[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
IMDbPro

A for Andromeda

  • Filme para televisão
  • 2006
  • 1 h 30 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,3/10
784
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
A for Andromeda (2006)
DramaFicção científicaSuspense

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaIn the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist d... Ler tudoIn the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.In the Yorkshire Dales, a group of scientists receive radio signals from the Andromeda Galaxy. Once decoded, these give them a computer program that can design a human clone. One physicist decides it is a Trojan horse and decides to destroy the computer.

  • Direção
    • John Strickland
  • Roteiristas
    • John Elliot
    • Richard Fell
    • Fred Hoyle
  • Artistas
    • Tom Hardy
    • Charlie Cox
    • Kelly Reilly
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,3/10
    784
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • John Strickland
    • Roteiristas
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • Artistas
      • Tom Hardy
      • Charlie Cox
      • Kelly Reilly
    • 16Avaliações de usuários
    • 3Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos

    Elenco principal10

    Editar
    Tom Hardy
    Tom Hardy
    • John Fleming
    Charlie Cox
    Charlie Cox
    • Dennis Bridger
    Kelly Reilly
    Kelly Reilly
    • Christine Jones…
    Jane Asher
    Jane Asher
    • Professor Madeleine Dawnay
    David Haig
    David Haig
    • General Vandenberg
    Colin Stinton
    Colin Stinton
    • Kaufman
    Robert Gill
    • Scientist
    Thushani Weerasekera
    • Teacher
    Janet Spencer-Turner
    • Doctor
    David Maybrick
    David Maybrick
    • Orderly
    • Direção
      • John Strickland
    • Roteiristas
      • John Elliot
      • Richard Fell
      • Fred Hoyle
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários16

    5,3784
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    3gray4

    What a load of rubbish!

    This is a totally pointless remake of the 40 year old TV series that launched Julie Christie. No such luck this time round. The film opens with a completely irrelevant rock-climbing scene and then deteriorates. There is just enough to hold some interest in the early scenes, set in an unrealistically empty government research laboratory, with just four scientists - evidence of BBC cost-cutting? All the cash seems to have gone on one special effect.

    But when the military appear, the whole storyline collapses. Even the acting is wooden, with good actors such as Jane Asher and Tom Hardy unable to rise above the poor material they have to perform with. The risible debates - good scientist against wicked soldier, human against alien, risk-taking biologist against cautious computer scientist - are couched in the crude terms of a 1950s American B-movie. Before the end - no spoilers but utterly predictable - the only question I'm left with is "why am I wasting my time watching this rubbish?"
    7mrg106

    Decent TV Si-Fi

    Despite some of the disparaging comments on here, I gave this a go and I think it was more than worth an hour and a half of my time. I enjoy Si-fi that's more based on ideas than SFX, and this was a prime (if somewhat truncated) example. I agree they could have done with more time but I didn't see anything wrong with the acting, Tom Hardy being particularly good. All in all very watchable stuff, which deals with issues from the more interesting end of science fiction..

    p.s, paulj-murphy, I know you probably wanted to look smart but they didn't send any messages to Andromeda, they only conversed with the computer, which wasn't millions of light-years away after all...
    9robert-temple

    An excellent remake of Fred Hoyle's sci fi morality tale

    'A FOR ANDROMEDA is an example of what could be called conceptual science fiction', says producer Alison Willett in the 'extras' of the DVD of this film. She hoped the BBC would commission more of that, but it did not. They declined for instance to remake the sequel. This film was made in ten days on a low budget, but the result overcame those limitations. The casting was inspired. Jane Asher was superb as the woman professor, perfectly underplaying the role to make it more effective. And the irresistible Kelly Reilly plays both the young mathematician and her double, the space girl Andromeda. She has a way of mesmerising viewers, which was just what was needed. I have read some of the other reviews of this film and was shocked that some of them seem to have been so disappointed to see a thinker's rather than a thrill-seeker's sci fi movie. There are no exploding cars, machine guns, colliding stars, grey aliens, or terrifying ogres in this film, not even a single spaceship. When the initial TV series of this story was broadcast in 1961 (see my review), it caused a nationwide sensation in the UK. The astronomer and astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle's concept of a radio signal from another galaxy transmitting a code for the creation of an alien being blew the collective minds of the public. The usual BBC idiots wiped most of that series and only one whole episode, part of the final episode, and a few scattered fragments survived; a book of the story followed. The next year the sequel story was transmitted as ANDROMEDA BEAKTHROUGH (1962, see my review, as this series does survive in its entirety), and the book of that followed in 1965. The first series introduced the beautiful Julie Christie as the alien girl Andromeda; she did not yet know how to act, but everyone was dazzled by her looks. She was unavailable for the sequel, so the girl alien was played by Susan Hampshire. (I got to know her in the following year but she never once mentioned her recent adventure as a space creature.) To return to the newer film, another key ingredient was the well-measured and low key performance by Tom Hardy as the brilliant young scientist, who is the only one who can work the computer built according to the specifications of the signal. The film was excellently directed by John Strickland. The film is also a love story. And of course there is also some spying, an irate general, and an underground bunker. It all works, whatever some soreheads may claim. I knew Fred Hoyle pretty well. He shook the world up with his first science fiction novel, THE BLACK CLOUD (1957), which has suddenly become more relevant again in a surprising way. It needs to be pointed out that many of the aspects of A FOR ANDROMEDA have also become surprisingly relevant at the moment. I have no space to elaborate on this. But it all goes to show that Fred was decades ahead of his time in just about everything. And, by the way, there was no Big Bang. Fred was right about that too. The time is coming when everyone will be forced to admit it, no matter how much of a blow to their pride it may be to do so. Geniuses like Fred do not come along often enough.
    10a_ross84

    i enjoyed it

    unlike everyone else here, i enjoyed it thoroughly. granted, i am not old enough to remember the original, i believe this to be an advantage. i had nothing to compare it to. on its own it is an excellent piece of British SCI FI. i enjoyed it a lot i am going to find the original now and watch that. but i will not compare them. like Battlestar Gallactica. you cant really compare them, so why bother. i know it is a remake but it doesn't mean have to compare them does it. secondly who cares about some minor holes in the science of it. does it detract from the enjoyment of the show? there are so many shows that don't follow the science of today so why should this?

    all in all i really liked this. well done the BBC.
    9learnersnation

    i liked it

    Its wonderful creative work under minimal budget, i don't think most of the people will understand and like it. Some of us will love it who good imagination =)

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Legion of Honor
    5,3
    Legion of Honor
    Jogo de Sedução
    6,7
    Jogo de Sedução
    Oliver Twist
    7,3
    Oliver Twist
    Cape Wrath
    6,8
    Cape Wrath
    Fuga de Colditz
    6,7
    Fuga de Colditz
    Stuart: Uma Vida Revista
    7,6
    Stuart: Uma Vida Revista
    Tempestade
    4,8
    Tempestade
    Jornada Nas Estrelas: Nêmesis
    6,4
    Jornada Nas Estrelas: Nêmesis
    The Take
    7,7
    The Take
    Capone
    4,7
    Capone
    EMR
    5,3
    EMR
    Minotauro
    3,7
    Minotauro

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      The production was broadcast live to mirror A for Andromeda (1961). The same was true of The Quatermass Experiment (2005), which was a remake of The Quatermass Experiment (1953). Both A for Andromeda (1961) and The Quatermass Experiment (1953) are acclaimed BBC science fiction serials which are largely missing from the archives.
    • Conexões
      Remake of A for Andromeda (1961)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 27 de março de 2006 (Reino Unido)
    • País de origem
      • Reino Unido
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Для Андромеды
    • Locações de filme
      • Brecon Beacons, Powys, Gales, Reino Unido
    • Empresa de produção
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 30 min(90 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Stereo
    • Proporção
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.