Lichtspiel Opus 1.

I just found this info on Opus I:

In 1914 World War I disrupted the lives of millions of people world wide, and Ruttmann was no exception. He served as a lieutenant in the German army durring the war, and when the war ended in 1918 he became increasingly dissatisfied with the medium of painting. The main problem Ruttmann saw in the medium was its inherently static nature. A painter could attempt to capture some sense of motion in his paintings, but the paintings were, in the end, fixed in place forever. We are told that Ruttmann made a comment, shortly after the end of the war, to the effect that it made no sense to continue painting, unless the paintings could be set in motion(Starr). In 1921, in Frankfort, Germany, he realized this desire with the release of his first abstract film, and indeed the first abstract film the world had ever seen: Lichtspiel Opus I. As is evident from its title, the film combined the separate art forms of painting and music into one work. The film featured moving patterns of light set to a custom score, written specially for Lichtspiel Opus I by Max Butting. The film was a great success, making a lasting impression on people such as Bernhard Diebold, film reviewer for the Frankfurter Zeitung, and Oskar Fischinger, future avant-garde filmmaker in his own right. Ruttmann went on to produce three more completely abstract films, Opus II, Opus III, and Opus IV, which were all well recieved at the time.

This is an interesting experimental short feature by Walther Ruttman that, while simple in its effect, took some creative thinking and innovation to come up with. Very few things like this had been done at the time, and the basic concept took advantage of Ruttman's painting experience as well as his theories on art.

The basic concept is similar to one or two of the more abstract sequences from "Fantasia", with one difference being that the score for "Opus I" was produced specifically to accompany the images, rather than adapting the images to an already-known piece. The harmony between the music and the abstract shapes of light works well.

"Opus I" is one of Ruttman's abstract experiments that show his imagination and his willingness to experiment. Of course, this little feature can hardly be compared with his wonderful creation, "Berlin: Symphony of a Great City", of a few years later. In itself, though, "Opus I" is a pleasant if simple piece, one that probably gets the most out of the basic idea without trying to stretch it too far.

I would like to know more about this great short. Did Ruttmann write the mesmerizing score himself?

Opus one is a German Short which consists of a great score for strings over which abstract animation (in color) is played. Think Toccata in Fugue in D minor in the original Fantasia.

I found this work very interesting and I,d love to have this score on CD, it sounds like Shostakovitch meets Richard Strauss!

This was included on the DVD for "Berlin: Symphony of a Great City". It's also by Walter Ruttman and is an early and much shorter film. It consists of animates shapes going back and forth across the screen--all set to music that was added for the DVD (since the film is a silent). It's all a bit hypnotic but the sort of film only a small select group could love. Believe me, the average person out there would only scratch their head at this one! You know it's a pretty dull film when you get excited late in the film when one of the moving blobs is red! Because it's so experimental and non-commercial in style, I'll elect not to score this one. It's one you just need to see for yourself...or not.

The isn't, of course, an actual movie as I'd understand the term: it's a piece of music with multi-coloured pictorial accompaniment... in an interesting reversal of the norms of its day, when music would usually be the accompaniment to 'colour' the emotions and message of the silent picture! It's pretty good music, too.

The actual picture motifs are simple and repetitive, bordering on a lava-lamp effect, and move against a variety of coloured backgrounds. I felt that the effect didn't quite outstay its welcome, as new variations are introduced every so often, but it does fall somewhere between the tedious and the hypnotic; I found my attention wandering to the question of by what combinations of dyes and coloured film stock the various colour combinations had been achieved, and away from the actual performance. I also found myself automatically attempting to ascribe meaning to the abstracts: searchlights, the sails of boats, bats' wings, or clouds sweeping across the sun.

An interesting experiment, although not exactly in my line: worth hearing for the music, anyway.