AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
44 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
George Banks deve lidar não apenas com a gravidez de sua filha, mas também com a gravidez inesperada de sua esposa.George Banks deve lidar não apenas com a gravidez de sua filha, mas também com a gravidez inesperada de sua esposa.George Banks deve lidar não apenas com a gravidez de sua filha, mas também com a gravidez inesperada de sua esposa.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 2 indicações no total
Kimberly Williams-Paisley
- Annie Banks-MacKenzie
- (as Kimberly Williams)
Kate McGregor-Stewart
- Joanna MacKenzie
- (as Kate McGregor Stewart)
Avaliações em destaque
I enjoyed this film, as I did Father of the Bride (1991), though I had to suspend my credulity a lot. This film was less realistic than the film it was based on, Father's Little Dividend (1951), with Spencer Tracy and Elizabeth Taylor. For example, it's unlikely that George Banks, a highly successful business owner who obviously must think through his decisions, would be so impetuous as to sell the house he loves and end up having to buy it back at a significant mark-up. (George and Nina decide to sell following a rainstorm that caused their kitchen ceiling to leak, even though the house had two storeys above it.) The new baby *wing* which the Banks then decide to build on to their repurchased home is equally ridiculous, since the house is already huge and only young son Matty is still at home. Between the ill-conceived house sale and repurchase, the posh baby wing and the lavish baby shower, featuring storks flown in from Austria, I don't think George Banks could possibly have spent more money. In the previous film, Father of the Bride (1991), Bryan's parents were portrayed as wealthy, but George is clearly a millionaire himself. I did enjoy this movie -- it's funny, romantic and very warm, with beautiful sets -- but I would have preferred a little less over-the-top consumerism.
This movie is as thin as you can get. Its' emotions are easily played. There are no surprises. It is very predictable. And I say...so what? What is wrong with that? This is an American Dream movie. Everything goes perfectly and everyone is as happy as can be. Why should it be a complicated character study? It deals with the birth of babies. There's no complex feelings that need to be dealt with in this situation. A life is being created. A family is being blessed. A baby's birth is a time for love and hope. This movie has both in spades. It's a very positive movie that shows the joy a new baby brings. Every parent-to-be should watch it. A child's birth is an emotional event with no equal. This movie knows it and milks it for all its' worth. My only complaint is it should have been called Parents of the Bride. Way too much time is spent with the relationship between Steve Martin and Diane Keaton. There should have been more attention paid to Kimberly Williams. Not only were the scenes between her and Martin the best scenes in this and the original, but Kimberly Williams is the most beautiful actress to come out of Hollywood in many years. Forget all the blond, silicone filled, bimbos that every teenage boy raves about. Ms. Williams is a natural beauty that is a true role model for all young girls. She, and her character, is beautiful, intelligent, and has a heart of gold. Had her relationship with Martin been more focused, this sequel would have surpassed the original. While it doesn't do that, it is still a perfect film for the entire family to watch. *** out of ****.
That is one of my favorite lines, followed by "and pack up your things and hit the road! And don't trample the daisies!" Or he says something like that.
Anyway. I went and saw this in theaters and amazingly enough, I really liked it. One of the best Steve Martin films next to Bowfinger and Planes, Trains and Automobiles. I enjoyed the acting, I enjoyed the story and everything else about this movie that made it great. It wasn't a comedy going from one zinger to the next but something well thought out and well written.
If your looking for a lite movie with some fun, I recommend seeing this movie.
Anyway. I went and saw this in theaters and amazingly enough, I really liked it. One of the best Steve Martin films next to Bowfinger and Planes, Trains and Automobiles. I enjoyed the acting, I enjoyed the story and everything else about this movie that made it great. It wasn't a comedy going from one zinger to the next but something well thought out and well written.
If your looking for a lite movie with some fun, I recommend seeing this movie.
In the sequel to the brilliant Father Of The Bride, Nina Banks and her daughter Annie are both pregnant and George Banks, being his usual nervous self has to learn to get used to the idea that he's going to be a father again AND a grandfather.
The whole cast including, Steve Martin, Diane Keaton, Kimberly Williams and Martin Short are all back here giving good performances.
Even though Father Of The Bride Part II is not as good as the first Father Of The Bride, this is still a great movie which is enjoyable and fun all the way through and that's why I'm going to give this good sequel a 10/10.
The whole cast including, Steve Martin, Diane Keaton, Kimberly Williams and Martin Short are all back here giving good performances.
Even though Father Of The Bride Part II is not as good as the first Father Of The Bride, this is still a great movie which is enjoyable and fun all the way through and that's why I'm going to give this good sequel a 10/10.
I thought the movie was quite funny, especially scenes like Martin Short doing a workout with the pregnant mother and daughter...that was really great! Martin Short is basically one of the highlights of the movie...his accent is so weird and funny that you have to love him. Steve Martin was also good, and I liked his reactions to everything. Overall, the flick was better than the first one, and cute. But after awhile, Steve Martin gets a bit annoying with his obsessing over the pregnant women.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe set used for the interior of the Banks' home had to be rebuilt from scratch for the sequel. With no presumption of a sequel during production of the original movie, the set was destroyed after production completed. Set crew had to recreate the entirety of the set based only on a few remnant sketches of the original set, and had to estimate most measurements, based on the known sizes of various reference items in the original film.
- Erros de gravaçãoAnnie and Bryan's wedding invitation is shown with the date October 30 when in O Pai da Noiva (1991) they were married January 6th.
- Citações
Franck Eggelhoffer, Howard Weinstein: [both chanting to George] Every party has a pooper, that why we invited you! Party pooper! Party pooper! Every party has a pooper, that's why we invited you, George Baaanks!
- Trilhas sonorasGive Me the Simple Life
Written by Rube Bloom and Harry Ruby
Arranged by Alan Silvestri and Robert F. Mann (as Bob Mann)
Performed by Steve Tyrell
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Everything New on Hulu in August
Everything New on Hulu in August
There's a whole lot to love about Hulu's streaming offerings this month — get excited for brand-new series premieres and film favorites to watch at home.
- How long is Father of the Bride Part II?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- El padre de la novia Parte II
- Locações de filme
- West Dayton Street & South Delacy Street, Pasadena, Califórnia, EUA(gang encounter scene)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 30.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 76.594.107
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 11.134.978
- 10 de dez. de 1995
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 76.594.107
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 46 min(106 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente