AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,6/10
4,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaSeparated by a checkpoint, Palestinian lovers from Jerusalem and Ramallah arrange clandestine meetings.Separated by a checkpoint, Palestinian lovers from Jerusalem and Ramallah arrange clandestine meetings.Separated by a checkpoint, Palestinian lovers from Jerusalem and Ramallah arrange clandestine meetings.
- Prêmios
- 6 vitórias e 2 indicações no total
Salwa Nakkara
- Adia
- (as Salvia Nakkara)
Avaliações em destaque
Given my fascination with the modern tragedy of the Palestinian's predicament, I thus was very willing to like Divine Intervention. But ultimately, this was a case of lofty ideals blinding the basic craft of good cinema.
The real life issues (Israeli Occupation of Palestinian lands/ Oppression of the Palestinian people) genuinely demands our attention and worthy concerns. And from what I have read, believed they were better explored in other non-fiction documentaries like "A Wedding in Ramallah" or "Gaza strip".
Which was a real pity. As Divine Intervention, being a fictional feature, could have achieved a dramatic potential and political resonance far wider than above-mentioned works. Instead, what I have seen was a painfully average work of an aspiring auteur, who harboured artistic ambition beyond his reach.
Yes, the themes explored may be noble and the real life issues behind the film may even be deemed absurd, ironic and ultimately tragic. But first and foremost, Divine Intervention needed to be judged as a film. However "holy" the subject matter, our sympathies for the real life issues need not compensate for what can seen so clearly as poor execution and misdirection. As such, as a film, it didn't work for me.
Granted, there may be brilliant parts of surreal beauty (the Santa Claus and Ninja sequence comes to mind). But ultimately these vignettes of uneven quality are marred by the glaring failure of its disjointed, disengaging whole. It's sophomoric metaphors and monotonous, pseudo artistic rythms, left me cold and empty.
Amazing really, how a film can show so much promise yet fails so miserably. That said, I'll still give it a passing 6/10 for some truly inspired moments. But that's about it.
The real life issues (Israeli Occupation of Palestinian lands/ Oppression of the Palestinian people) genuinely demands our attention and worthy concerns. And from what I have read, believed they were better explored in other non-fiction documentaries like "A Wedding in Ramallah" or "Gaza strip".
Which was a real pity. As Divine Intervention, being a fictional feature, could have achieved a dramatic potential and political resonance far wider than above-mentioned works. Instead, what I have seen was a painfully average work of an aspiring auteur, who harboured artistic ambition beyond his reach.
Yes, the themes explored may be noble and the real life issues behind the film may even be deemed absurd, ironic and ultimately tragic. But first and foremost, Divine Intervention needed to be judged as a film. However "holy" the subject matter, our sympathies for the real life issues need not compensate for what can seen so clearly as poor execution and misdirection. As such, as a film, it didn't work for me.
Granted, there may be brilliant parts of surreal beauty (the Santa Claus and Ninja sequence comes to mind). But ultimately these vignettes of uneven quality are marred by the glaring failure of its disjointed, disengaging whole. It's sophomoric metaphors and monotonous, pseudo artistic rythms, left me cold and empty.
Amazing really, how a film can show so much promise yet fails so miserably. That said, I'll still give it a passing 6/10 for some truly inspired moments. But that's about it.
"Divine Intervention," or" A Godlike Hand," consists of many vignettes which are Tati-esque "sans paroles" cartoons (they call them "bidoon ta'leeq" in Arabic, without comment), or comic strips actually, since scenes keep returning with slight changes and end with implied punch lines.
The first half focuses on individuals in Jerusalem, the last on Suleiman himself, his father (Nayef Fahoum Daher), and his girlfriend (Manal Khader). His girlfriend disappears and his father dies. The director plays like the sad-faced Buster Keaton doing "Waiting for Godot." He's also been compared to Hal Hartley and Groucho Marx and Yiddish humor, but what we need to remember is that this is a series of disjointed cartoons. Suleiman's aim is not to tell a story but to delineate with bitter, detached irony the miseries and absurdities of Palestinian life under Israeli occupation. In doing so he has had full access to a large Israeli cast, including actual or former IDF border guards.
The movie was originally nominated for the Oscar for Best Foreign Film -- and then taken off the list because Palestine 'is not a legitimate nation.' That's what Golda Meir used to say; the Motion Picture Academy is more backward than the judges at Cannes, which gave Suleiman two jury prizes. Politics are different in the USA, as observers of world events are currently all too well aware, and "Divine Intervention" is unlikely to be as well appreciated in America as in Europe. American and English reviews have frequently focused on the movie's weaknesses and overlooked its elegance and restrained passion.
Indeed there are subtleties that will elude an audience from outside Israel. I'm told that the green envelopes "E.S.'s" father is opening are government mail, whatever you get from different ministries and departments, and the big blue envelope pertains to income tax. It just looked like junk mail to me. In another sequence something happened with the owner of a house who was the object of fire bombings, but I didn't follow the outcome.
Suleiman's black images of Israeli occupation resemble the humor of the concentration camp; the occupation is like a summery, open air detention center, the Jews giving back what they got under the Nazis to the people they got their land from. The final aim is still extermination and removal of a people.
The detachment of Suleiman's view, and perhaps the warped sensibilities that repression and frustration cause, are reflected in the meanness and feuding he depicts as existing daily among the Palestinians themselves and their contacts with Israelis; the alienation in the constant sound of Hebrew in the ears of Arabic speakers. Neighbors throw garbage in each other's yards, puncture a boy's lost soccer ball before returning it; drive along greeting acquaintances and cursing them under their breath.
Between Jerusalem, where E.S. lives, and Ramallah, where his girlfriend is, lies one of the infamous checkpoints: the lovers' separation causes them to meet at a vacant lot next to it. They stare ahead with blank sadness, twining their hands together. Their lovemaking is reduced to that tiny gesture. They sit impassively for hours, as Palestinians must sit in car queues for hours at the checkpoints. Sometimes Suleiman shifts to fantasy: an apricot pit E.S. flips out his car window blows up a tank, or a pretty girl (his girlfriend?) in tight clothes leaves her car, and approaches the elevated observation cabin of a checkpoint, to the consternation and arousal of the young Israeli guards. She walks past, and the whole observation cabin magically disintegrates. (These two sequences had to be staged and shot in France.)
Another time a lively new guard takes over with a megaphone barking commands at Palestinian motorists, stealing a young man's imported leather jacket, ordering others to switch cars, making another sing along with him, humiliating them all, and then suddenly waving the whole line of cars through. The Palestinians are at the mercy of individual personalities, and have only a choice between humiliation and cruelty.
E.S.'s father sits in his pajamas having breakfast seemingly for hours opening the mail mentioned above, eating an egg. He smokes a cigarette and then gets up, and falls onto the floor.
Hospital scenes follow which emphasize how everybody, patients, doctors and nurses, constantly smokes.
Periodically we see Suleiman/E.S. pulling large Post It's off a wall, representing all the little episodes of the movie.
In an elaborate sequence toward the end five Israelis do target practice in formation like chorus girls shooting up effigies of a Palestinian woman -- the girlfriend -- wearing a kufia mask. Finally the real woman emerges from behind the one remaining effigy, dodges dozens of bullets, flies into the air transmogrified into a martyr, emits stones that knock down the men, blows them up with grenades, and spins off in the air like a Ninja. This, and the opening sequence in which Arab boys chase and stab a costumed Santa Claus, have been criticized in English-language reviews as too vicious or too fanciful, but they accurately represent the workings of a tormented Palestinian mind.
It's important to remember that there's no intention to tell a connected story here; Suleiman is an observer and note-taker. Returned to Jerusalem since 1994, he lived abroad for a decade before that, mostly in New York. Like all Palestinians he is rootless and international, treated like dirt in his native land. The power of his observations is in their coolness and wry humor.
For all the explosions, shooting, beatings (of a snake, in one scene) and expressions of hostility, the movie is marked by its distance, stillness, and restraint. People are seen from afar, head on, or from above. Perhaps the most memorable image is the one of E.S. and his girlfriend staring impassively forward for hours at the checkpoint. Passive endurance is the hallmark of Palestinian survival as seen in "Divine Intervention."
A highly symbolic scene is the repeated one of a bus stop where one man is standing and another comes and says, "There's no bus," and the first one says, "I know!" This pinpoints the hopeless situation of the whole society.
Despite the links with classic movie comedy tradition, Suleiman has a unique and sadder vision. One may or may not find the scenes amusing or entertaining but one does get a sense of the average Palestinian's predicament. Bitter irony and detachment are two of the only ways of dealing with it.
The first half focuses on individuals in Jerusalem, the last on Suleiman himself, his father (Nayef Fahoum Daher), and his girlfriend (Manal Khader). His girlfriend disappears and his father dies. The director plays like the sad-faced Buster Keaton doing "Waiting for Godot." He's also been compared to Hal Hartley and Groucho Marx and Yiddish humor, but what we need to remember is that this is a series of disjointed cartoons. Suleiman's aim is not to tell a story but to delineate with bitter, detached irony the miseries and absurdities of Palestinian life under Israeli occupation. In doing so he has had full access to a large Israeli cast, including actual or former IDF border guards.
The movie was originally nominated for the Oscar for Best Foreign Film -- and then taken off the list because Palestine 'is not a legitimate nation.' That's what Golda Meir used to say; the Motion Picture Academy is more backward than the judges at Cannes, which gave Suleiman two jury prizes. Politics are different in the USA, as observers of world events are currently all too well aware, and "Divine Intervention" is unlikely to be as well appreciated in America as in Europe. American and English reviews have frequently focused on the movie's weaknesses and overlooked its elegance and restrained passion.
Indeed there are subtleties that will elude an audience from outside Israel. I'm told that the green envelopes "E.S.'s" father is opening are government mail, whatever you get from different ministries and departments, and the big blue envelope pertains to income tax. It just looked like junk mail to me. In another sequence something happened with the owner of a house who was the object of fire bombings, but I didn't follow the outcome.
Suleiman's black images of Israeli occupation resemble the humor of the concentration camp; the occupation is like a summery, open air detention center, the Jews giving back what they got under the Nazis to the people they got their land from. The final aim is still extermination and removal of a people.
The detachment of Suleiman's view, and perhaps the warped sensibilities that repression and frustration cause, are reflected in the meanness and feuding he depicts as existing daily among the Palestinians themselves and their contacts with Israelis; the alienation in the constant sound of Hebrew in the ears of Arabic speakers. Neighbors throw garbage in each other's yards, puncture a boy's lost soccer ball before returning it; drive along greeting acquaintances and cursing them under their breath.
Between Jerusalem, where E.S. lives, and Ramallah, where his girlfriend is, lies one of the infamous checkpoints: the lovers' separation causes them to meet at a vacant lot next to it. They stare ahead with blank sadness, twining their hands together. Their lovemaking is reduced to that tiny gesture. They sit impassively for hours, as Palestinians must sit in car queues for hours at the checkpoints. Sometimes Suleiman shifts to fantasy: an apricot pit E.S. flips out his car window blows up a tank, or a pretty girl (his girlfriend?) in tight clothes leaves her car, and approaches the elevated observation cabin of a checkpoint, to the consternation and arousal of the young Israeli guards. She walks past, and the whole observation cabin magically disintegrates. (These two sequences had to be staged and shot in France.)
Another time a lively new guard takes over with a megaphone barking commands at Palestinian motorists, stealing a young man's imported leather jacket, ordering others to switch cars, making another sing along with him, humiliating them all, and then suddenly waving the whole line of cars through. The Palestinians are at the mercy of individual personalities, and have only a choice between humiliation and cruelty.
E.S.'s father sits in his pajamas having breakfast seemingly for hours opening the mail mentioned above, eating an egg. He smokes a cigarette and then gets up, and falls onto the floor.
Hospital scenes follow which emphasize how everybody, patients, doctors and nurses, constantly smokes.
Periodically we see Suleiman/E.S. pulling large Post It's off a wall, representing all the little episodes of the movie.
In an elaborate sequence toward the end five Israelis do target practice in formation like chorus girls shooting up effigies of a Palestinian woman -- the girlfriend -- wearing a kufia mask. Finally the real woman emerges from behind the one remaining effigy, dodges dozens of bullets, flies into the air transmogrified into a martyr, emits stones that knock down the men, blows them up with grenades, and spins off in the air like a Ninja. This, and the opening sequence in which Arab boys chase and stab a costumed Santa Claus, have been criticized in English-language reviews as too vicious or too fanciful, but they accurately represent the workings of a tormented Palestinian mind.
It's important to remember that there's no intention to tell a connected story here; Suleiman is an observer and note-taker. Returned to Jerusalem since 1994, he lived abroad for a decade before that, mostly in New York. Like all Palestinians he is rootless and international, treated like dirt in his native land. The power of his observations is in their coolness and wry humor.
For all the explosions, shooting, beatings (of a snake, in one scene) and expressions of hostility, the movie is marked by its distance, stillness, and restraint. People are seen from afar, head on, or from above. Perhaps the most memorable image is the one of E.S. and his girlfriend staring impassively forward for hours at the checkpoint. Passive endurance is the hallmark of Palestinian survival as seen in "Divine Intervention."
A highly symbolic scene is the repeated one of a bus stop where one man is standing and another comes and says, "There's no bus," and the first one says, "I know!" This pinpoints the hopeless situation of the whole society.
Despite the links with classic movie comedy tradition, Suleiman has a unique and sadder vision. One may or may not find the scenes amusing or entertaining but one does get a sense of the average Palestinian's predicament. Bitter irony and detachment are two of the only ways of dealing with it.
Set in the segregated world of checkpoints and bombings of the Middle East, two lovers are separated - one living in Jerusalem, the other in Ramallah. Despite the threats posed by bombings and shootings, and the deterrents of the checkpoints, the two arrange secret meetings.
I have done it too, so I won't make too big a deal out of it; but too many of us doff our caps at the sight of a foreign film, too many reviews are very forgiving of flaws foreign films that we would go to town on in a western film. That appears to be the case here, reviewers seem to have sat down looking for `a deep film that will touch them' and that is what they have found - and in doing so they fall for much of the film's forced pretension. The plot is very difficult to describe and it is not easily forgotten - I found it very difficult to get into it simply because it was episodic and lacking a flow to it; it is more interested in delivering metaphors and symbolism that don't necessarily work that well.
I, like many, do not and cannot ever hope to fully understand what life is like in this part of the world; therefore I was not able to get the meaning or, if there were any, the jokes. I have lived the vast majority of my life in a world of terrorism and check points - but this film is more specific than that general experience. However, for me the film was still too shrouded in mystery and `deep' scenes - long scenes pass without dialogue; the camera stares at a road for minute after minute and so on - it smacks of a film trying too hard to be arty and pretentious. This wouldn't be too bad if it had worked - but, for me, it simply didn't do anything. Some of it I'm sure is daring, and I wanted to find the Power Rangers style moment funny - but the tone of the film stopped it working.
As far as characters, the film barely tries - the focus being `meaningful' swipes and jokes. Five minutes after the film ended I could barely recall character names - and there wasn't really an attempt to develop people within this smugly smart piece.
Overall, if you know the area and are willing to work past all this film's flaws then you may get something from this. However, the curious audience looking to be helped through the film or just looking for something interesting will likely be left as cold, disinterested and poorly served as I was.
I have done it too, so I won't make too big a deal out of it; but too many of us doff our caps at the sight of a foreign film, too many reviews are very forgiving of flaws foreign films that we would go to town on in a western film. That appears to be the case here, reviewers seem to have sat down looking for `a deep film that will touch them' and that is what they have found - and in doing so they fall for much of the film's forced pretension. The plot is very difficult to describe and it is not easily forgotten - I found it very difficult to get into it simply because it was episodic and lacking a flow to it; it is more interested in delivering metaphors and symbolism that don't necessarily work that well.
I, like many, do not and cannot ever hope to fully understand what life is like in this part of the world; therefore I was not able to get the meaning or, if there were any, the jokes. I have lived the vast majority of my life in a world of terrorism and check points - but this film is more specific than that general experience. However, for me the film was still too shrouded in mystery and `deep' scenes - long scenes pass without dialogue; the camera stares at a road for minute after minute and so on - it smacks of a film trying too hard to be arty and pretentious. This wouldn't be too bad if it had worked - but, for me, it simply didn't do anything. Some of it I'm sure is daring, and I wanted to find the Power Rangers style moment funny - but the tone of the film stopped it working.
As far as characters, the film barely tries - the focus being `meaningful' swipes and jokes. Five minutes after the film ended I could barely recall character names - and there wasn't really an attempt to develop people within this smugly smart piece.
Overall, if you know the area and are willing to work past all this film's flaws then you may get something from this. However, the curious audience looking to be helped through the film or just looking for something interesting will likely be left as cold, disinterested and poorly served as I was.
"Divine Intervention" is not a perfect film. Certain scenes go on too long. Some of the metaphors and symbolism are overdone and over-emphasized, and I'm still not sure how I feel about a crucial scene towards the end of the film, but overall when registering my vote for the film I, again, simply couldn't vote less than 10. It's hard to do so with such a unique film, and one which I feel is quite important and special, regardless of my own personal connection to the film and its subjects (like most of my father's family the filmmaker is a Palestinian Christian from Nazareth).
The film's tone is one of detached, bitter irony. It's an absurdist look at the conflict, at life under Israeli occupation. A far cry from many Palestinian (or Israeli) films, especially the likes of "Paradise Now" (a great film in its own right), with their emphasis on examining the conflict itself, the solutions available and the morality of the actions taken by desperate people on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides, "Divine Intervention" is ultimately about minor miseries and absurdities, an uncanny portrayal of the mundane, monotonous nature of living in Palestine- you're always at a checkpoint, even if you're not actually at one.
Checkpoints play a big part in the film. So do hands, eyes, footballs, balloons, post-it notes, Israeli authority figures, colorful language, and various other things. The opening half of the film is largely in a classic comedy tradition: sight gag after sight gag, with some uproariously (as far as I'm concerned) hilarious exchanges of dialogue, sadly some of this is lost in translation, but the film's humor is so overwhelmingly visual that this doesn't matter so much. The first time I saw the film some of the jokes didn't work for me and some did. Three viewings later it's easily one of the most satisfying comedies around.
The film's latter half is more intent on surreal, symbolic imagery. Imagery which retains the bitter irony and absurdist tendencies of the first half, but will surely be harder to swallow for most, especially as some of it can easily be misunderstood and misinterpreted. The more ambitious set-pieces are also more visually problematic, with dated CGI mixing with Suleiman's wonderful portraits of Jerusalem.
Most of the film's flaws are still in sequences I wouldn't dream of cutting out of the film. These scenes don't have the perfect timing and delivery of the comedy in the first half, which is much more subtle in its metaphorical and symbolic value than the latter half, but the film wouldn't work without them. It's a very odd film to say the least, and while I can complain about certain things I wouldn't have any suggestions on how to make them better.
"Divine Intervention" remains one of very, very few films to really capture what it means to be Palestinian and to have a Palestinian mindset. More interestingly the film is almost entirely from the perspective of Christians (I don't believe hijab is seen at any point in the film), eliminating the ever-present Jews vs. Muslims debate and focusing on Palestinian identity and Palestinian life. As a document of Palestinian life, absurd yet believable and shockingly realistic, it is invaluable. Yet the film achieves more. It has depth. It works as a comedy first and foremost, but always has significance and importance, something more to say.
The film is, ultimately, a collection of sketches, but they're brought together so well into a fairly cohesive whole that I can't understand the complaints about this aspect of the film. Some of the scenes are absolute classics, unforgettable even. The film has a wonderful visual sensibility, Suleiman's detachment extending beyond the writing and perspective to his camera which views these lives from a distance, static and observant, letting things play out against strikingly beautiful shots of Nazareth and Jerusalem. When Suleiman does go for motion it's for good reason. These shots tend to be ambitious and crucially important and are consistently well-realized by him and his crew.
Something of a forgotten film, opening to mixed reviews and an extremely limited run in North America, "Divine Intervention" remains one of the most deserving Jury Prize winners at Cannes. It's not surprising that the Europeans were more receptive, it's just a shame that this movie is such a tough sell to fellow North Americans, even film buffs, mostly because it's so relatively unheard of. Too bad, it's really great.
The film's tone is one of detached, bitter irony. It's an absurdist look at the conflict, at life under Israeli occupation. A far cry from many Palestinian (or Israeli) films, especially the likes of "Paradise Now" (a great film in its own right), with their emphasis on examining the conflict itself, the solutions available and the morality of the actions taken by desperate people on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides, "Divine Intervention" is ultimately about minor miseries and absurdities, an uncanny portrayal of the mundane, monotonous nature of living in Palestine- you're always at a checkpoint, even if you're not actually at one.
Checkpoints play a big part in the film. So do hands, eyes, footballs, balloons, post-it notes, Israeli authority figures, colorful language, and various other things. The opening half of the film is largely in a classic comedy tradition: sight gag after sight gag, with some uproariously (as far as I'm concerned) hilarious exchanges of dialogue, sadly some of this is lost in translation, but the film's humor is so overwhelmingly visual that this doesn't matter so much. The first time I saw the film some of the jokes didn't work for me and some did. Three viewings later it's easily one of the most satisfying comedies around.
The film's latter half is more intent on surreal, symbolic imagery. Imagery which retains the bitter irony and absurdist tendencies of the first half, but will surely be harder to swallow for most, especially as some of it can easily be misunderstood and misinterpreted. The more ambitious set-pieces are also more visually problematic, with dated CGI mixing with Suleiman's wonderful portraits of Jerusalem.
Most of the film's flaws are still in sequences I wouldn't dream of cutting out of the film. These scenes don't have the perfect timing and delivery of the comedy in the first half, which is much more subtle in its metaphorical and symbolic value than the latter half, but the film wouldn't work without them. It's a very odd film to say the least, and while I can complain about certain things I wouldn't have any suggestions on how to make them better.
"Divine Intervention" remains one of very, very few films to really capture what it means to be Palestinian and to have a Palestinian mindset. More interestingly the film is almost entirely from the perspective of Christians (I don't believe hijab is seen at any point in the film), eliminating the ever-present Jews vs. Muslims debate and focusing on Palestinian identity and Palestinian life. As a document of Palestinian life, absurd yet believable and shockingly realistic, it is invaluable. Yet the film achieves more. It has depth. It works as a comedy first and foremost, but always has significance and importance, something more to say.
The film is, ultimately, a collection of sketches, but they're brought together so well into a fairly cohesive whole that I can't understand the complaints about this aspect of the film. Some of the scenes are absolute classics, unforgettable even. The film has a wonderful visual sensibility, Suleiman's detachment extending beyond the writing and perspective to his camera which views these lives from a distance, static and observant, letting things play out against strikingly beautiful shots of Nazareth and Jerusalem. When Suleiman does go for motion it's for good reason. These shots tend to be ambitious and crucially important and are consistently well-realized by him and his crew.
Something of a forgotten film, opening to mixed reviews and an extremely limited run in North America, "Divine Intervention" remains one of the most deserving Jury Prize winners at Cannes. It's not surprising that the Europeans were more receptive, it's just a shame that this movie is such a tough sell to fellow North Americans, even film buffs, mostly because it's so relatively unheard of. Too bad, it's really great.
Amazing..
A film that has a crucial twist to what is happening in Israel today.
Two tribes at each others throat. However this isn't your usual mainstream war type, social issues, machine gun shoot type film. This is a film of quality..
Scenes are cut, a lot is left for the audience to tie up and conclude.. Directing at its best.
Powerful visions and photography.
You'll laugh.. but as the scene stays fix on the sketch.. you start thinking of the REAL message the director is giving you and believe you stop laughing.
I will definitely watch it again..
the balloon, the football, the Palestinian lady walking past and creating havoc to the Israeli border, the scene with the hands... all sketches that are unforgettable! Very symbolic...
A film that has a crucial twist to what is happening in Israel today.
Two tribes at each others throat. However this isn't your usual mainstream war type, social issues, machine gun shoot type film. This is a film of quality..
Scenes are cut, a lot is left for the audience to tie up and conclude.. Directing at its best.
Powerful visions and photography.
You'll laugh.. but as the scene stays fix on the sketch.. you start thinking of the REAL message the director is giving you and believe you stop laughing.
I will definitely watch it again..
the balloon, the football, the Palestinian lady walking past and creating havoc to the Israeli border, the scene with the hands... all sketches that are unforgettable! Very symbolic...
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe film was only submitted once to the Academy. Though the Academy did consider it, it did not make the final cut of the top five films in the world. There was some misinformation about why the Academy didn't consider the film the first time. The American distributor claimed he called AMPAS and asked them if they would consider it and was told they would not because Palestine is not a country recognized by the Academy. In fact, the Academy spokesperson said that the film was not considered the first year because it was never submitted. The second time it WAS considered but didn't win a nomination. The AMPAS spokesman also said that it's not their job to decide who is a country and who isn't as the UN decides that. It should be noted that Taiwan and Hong Kong are also not recognized by the UN as "official countries" but have had films nominated by the Academy.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt the border, when several cars are told to turn around, the camera is reflected in the side of the cars for several seconds.
- ConexõesFeatured in Humbert Balsan, producteur rebelle (2006)
- Trilhas sonorasDefinitive Beat
By Mirwaise
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Divine Intervention?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Divine Intervention
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 421.343
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 13.228
- 19 de jan. de 2003
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 1.679.544
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente