Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.A secret bioweapons lab invaded by mercenaries becomes a house of horrors when they encounter MR. HELL, an ancient serial killer who takes souls by removing his victims eyes.
David Carren
- V.C. (Toxic Waste Worker)
- (as David B. Carren)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Wow, simply Wow. This movie is also craptastic. I gave it a 4 because of a great scene where a mercenary chick has sex but thats bout it. This movie is about a guy that gets killed by a little girl by means of a flesh eating virus in a research plant, or so it seems since they don't actually tell you. Anyway she grow up and becomes a security guard there and these random mercenaries show up for the virus since it sells for a lot. They raid the place and take over while Mr. hell comes out of a oozing can of slime. He kills people and takes their eyes to stay alive and in the end that stack of eyes is destroyed and so is he. The only good part is when the blonde mercenary gets naked and has sex then puts on her red thong. Bad acting, bad props, bad funding, bad idea, wasteful crap.
Acting in this movie is amateur (makes one wonder what motivated the choice of genre), representing typical, nonetheless exasperating, mix of inadequate feelings (consequently, behavior) and involuntary pauses between lines being filled with either blank or bewildered facial expressions.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
Arguably, the plot isn't much worse than that of the "exclusive horror" movie majority, meaning it's plain, predictable and thus, boring (when not silly).
Dialogues complete "Mr. Hell" as a cinematographic disaster, being fragmentary, extremely uninformative and unnatural. Moreover, sadly, the writers chose to uphold the flawed tradition of covering up the lack of scariness with would-be humor, would-be irony and would-be sarcasm, manifested in shabby, overly repetitive "cliché - change of context - touché" form.
The only thing that counts positive is solid B-class photography.
I resisted about 20minutes in front of the screen, but it wasn't the flick nor the murders...it was the horror acting of those people cause i can't refer to them as actors.
I've seen school plays better directed with better acting and why not with even more credibility from the actors than this one, I mean pleeease not even the swearing is believable, so yes i give it a 1 for awful.
If he is Mr. Hell than his name probably comes from the acting cause he killed every single line of script and every single frame of film the director wasted on one of the worst movies ever.
If you wanna see a better movie with a killer that plucks the eyes of from his victims you should go to see "See no evil" cause even though the "bad childhood" cliché was overdone, you don't get up from your chair screaming in horror cause of the awful non-existing acting
I've seen school plays better directed with better acting and why not with even more credibility from the actors than this one, I mean pleeease not even the swearing is believable, so yes i give it a 1 for awful.
If he is Mr. Hell than his name probably comes from the acting cause he killed every single line of script and every single frame of film the director wasted on one of the worst movies ever.
If you wanna see a better movie with a killer that plucks the eyes of from his victims you should go to see "See no evil" cause even though the "bad childhood" cliché was overdone, you don't get up from your chair screaming in horror cause of the awful non-existing acting
Did any of you, "who watched the movie", actually see any of the stunts performed?? If so, what did you think? I watched the movie, and I'm no motion picture stuntman, but I thought the action was awesome! If anyone out there has actually scene the movie, and didn't help make the movie, please give an honest reply about the stunts. I have not scene a B-movie with action such as stair-falls, fire-burns, and fight scenes to the caliber of Hollywood in ANY B-rated movie EVER! Please respond with your personal opinion. Whether you like the movie or not, let's hear what you think about the stunts in this film. From a novice's point of view, tell me, (the B-Rated movie fan), what people think.
Well, I don't feel this a bad movie, it all depends on how you look at it. I say that as an actor, writer, and soon a producer appearing in this movie as Dr. Karl Matthews, I do appreciate all comments. It is useful to understand what fans want to see, and we hear you, but also understand many "B" Horror Movie goers, can appreciate this film for what it is, simply put, although this film DID lack many things, the writing was fantastic, and for first time Horror Director Rob McKinnon, and the talented writer David Carren I can say I look forward to seeing what they can do in the near future. I say look for more from Rob McKinnon and Jolene McMaster with Pure Horror Films. Thanks for the opportunity guys, I appreciate it! One more thing...I hate to say this but since we are being blunt I take offense to the bad acting comment. Put yourself in the actor and director's shoe's for a moment and then we can talk intelligently about any movie you would like to discuss. I am a big fan of movie's and who isn't! Sincerely, ABM
Você sabia?
- ConexõesReferences As Aventuras de Robin Hood (1938)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 42 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente