Superstarlet A.D.

Its in the Troma library that should be your first clue its not mainstream bad. This review is after covid lock down and one bad prez; not a bad movie. It reminds me of fishing...you have a bite of the plot...then it spits the plot hook. This movie would fit in with the wild Times Square hey day. Better than most BW avant guard flicks. 600 hundred characters is alot for this almost nudey cutie. Hey they even mention nudey cuties. LOL Throw in a a little basement bdsm and men in make up...its a hoot. All in all its a send up of good old fashion high faluten nonsensical black and white story telling celluloid.

Congratulations. It takes effort to make an unwatchable movie with this many good-looking women fighting and making out in and out of their underwear. The movie is poorly written, extremely slow and largely nonsensical, but these are not the main problems. These are par for the Troma course.

No. The big problem is that this movie is EXTREMELY POMPOUS. That's right. The characters are constantly spewing long vapid soliloquies.

I gave it a 3, rather than a 1 for the above-mentioned good-looking women living in a world where "there are no more clothes". I also give them credit for trying to make something good. Unfortunately, they did not pull it off.

You'll love this flick if your head doesn't explode while viewing! A thrill ride of black and white images with bursts of exploding reds to tickle your gonads and fondle your funny-bone. Bona-fide freak direcktor/writer: JMM(The Sore Losers, Shine On Sweet Starlet, Teenage Tupelo) and producer/asst. director: Emmy Collins(HeadShot, Jack the Dipper, 'Cept Jim) wallop the viewer once again with a film so convoluted you'll hope it never ends.

Can't hardly wait for their next epic!!

Nothing else was on late at night so I watched this movie. It's got to be the worst movie ever made. The acting is atrocious. The script is incomprehensible and since it's a very low budget movie I will forgive the prop and make-up departments for being "cheesy"; but a low budget shouldn't be an excuse for the lack of storyline. Even if the reason you wanted to watch this movie was to see bare breasted women romping about then the movie will leave you wanting because the only women getting naked were the ones nobody wanted to give a second look at anyway; all the good looking ones kept their clothes on.

If I could give it a minus score I would've. As I said before, I'll excuse the acting, the props, the makeup and even the location shots because the budget was so low; but there just is no excuse for the storyline being so incomprehensible. Even if you try to explain it away as "apocalyptal" or avant-garde it doesn't excuse the fact that this movie is purely BAD.

I bought this movie on a whim for several reasons.

A: I love glam, and it was compared to Hedwig and the Angry Inch {fav movie} in preview.

B: I'm a feminist and I thought the synopsis {"when man turns to ape, woman turns to woman"} was rather amusing.

C: I LOVE TROMA!

It was everything I could have hoped for and more! Beautiful glamorous women killing neanderthal-like men ,and women who get in their way. It was beautifully shot in color and black and white, in 16 days with $16,000. Combine the unique vision of John Cameron Mitchel + Wes Anderson + Oliver Stone + Baz Luhrman and you might have an idea of John Michael McCarthy. Wrap all that together with a dash of Troma and you have Superstarlet A.D.!