Namkeen

A nice hand at good storytelling. Three adept actresses and 1 adept actor, carries this romantic story right to the end and nicely. The name suggested that the film would be comic or chucklesome or both but the film is weighted, thoughtful and maybe at times even thought-provoking. The show of the sisters being innocent pure and sinless & being disciplined by the eldest in every sphere of life , just before the corruption sets in, is very well portrayed . Alas, One of those gems that never got discovered or maybe even rejected after getting discovered. My two hours were spent nicely & nostalgically, compared to the gorge of trash that normally gets dished out by Bolly.

I just read abladabla's review and since it was written in March 2004, I assume it must have been for the DVD version. I saw this movie as a kid, I must have been 10 or so. I picked up the DVD yesterday and was disappointed that the ending had been changed. I remember that it was a very real and tragic, yet hopeful ending. The DVD had Girulal driving away in his truck in the final scene (song). The original movie had him come back to find the small household gone.

Email me if you want to know what happened because I don't want to put the ending here and get blocked by IMDb.

Gulzar has always told stories worth telling. He brings together his talents as a writer, director and an artist to weave a deeply human story that touches you. He makes it entertaining while bravely delving into the depths of the story, even if it's likely to be unpopular. He does this with dialogues that are realistic and yet laden with emotion and drama. I have been amazed at his work in Mausam, Maachis, Ijaazat and other movies. Certainly one of India's best artists. He deserves to be recognized as such.

Very disappointing specially at the end. Just no drama - no pathos - story just ends very weak. Great actors - Sharmila, Shabana, Sanjeev Kumar but very weak story. Name suggests it is a comedy but really it is a slow winding movie that leads nowhere. Nice portrayal of a village in the hills in the uncomplicated times - an India which we don't see anymore. Sanjeev Kumar had pretty good acting and so did Sharmila. The scenes by themselves were interesting but no spell binding story to hold your attention. Pretty good acting by the little girl too. It is the story of a truck driver who rents a house owned by a old lady and her 3 daughters. Predicatably there is the undertone of romance and challenges.

Review By Kamal K

The more you watch, the more you fell in love with this masterpiece by the great GULZAR sahab and cast most prominently Sanjeev Kumar and waheeda Rehman were outstanding ..... Gem and a must watch for old indian movie lovers.

I have watched almost all Gulzar films. Ijaazat, Aandhi, Mausam, Machis, Meera, Kitaab, Koshish, Parichay, Khushboo, Angoor and Kinara - all were nice. Some close to masterpieces, others great work and just a few not-so-good ones. Like 'Mere Apne' wasn't too appealing for me. Lekin, Achanak, Hu Tu Tu and Libaas are those I haven't seen yet. But still there are certain elements that are common in almost all Gulzar films. 1. Stories of longing, unfulfilled love (Ijaazat, Aandhi, Mausam, Machis, Khushboo and Kinara) 2. Screenplays with strategic flash-backs and flash-forwards (Ijaazat, Aandhi, Mausam, Machis, Kitaab and Kinara) 3. Mature, multilayered characters who talk like Gulzar (all of his films) 4. A title that can be interpreted in beautiful ways (Ijaazat, Aandhi, Mausam, Kitaab, Parichay, Khushboo, Angoor, Kinara)

This time it was different. It was again a story of longing, of unfulfilled love. But its screenplay structure is slightly different. It looks more like a Shyam Benegal, Mrinal Sen, Govind Nihalani type of screenplay, with Gulzar's dialogues. It takes its own time to grow, moves slowly and is not as cerebral as his other screenplay structures. Even the plot points are subtle and not dramatic enough.

There is one flashback sequence, coming late in the movie. Otherwise it is a linear narrative.

Characters are mature but not multilayered. They are simple, which is a welcome change from Gulzar. They are poor, caught in the simple troubles of life. For them, everyday bread is a greater concern than falling in love. They are not very educated and although they still 'talk like Gulzar', they are more like themselves.

And the title is based on one of the principal characters.

It is more like an European film. Its drama is like that of a Kieslowski film. It is more like an account of the lives of these people than a complete story with dramatic twists.

It is still great. And it ends in a beautiful and haunting manner. Moving you deeply.

Now, the catch.

I have watched this film just today. And what I come to know is - the DVD version is abridged. The original cut had a dramatic twist in the end. Hence the lack of drama that I talked about in my comment. I read what the original ending was. But I prefer it this way. The DVD version was good enough for me. I doubt the original cut would have appealed me equally.

It is a must watch for Gulzar fans. For those who are new to his cinema, you should first go for Ijaazat, Maachis, Mausam, Aandhi, Kitaab and Koshish.