L2: Empuraan

Empuraan had the potential to be a masterpiece, but it falls short due to misplaced priorities. Instead of focusing on storytelling, Prithviraj seemed more invested in making every frame grand.

At its core, there is a compelling story, but it gets buried under indulgent filmmaking. Manju Warrier carries the film, yet character arcs feel rushed because Prithviraj prioritized exotic locations over depth. The same over-the-top storytelling prevails despite the attempt to be "different."

A major issue is the inclusion of white actors who can't act. Many Indian films do this, and *Empuraan* follows suit, making these performances feel artificial and distracting.

Then there's Mohanlal-practically every shot of him is slow motion. The overuse of this, paired with an excessive background score, becomes exhausting. The helicopter shootout scene? Completely unnecessary. Had Prithviraj focused on political intrigue rather than gimmicks, this film could have been brilliant.

The film shines when it delves into Indian politics, creating genuinely engaging moments. The villain had a strong introduction-well-written and menacing. However, instead of developing him further, he gets sidelined once the audience has enough reason to dislike him. A missed opportunity that weakens the film.

For such a massive budget, the editing is surprisingly poor. Unnecessary jump cuts and excessive zoom-ins hurt immersion. These choices cheapen what could have been a polished cinematic experience.

The cinematography, however, is excellent. Not to be confused with the VFX, which remain subpar. But the lighting, framing, and composition stand out. If the storytelling had matched the cinematography's quality, Empuraan" would have been far stronger.

Prithviraj's character suffers from forced emotional beats. One key scene feels like a plot device rather than genuine development, only for the film to cut abruptly to an unrelated sequence.

Mohanlal, despite being an icon, feels more mythical than human. His constant deep, philosophical dialogues add little to his character. This detachment weakens his role as the film's emotional anchor.

Ultimately, Empuraan excels when focused on India, its politics, and its power dynamics. Those moments shine. However, its obsession with spectacle over substance holds it back from greatness.

Visually impressive but narratively inconsistent, Empuraan prioritizes style over depth. It could have been much more.

I was extremely impressed by Prithviraj's direction and the overall making of the film. The visuals, cinematography, and background score were top-notch and clearly demonstrated the effort and vision behind the project. The scale of the film and its technical aspects were commendable, setting high expectations for the story that followed.

Unfortunately, the content of the film didn't quite live up to those expectations. It felt cluttered with unnecessary elements, many of which didn't add any real value to the narrative. One of the biggest disappointments was Mohanlal's portrayal of the character Abraham. His performance lacked the depth and expression we've come to expect from him, especially when compared to his iconic role as Stephen. The character of Abraham came across as flat and unimpactful, leaving fans longing for the familiar charisma and emotional depth that Stephen brought to the screen.

Additionally, the movie was bogged down by an excessive number of characters who seemed irrelevant to the plot. Their presence detracted from the main story and weakened the overall impact of the film. It felt like the movie was trying to juggle too many storylines, which ultimately left it feeling disjointed and unfocused.

In conclusion, while the craftsmanship and ambition behind the film are commendable, the content and storytelling failed to meet the mark. What could have been a gripping, memorable experience ended up feeling bloated and underwhelming.

I watched the movie yesterday and noticed that the director (or someone involved) seemed to have a hidden agenda influencing the narrative. The first half had no real connection to the previous part , making it feel somewhat disconnected. However, I believe the filmmaker achieved their target without any cost.

The movie touches on various political issues in Kerala, highlighting the weaknesses of its leaders and referencing sensitive incidents. Given the nature of these topics, it should have undergone stricter censorship before release. While having a business-driven mindset is understandable, it should not come at the cost of manipulating history.

That said, the movie excels in its technical aspects-especially the action sequences and choreography, which were executed brilliantly. Overall, it's a commendable attempt, but it falls short of being a complete success.

Thanks!

With all the budget and solid starcast, if only they had a good screenplay.

Fire Murali gopy and get someone new to write Lucifer 3 .

All the layers and symbolisms from Lucifer is missing in empuraan and is replaced with flashy pointless scenes . Movie was going good in the first act then maybe the makers thought screw this and let's throw random bs.

Manju warrier was the only saving grace. Except her makeover saree in one key scene. That was off putting .

Tovinos character arc and his big political decision doesn't make any sense.

Prithviraj as Zayed is really good but has placed himself as an equal or even better than the titular protagonist. Ahem, conflict of interest. By the third act, KA becomes like a secondary character in his own film.

Deepak Devs score is crap. Antony Perumbavoor and his son doing glorified cameos sums up the essence of this movie.

Mohanlal is at his best and does what he can do with his enigmatic - more than life character in this wasted multi million opportunity of a promising sequel. Still he is nowhere close to the amazing Stephen Nedumpally we saw in Lucifer.

His attire looks like an unintentional parody. Wonder who is the fasion terrorist for his costumes as KA.

In short KA nexus and its dealings feel like written by a 11 year old who is fascinated by newly found conspiracy theories.

Haven't been let down by any other movie in recent times like this.

Rather than concentrating on the narrative and expanding the 'Lucifer' universe, it seems the creators prioritised showcasing the impressive scale and opulence they achieved, particularly striking for an industry that rarely ventured into such lavish and extravagant realms.

This emphasis is evident at frequent intervals, especially when they lead the protagonist to exotic locations, make him do sleek, slo-mo action, all while maintaining an air of sophistication and grandeur.

Now do not get me wrong, I am not opposing the ambition to go grand and embrace flamboyance, particularly when the film's budget allows for such creative freedom. However, that should not compromise the quality of the writing or the development of the characters. When one strips away all the glitz & glamour and assesses the feature purely from a story point of view, shortcomings become apparent.

FYI, I appreciated the original 'Lucifer' for its intent to weave a compelling political thriller, and I was captivated by the character of 'Stephan', I was eager to delve deeper into his story in this continuation.

Even when the trailers for the sequel promised an entirely new experience, I held onto my hopes for something deserving of my wait & anticipation, but unfortunately, none of those were fulfilled, it did not meet my expectations.