[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Possuída: O Início

Título original: Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
  • 2004
  • R
  • 1 h 34 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,8/10
12 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins in Possuída: O Início (2004)
DramaHorrorSuspenseTerror de lobisomem

No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.

  • Direção
    • Grant Harvey
  • Roteiristas
    • Christina Ray
    • Stephen Massicotte
  • Artistas
    • Katharine Isabelle
    • Emily Perkins
    • Nathaniel Arcand
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,8/10
    12 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Grant Harvey
    • Roteiristas
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • Artistas
      • Katharine Isabelle
      • Emily Perkins
      • Nathaniel Arcand
    • 101Avaliações de usuários
    • 40Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 1 indicação no total

    Vídeos1

    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    Trailer 2:02
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning

    Fotos146

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 141
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal16

    Editar
    Katharine Isabelle
    Katharine Isabelle
    • Ginger
    Emily Perkins
    Emily Perkins
    • Brigitte
    Nathaniel Arcand
    Nathaniel Arcand
    • Hunter
    JR Bourne
    JR Bourne
    • James
    Hugh Dillon
    Hugh Dillon
    • Reverend Gilbert
    Adrien Dorval
    Adrien Dorval
    • Seamus
    Brendan Fletcher
    Brendan Fletcher
    • Finn
    David La Haye
    David La Haye
    • Claude
    • (as David LaHaye)
    Tom McCamus
    Tom McCamus
    • Wallace Rowlands
    Matthew Walker
    Matthew Walker
    • Doc Murphy
    Fabian Bird
    • Milo
    Kirk Jarrett
    Kirk Jarrett
    • Owen
    David MacInnis
    David MacInnis
    • Cormac
    Stevie Mitchell
    • Geoffrey
    Edna Rain
    • Elder
    Jake McKinnon
    Jake McKinnon
    • Hellhound
    • (não creditado)
    • Direção
      • Grant Harvey
    • Roteiristas
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários101

    5,812.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    6mbworm

    An effort without any heart

    After the success of the superior werewolf thriller "Ginger Snaps", it seems Lions Gate rushed to churn out two sequels in the shortest amount of time possible, those being the frightening "Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed" and the disappointing "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning". Where "Unleashed" was a bit of letdown compared to its predecessor, it made sense and it followed the storyline well and even managed to wrangle up a boatload of genuine scares. Then there's "Ginger Snaps Back", the weakest and wholly unnecessary entry into the series. It should have stopped with "Unleashed" but the writers have decided to give our doomed heroines Brigitte and Ginger one last go around.

    This time Ginger and Brigitte (a major plus is that Katharine Isabelle reprises her role as Ginger whereas she was missing in the second film save for a few scenes) are wandering around in the Canadian wilderness after being stranded in the early 1800's. For some reason it's a prequel that has nothing to do with the story that was developed in the first two films, so what's the point besides some cheap werewolf scares? When they come across a wrecked Indian camp that depicts carnage and brutal murder, they hastily make way to find shelter. That's when they find a strange fort in the middle of nowhere that some soldiers reside in, and that's where the nightmare begins. At night, a pack of vicious werewolves continually attacks the fort outside the thick log walls, and by day things take a nasty turn for Ginger when she is bitten... again. It's all apparently a foreshadowing of the events in the first film but none of it is needed. There's no tension or intrigue where there was in the first and second, plus any trace of black humor that made the first film so ingenious is not apparent anywhere. The editing and cinematography seem rushed and at times I found the film almost incoherent. A huge disappointment that further ruins the integrity of the first. They should leave Ginger and Brigitte alone now.
    5juliankennedy23

    Werewolf? Therewolf!

    Ginger Snaps Back the Beginning: 5/10: The original Ginger Snaps truly deserves its cult classic label. Leads Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins created original characters that transcended both the teen angst genre as well as werewolf films needless to say. The second sequel transports both characters to the 19th century Canadian wilderness. The good news is that the girls and their relationship is exactly the same as the first film. The bad news is that the first film took place in modern suburbia and the girls' characterization simply couldn't feel more out of place. It's like coming across a valley girl in a WWI Drama.

    Anachronisms aside what they really don't have from the first film is the witty banter and subtext of the story. The script is a true bare bones affair with that old Assault on Precinct 13, Rio Bravo plot. But instead of gang members our antagonists are werewolves. Now this plot can work mind you (See Dog Soldiers for a perfect werewolves trapping people movie) but with the first two Snaps films about puberty and addiction a trapped with crazy people plot line is quite a let down.

    The script is lazy in other ways as well. We have a ridiculous preacher character that would have been thrown out of 17th century Salem for being too fundamentalist and we also have endless Native American (okay Native Canadian) mumbo jumbo.

    There are very very few things that grate on my nerves faster in a movie than the wise Indian character with the endless intelligible incantations and feathered dream catchers. And of course they predict the future and give warnings of bad tidings and initially scare our girls but turn out to be the real good guys that everyone treats badly. Pretty generic and lazy screen writing.

    Needless to say the movie is all over the map. The end is good, the werewolves look good and honestly I can watch Katharine Isabelle all day long. The plot however is a really a mess and Snaps really doesn't make much sense if you haven't seen the other two Ginger Snaps films and even less sense if you have.
    6Gafke

    Somewhat Disappointing

    This prequel concerns the sisters, Ginger and Brigitte, making their way through 19th century Canada in what one can assume to be a previous incarnation.

    Having lost their parents, the orphaned girls trek alone through the wilderness during a cold, harsh winter. They stumble upon the remains of an Indian village, which looks to have been ripped apart by some great beast. One of the few survivors, an old wise woman, warns them that they must "kill the boy" or "one sister will kill the other." When Brigitte accidentally steps into a bear trap a short time later, the two girls are rescued and assisted by a handsome Indian man known only as The Hunter, who leads the girls to nearby Bailey Fort...perhaps the very fort around which the future suburban community of Bailey Downs will spring. The fort is in poor shape. The men are suspicious, the atmosphere is bleak and the supplies are running low. It seems that the men who were sent for winter provisions several months before never returned...at least, not in human form. Indeed, several strange and vicious beasts seem to be stalking the woods just beyond the fort...and there may be one within as well!

    This 3rd installment in the imaginative and intelligent Ginger Snaps series lacks the black humor and witty script of the previous two. The girls are lovely and convincing, the setting of a snowbound fort is both creepy and beautiful, and the new character of The Hunter is intriguing and nice to look at, but this film takes itself far too seriously. I also had a hard time accepting the fact that a young girl in the 19th century would utter a phrase like: "These people are f-cked." Such instances of modern dialogue inserted into a setting of 100+ years past is disconcerting at best...but maybe I'm the only one it would bother.

    The beasts are highly visible in the final scenes of the film, and are pretty impressive looking. Other than that, the films gets a little weighted down by the gloomy atmosphere, with nary a joke to be found. The religious metaphors and Native American mysticism seem to have been pulled right out of "The Crucible," "The Scarlet Letter" and "Thunderheart" and seem to have been used for set dressing rather than as crucial plot devices. Still, there's a good amount of blood and gore to please most splatter enthusiasts, and an open ending which seems both to resolve the second film and bring us right back around to the first.

    It's not a terrible movie by any means, but since I'd come to expect a certain amount of smart black comedy and found none here, it was just a little disappointing. The girls do a great job with their characters, as they always do, but they had far less to work with this time around. I give this a 6 on a scale of 10, whereas the first two each get a 9.
    6matt-1252

    Watchable, but shallow

    What made the original Ginger Snaps a classic horror movie is the way it used the genre to explore universal themes. It offered a unique take on sibling rivalry, death, suicide, puberty, feminism, sexuality and love. Most poignantly, it gave us Ginger, a complex character with a genuine hatred of herself and everything around her.

    Ginger Snaps also introduced Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins, two talented, beautiful and utterly believable actresses. So while I was a bit put off by the premise of Ginger Snaps Back, I was excited for the chance to watch the girls reprise their roles.

    Ginger Snaps Back is a very watchable movie. It re-imagines the sisters in a different era, which is interesting. It's creepy. The special effects are much better than in the original. The climax is very cool. And the sisters are both perfectly portrayed. Unfortunately, when it was over, I wasn't thinking about my own mortality. I was just thinking, "Hey, cool werewolves."

    I was also irritated by the dialog. Most of the time, the characters speak in stilted sentences appropriate to the era. But occasionally, Ginger drops a pithy one liner or a curse word which seems completely out of place.

    The supporting cast was filled with stereotypes. The harsh minister and the sage native American hunter were especially flat.

    Ginger Snaps Back gives you two things. An entertaining werewolf movie. And an excuse to watch two talented actresses portray Ginger and Brigitte. But it doesn't give you anything beyond that.
    rddevil-1

    What do you get when you take a TV commercial director and add a rushed script?

    Nothing special. And that's a shame.

    Ginger Snaps Back is a retelling of the storyline used in the original, with a few changes here and there. I got this movie the day it came out and couldn't wait to watch it. However...

    This is a period piece and while I respect the fact that the director didn't want the sisters to speak with phony accents, the dialogue really didn't match up with the time. Lines like "These people are f***ed" really took me out of the story. It actually started to remind me of watching a high school play put on by jaded teenagers.

    But being the fan and overall geek that I am, I still watched the movie again with the director's commentary track. I expected it to be boring. I didn't expect it to make me angry. The running theme for the commentary was "not enough time". I really angered when I found out that the script wasn't done until there was only ten days until the first shooting day. That along with the director and writer talking about how they came up with the idea for the film was infuriating. You see, they thought it would be a "treat for the fans" to do this movie. Maybe I'm just cynical, but that sounds like a lame attempt to make some money off of a title many horror fans have come to love.

    But I'm getting off topic.

    Overall, I liked this film. It's good to see Canada's finest (Katharine and Emily) on screen together once again. The dream sequence felt very abstract and Argento-like, which was cool. The only real complaints that I have are the dialogue and certain subplots that didn't belong. They should've gotten Karen Walton to write this one (she wrote the original).

    I give it 6/10.

    Oh yeah, one more thing...

    This might be nitpicking, but where was the original song? It only appeared once in Unleashed and is completely absent from this one. This is disappointing to me because I always thought of that song as the theme for the films.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável
    6,4
    Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável
    Possuída
    6,8
    Possuída
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    7,0
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    6,4
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    7,6
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    Amaldiçoados
    5,1
    Amaldiçoados
    May, Obsessão Assassina
    6,6
    May, Obsessão Assassina
    American Mary
    6,2
    American Mary
    Um Lobisomem Americano em Paris
    5,1
    Um Lobisomem Americano em Paris
    Late Phases
    6,0
    Late Phases
    Lobisomem: A Besta Entre Nós
    5,1
    Lobisomem: A Besta Entre Nós
    Ginger Snaps
    7,9
    Ginger Snaps

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Shot back-to-back with Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável (2004).
    • Erros de gravação
      The movie states it takes place in 1815. All of the rifles/muskets used in the movie are percussion locks, not flintlocks. The percussion cap was invented in the early 1820's. Percussion style rifles did not start becoming prevalent until the 1840's. In fact many of the "Northwest trading companies" produced flintlock trade guns well into the late 1880's.
    • Citações

      Ginger: Come closer... it's a secret.

      [smiles through canine teeth]

      Ginger: [whispers] they're coming.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      Near the end of the credits, it says "No animals or werewolves were harmed badly during the production of this film."
    • Versões alternativas
      The DVD release contains deleted scenes. The additional footage is as follows:
      • While looking for a set of keys, Finn tells the girls that he is a map maker. The girls ask what has happened at the fort. Finn doesn't answer them. They see a pile of werewolf drawings on a desk, and look at Finn questioningly. He says that the pictures are of old wives tales.
      • An extended dinner scene with additional dialogue amongst the men. Seamus says that the scripture has made Gilbert twisted. James loudly questions Hunter's motives for staying at the fort. Seamus defends Hunter. Hunter puts a knife to James' throat before letting him go. Rowlands begins to make a speech before being interrupted by the howling of werewolves outside.
      • Returning to the fort after helping Ginger escape, Brigitte is brought before Rowlands. Gilbert claims she is a disciple of the devil and will steal the souls of the men. Rowlands tells Brigitte that when he looked into his son's eyes before shooting him, he saw nothing. He then says that when he looks into Brigitte's eyes, he sees only her sister. He tells the men they can do what they want with Brigitte, and that he washes his hands of the whole thing.
      • An extended burial scene where Gilbert makes several veiled attacks towards Seamus' personal life.
    • Conexões
      Edited into Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes (2004)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes28

    • How long is Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • What kind of natives are featured in the film?
    • What is 'Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning' about?
    • Is "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning" based on a book?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 27 de agosto de 2004 (Canadá)
    • País de origem
      • Canadá
    • Idiomas
      • Inglês
      • Cree
    • Também conhecido como
      • Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    • Locações de filme
      • Fort Edmonton Park - Fox Drive and Whitemud Drive, Edmonton, Londres, Canadá
    • Empresas de produção
      • 49 Films
      • Combustion
      • Lions Gate Films
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • CA$ 3.500.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 34 min(94 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.