highlights one of the main subtexts of this well crafted show. A lot of sensationalist polarised opinions based on political allegiance rather than acknowledgement of a well written script and some standout performances. I agree that the characters are a bit 2D but the show needs to form a base from which to develop. I hope the BBC comissioners give this show the future it deserves as there's a lot of interesting and engaging stuff here.

I have watched the 4 episodes of this show and I think it has some ups and downs, but as someone who is not British and mostly centralist in my own political views I felt I needed to give my thoughts in hopes of offering some fair perspective. Now in ep 1 I really felt the show was biased and anti-right wing, so for people who only saw ep 1, I see where you are coming from, but I did feel later episodes sort of shifted that narrative, Peter's personality is layered and his ambition isn't ideological, they do make an effort to show he's coming from a place of conviction not just greed or hate, he sees his actions as for the betterment of his country, the story isn't even about the ideology it's about how politics and scandals go together and I think the way the story concludes is quite effective. Is it amazing or earth shatter, No. Is it leaning a certain way politically, yes. Is it an entertaining 4 hours of content where you find yourself rooting for the "bad guys", absolutely! I wish everyone would give it a fair shake! but also acknowledge that people have different political views and it's ok if they like/dislike a show for the way it handles them, it's fine, but what's not fine is when those views completely cloud your judgment.

Thought I'd write something as I saw a rant about tropes of people of colour and "white men bad"- That person has issues and is projecting. There is a female PM (she's no Angel) but the majority of the politicians are depicted as white men, it's Britain so this should be expected. The people of colour are side characters and the majority are in prison, the other notable main person of colour is a morally bankrupt barrister and that's it so I'm not seeing all this good that PaulSpencer chose to see. I'm also confused as to what could have been the expectation considering they're supposed to represent the Tory party. Also, I didn't think of the main Hugh Laurie character as bad, he's just a politician, has done no worse if not less than our current politicians, but his character is very likeable. After the things our ministers have done they still manage to survive and carry on- This is no different. Despite his failings he still manages to make us like him and even root for him. The portrayals of some of the female characters are a bit 2D and questionable, something seems unfinished so I can understand people having issue there. As a Brit I didn't see the anti-right sentiment, I simply see snippets of what we have now with the Tory government and I don't think it would been much different if they were portraying a labour government - These are the political workings of our government.

Overall this isn't groundbreaking but it's a decent watch, it's entertaining. They could have done better with the material and stretched it out over a few more eps but for the talent alone I'd watch another series.

Roadkill, a British semi-Drama series with only 4 episodes! Initially, I thought that it would be a compact, well-paced Drama pursuing to a second season whatever story it had. Well, after watching it, it falls hard on the face.

• (+) Great acting by Hugh Laurie as always. The near-only very good performance here. Worth mentioning are Helen McCrory and Millie Brady too.
• (+) Some touching and funny moments relating to the main character's personal life.
• (+) Nice filming and instructive cinematography.
• (-) Slow, bland and uninteresting screenplay and developments.
• (-) Awful music and piano playing in the background. More like a score suitable for a light-hearted but depressed comedy series.
• (+-) Some interesting twists and turns, having the weight of five ping-pong balls.

A series to forget, besides the marvelous acting of Hugh Laurie.

It seems that some reviewers are basing their opinions on their political biases, rather than on the quality of the production, the plot or the acting. I binge-watched all 4 episodes. The performance of the main cast was convincing and the storyline wasn't too far-fetched to be believable. There were some minor weaknesses, such as the Prime Minister having no facial expressions due to a Botox overdrive (even though McCrory played the part well), but overall it's pretty good. The ending opens the possibility of a second series.

If it were a book I wouldn't have been able to put it down.

Hare does a brilliant job in portraying Peter Laurence, a politician with a nose for power, wriggling his way through the system. Despite his awfulness, he is still a rounded, three dimensional character. Sometimes you even find yourself rooting for the cad.

With an unpredictable, intersecting plot line, some surprising turns and a great cast and score, this is a must-watch if you like political thrillers. Just don't expect it to do much to raise your expectations of politicians.

So now I got the public service announcement out of the way, lets discuss this series so far.

Acting is solid, pacing is suitable. Dialog seems a bit unnatural at times. Its as if the cast don't really gel, but sometimes that takes time in a new series.

Subtle comedy and intrigue support what would suite those who like dry slow-roll political drama. It has enough to keep you watching, but mostly because of Laurie's character and on-screen presence.

I would not recommend for those not familiar with UK politics. Most US viewers won't understand some of the political interactions.

For this genre and target audience its a solid entry. It may end up being something special eventually, but currently its a little stunted- and that's what stops it being great.

7.5/10

If this was any further up my street it would be living in my house. David Hare as reliable as ever, Hugh Lawrie and Helen McCrory quite rightly being showered with plaudits but the whole cast is tremendous with special mention to Saskia Reeves. Political intrigue and backstabbing, shady civil servants, personal conflict and an ending that is crying out for another series. I for one can't wait. Perfect Sunday night viewing.

Ignore the ideological anti-BBC campaign here. This is well written and well performed political drama.

It's evident that there has been a concerted move by far right anti-BBC reviewers to downgrade this drama, giving very low marks that are contrary to the majority of reviewers not related to the Daily Mail et al. In fact, after watching just one episode l think this appears to be an absorbing political drama, not wholly unconnected to events at the present time. l know the idea that certain politicians are nasty pieces of work who are strangers to truth upsets some people, but not the majority of people and I believe this is going to be a very good series based on what I've seen so far.

As an expat Brit who grew up in the reign of Queen Thatcher this resonates.

David Hare is at least consistent, mostly from the self-righteous Tony Blair worldview.

You know you'll get some disparagement of the Tories but God knows if you're paying attention you know it's well deserved...

Political venality isn't party specific so he does a good job with lightly sketched characters.

I liked the music, no idea why so many didn't.

It's not House of Cards, but Barbie isn't Oppenheimer...so what?

Well acted and filmed, yes there are cliches and tropes here. In political drama thus will it ever be so.

A good use of four hours of your leisure time.

Watch this!!!!

In general easy to watch, not as confusing as other political dramas, however that sometimes led to the writing feeling lazy in places. Cinematography and lighting was great for setting the scene of the dark underside of politics. I just wish it was developed a little more, couldn't it have been made into 10 parts to really show the full lead up to the ending?

I feel as though this should have been a 6 episode series. So much more to say. It left me feeling cheated, as if only half of the story was missing. Enjoyed it but hopefully there's a Series 2. Otherwise, very disappointing. Great cast but a wasted opportunity.

The BBC used to be a bastion of honesty and impartiality, used to be. All they are now is an anti-government media outlet that changes to suit the wealth attached. We all know who the MP is meant to be and which party it is meant to degrade and that's the problem. Storytelling is lost, you're just meant to believe the one sole point of view with no background. Everything linked to one party is morally corrupt, untrustworthy and utterly out for themselves. Ergo why bother and that is key question. Don't bother if you like to think for yourself, but you'll enjoy if you watch Strictly Come Dancing.

I'm not from UK, so as an outsider i can disregard the bias without much problems. It centers on the tories, and the main character is also a tory. So you would expect them to show a decent tory as well. In fact, i can give them a pass on that because, as i said, i'm not from UK so i don't have a horse in the race. But it lools like everyone from the tories is evil. However what does bother me is that they seem to make this a "diversity" thing as well: all people who "want justice" are females, excluding one middle eastern guy. But all white guys are in expensive restourants drinking and smoking cuban cigars, being all corrupt and "patriarchal": oh how original. One of those "female fighters" is also a lesbian, and a few are black, so they got the main "oppressed people" covered. Despite this, i try my best to concentrate on the main character and the amazing actor who portrays him. He's pretty much the only thing which made me want to watch more. The story itself is not particularly original, they just throw everything at the main character who is being all "patriarchal".

Looks to me like this could be an intriguing, slightly fun British political drama that has some very topical points to make on the seediness and corruption within our political system. It's not something that only happened in the 80's and 90's like many of the low score reviewers on here are saying...It's always been there and depressingly probably always will...especially from one side. Just start reading some papers that aren't owned by billionaires. These obnoxious, self serving career politicians fill one side of our political system and we all know it. The more dramas or documentaries that come out and address, uncover, investigate or hopefully in the case of this little drama let people into the world of some of the seedy little people that have been elected on the ticket of a caring, working class Tory pretending to give a voice to and help their "people" only to go on to look after themselves and feather the nests of their Cronies. Here's hoping it gets even better.

A typical average political drama which is nothing special. Hugh Laurie is capable of accepting far better. The plot gets confusing at times and for me one of the MOST irritating parts of this drama was the constant over playing of the 4-5 second piano piece which becomes very annoying. It takes your mind off the drama, as all you end up doing is wishing they would mute it!

Great script, intriguing theme if you go past the first somewhat woozy 10 mins of episode 1. I'm not sure why the rating is low overall because each episode is highly rated by the same audience -- hmm. Don't miss it, superlative show and I can't wait for the second season!

In general it is a good show, the drama unfolds in an interesting way and we are taken to accompany not only the protagonist's professional life, but also his personal life. In my opinion, the story could have developed much more... and it may leave a little bit to desired but it is still well done and Hugh Laurie's performance is captivating. A good political drama with some twists and turns outs that make it quite interesting. :)

I don't have the time or crayons to explain to the haters why they are wrong. Well written with some excellent cast choices. Laurie & McCrory are brilliant.

A formulaic piece of work about cardboard politicians but saved by the presence of Hugh Laurie even though he can't save it. It's not a smooth ride but clumsy and jerky relying on telegraphed scenes. Little time is taken to develop the characters or explore the events as there is too much going on. And, as for events, it's a matter of piling one on top of the other, then adding another and another. It would have been better if it had been leaner.