[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
IMDbPro

Destruição em Alto Mar

Título original: Path of Destruction
  • Filme para televisão
  • 2005
  • Not Rated
  • 2 h
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,6/10
696
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Destruição em Alto Mar (2005)
AçãoAventuraDramaFicção científicaSuspense

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katheri... Ler tudoThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, ... Ler tudoThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, the dangerous nanoparticles - having escaped from the explosion into the stratosphere - th... Ler tudo

  • Direção
    • Stephen Furst
  • Roteirista
    • Chase Parker
  • Artistas
    • Danica McKellar
    • David Keith
    • Chris Pratt
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    3,6/10
    696
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Stephen Furst
    • Roteirista
      • Chase Parker
    • Artistas
      • Danica McKellar
      • David Keith
      • Chris Pratt
    • 22Avaliações de usuários
    • 2Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos3

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal16

    Editar
    Danica McKellar
    Danica McKellar
    • Katherine Stern
    David Keith
    David Keith
    • Roy Stark
    Chris Pratt
    Chris Pratt
    • Nathan McCain
    Stephen Furst
    Stephen Furst
    • Terry
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    • Colonel Thomas Miller
    Richard Wharton
    Richard Wharton
    • Dr. Van Owen
    Ray Baker
    Ray Baker
    Ryan Spike Dauner
    • Lab Coat #1
    Michael Cory Davis
    Michael Cory Davis
    • Eric
    Griff Furst
    Griff Furst
    • Krieger
    • (as Griffith Feuerstein)
    Vladimir Kolev
    • P-17 Pilot
    Jeff Rank
    • Father
    Atanas Srebrev
    Atanas Srebrev
    • Purcell
    Jonas Talkington
    • Mount Weather Tech
    Raicho Vasilev
    • Bodyguard
    Julian Vergov
    Julian Vergov
    • Lab Worker #2
    • Direção
      • Stephen Furst
    • Roteirista
      • Chase Parker
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários22

    3,6696
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    4StediEng

    Eh.

    Poor acting, mediocre CGI and technical ignorance abound in this time filler. Some of the plot points don't hold up to even the barest scrutiny. They draft a bimbo reporter to serve as bombardier when they have an entire base of Air Force personnel to pick from? They push for an EMP bomb over a nuclear blast (the biggest EMP bomb there is, BTW) because radiation is too non-directional like shotgun pellets? Dental braces attract lightning? Come on. And why are molecular disassemblers causing storms and hail anyway? Even the bad acting and video game quality CGI could be tolerated with a little technical competence. The underlying concept is OK but the execution is pretty bad. Trying to guess which eastern European country is substituting for Alaska (and the winner is...... Bulgaria!) was fun. And David Keith and Stephen Furst chew the scenery in amusing if one-note performances. Any time you can completely and totally describe a character with two words, like horny yokel or corporate greedhead, you're in trouble.

    I've watched worse, though. And can't David Keith get any better roles than these second rate Sci-fi channel crapfests? Every month he's in at least one (two this month) of these celluloid WMD's. He used to be somebody. Maybe he figured, "Hell, I'm already in Bulgaria filming Epoch 2, I'll just knock another one off while I'm over here". Maybe the beer's cheap. Who knows.
    5bobwildhorror

    Sci Fi Channel Does It Again

    Okay, okay...I know my summary says it all. Another Sci Fi Channel "original." Well, wait just a minute folks; this one actually seems to have a grain of originality.

    I'm afraid the nanotechnology concept is where it ends, though. Bad acting. Horrible CGI. Ridiculous plot twists. Starring Winnie and directed by Flounder.

    But this one is so horribly bad, folks, that it's entertaining. We're not talking PLAN 9 bad, but pretty close. Another reviewer indicated that this may have been intentional, but I'm not buying it. For those of you that enjoy this kind of thing, buy some beer, turn off your mind, relax and float down stream.
    3ManiacCop

    If you love bad movies, then is takes the cake

    This movie is hilariously bad. From the very beginning, you know you're in for a gut busting ride of bad script writing, acting, directing and gaping plot holes that boggle the mind. If you enjoy laughing at poorly made tripe, than this is your type of movie. If you want to watch a movie with a somewhat believable plot and some point, then you might want to rent something more mainstream.

    I watched this with my brother last night at 1am on sci fi. We knew what we were getting into. From the absurd dialogue to sheer convenience of certain events, you will get your fair share of 'writing class no-no's'. Anyways, this movie, taken for what it's worth (production value, acting and sheer lunacy), can be tolerated and watched. Once only though. NO ONE has that much time.
    4lslore

    Ignorance is not bliss; it is merely sloppy

    I have to wonder if the people that produced this movie, were the same ones that made Steven Segal's "On Deadly Ground." Neither group seems capable of reading a map. They manage to "crunch" the 700 miles from Palmer, Alaska to Juneau, Alaska down to an afternoon drive -- and got there driving! At one point, the protagonists say they are "a few miles outside of Juneau." Cute trick; Juneau is landlocked!! There are only two ways in, by boat or plane. Driving there is not a possibility. And I am not going to even get into the numerous other areas involving locations that showed the makers of this movie never bothered to do their homework.
    4MartianOctocretr5

    Path of demented plot holes

    Some weird things that look like a swarm of black CGI marks try to take over the world. An accident releases them at some off-shore drilling place which they wreck, and then they wander off to destroy more things.

    Beautiful Danika McKellar is the most memorable part of the movie. Not only is she incredibly cute, but her acting is top notch in spite of the plot-hole ridden script. She's a journalist who happened to be at the site of the first accident, and apparently there's some icky evil government plot behind the creatures, so a bunch of thugs everywhere are after her. There are numerous clichés of this kind thrown around, but there are a few spots of action that almost make sense in this thing.

    The science is whack. The things destroy stuff in ways that are bizarre and inconsistent. The way the heroes try to combat the things is almost comical. If you watch this as a joke in an MST3K sort of way, it can be entertaining on that basis. I just hope Danika gets some better roles in the future.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    The Extreme Team
    3,4
    The Extreme Team
    Walk the Talk
    5,7
    Walk the Talk
    Os Salsichas
    4,2
    Os Salsichas
    Cursed Part 3
    6,0
    Cursed Part 3
    The Huntress
    6,2
    The Huntress
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    Strangers with Candy
    5,9
    Strangers with Candy
    Deep in the Valley: Por Dentro do Pornô
    4,4
    Deep in the Valley: Por Dentro do Pornô
    Timms Valley
    6,4
    Timms Valley
    The Multi-Hyphenate
    3,6
    The Multi-Hyphenate
    7,7
    Mr. Payback
    Everwood: Uma Segunda Chance
    7,5
    Everwood: Uma Segunda Chance

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Erros de gravação
      Blackhawk helicopters have a main rotor and a tail rotor. They require both rotors to fly. The helicopter pilot states that the helicopter lost one of its rotors; yet the aircraft continues flying.

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 24 de setembro de 2005 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Death Cloud
    • Locações de filme
      • Seattle, Washington, EUA
    • Empresas de produção
      • Armored Productions
      • BUFO
      • Curmudgeon Films
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 1.800.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 2 h(120 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Stereo
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.