Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe lives of three families are woven together across three decades in multi-cultural Britain.The lives of three families are woven together across three decades in multi-cultural Britain.The lives of three families are woven together across three decades in multi-cultural Britain.
- Indicado para 3 prêmios BAFTA
- 3 vitórias e 3 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
I found the first couple of episodes quite engaging. Plenty of fun being poked in all directions: religion, culture, politics and above all the frailty of human nature.
But after the first two, it all began to wear thin. By the final part I just wanted it to be finished.
I think my 5 is rather generous, but it was ok-ish.
But after the first two, it all began to wear thin. By the final part I just wanted it to be finished.
I think my 5 is rather generous, but it was ok-ish.
After some real stinkers, I wasn't expecting much. Pleasantly surprised.
didn't read the book- many think the series is better. and don't read the book (unusual)
some of the turn around E#3 and E#4 a bit muddled.
But one of the better mini-series. about people, relationships, and life choices, and destinies. without murder or serial killers.
Notably, Iria, gets ignored and put down as a woman.
2002, this material is not dated. I enjoyed it. and good solid acting.
some of the turn around E#3 and E#4 a bit muddled.
But one of the better mini-series. about people, relationships, and life choices, and destinies. without murder or serial killers.
Notably, Iria, gets ignored and put down as a woman.
2002, this material is not dated. I enjoyed it. and good solid acting.
In 1960's England, cultures start to mix and cross with different experiences. Archie is contemplating suicide until he meets Clara, who is fleeing an oppressive Jehovah's Witness mother. Meanwhile Samad has arrived in England to meet with his old war-friend Archie and to complete his arranged marriage. The two couples have different experiences of multi-cultural Britain and this differs from their children as the story follows the two generations across the years.
I have never read the book and probably won't bother, but I have seen all four episodes oft his miniseries that adapted it for the screen. The plot sees us follow the two multicultural families from the moment the parents meet and marry in the sixties through the main stages of their children's lives. It's a little difficult to put a finger on one narrative strand running through the series as it manages to be both a very simplified version of 30 years of time and a bundle of energy with little direction or focus.
The programme was strongest when focusing on the Asian father and the white father. They were the focus of the first two episodes. However the final two shows were also good character wise as I was very interested in the conflicting characters of the shy mixed race daughter Irie and the very urban/western son Millat. The central theme of race and the multicultural experience in Britain is layered through at all times but is not used well at all times, instead it is merely a backdrop and the series didn't seem to make any points that weren't obvious. For example the fact that Archie (traditional England) finds rejuvenation and new life in Samad and Clara (new England) is obvious but not forced in your face. I had a problem with the free flowing nature of the first three shows - or rather a problem with the way this was lost in the final show. The fourth part brought everything neatly together in a series of events that were implausible and felt like the series had suddenly realised that it needed a firm `plot' to finish with. I preferred the first three parts that were more about the characters than events or plot.
The acting is quite good. Om Puri powers over everyone as Samad and is well used. He brings out his mixed emotions towards the west well and is a man in conflict with all he knows around him. Phil Daniels is a little unmemorable but in the first show is good. In his marriage he turns into a quiet little man behind his Jamaican wife so that explains why he is like that, he is necessarily understated. Newcomer Harris is not used well in later parts but is excellent as Clara in parts one and two. Panjabi (Goodness Gracious Me) is average as Alsana, only really shining in the final part when she is given more of a role. The problem with her is that she doesn't seem to age as well as those around her. Simpson is good in dual roles and it's not his fault that the characters are forced so obviously to extremes.
I enjoyed the series despite the fact I found the fourth part to be less enjoyable because it suddenly seemed to feel like it needed `a plot' to get by. The only other thing I disliked about it was the `trainspotting' feel that is given to too many of channel 4's drama series. What I mean is the overuse of music in an attempt to make it cool and fell like it's brimming with energy. This was particularly evident in part one which was wallpapered with music from the period. The music is cool but it just started to feel like a gimmick rather than a soundtrack - happily this was toned down for later parts.
Overall the series is well worth checking out. I don't know what those who have read the book thought of it but I enjoyed it. The main characters are well brought out despite the fact that it doesn't quite feel like a tapestry - more that bits of each part are given over to each character. May not as brought in as many viewers as channel 4 had hoped given the £35 million budget, but it is still a really good mini-series.
I have never read the book and probably won't bother, but I have seen all four episodes oft his miniseries that adapted it for the screen. The plot sees us follow the two multicultural families from the moment the parents meet and marry in the sixties through the main stages of their children's lives. It's a little difficult to put a finger on one narrative strand running through the series as it manages to be both a very simplified version of 30 years of time and a bundle of energy with little direction or focus.
The programme was strongest when focusing on the Asian father and the white father. They were the focus of the first two episodes. However the final two shows were also good character wise as I was very interested in the conflicting characters of the shy mixed race daughter Irie and the very urban/western son Millat. The central theme of race and the multicultural experience in Britain is layered through at all times but is not used well at all times, instead it is merely a backdrop and the series didn't seem to make any points that weren't obvious. For example the fact that Archie (traditional England) finds rejuvenation and new life in Samad and Clara (new England) is obvious but not forced in your face. I had a problem with the free flowing nature of the first three shows - or rather a problem with the way this was lost in the final show. The fourth part brought everything neatly together in a series of events that were implausible and felt like the series had suddenly realised that it needed a firm `plot' to finish with. I preferred the first three parts that were more about the characters than events or plot.
The acting is quite good. Om Puri powers over everyone as Samad and is well used. He brings out his mixed emotions towards the west well and is a man in conflict with all he knows around him. Phil Daniels is a little unmemorable but in the first show is good. In his marriage he turns into a quiet little man behind his Jamaican wife so that explains why he is like that, he is necessarily understated. Newcomer Harris is not used well in later parts but is excellent as Clara in parts one and two. Panjabi (Goodness Gracious Me) is average as Alsana, only really shining in the final part when she is given more of a role. The problem with her is that she doesn't seem to age as well as those around her. Simpson is good in dual roles and it's not his fault that the characters are forced so obviously to extremes.
I enjoyed the series despite the fact I found the fourth part to be less enjoyable because it suddenly seemed to feel like it needed `a plot' to get by. The only other thing I disliked about it was the `trainspotting' feel that is given to too many of channel 4's drama series. What I mean is the overuse of music in an attempt to make it cool and fell like it's brimming with energy. This was particularly evident in part one which was wallpapered with music from the period. The music is cool but it just started to feel like a gimmick rather than a soundtrack - happily this was toned down for later parts.
Overall the series is well worth checking out. I don't know what those who have read the book thought of it but I enjoyed it. The main characters are well brought out despite the fact that it doesn't quite feel like a tapestry - more that bits of each part are given over to each character. May not as brought in as many viewers as channel 4 had hoped given the £35 million budget, but it is still a really good mini-series.
I found this comment on PBS.org and I agree with it... "While the series was great, and the acting wonderful, I would have enjoyed it more had the author bothered to get even the smallest detail about Jehovah's Witnesses correct. There were so many inaccuracies, that I doubt she did any research.
First of all, a Jehovah's Witness would never have a cross in the home. Crosses are pagan relics that have no place in a witnesses' worship. Second, witnesses do not believe in burning hell, nor do they believe in everyone going to heaven. The belief is that while 144,000 will go to heaven, others will live forever on Earth. Third, even in 1974, when some witnesses did believe the end was near, they did not believe they would be taken up to heaven in rapture.
Verna Leep Thoreau, NM" The show is laughable in its portrayal of Jehovah's Witnesses as a stereotype of religious fanaticism. At the same time, it is so inaccurate in its portrayal, I think the average Jehovah's Witness would be vastly amused rather than offended.
First of all, a Jehovah's Witness would never have a cross in the home. Crosses are pagan relics that have no place in a witnesses' worship. Second, witnesses do not believe in burning hell, nor do they believe in everyone going to heaven. The belief is that while 144,000 will go to heaven, others will live forever on Earth. Third, even in 1974, when some witnesses did believe the end was near, they did not believe they would be taken up to heaven in rapture.
Verna Leep Thoreau, NM" The show is laughable in its portrayal of Jehovah's Witnesses as a stereotype of religious fanaticism. At the same time, it is so inaccurate in its portrayal, I think the average Jehovah's Witness would be vastly amused rather than offended.
I found the four-part adoption of Zadie Smith's novel White Teeth fantastic. I thought the first two parts were more serious then the last two but the plot was more obscure. I thought Christopher Simpson was brilliant as Millat and Magid. I have never seen him before in anything else but his acting was great as he really made his unrealistic characters believable and unforgettable. He had an amazing talent of making the audience believe in these two totally different people.
After watching each part, I found my self-counting the days till the next instalment. I got really involved in the narrative but all the way through the series I felt as if I were watching a story meant for a book because of the extreme situations and characters. The plot was unbelievable at times but that did not spoil it at all but on the contrary made it more entertaining and exhilarating. I thought that having Archi Panjabi play Samad's wife Alasana played by Om Puri, was a bit outrageous and ridiculous because she played his daughter in East Is East. The third part had more of an impact on me and brought me back wanting more. The last part was more humorous than anything, I did begin to think that the plot was going to get really serious but it didn't. I loved the unpredictability of it. It was fantastical. A must see.*_*
After watching each part, I found my self-counting the days till the next instalment. I got really involved in the narrative but all the way through the series I felt as if I were watching a story meant for a book because of the extreme situations and characters. The plot was unbelievable at times but that did not spoil it at all but on the contrary made it more entertaining and exhilarating. I thought that having Archi Panjabi play Samad's wife Alasana played by Om Puri, was a bit outrageous and ridiculous because she played his daughter in East Is East. The third part had more of an impact on me and brought me back wanting more. The last part was more humorous than anything, I did begin to think that the plot was going to get really serious but it didn't. I loved the unpredictability of it. It was fantastical. A must see.*_*
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIn White Teeth, Om Puri and Archie Panjabi play husband and wife. In East is East, they played father and daughter.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does White Teeth have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Білі зуби
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente