Dream Home

Where to begin with Dream Home? Where to begin indeed.

Let's be clear, the most professional part of this production is the cover art. But even that is badly flawed, that house doesn't even remotely resemble the house in the movie and a child on a bike like that? Not relevant.

The film itself is truly amateur hour, it looks and sounds like a student film. The cinematography is messy and the sound quality is the pits. Want an example of how bad? You'll have two characters talking to one another and the background noises will vary in intensity when the camera bounces between them. It truly is awful.

The acting is some of the worst I've seen for years. No passion in the delivery, it's as if they were taken off the street randomly and asked to just read off a teleprompter.

The plot is recycled, we've seen it all before but better. So basically to summarize the film literally has no redeeming features. It looks like hell, it sounds like crap and the content itself is unoriginal tripe.

They do get better than this, but not by much.

The Good:

Erm....

The Bad:

Poor boom quality

Lifeless performances

WTF is that front cover?

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

When you actually hear the director yelling "Cut" in a finished film you know these people shouldn't be in the industry

People who buy million dollar homes can't afford kids

this "movie" sucks A and I think whomever made this needs to go to film school.. the acting was so bad, I couldn't watch more than 5 minutes of it.. I stopped at the fake A conversation at the beginning.. B title? no, more like D title for dumb as F.!! if I could have left a half star it would have been too much credit, so 1 star is being extremely generous. bad acting, terrible editing, the cover depicts nothing from the movie, horrible effects........ my advice, watch something else, don't waste your time with this "movie".. I would suggest finding a new day job for the producers, and editors.. because making movies is not for them at all...

I felt the movie itself would have been good if the director had really tried to focus on making a good movie. Low budget is probably what they were using. It was an excellent story for a horror movie and could have been a great horror movie. Ghost stories that aren't gory are my favorite types of movies. The movie could have been up there with The Ring, or The Grudge but it seemed like a high school video project instead of a "real movie." The plot of the story was good--but the stiffness of the acting and the lame dialog was laughable. Even though it had a certain creepiness factor, it was actually a challenge to continue watching it to the end. Maybe it will rank with the cult classics for dumb horror stories. I'll give it some points for surprising me at the end, though.

My wife and I are always on the look out for a new horror movie/director may be we should have been looking for a GOOD new horror. This was the worst attempt at movie making that I have ever had the miss fortune of stepping in. The acting was atrocious, monotone and strained the camera work was shoddy and ineffective. The biggest early clue was when you can here someone in the back ground yelling CUT at the end of a scene an obvious audio clip that should have made it to the producers floor with the rest of the movie. We will be on the watch for cast and crew so that we can steer clear of the next train wreck they are involved with. I pray that you are reading this before your flush your money and time out of your life away.

Well that's 30 minutes of my life I won't get back! I skipped most of it as it's absolute rubbish with terrible acting and stupid storyline. Not even scary! Don't waste your time!