[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

A Pele

Título original: Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus
  • 2006
  • R
  • 2 h 2 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,3/10
17 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Nicole Kidman in A Pele (2006)
Theatrical Trailer from Picturehouse Entertainment
Reproduzir trailer2:22
1 vídeo
99+ fotos
Drama de épocaDrama psicológicoBiografiaDramaRomanceSuspense

Dando as costas para sua família rica e estabelecida, Diane Arbus se apaixona por Lionel Sweeney, um mentor enigmático que apresenta Arbus às pessoas marginalizadas que a ajudam a se tornar ... Ler tudoDando as costas para sua família rica e estabelecida, Diane Arbus se apaixona por Lionel Sweeney, um mentor enigmático que apresenta Arbus às pessoas marginalizadas que a ajudam a se tornar uma grande fotógrafa.Dando as costas para sua família rica e estabelecida, Diane Arbus se apaixona por Lionel Sweeney, um mentor enigmático que apresenta Arbus às pessoas marginalizadas que a ajudam a se tornar uma grande fotógrafa.

  • Direção
    • Steven Shainberg
  • Roteiristas
    • Erin Cressida Wilson
    • Patricia Bosworth
  • Artistas
    • Nicole Kidman
    • Robert Downey Jr.
    • Ty Burrell
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,3/10
    17 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Steven Shainberg
    • Roteiristas
      • Erin Cressida Wilson
      • Patricia Bosworth
    • Artistas
      • Nicole Kidman
      • Robert Downey Jr.
      • Ty Burrell
    • 104Avaliações de usuários
    • 94Avaliações da crítica
    • 50Metascore
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 2 vitórias no total

    Vídeos1

    Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus
    Trailer 2:22
    Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus

    Fotos159

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 152
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal82

    Editar
    Nicole Kidman
    Nicole Kidman
    • Diane Arbus
    Robert Downey Jr.
    Robert Downey Jr.
    • Lionel Sweeney
    Ty Burrell
    Ty Burrell
    • Allan Arbus
    Harris Yulin
    Harris Yulin
    • David Nemerov
    Jane Alexander
    Jane Alexander
    • Gertrude Nemerov
    Emmy Clarke
    Emmy Clarke
    • Grace Arbus
    Genevieve McCarthy
    • Sophie Arbus
    Boris McGiver
    Boris McGiver
    • Jack Henry
    Marceline Hugot
    Marceline Hugot
    • Tippa Henry
    Mary Duffy
    • Althea
    Emily Bergl
    Emily Bergl
    • Allan's New Assistant
    Lynn-Marie Stetson
    Lynn-Marie Stetson
    • Fiona - Naked Girl
    • (as Lynn Marie Stetson)
    Gwendolyn Bucci
    Gwendolyn Bucci
    • Dominatrix
    Christina Rouner
    • Lois
    Matt Servitto
    Matt Servitto
    • Handsome Client
    David Green
    • Another Client
    Sandriel Frank
    • Fox Model
    Krista Coyle
    Krista Coyle
    • Fashion Model
    • Direção
      • Steven Shainberg
    • Roteiristas
      • Erin Cressida Wilson
      • Patricia Bosworth
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários104

    6,316.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    ThreeSadTigers

    Every picture tells a story.

    Any instance in which a filmmaker attempts to blend ideas of fact with fiction - especially when that particular fact is fairly well known and tied to an iconic historical figure - they're going to have problems in maintaining a connection with certain factions of their audience. Just look at some previous examples of this same stylistic device in other films; such as Dreamchild (1985) for instance, in which an elderly Alice Liddell reflects on her time spent with Lewis Carroll and his obsessive compulsion to nail her character to the very pages of his most celebrated work. Even more polarising was David Cronenberg's adaptation of the cult novel Naked Lunch (1991), in which elements of the author's life and works were blended together to create a torturous, darkly-comic and highly homo-erotic trek through the damaged psychological territory of a Burroughs-like bug exterminator. A similar approach was also used by director Steven Sodebergh and screenwriter Lem Dobbs with their coolly expressionistic merging of the fantastical and horrific writings of Kafka (1991), with the more mundane, everyday-like tedium of his real life and work.

    Fur (2006), which makes its intentions clear with the subtitle "an imaginary portrait of Diane Arbus", takes on a similar approach to the films aforementioned; blending elements of personal fact and actual biographical detail with a story that is pure, fairy tale fabrication. Having watched the film just a few days ago, I browsed the Internet for previous reviews to get a sense of how other audiences had approached it. In doing so, I was quite shocked and surprised to see just how violently some viewers had reacted to the film; citing everything from the liberal approach of the film's script, the central performance from Nicole Kidman, and the fundamental message that seems implied by the film's very tender sense of emotional drama as reasons why this film was worthless or simply not good. This surprised me for two reasons, firstly; that these intelligent and well-versed viewers were unable to separate the elements of fact surrounding the real life Diane Arbus and her extraordinary body of work from the quite clearly fabricated depiction of grotesque beauty that the filmmakers create through the imagined relationship between our caricature of Diane and a character named Lionel; a mysterious former carnival performer. Secondly, it surprised me that these viewers felt that Arbus's life would be better served by a routine, by the books Hollywood biopic in which all the facts and back stories are simplified, and we end up with a very simple film about the triumph of the little guy against all odds.

    Do people really want bland, cookie-cutter, connect the dots cinema; a struggle over adversary and all the usual nonsense that comes with those A-Z, biographical features, such as Walk the Line (2005) and Ray (2004)? Sadly, it would appear so. What happened to audiences craving imaginative, free-thinking cinema? Something that attempts to deconstruct a greater truth in an intelligent, imaginative and emotionally captivating way that is genuinely suited to the visual, metaphorical capabilities that cinema presents. For me, everything you would need to know about Arbus is here and everything you would need to know about her art is divulged in a number of interesting, highly imaginative visual quirks. You just have to scratch beneath the surface. Read between the lines and you'll see with this film the very psychological impulse and motivation to create something beautiful from the seemingly mundane; to capture that all too fleeting moment and preserve it on film forever. Fur, for me, took us inside the psychological world of Arbus, with none of the black and white moralising or textbook type tedium that often plagues this particular genre; but instead, showing us some of the potential ideas and imagined situations that came to instill her work with such a grotesque sense of beauty.

    It has a long been said; "every picture tells a story". That's what this film is about. Anyone can read a book about the real life Arbus; but how on earth is that enriching the cinematic medium? I personally don't look to cinema to find something that is readily available to me at my local library. This film takes us inside Arbus' world and gives us a beautifully told and imaginative back-story that blends elements of real-life fact with references to Gothic literature, fairy stories, history and the subjective power of the art itself. The creative spirit of this film is exactly in tune with Arbus's creative vision. To give us something like the Rocky (1976) of photographer-themed biographical pictures would, to my mind at least, have been a much greater insult to the unique and continually captivating universe that this particular artist created through her work. You may disagree with the approach, or fail to see the appeal of the story, but for me, Fur is the kind of film that I feel I could go back to again and again and still find a number of things worth raving about.

    Like one of Arbus's iconic pictures, Fur presents us with something seemingly drab, seemingly bizarre, and allows us to take the time to see the inherent beauty behind it. Like the work of Diane Arbus itself, you can choose to see it as something unfeeling or exploitative, or alternatively, you can see it as a gateway into understanding the enormous amount of empathy that Arbus had for her bizarre and often extraordinary subjects. The direction manages to create a mood and an ambiance that is halfway between the aforementioned William S. Burroughs and the antiseptic 50's Americana of The Bell Jar, with the otherworldly danger and mystique of a film like Pan's Labyrinth (2006). Alongside these stylistic elements we also have continual references to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and the notion of Beauty and the Beast, and all tied together by the fine performances from Kidman as the shackled, stifled Arbus and Robert Downey Jr. as the mysterious and sympathetic Lionel.
    7helen-240

    An original and refreshingly non biographical story, not for the anally retentive seeking what is easily accessible from a good BOOKSTORE!

    I actually admired the extreme lengths to which the film's creator went in exercising his freedom of artistic licensing in this totally fantastical and imaginative version- fictionalising the source of inspiration behind Ms Arbus's consequent journey into developing her art; to many it may suggest indulging ones-self to the extreme at the risk of inflaming the passions of her loyal fans, I can empathise with those hardcore admirers who were eagerly anticipating an homage to her life and work as the film must have been a source of immense disappointment, bearing very little resemblance to the physical or biographical realities of Ms Arbus and her life...though the title clearly alludes to the fact that this was never the intention. I really enjoyed the film, Nicole Kidman never fails to deliver and visually it was an absolute feast of colour, subtle surrealism, atmosphere and even humour albeit poignant and dark at times.

    I particularly liked the harmonious balance in tempo, and rhythm as the story unravels, the subtle and sensitive balance between humour and tragedy, the exploration of the complexity of intimate relationships, the need to find ones own path or destiny however painful and incongruent that journey may be- with social expectation, preconceived values or personal responsibility.

    The biographical inaccuracies seem insignificant within the greater framework and although I was hitherto unfamiliar with the specifics of Ms Arbus's life, I still felt that valid insight was gained into the perplexing struggles endured by this artist searching to become true to herself amidst the parental social/emotional pressures and expectations. I was able to recognise an unconfident and yet courageous and strong, empathetic, sensitive woman, uniquely lacking in prejudice given the era and social background from which she came. For the open-minded viewer who appreciates the complexities of life, it is a thought provoking and challenging story which does not stray unforgivably far from a kind of truth.
    10mona_boutet

    It touched me deeply

    I saw Fur this afternoon. I went to the 1:30 pm matinée and we were only three in the theater. That's OK… I felt like it was a private showing. From the very start of the making this film, the whole story got my attention, more than any other. It wasn't simply an opportunity to see Robert work – it was my kind of film. I love the unusual, the weird, the unique and all of these elements were in this film. When Lionel tells Diane that he's "been waiting for a real freak" I knew just what he meant. Diane has been forbidding her own self to be true and she suffers from it. Lionel is her liberator, it's a love story of the most spiritual kind since "…there are only two sins; the first is to interfere with the growth of another human being, and the second is to interfere with one's own growth." I thought the chemistry between Nicole and Robert was right on, both of them being seekers of truth. If you believe that the eyes are windows to your soul then you will be unable to take your eyes off the screen. Their journey is in their eyes – you see in them the curiosity, the fascination, the fear, the pain, the joy, the love and finally the liberation of their souls. When the photograph is finally taken, Robert has your heart in his hands. If any of you have gone through that "soul transformation" experience, you will recognize it. If not, it's still a great fairy tale.

    I love the sets, the music and the photography because they served the story so well. And all I have to say about the love scene is Oh. My. God. This is a film I want to see again, and again.

    As for the mix reviews, maybe, just maybe, if they had not used Diane Arbus' name, the critics would have been kinder and they would have been willing to have more of an open mind. The writer and director used Arbus' claim to fame to explore the spark, the birth if you will of creativity. In any case, those who got it loved it and those who did not get it, smothered it. I guess I don't have to tell you I loved it.
    Chrysanthepop

    Imaginary and Beautiful

    'Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus' is itself like a beautiful painting. Starting from the photographic visuals, the artistic execution, the use of symbolism and metaphors, the superb camera-work, the incredible performances and stunning art direction, this is one film that is a poetic treat for the viewer. The background score gives voice to the unsaid feelings. Not only is it dazzling to look at, it's thought provoking and a fulfilling cinematic experience.

    I loved the use of symbolism and metaphors. Some examples include: The association between the scene where Diane disrobing in the final sequence and the earlier scenes where she dresses up to her neck as part of social etiquette. Then there's the strong contrast between a furry Lionel and the high-classed women who were obsessed with fur and another interesting contrast between Lionel's dark fur and Diane's smooth translucent skin. There are numerous such intriguing symbolism that beautifully stand out. The references to classics like 'Alice in Wonderland' and 'Beauty and the Best' and influences of Hitchcock and Kubrick are obvious and brilliantly used. The visuals too represent a strong ideas. They are not just there for mere beauty. The colour blue plays a key role on multiple levels.

    Shainberg's direction is awesome but what I liked most was the way Diane felt more 'at home' with the people who were termed 'freaks' rather than her own family or her husband's social circle. Nicole Kidman is magnificent. Robert Downey Jr. too gives an equally subtle and heartbreaking performance. The two share a very passion-filled chemistry which only stresses on the fascination and attraction that draws Diane and Lionel towards each other. Their quiet love story speaks volumes about their internal desires and strong feelings for one another. I've mostly seen Ty Burrell in comedies like 'Out of Practice' and 'Back To You' but here he shows that he can pull off serious roles as well.

    Not only is 'Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus' a plot driven film, it can be watched as a character piece, a mood piece, a love story and a period piece. A film that can be appreciated on so many levels, I fail to understand why it gained so little recognition.
    7plutus1947

    Hmmmmmm!!

    There is not a great deal I feel I can say about this film, except that it is one of the strangest and most surreal film I have ever seen.

    It was a film which made me constantly want to reach for the 'Off Button' on my remote but at the same time I felt compelled to continue watching it.

    In the end I did see the whole film and was glad that I did.

    I cannot 'hand on heart' recommend Fur..... as I feel it is one of those films that we simply love or hate. However in my case I simply can't decide and I feel I shall have to watch it again in order to decide which way I feel.

    If you like surreal and/or the actors, give the film a viewing, thats the only way to decide how you personally feel.

    Plutus

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Revelações
    6,2
    Revelações
    Reencontrando a Felicidade
    6,9
    Reencontrando a Felicidade
    A Isca Perfeita
    6,0
    A Isca Perfeita
    Hemingway & Martha
    6,3
    Hemingway & Martha
    Margot e o Casamento
    6,0
    Margot e o Casamento
    Reencarnação
    6,3
    Reencarnação
    Obsessão
    5,7
    Obsessão
    O Peso do Passado
    6,2
    O Peso do Passado
    Mulheres Perfeitas
    5,4
    Mulheres Perfeitas
    A Intérprete
    6,4
    A Intérprete
    Hit Me
    5,4
    Hit Me
    Cold Mountain
    7,2
    Cold Mountain

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      MGM optioned the biography, upon which this film is based ("Arbus"), in 1984 as a possible starring vehicle for Diane Keaton.
    • Erros de gravação
      Towards the end of the movie, Lionel is shown beginning to blow up the canvas raft. He later explains that it is for Diane when he takes his final swim. Someone suffering from such extremely low lung function that he will only live a few months would never be able to inflate a raft that size.
    • Citações

      Diane Arbus: [to Lionel] I saw you through my window and right away I wanted to take a portrait of you.

    • Conexões
      Featured in HBO First Look: Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus (2006)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      Midnight Romance
      Written by Alain Leroux (as Alain J. Leroux)

      Published by Cypress Creek Music

      Courtesy of 5 Alarm Music

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes19

    • How long is Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • What the heck is going on in this movie?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 9 de março de 2007 (Brasil)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Fur
    • Locações de filme
      • East 54th Street Recreation Center, Nova Iorque, Nova Iorque, EUA
    • Empresas de produção
      • Pressman Film
      • River Road Entertainment
      • Iron Films (I)
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 16.800.000 (estimativa)
    • Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
      • US$ 223.202
    • Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
      • US$ 28.815
      • 12 de nov. de 2006
    • Faturamento bruto mundial
      • US$ 2.312.717
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 2 h 2 min(122 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • SDDS
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.