Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..An exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..An exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Fotos
Bill McGuire
- Self - Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre, UCL
- (as Prof. Bill McGuire)
Jay Melosh
- Self - University of Arizona Lunar & Planetary Laboratory
- (as Prof. Jay Melosh)
Simon Day
- Self - Benfield Greig Hazzard Research Center, UCL
- (as Dr. Simon Day)
David Levy
- Self - Jamac Observatory
- (cenas de arquivo)
John Oxford
- Self - University of London
- (as Prof. John Oxford)
Brian Cox
- Self - Manchester University
- (as Dr. Brian Cox)
Frank Close
- Self - Oxford University
- (as Prof. Frank Close)
David Riley
- Newsreader
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
10Nobbsy
I don't get the low rating for this well done little movie. In the style of "Groundhog Day" , it presents several possible mega-catastrophes, two of which have actually occurred since this docu-drama was made, in 2004. The last catastrophic event dramatized in the movie is a physics experiment gone wrong. It is the most catastrophic of all, but, No Spoilers, you'll have to watch the movie.
There are five possible endings and two levels of the movie.
The first level is science fiction, ie. fiction based on science. Scientists do comment the different possible scenarios: Super tsunami, super eruption, meteor collision, virus outbreak and strangelet creation. Most of these happenings do not lead to the end of the world, some of them are displayed actually in very mild manner (like the meteoric impact which would be way way more devastating that displayed). But never worry, it is worthy of your time anyway.
The second level is pure scifi, ie. story about the man who wakes every day to experience another end of the world. The parallel stories are actually very well connected and it is extremely enjoyable. You can even see these little details like references to dinosaurs in meteorite plot. I would say this was done better that many "real" scifi movies. It worked for me, I really enjoyed it several times. I could watch another set of scenarios, maybe even darker ones.
Way to go, BBC, great work!
The first level is science fiction, ie. fiction based on science. Scientists do comment the different possible scenarios: Super tsunami, super eruption, meteor collision, virus outbreak and strangelet creation. Most of these happenings do not lead to the end of the world, some of them are displayed actually in very mild manner (like the meteoric impact which would be way way more devastating that displayed). But never worry, it is worthy of your time anyway.
The second level is pure scifi, ie. story about the man who wakes every day to experience another end of the world. The parallel stories are actually very well connected and it is extremely enjoyable. You can even see these little details like references to dinosaurs in meteorite plot. I would say this was done better that many "real" scifi movies. It worked for me, I really enjoyed it several times. I could watch another set of scenarios, maybe even darker ones.
Way to go, BBC, great work!
My favorite part of this was when one interviewee near the end was named Brian Cox, and then the interviewee after him kept repeating the word "succession." Truly forward-thinking as a docudrama/disaster movie, End Day is.
When judged as a TV movie made during the middle of the 2000s, it's fine. There are a couple of shots that understand the budget is next to nothing, and these are the most effective. Unfortunately, other shots are way too ambitious, rendering certain parts of this horrendously bad-looking.
It's interesting how Gareth Edwards more often than not makes films with bland/bad protagonists - I couldn't stand the lead guy in this, and the self-aware Groundhog Day approach to showing the world ending in several different ways is probably more interesting in theory than it was in execution here; maybe some points can be afforded for effort.
When judged as a TV movie made during the middle of the 2000s, it's fine. There are a couple of shots that understand the budget is next to nothing, and these are the most effective. Unfortunately, other shots are way too ambitious, rendering certain parts of this horrendously bad-looking.
It's interesting how Gareth Edwards more often than not makes films with bland/bad protagonists - I couldn't stand the lead guy in this, and the self-aware Groundhog Day approach to showing the world ending in several different ways is probably more interesting in theory than it was in execution here; maybe some points can be afforded for effort.
This is a great made for TV disaster movie. If you love the genre you should see it. No, it's not a billion dollar budget, but it can still be an 8 for what it is. Maybe a 7.5 but I always round up if I think the general rating is too low.
What the hell is wrong with people releasing something like this, I just need to point out one thing. A meteorite is falling behind a kid and the kid is just watching it from a train leaving the city like nothing is happening.
Its not about acting, reaction of people are so unbelievable unreal that it makes this thing even more terrible then it is.
A tsunami higher then most buildings in Manhattan sweeps down the streets and a guy in a car just watches it and is like wooow thats big.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAs the taxi pulls away from the hotel at the start of the second scenario, a movie theatre can be seen across the road with the sign over the entrance reading "Now Showing Groundhog Day" an obvious reference between the similarities to the storyline of Feitiço do Tempo (1993) and the docudrama's filming style.
- Erros de gravaçãoA supposed news reporter mentions Eastern Seaboard Time. There's no such thing.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 48 min
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.78 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente