Yavanika

Good Movie. Everybody acted well in the movie. BGM in the movie was worst. The movie was somewhat interesting and thrilling. The movie bored and dragged a lot because of many unwanted scenes. Good Movie.

It was like a time-machine for me. The movie was really smart (although it might seem a bit cliche), it upheld the charm throughout. I keep watching it every few years. It's a treat!

As it says in the trivia, I'm so close to the Rashomon effect in this film. The narrative process is similar to Rashomon. The movie is going so slowly and the interrogation sequence is a little bit longer because each one in that drama camp should have to be questioned. The editing technique was the scene cut seems astonished to me because at that time the director gave a sense of magical making along with that scene. That two cuts remembers me of many new films which that editing pattern as a fresh one. A nice thriller to watch. Yavanika.

Not much of a mystery for today's viewer. Within 15 minutes of the start of the movie, you can come up with an educated guess who the murderer is, by the obvious facial expressions and body language of the characters. Mammotty shows up almost half way through the movie as a police investigator. 1982 was still early days for him so his powerful on screen presence that we are use to today, wasn't present back in the days, he was just a competent actor. Bharath Gopi plays a despicable womaniser and rapist. The use of Rashomon effect was a creative touch that could be appreciated. Overall just a straight forward story with not much twists or turn.

Watching a classic of 1982 in the year 2014 and deriding it for lacking new-age panache would never do justice to the film. So, Yavanika, in all its glory, could be considered a masterpiece.

Because of the narration. No one would even guess the film is about murder. It starts with the proceedings of drama troupe as they rehearse, perform and interact with each other. The character development is amazing; each character is idiosyncratic and their stories all are told beautifully. Take Nedumudi Venu as the flirty dandy or even Jagathy Sreekumar in one of his initial comic roles or Thilakkan as the troupe manager.

The story advances quickly in the second half as Mammootty enters the scene to investigate the missing of a troupe member who is known to be a drunk bastard. We could guess who the murdered might be, but all the following sequences negate our guesses. The interrogation, actual field investigation all will keep you hooked. The dialogs are both witty & apt. Even the songs are classics and I sat there asking my partner "Oh! That song is from this movie!"

K G George has captured his sets nicely: the murder spot, the troupe's hub and even the performing stage. I didn't much like the performance by Jalaja. But Ashokan is terrific. The climax is good. The makers concentrated not only on murder as a tool to convey a message, but they also evince shades of poverty, adultery, romance, alcoholism, assault, policing, and the elements surrounding drama as a genre.

BOTTOM LINE: If you are in your mid-20s as of year 2014, then you may not appreciate the film. Because chances are you may have watched many similar films. But if you are above 40, I bet you will appreciate the sheer mastery behind the film which is considered one of the best not only in Malayalam cinema but also in the world.

Can be watched with a typical Indian family? YES