Maine Gandhi Ko Nahin Mara

I've never seen Mr. Bahru movie before, neither Mr kher's saanrch. but one thing that really struck me is that if u combine the finest people from Bellwood you definitely something spellbinding. this movie is surely one of the best in performances/story/screenplay and even background music. kher is disturbingly fantastic and we cud compare him with amitabh's performance in black. he played his character with utmost perfection leaving us shocked and shattered in the end. Urmila, on the other hand, is the most underrated actress of Bellwood. i don't want to describe how amazingly she performed because we all know that her performance is always 10 by 10 right from Pinjar, bhoot or Ek hasina thi. this year i sincerely hope she gets her long delayed national award as she acted on the level of shabana azmi & smita Patel. MGKNM succeeds in capturing father/daughter relationship which an over hyped movie called YAADEIN miserably failed to do so. even the kavita is like satisfying your soul.

Yet another remarkable film by Jhanu Barua the acclaimed Assamese director in film circles.. Anupam Kher can be proud of his excellent characterization of a retired professor of Hindi literature getting into Alzheimer's disease. Kher can have his soul satisfaction of his best two films in his life-SARAMSH and this film in spite of intervening roles which he has to do for his bread and butter.

Every action of Kher including the way he walks, he smiles, his jokes, his bout of forgetfulness brings tears to the even most rational viewer. Urmila as his daughter is the best support to Kher. The restrained acting by these two and others makes us proud even India can produce such a film. The mock court (more or on the lines of Tendulkar's famous Marathi drama) may be little dramatic but it serves the purpose and clears the cobweb in the minds of the professor. The professor's last reply to the court blames all of us for the death of Gandhi.

This is an excellent serious film. Those whose first language is not Hindi may better see it with subtitles.

Anupam Kher & Urmila Matondkar totally pull their respective characters together. It is because of them, accompanied by a good plot, that I rate it a 7.8/10.

Directly getting to the point in less than 10 minutes keeps the viewer hooked on to what might be the cause of happenings in the screen. A sense of suspense grows and even though the screenplay feeds us constantly, another revelation towards the end does make sense. The courtroom drama at the end is worth a watch.

What the makers fail here is to keep away from boring sequences wherein the characters are speaking/enacting something, while the actual plot is narrated. It does turn off the experience. Dialogs are just fine, while the character building is very good. Not going astray, Maine Gandhi Ko Nahin Maara is a engaging watch.

BOTTOM LINE: Cinema aficionados & critic will love it alike. Once again, great performances, I have to mention.

Can be watched with a typical Indian family? YES

Profanity/Nudity/Sex: No | Violence: Mediocre | Gore: No | Smoking: Very Mild | Alcohol/Drugs: No

I like the films of Jahnu Barua. I find him to be an honest filmmaker. He has made some very interesting movies--the best of which I consider to be "Papori," made in 1986. Any director would like to aspire to make a bigger budget film, with bigger names in Indian cinema. I guess this was the genesis of Barua's well-meaning effort called "Maine Gandhi Ko Nahin Mara." Forget the melodrama of a senior member of the family suffering from a serious disease (why do so many Indian films need to have this ingredient in the plot?) the viewer will be able to see the honest Barua at work: the modern India forgetful of the values of individuals who gave birth to the world's largest surviving democracy, the dishonest lover who is scared of annoying his parents, the university students who treat a demented teacher with respect and courtesy, and the love and affection of grown-up adults for their parents. These are social values that exist in India today that Yash Chopra and other producers bank on to make a film successful. These are the "feel good" social credentials of Indian cinema.

In this film, the real Jahnu stands up as he succeeds in extracting a marvelous controlled performance from Urmila Matondkar, while Anupam Kher does his usual over-the-top melodrama playing to the gallery as he did in "Saaransh." Yet Jahnu, who usually is careful with his script mixes up Alzheimer's disease (first half of the movie) with delusion and psychological after-effects of a childhood incident (later half of the film) and the cure for it. I am not a medical expert but the two disorders seem to be strange bedfellows to manifest itself in the same individual.

The film, though well-intentioned, lacks the intensity of "Papori" comparatively a small budget film because it plays to the gallery. We love this film because it is more honest than the Bollywood kitsch and has some fine performances. This was evident at its screening at the recent Dubai Film Festival. For many in the audience it was the first film of Barua they had seen. And they liked it. If you loved this film (which is technically superior to his previous films, thanks to the bigger budget) do see Barua's "Papori" or even the less impressive "Aparoopa" where the real talent of Jahnu Barua emerges and impresses you even more.

What happened to our mainstream Hindi cinema at last? One after other it is coming out with excellent and diverse themes never dealt before. Wow ! When FTII-alumni, internationally renowned Assamese film maker Jahnu Barua and Anupam P. Kher as producer-lead actor comes together, you expect a result to be of very high value. Yes, it is, as what starts off as a touching tale about a Retd. College lecturer (Anupam Kher) who falls prey to Alzheimer disease and how the lives of everybody around him get affected ends on a very topical note of ignorance of values in today's world, very subtly. This is the second feature film in Hindi of Jahnu Barua who directed another one called Apekshaa (1984) though almost all his films are in Assamese and also based in soil there. There are some amazing performances viz. Anupam Kher and also Urmila Matondkar who is quite restrained here. More than anything this film succeeds in making any layman realize and empathize to deal with somebody close whom this disease affects. This film qualifies for select audience, as it is devoid of any of those rubbish commercial elements of forced romance and songs, hero-heroine track or inconsequential sub-plots but come across as very honest film with more substance than style. Bappi Lahiri surprised with his background score. The film has no political overtones as the title suggests but a human story. The problem? Well the story is too simplistically told so much so that to pack it in duration of 1.45 hr, the pace slows down, as the events are not too many. Also, it would be better if it covered more of the disease part and treatment part but of course that was not the focus of the film. The drama in the staged part of the courtroom also lacks that required punch. Nonetheless it put across the message very clearly and aptly and thus succeeds without taking a road to melodramatic Indian ethos or art house cinema. Also, distributor Yashraj Films deserves a pat on their shoulders for bringing a quality product, which is so contemporary, and a must especially for youth audience. A sooner Tax-free status is demanded.