[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Celular

Título original: Cell
  • 2016
  • R
  • 1 h 38 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,4/10
32 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson in Celular (2016)
At the Boston airport, Clay witnesses a scene of chaotic mayhem when an electronic signal turns hundreds of cell phone users into rabid killers. Desperate to find his estranged wife and son, Clay teams with a train driver to battle the horde of murderous "phoners" as the city descends into apocalyptic madness.
Reproduzir trailer2:31
4 vídeos
47 fotos
AçãoAventuraFicção científicaFicção científica distópicaHorrorSuspenseTerror zumbi

Um misterioso sinal de telefone celular causa um caos apocalíptico, um artista está determinado a se reunir com seu filho.Um misterioso sinal de telefone celular causa um caos apocalíptico, um artista está determinado a se reunir com seu filho.Um misterioso sinal de telefone celular causa um caos apocalíptico, um artista está determinado a se reunir com seu filho.

  • Direção
    • Tod Williams
  • Roteiristas
    • Stephen King
    • Adam Alleca
  • Artistas
    • John Cusack
    • Samuel L. Jackson
    • Isabelle Fuhrman
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    4,4/10
    32 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Tod Williams
    • Roteiristas
      • Stephen King
      • Adam Alleca
    • Artistas
      • John Cusack
      • Samuel L. Jackson
      • Isabelle Fuhrman
    • 345Avaliações de usuários
    • 142Avaliações da crítica
    • 38Metascore
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Vídeos4

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Official Trailer
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Clip 1:49
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Clip 1:49
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Cell: Meeting Alice
    Clip 1:53
    Cell: Meeting Alice
    Cell: Middle Of The Night
    Clip 0:35
    Cell: Middle Of The Night

    Fotos46

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 41
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal99+

    Editar
    John Cusack
    John Cusack
    • Clay Riddell
    Samuel L. Jackson
    Samuel L. Jackson
    • Tom McCourt
    Isabelle Fuhrman
    Isabelle Fuhrman
    • Alice Waxman
    Clark Sarullo
    Clark Sarullo
    • Sharon Riddell
    Ethan Andrew Casto
    Ethan Andrew Casto
    • Johnny Riddell
    Owen Teague
    Owen Teague
    • Jordan
    Stacy Keach
    Stacy Keach
    • Charles Ardai
    Joshua Mikel
    Joshua Mikel
    • Raggedy
    Anthony Reynolds
    Anthony Reynolds
    • Ray
    Erin Elizabeth Burns
    Erin Elizabeth Burns
    • Denise
    Jeffrey Lee Hallman
    Jeffrey Lee Hallman
    • Hog Tied Man
    • (as Jeffrey Hallman)
    Mark Ashworth
    Mark Ashworth
    • Bartender
    Wilbur Fitzgerald
    Wilbur Fitzgerald
    • Geoff
    Catherine Dyer
    Catherine Dyer
    • Sally
    E. Roger Mitchell
    E. Roger Mitchell
    • Roscoe
    Alex ter Avest
    Alex ter Avest
    • Chloe
    Gaby Leyner
    Gaby Leyner
    • Maddy
    Rey Hernandez
    Rey Hernandez
    • Cop (Rick)
    • Direção
      • Tod Williams
    • Roteiristas
      • Stephen King
      • Adam Alleca
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários345

    4,432.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    1carlcasso

    What Book Did They Read ???????

    I remember reading this book and thinking what an amazing Movie it would make. With the right cast and script I knew this could be a winner. I waited for someone to make it and finally they did.

    We were getting John Cusack and Samuel L Jackson. How could they not make an amazing movie.

    I waited eagerly to view this long anticipated adventure and thought the day would never arrive when I could get the chance to see it.

    Then I did.

    Firstly it has very little in common with the book I read. the book is very clever and draws you into the story. The movie is not clever and the story is thrown at us.

    In The book we care about all the characters. In the movie we don't.

    I have to admit I walked out before the end. I just couldn't take anymore.

    Why oh why did they not just stick to the books narrative.

    I know you have to cut corners but they didn't cut corners, they invented new corners that had nothing to do with the story.

    I love Stephen King and have read all of his books but I'm tired of seeing them butchered by Movie makers who just don't understand the story.

    Save your money. Don't even bother renting this movie.

    Watch TV instead.
    1joshuakyte-60400

    Worst Adaptation Ever

    First... I did not know anything about this awesome, and I can't say that enough, awesome book becoming a movie. I have had to read this book at least 10 times over the last few years and some of my most favorite life quotes came from this book. So when I saw this as a movie and John as the main role I knew it was going to be amazing. I mean if I could cast the main character myself it would be John.

    BUT... Well, if the director had made a movie out of the book, it would have been amazing. If the movie had any of the most notable and required pieces of the plot it would have been amazing. If the director had even read anything to do with the book, even the dust jacket, it would have been amazing. But he didn't, he didn't, he didn't.

    SO... The movie sucked. I don't like to use that type of "language" when reviewing anything, but there is no other choices here. Everything about the movie was wrong and I gave it a lot of room, a lot of space to make errors and not flow the same. Because ultimately you want to be surprised by the movie. You ultimately want the director to make it his own just a little bit, put his spin on something and have it shine even more. And I did, I watched the movie to the very end. Checked behind the credits and everything. And now I wish I would have gone on for the rest of my life without knowing this movie existed.

    IF... Now one might think by my review that had you not read the book, you might have liked it but sadly that is not true. This is not only the worst adaptation of a book ever, but it is also just poorly put together, scripted, acted, and there is no redeemable quality anywhere.

    Such as... The sound effects were horrible, the video tried to be dark and creepy, but it was just bland. There was very little action or scare factor other than some BOO moments from the "zombies type people." If you didn't see something coming from a mile away it is because it made no sense. The ending was a little baffling on how horrible it was. I mean I am actually trying to think of one thing. Just one that I can say and would take this movie from a 1 star to at least a 1.5 star. But I can't. I can't think of a single thing that I can look back on and say that was cool/nice/awesome/not terrible.

    Lastly... So I will leave you with this. I am actually praying that I reach you before you watched this movie. I am hoping one of your not nice friends didn't play a prank on you and made you pay for this movie. It is my desire that this review has reached you before you have wasted one single heartbeat within the vicinity of this horrible, horrible film mistake. And I thank you for reading my review and I am sorry to those that I did not reach in time.

    Joshua Kyte
    5Quinoa1984

    forgettable, but not necessarily terrible

    Considering I went into Cell with abysmally low expectations, it turned out to be not too bad. Not that this necessarily means that it's all good, but there are some good things I can say about this. I'm pretty sure, from what I've heard about the book (at best it's liked but not loved, sort of a middle-tier King work, not one of his triumphs but not a failure either, something fun he could knock off in a month or two as one of those 'hey this is happening in the real world, I'll use it for one of my spooktacular stories' things) that this actually makes for an accurate assessment. It's a standard-issue zombie-ish story of people being infected and going bugf*** insane, only this time King (who also gets a screen writing credit) adds a kind of bird-pulse-hive-mind thing that only gets explained enough to move the plot along.

    Maybe in the book it was explained more or better; here, it seems like some weird and borderline lame (or just lame) device to keep us sort of on our toes, like, 'oh, hey, this time they're *not* vomiting blood on one another or eating brains, and any gunshot can kill them, not just the head, gotcha, thanks.' But more lame than that is the generic story thing of 'well, my son and ex are somewhere, and I'm gonna go find them' when, naturally, it's not going to be pretty or something he likes when he finds out (that he being Cusack, who is doing the best he can with fairly weak-tea material). Meanwhile, Samuel L Jackson does his best Ken Foree (intentional or not) from Dawn of the Dead, and is a reason to see the movie - even in the midst of some mediocre writing or plotting, or moments that can make one groan, he's there to work and it's not something to be embarrassed about on his resume.

    As for the action, it's... fair. I guess I may be tired of seeing action shot with the shutter off (that's when the camera has this function that makes it go, oh, nevermind, you know it when you see it), and I think Tod Williams is a competent director of action but not one who can make things as thrilling as it should be. By the time you see one character go to a door slowly - not in this, I mean in any other movie you've ever seen in your lives - you've seen them all, and this has a lot of that. And while at one time I felt apprehensive about Eli Roth being the director, as he was attached for a period of time after the book first came out (his movies tend to be Dumb with a capital, sometimes double, D), now I'd be curious as to what he might have changed or made more visceral or f***ed up.

    Cell goes through the motions, has some decent atmosphere, and a couple of those strange touches that I'm sure come from that primordial cavern that is King's sub(or regular)consciousness - such as the whole aspect of how these beings screech and them come together (which is a fascinating sight to me), or Stacy Keach having the whole football stadium of infected asleep listening to the... is that the yodeling from that Christopher Lee mashup from LOTR online(?) But there's not enough of it to make it stand out; while I haven't seen enough of it to make a full comparison, my gut tells me this is, to the lay-person, Walking Dead lite, with some good actors doing their best and only rising to meet the absolute minimum required.

    ... okay, maybe the ending is a little terrible, but my rating still stands.
    5cosmo_tiger

    Not terrible and this is worth seeing, but I just feel it could have been so much more than another in the line of zombie movies

    "Quite a problem these cell phones have caused." Clay Riddell (Cusack) has just landed and is talking to his wife about getting together with his kid again. When his phone dies he begins to look for change when all of a sudden he hears screaming and everyone in the airport falls to the ground. What happens next is unthinkable and now, in a type of post apocalyptic world Clay and a small group of survivors try to make it back to his family, before it's too late. I had no idea what to expect from this movie. I liked the fact that it was a Stephen King book, though I never read it, and the idea of technology leading to some sort of downfall is scary in its possibility. All of the excitement started to slowly fade away when the movie fell into what it really was… another zombie movie. The symbolism of cell phones turning people into zombies wasn't lost on me and the movie did have a message in that sense, but it essentially became just another generic zombie movie. Overall, not terrible and this is worth seeing, but I just feel it could have been so much more than another in the line of zombie movies. I give this a B-.
    5DVDExotica

    For Us, It's a Horror Film. For Our Grandparents, It's a Documentary

    Okay, people are going to tell you that this movie is dumb and corny and frustrating. Don't listen to them. Admittedly, they're absolutely right, but don't listen to them anyway.

    This movie is the closest we're going to get to a sequel to Maximum Overdrive from Stephen King, and it's actually pretty close. Instead of a bunch of disparate stragglers surviving in a world where humanity is overrun by machines being controlled by an alien force, we get a bunch of disparate stragglers surviving in a world where humanity is overrun by people being controlled by an alien force. So it also dips into Walking Dead knock-off territory, where everyone who uses their phone basically becomes a fast zombie; but on the plus side, this still has a lot of King vibes in it.

    Do you ever think about horror movies after seeing them and realize, if you view the film from the evil supernatural side of things, its motives make no sense? Like, "if the demon spirit wanted to possess the little girl before anyone could figure out what was going on and stop it, why did it spend the first 45 minutes terrorizing the babysitter and attracting needless attention to itself?" Well, this movie is like that: if you think about whatever mysterious intelligence is behind what's happening, what it decides to make the people it controls do doesn't really add up. But this movie goes the extra step, where you don't even have to do the thought experiment and shift perspectives to see that this movie regularly makes no sense.

    It's like King wrote down his dream and these people filmed it. And that's kinda cool if you're prepared to view this film like Kurosawa's Dreams or Fulci's The Beyond. If broken and contradictory logic is going to bother you, you're going to be kicking a hole in your monitor. And for all the fun King brings to his work, there's also his usual flaws. In this case: hokey characters. DJ Liquid? The "you're cute" lady? The King Of the Internet? But it's also kind of charming in a "King's our lovable grandpa who writes these crazy stories" kinda way, and this film gets past them easily enough with plenty of fast paced action and shocking violence.

    Other pros: Sam Jackson and John Cusack give their roles more weight than the script deserves. You actually care if they survive and worry for them in a way most lesser films don't manage. Stacy Keach shows up for a bit of fun, too. The story's also ambitious, playing with big ideas and isn't afraid to get pretty dark and cynical, which is nice to see in a more mainstream horror film with a name cast.

    Other cons: Most of the down to Earth effects are fine (zombies, gore), but it tries to depict some very big things that clearly just aren't in its budget. There's a scene right in the very beginning where an airplane explodes, which they really should've left off-camera, because it really looks super fake. And some shots in the film's climax look like a cartoon.

    Look, this is a heavy-handed movie for technophobes. Everyone who uses their cellphone turns into a mindless zombie. Characters walk through a brand new movie theater with a giant sign advertising "now with digital Projection," and then immediately into a drive-in movie lot. Keach gives a big dramatic reading to the line, "you can't stop progress, but you're never too old to fight it" before firing a bow and arrow. There's nothing subtle for miles around, and I'm sure we all know someone, probably older, who'll applaud the scene where people throw their smart phones into a fire, thinking finally someone else understands that change and technology are evil.

    But for the rest of us, it's a pretty amusing, entertaining time so long as you're willing to not question anything it throws at you. Fast paced, loads of thrills, our protagonists walk around with armfuls of weapons and ammo; and yet the film takes itself seriously enough that it never starts to feel like a bad joke. Silly sure, but earnest. All it needed was a rockin' AC/DC soundtrack.

    Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating

    Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating

    See how IMDb users rank the feature films based on the work of Stephen King.
    See the list
    Production art
    Lista

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Among many differences from the source material, in the book, the zombie-like infected continue to have their brains re-written every night and evolve further psychic abilities, including telekinesis, which allows them to fly. This is explained as the infection having unlocked the human brain's latent supernatural potential. This idea is only vaguely alluded to in the film when the survivors of the boys school explain that the human brain is like a computer and that this could be the next stage in human evolution.
    • Erros de gravação
      On Tom McCourt's advice, Clay puts a cellphone in the fridge to cool the battery down to make the charge last longer yet he fails to do the obvious and turn it off. Also the theory of 'making a phone battery last longer by freezing it' is dubious at most, but the characters may not know any better.
    • Citações

      Tom McCourt: Clay, I'm really sorry about your family.

      Clay Riddell: Don't be sorry because there is nothing to be sorry about yet.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      After the closing credits have finished, the catalyst signal from the movie plays for approximately 5-10 seconds, with no image, as if attempting to convert the audience.
    • Conexões
      Featured in FoundFlix: Stephen King's CELL (2016) Ending Explained (2016)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      I am glad, I am very glad, because i'm finally returning back home
      aka "Trololo song"

      Music by Arkadiy Ostrovskiy

      Performed by Eduard Khil

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes19

    • How long is Cell?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • What is the title of the poem recited by Samuel L. Jackson's character in the office of open air cinema?
    • What is 'Cell' about?
    • Is 'Cell' based on a book?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 1 de dezembro de 2016 (Brasil)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Conexão Mortal
    • Locações de filme
      • Atlanta, Geórgia, EUA
    • Empresas de produção
      • The Genre Co.
      • Benaroya Pictures
      • 120dB Films
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Faturamento bruto mundial
      • US$ 1.323.012
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 38 min(98 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby Digital
    • Proporção
      • 2.39:1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.