[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
IMDbPro

Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America

  • Filme para televisão
  • 2006
  • TV-14
  • 1 h 23 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,9/10
1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America (2006)
DramaFicção científicaHorrorSuspense

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn outbreak of avian flu mutates into a virus that becomes transmittable from human to human.An outbreak of avian flu mutates into a virus that becomes transmittable from human to human.An outbreak of avian flu mutates into a virus that becomes transmittable from human to human.

  • Direção
    • Richard Pearce
  • Roteirista
    • Ron McGee
  • Artistas
    • Joely Richardson
    • Scott Cohen
    • Justina Machado
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    4,9/10
    1 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Richard Pearce
    • Roteirista
      • Ron McGee
    • Artistas
      • Joely Richardson
      • Scott Cohen
      • Justina Machado
    • 33Avaliações de usuários
    • 4Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos5

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal52

    Editar
    Joely Richardson
    Joely Richardson
    • Dr. Iris Varnack
    Scott Cohen
    Scott Cohen
    • Governor Mike Newsome
    Justina Machado
    Justina Machado
    • Alma Ansen
    Ann Cusack
    Ann Cusack
    • Denise Connelly
    David Ramsey
    David Ramsey
    • Curtis Ansen
    John Atkinson
    • Ed Connelly
    Stacy Keach
    Stacy Keach
    • Collin Reed
    Peter O'Brien
    Peter O'Brien
    • Alan
    Carolyn Dando
    • Lauren Connelly
    Kodi Smit-McPhee
    Kodi Smit-McPhee
    • Toby Connelly
    Kate Butler
    Kate Butler
    • Chief of Staff Jean Loos
    Trevor Sai Louie
    Trevor Sai Louie
    • Dr. Kwon
    Latham Gaines
    Latham Gaines
    • Kostmart Manager
    Jonny Pasvolsky
    Jonny Pasvolsky
    • Governor Newsome's Aide
    Steve Bastoni
    Steve Bastoni
    • FEMA Director McGarrett
    Jerome Ehlers
    Jerome Ehlers
    • Chad Sinclair
    Mark Tronson
    • Derek Newsome
    Rebecca Hamilton
    • Sarah Newsome
    • Direção
      • Richard Pearce
    • Roteirista
      • Ron McGee
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários33

    4,91K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    5srooks1

    Prophetic and Dark

    There are similarities between this film and our current situation; however, the film is much more dark. The acting for the most part is stark and lacks emotion. This film is almost like like a hastily constructed documentary. This film will not leave you in a good place.
    7dougscuderi

    2006 to 2022

    Well, I saw this on Prime in 2022 and decided to give it a view. I found it pretty similar to our pandemic, yet funny to read the prior reviews to 2020 as nobody has seen something like we have, post 2019. The cast isn't well known, but I did like the Blonde from nip tuck so I gave it a try.

    In all honesty the rating should be a little higher, this idea may have been a little far fetched but it hit home since, in a lot of ways. I probably wouldn't have watched it though if it was made after 2020. As nobody cares to be reminded of the pandemic constantly, while still in it. This being 2006 is different. It also would have been worse if Facebook and social media were stronger when they filmed this. They weren't too far off.
    vchimpanzee

    Terrifying and graphic, at least in the first half

    In Guangdong province, China, numerous birds infected with the H5N1 virus are being killed, but it may be too late to stop the disease from spreading. At least one man is sick at a nearby factory being visited by Ed Connelly of Richmond, Virginia, who is criticizing the factory's policies that are costing the company money (as far as we know, this has nothing to do with the disease).

    As Connelly returns to the United States, we see extreme close-ups of the ways the disease is being spread by him to others on the plane. Soon after he gets back to Richmond, life appears normal but he is infecting others around him. He has no idea how sick he is.

    Dr. Iris Varnack (Joely Richardson) is called to China, where 8 people have been infected by the bird flu virus. Correction--25 people. And the doctor there believes these cases, unlike others before, were passed from human to human rather than from bird to human. Dr. Varnack soon must inform the government that a pandemic worse than the 1918 Spanish Flu is a strong possibility. 300 million people could die worldwide (compared to 50 million in the earlier disaster).

    Connelly becomes delusional and passes out in a store, and once doctors figure out what is wrong, all who visit him, including his wife Denise (Ann Cusack), must wear what look like space suits. By the first commercial break, the death toll is 125.

    Soon, Connelly's neighborhood looks like a military installation, with a fence, complete with barbed wire, and armed military guards. Everyone there and in several other Richmond neighborhoods must stay in, depending on outsiders to get them the food and supplies they need. And as the epidemic worsens nationwide, the necessities of life become harder and harder to get.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services (Stacy Keach) communicates with the press. We are told the President addressed the nation, but we never see him.

    Hospitals are soon overwhelmed with people who suspect they have the disease. We see treatment of the bird flu primarily through the eyes of one heroic nurse, Alma Ansen (Justina Machado), whose husband Curtis (David Ramsey) is in the military in Iraq--until his unit gets called back to the United States. Hospitals become terrible places, and before long, large buildings must be turned into auxiliary health care facilities.

    The Connelly family becomes isolated from the world, though they do not have the disease. Or do they?

    Periodically, we see a death count on the screen. People are dying so fast, though, that the count looks like the total sale display on a gas pump while you are filling up. The death toll goes from hundreds to thousands to many millions.

    Virginia Governor Mike Newsome (Seth Cohen) is criticized for overdoing the quarantines and focusing on certain groups (the NAACP and ACLU, we are told, do not like his policies). He is told his efforts are doing no good to stop the disease's spread, but that doesn't really matter.

    Life as we know it ceases to exist. The country is like a Third World nation, with people waiting in lines for everything they need, and lucky to get what they have. Black markets develop and crime increases (Remember the Rodney King verdict? Fortunately, we see this type of situation primarily in news footage). And people need other types of services from hospitals and the health care system--but this is just not readily available. Other problems develop that you might not have thought of. This situation is much worse than when polio was a problem (I'm not that old, by the way, but I've heard about it)--that's more like what I was led to expect if the bird flu became a problem.

    The situation is not as grim in the second half. Life appears 'normal' in many scenes, though it is a 'new' normal. Denise Connelly's determination and compassion make the movie worth seeing, and a little more than just a 'disease of the week' movie. Scenes with Alma and Curtis also provide some welcome relief, though they both have their jobs to go back to.

    I have to wonder why people stopped wearing space suits. There was no vaccine to begin with, and of course we had the obligatory controversies once one was found (there has to actually be a specific form of the disease to develop a vaccine for). My guess is they ran out of space suits and hoped they didn't need them. Of course, we are told some people just don't get sick.

    The ending shows promise of a return to normal, but also impending gloom. IT MAY NOT BE OVER.

    It is true that every version of the flu must have its own vaccine, and we don't know whether a vaccine for the current H5N1 virus will work if human-to-human transmission occurs. That part the movie probably got right. And people do have a tendency to overreact to threats such as this--where I live even the hint of snow means no bread or milk on grocery store shelves, so people's behavior here probably seemed realistic. But this movie just showed a quite exaggerated and terrifying look at what could happen. We may have been educated on some of the concerns a bird flu epidemic could bring--both consequences directly related to the flu, and the indirect results as well. Still, this looked overdone to me.

    The autopsy on one victim was quite graphic. And we did see blood in a number of cases, because people with this disease cough up blood or bleed from the nose, at least in this version.

    Stacy Keach gave the standout acting performance. Other actors were good at times, considering this was a TV-movie. Seth Cohen, Ann Cusack, Justina Machado and David Ramsey all had their moments.

    Was it just a 'disease-of-the-week' movie? Probably, but it had its good moments.
    7mmalkasian

    Surprisingly accurate, ending was a bit disappointing

    As a professional business continuity planner, one who has worked extensively in the pandemic flu planning field, let me tell you now that this movie is not about an impossible doomsday scenario. The H5N1 virus is a very real threat and every government on every level has been preparing for it for years. What was pleasantly surprising about this movie (which, frankly, I did not expect very much from) was its accuracy - both in portraying facts and possible situations. They did a very good job of giving background on the pandemics of the past - 1918, 57, and 68. They also showed the infections coming in waves, just as they have in past pandemics and in all probability will when the next one hits.

    Watching this movie was like watching the scenario that plays in the head of every pandemic flu planner when they write response protocols and imagine how quickly this could move and how devastating it could be. I know I've seen this movie many times in my own head already. The fact is that it is a matter of "when", not "if". Historically, we have had pandemics on average once every 30 years (which means we are currently overdue for one). It is enormously unlikely that after an established record like that, we would never have one again. It may not be the H5N1, but it's very likely a pandemic flu will happen again.

    The acting was good, especially Joely Richardson's performance. The characters were well-developed and watching the communities after the first wave hit brought tears to my eyes a few times. The bravery and resiliency of the American people is truly amazing. Scott Cohen also did a very real, believable job as Governor Newsome.

    This movie is definitely scary, but what's more scary is being unprepared. Health departments in most large cities are developing or running education campaigns for the public to create awareness for common-sense precautions, as they say in the movie, so hopefully people will start paying attention to the ads that tell them to cover their coughs, wash their hands, and stay home when they're sick.

    On a final note, despite being quite impressed with the quality of this movie, the ending was a little disappointing. I was hoping for something a bit more resolutory, but I suppose it would have been difficult to end the movie on a very cheery note.

    Definitely worth your time to see!
    5RodrigAndrisan

    Prophetic and predictable!

    Many similarities in this film made in 2006 with what really happened in the world starting in the Fall-Winter of 2019. That will be a good reason to watch it. Joely Richardson and Stacy Keach are another reason to watch the movie. It's well made but has lengths that will be harder to digest.

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Parallels the real life pandemic that occurs 15 years later in 2020.
    • Conexões
      Featured in The Cinema Snob: Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America (2020)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 9 de maio de 2006 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • Países de origem
      • Nova Zelândia
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Virus mortal
    • Locações de filme
      • Nova Zelândia
    • Empresa de produção
      • American Broadcasting Company (ABC)
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 23 min(83 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby Digital
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.