[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Olhar de Anjo

Título original: Angel Eyes
  • 2001
  • R
  • 1 h 42 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,7/10
26 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Jennifer Lopez in Olhar de Anjo (2001)
Home Video Trailer from Universal Studios Home Entertainment
Reproduzir trailer2:24
4 vídeos
45 fotos
Drama psicológicoDramaRomance

Um homem misterioso é atraído por uma policial e segue um relacionamento incomum, pois nem tudo é o que parece.Um homem misterioso é atraído por uma policial e segue um relacionamento incomum, pois nem tudo é o que parece.Um homem misterioso é atraído por uma policial e segue um relacionamento incomum, pois nem tudo é o que parece.

  • Direção
    • Luis Mandoki
  • Roteirista
    • Gerald Di Pego
  • Artistas
    • Jennifer Lopez
    • Jim Caviezel
    • Jeremy Sisto
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,7/10
    26 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Luis Mandoki
    • Roteirista
      • Gerald Di Pego
    • Artistas
      • Jennifer Lopez
      • Jim Caviezel
      • Jeremy Sisto
    • 192Avaliações de usuários
    • 60Avaliações da crítica
    • 39Metascore
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 3 vitórias e 5 indicações no total

    Vídeos4

    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 2:24
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:31
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:31
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:32
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:32
    Angel Eyes

    Fotos45

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 38
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal49

    Editar
    Jennifer Lopez
    Jennifer Lopez
    • Sharon Pogue
    Jim Caviezel
    Jim Caviezel
    • Steven 'Catch' Lambert
    Jeremy Sisto
    Jeremy Sisto
    • Larry Pogue, Sr.
    Terrence Howard
    Terrence Howard
    • Robby
    Sonia Braga
    Sonia Braga
    • Josephine Pogue
    Victor Argo
    Victor Argo
    • Carl Pogue
    Monet Mazur
    Monet Mazur
    • Kathy Pogue
    Shirley Knight
    Shirley Knight
    • Elanora Davis
    Danny Mags
    Danny Mags
    • Larry Pogue, Jr.
    • (as Daniel Magder)
    Guylaine St-Onge
    Guylaine St-Onge
    • Annie Lambert
    • (as Guylaine St. Onge)
    Connor McAuley
    • Max Lambert
    Jeremy Ratchford
    Jeremy Ratchford
    • Ray Micigliano
    Peter MacNeill
    Peter MacNeill
    • Lieutenant Dennis Sanderman
    Eldridge Hyndman
    • Jamal
    Kari Matchett
    Kari Matchett
    • Candace
    Michael Cameron
    • Charlie
    Marcello Thedford
    Marcello Thedford
    • Peebo
    Dave Cox
    Dave Cox
    • K-Dog
    • Direção
      • Luis Mandoki
    • Roteirista
      • Gerald Di Pego
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários192

    5,726.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    Theoriginaltruebrit

    Out of the blue - a good movie.

    So let me set the scene here, I was in a motel, in the middle of nowhere, and was flicking through the channels of the limited cable that the motel offered... I spotted Jim Caveizel (or however on earth you spell his name) and put down the remote as he is an actor that I admire and respect. Of course JLo then came into the scene and my instinct was to pick up the remote and flick the channel but I didn't and I am glad that I made that decision. Not being a fan of JLo I have never seen Angel Eyes and had no reason to seek it out either on video or on the TV but hell when you are in a motel with limited cable options you don't have alot of choice right? Nevertheless, I was thoroughly delighted that I left the remote where it was and watched this movie because in the end I loved it. I loved it more for the subtle points than the big "hollywood this is a romance you better weep points." "Hang up and I'll call your machine" in this day and age how relevant is that? how many people (if they would be honest) would much rather talk to a machine than the person because it is impersonal and they can save face? The teeny tiny aspect of him playing the notes of the trumpet on her back as they were dancing... okay so I am married to a musician so that resonates with me but it spoke volumes, no matter how much he had tried to block it out, his soul was still there, and in his soul was his music. I thought both leads played their roles with skill and conviction. I was never quite sure (until the end of course) if Catch was a good guy or a bad guy, and I liked the fact that it kept me guessing. As I said I am not a JLo fan, in fact I could be described as quite the opposite but in this movie she played her part beautifully, with conviction and totally believably. Jim Caveizel as always was understated, calm and played his role with a sympathy that is rare to see. Loved this movie, and cannot wait to see it again. I will agree with everyone however about the advertising hype that surrounded it, they ended up portraying it as a psychological thriller, if they had stayed true to the story and advertized it for what it was, a beautiful romance, I think it would not have died as it did. Shame on the publicity people for burying such a fine film.
    8JCR-4

    I thought this film was brilliant

    I have to say I can't believe some of the reviews I've read of this film here. I thought this film was extremely well acted, had an original story line, and a quirky but interesting script. I'm impressed by Jennifer Lopez's acting, James Caviezel's interpretation was fantastic and there was great chemistry between them on the set. I was intrigued right throughout. It was well-paced, and just had a good feel about it, something which I find is missing in 95% of films being made these days. 9 out of 10.
    Chrysanthepop

    Catch and Pogue

    Mandoki's 'Angel Eyes' is one movie that I had walked out on, twice. But for some reason, I stayed through the whole film during the third viewing, and I'm glad I did. Now, the problem with 'Angel Eyes' is the incoherence during the entire first hour. The story unfolds into something different each time while not staying within the frame of the main story. It's confusing. It's misleading. That works for some movies but not for 'Angel Eyes'. The reason why I had walked out earlier was because at some point the movie really drags but once the characters confront their own pain, the conflicts are presented and somewhat resolved. I appreciate Mandoki's attempt in telling the story of two lonely characters: One who is traumatized by a past event that changed his life and the other who has been neglected (almost disowned) by her family because she did the right thing. In spite of the mess in the beginning, he gets most of it right towards the end. The confrontation scene between Sharon and her family at the 'vow-renewal party' and the scene where Catch visits his wife and child's grave are very well executed. I liked the chemistry between Caviezel and Lopez. James Caviezel delivers a quietly subtle performance. It seems as though the part was made for him. Jennifer Lopez is a mixture. While she was terrible in some scenes, there were some shining moments of excellent acting, especially in the beginning and the latter half. She also carries off the copper role very well, just like she did in 'Out of Sight'. So, I guess it wasn't such a bad watch as I had thought earlier. Just needed some patience.
    JohnnyNoGood

    Under Appreciated

    There are many films in the past years that are so under appreciated, tossed

    away from theaters and dismissed by the masses. Films like Donnie Darko and

    Rounders fall into this category. And Angel Eyes follows their path. It's a very well-written, well-acted drama with the unstoppable Jim Caviezel and Jennifer Lopez. As many have said, this IS Lopez's best film to date and she truly shines. And Caviezel is amazing. He's one of my favorite actors and his performance,

    like all of his other films, is utterly spectacular. The dialogue is flawless and although the story takes a while to progress and the pacing is slow, Angel Eyes is worth checking out.
    7purrlgurrl

    A gentle love story

    First, note to all brain dead film makers: If you're going to open your film with a location shot that includes Toronto's CN Tower, don't set the story in Chicago.

    I'm sick of seeing obviously Canadian cities substituting for New York, Boston, Chicago, etc, etc. If you're going to film in Toronto, Vancouver, or Montreal then, you airheads, set the story in those cities. Or . . . don't choose filming locations and shots that scream you're not even in the U.S., never mind the city you purport to be the story's location.

    That aside, I really enjoyed this film, mainly because Jennifer Lopez and Jim Caviezel are so likable together here. This is one of Lopez's better performances as well. She's as good as she was in "Out of Sight."

    The film is a gentle love story about two people haunted by having unwittingly destroyed their families. They have a brief, chance encounter during one family's tragedy, and then as strangers are drawn together a year later; neither having a conscious recollection of the other. The relationship that develops after their second meeting gives both the strength to acknowledge and come to terms with their losses as well as find healing in each other.

    Interesses relacionados

    Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet in Brilho Eterno de uma Mente sem Lembranças (2004)
    Drama psicológico
    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight: Sob a Luz do Luar (2016)
    Drama
    Ingrid Bergman and Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca (1942)
    Romance

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Jennifer Lopez insisted that the part of Catch be played by Jim Caviezel even though she didn't even know his name. She had recently been impressed with his performance in Além da Linha Vermelha (1998).
    • Erros de gravação
      The night before Catch and Sharon's breakfast date, we see that Sharon has a digital clock radio on her bedside table. The next morning Sharon is awakened by an old fashioned alarm clock. Later in the movie, a bedroom scene shows the digital clock radio back again and the old fashioned alarm clock gone.
    • Citações

      Catch: [Catch is at the cemetery looking at the headstones of his wife and son] Annie. Max. I don't want you to think I forgot you, it's just that I couldn't find you. I woke up and you were gone, everything was gone, it just disappeared in one minute. I couldn't remember that minute, I lost it, but I think I found it all now. I used a calculator, see. Do you know we get about 1500 minutes a day?, so I figured it out. I was 29 years old, three months and eight days, so it was minute number 14,500,980 or so. That's the one I lost and when I lost that minute, I guess I... I tried to lose it all, all the memories because it hurt so bad. I tried, but... but I couldn't do it. Max, you were sick that day, remember?, it was your birthday and you ate too much. Annie, you said ''Slow down, it's wet, okay?'' And you were right, I should have slowed down. I should have slowed down lots of times, but I didn't always listen. I didn't listen when you, when you said, ''Steve, just please spend more time.'' That day I made you smile, Max, remember? You looked at me and I made a face and then we all smiled. It was a great minute. It was. I'm so glad l found that minute and no matter what... no matter what, I won't forget anymore. I won't forget anymore, I love you.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      "Turning Away" performed by Mary Black (elevator and furniture scene) not listed in movie credits?!
    • Versões alternativas
      All UK versions were cut to obtain a 15-rating. Warner Brothers had to remove the aggressive use of the word "cunt", or the film would have been rated 18.
    • Conexões
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: A Knight's Tale/Angel Eyes/About Adam/The King Is Alive/Bread and Roses (2001)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      My Life
      Written by Dido (as Dido Armstrong), Rollo (as Rollo Armstrong) and Mark Bates

      Performed by Dido

      Courtesy of Cheeky Records, London / Arista Records, Inc.

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes18

    • How long is Angel Eyes?Fornecido pela Alexa

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 19 de outubro de 2001 (Brasil)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Central de atendimento oficial
      • Warner Bros.
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Ojos de ángel
    • Locações de filme
      • Elora, Ontário, Canadá(Diving/Swimming Scene, Elora Gorge)
    • Empresas de produção
      • Morgan Creek Entertainment
      • Franchise Pictures
      • The Canton Company
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 53.000.000 (estimativa)
    • Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
      • US$ 24.174.218
    • Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
      • US$ 9.225.575
      • 20 de mai. de 2001
    • Faturamento bruto mundial
      • US$ 29.715.606
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 42 min(102 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.