Jacó

i found Jacob to be intriguing and a great biblical story of love, first i am not that familiar with most bible story's probably because the religious folk only tell us what they deem most significant IE moses ,jesus etc i had never heard the more personal side of his life and am glad i got to watch this.

however i think Jacob's story should be as told as other more well known biblical figures as it allows us to hear story's other than the thou shall and thou shalt not and all other story's parent's tell there children to frighten them. if you are interested in the bible i would highly recommend you watch this and the cast give a emotional and convincing performance. a beautiful if not tragic love story.

In land of Canaan lives Isaac : Joss Ackland, and his wife Rebekah : Irene Papas . Both of whom have two twins sons : the valiant , strong Esau : Sean Bean and the shy, silent Jacob : Mathew Modine. Esau is a brave, fearless hunter while Jabob is a lonely shepherd who is usually caring sheep. While Jacob is more compassionate, sensitive and tender than Esau. The good mother Rebekah is convinced that Jacob is the chosen heir, and due to God announced her long time ago : "two nations are within your womb, two manner of men shall be delivered , the one shall be stranger than the other and the elder shall serve the younger" . However, Jacob is the second born son, and he has not right in his father's inheritance against the desires his mother . Shortly after, Jacob is preparing a lentil porridge when his famished brother Esau asks him some food, Jacob agrees but only one condition, that Esau sell him his birthright .The starving Esau agrees it, though he gives little value to its meaning , and they eventually conclude the covenant. Later on, Rebekah prepares a ploy, as Jacob replaces Esau when Issac is blind and almost dying, and he then obtains his blessing as the main heir instead Esau. To be aware of Jacob blessing, Rebekah advises Jacob to flee due to the kill intention of his brother Esau . In his way to Haran, Jacob experienced a weird vision in which he saw a long stair to heaven, the famous Jacob's ladder and at the stair top, he heard the God's voice while shouting blessings to Jacob. Along the way Jacob fights an Angel and other incidents. Arriving in Haran Jacob meets Rebeca : Lara Flynn Boyle, and falls for her. Jacob asks his uncle Laban : Giancarlo Giannini for marrying her, but he has to carry out a hard condition by working 14 years for him. But then Jacob is deceived again, as in the wedding night Rebeca is replaced by her sister Lea : Juliet Aubrey. A bit later on, Laban gave him his daughter Rachel in exchange of other seven years working.

Biblical story narrated on The Genesis Book from the Holy Bible. This is the classy Biblic history with usual ingredients, dramas confrontation and romances. However, here lacks battles, epic events and spectacular settings. As it is a medium budget film, without pompa, shot simply on the usual location in Morocco .Well played by a very fine main and support cast. Matthew Modine is nice as as the good shepherd who God finally appoints as ruler of Israel and Father of Israelis. Lara Flynn Boyle is attractive as Rachel and Juliet Aubrey as her sister is charming . Remaining cast is excellent as Joss Ackland playing Isaac, Irene Papas as Rebekah, Giancarlo Giannini as Jacob's father-in-law, Christopher Ohrt as Morah, Yvonne Scio and brief appearance by a young Christopher Waltz.

It packs a sensitive and adequate musical score by Marco Frisina under supervision by the great Ennio Morricone. And colorful, evocative cinematography by Ennio Guarneri. The motion picture was professionally directed by Peter Hall. He was director of the Royal Shakespeare Company, as he took over the direction of the National Theatre from Sir Laurence Olivier. Peter Hall, Rebecca Hall's father, also directed some films as Never talk to strangers, The homecoming, La traviata, Perfect Friday, Work is a 4-letter word. Rating 6/10. Entertaining religious epic for the Bible lovers.

There were not very many errors or even extra-biblical plot elements. I would guess that there are not more than a dozen films that are both widely available and as accurate as this one. Still there were a few odd things that made me wonder...like at the start of the film, Jacob is with "his grandfather"? How can this be? The last time we know for certain that both Isaac and Abraham were alive together was earlier in Genesis when Eliezer returns from finding a wide for Isaac.

Abraham must have died somewhere around the time either just before or just after the twins (Jacob and Esau) were born. In the film, Isaac and Abraham actually die within the same year, or possibly Isaac dies first! Well, that is trivial but my point and my concern is that when a film is as accurate as this it can lead some to learn incorrectly if they assume everything is accurate.

The things I like about this may also seem trivial, but they are plentiful and continue throughout the film. When Jacob has to flee to Laban's village, it takes several days. There was an interesting thing they added to the film that actually may be a logical addition from the story that we are not told. When Jacob leaves for Laban's, the Bible does tell us that Isaac sends him to take a wife. We are not told about a dowry and this is a very interesting mystery. Why? Now only is this a very important custom, but we also know that Abraham and Isaac were very very wealthy. None of the films I have seen even begin to show how much so. When Abraham went on an urgent mission to save Lot (before Sodom was destroyed) he had over 300 men with him that were on his payroll. That many people can watch over HUGE herds but even if they only had 10 animals to watch over per man, this is 3000 head of various animals. Heck, even if he hired a man for EACH ANIMAL, he still has a herd of 300. That is not super rich but certainly not poor. There is no way that anyone would expect to take a wife without a dowry unless his family was very very poor! Yet we have no idea why Jacob arrives without a dowry.

The film postulates that he did have a dowry but that he lost it on the way. This occurs when Jacob sees a man tracking him and fears either his brother or an assassin on his brother's behalf (it is a brother in-law of Esau) and Jacob hurries up a hill with his donkey holding him back. The dowry is packed on the donkey and falls off the hill down to where the assassin is chasing, who after all was most interested in killing him to steal the dowry. This made a lot of sense because I can't figure out any other reason why Jacob would show up without a dowry, knowing his sole purpose was to take a wife and the only other factor was yes, the timing was more urgent because of the fight with Esau.

Another thing I appreciated was a scene soon after he loses the dowry. In the Bible, there is a dream Jacob has about the ladder (known as "Jacob's ladder", and it is symbolic for Christ as the bridge that joins Heaven and earth). The digital effects that were used to depict this though not especially fancy, I thought they were just right in that they were beautiful without being too fancy or "showy" the way so many effects people in modern film seem to over-do their scenes at times. This was a beautiful shimmering golden ladder that came down to the stone lined path that Jacob was following until he laid down to sleep that evening.

The rest of the film was done just as well in following the Bible closer than most screenplays manage, even with a topic as important as the Bible. All of the actors handled several complex situations just right. I don't think I could improve on the screenplay without making it far more complicated so obviously that is unfair of me to expect anything better. The pace even seemed roughly the same as in the Bible in that they glossed over sections we don't know as much about and expanded really only when the detail was available with the only exception as I indicated (the dowry).

The only other way for me to rate this film higher would be for them to somehow make it more interesting, but them that is hypocrisy for me to ask for authenticity and entertainment! The story is what it is. I am rating it an outright 8 as a film and a 10 for a Biblical adaptation. I feel that the production values (the lighting, balance, score etc. things that are normally ignored by most unless they are annoyed by it) were also just right. I just realized that I saw a pack of I think 6 Bible film adaptations and they were all really excellent. It contained all of the best adaptations together, except for "Jesus of Nazareth" (which I have on VHS and is worth buying on its own). The 6-pack includes the story of Saul and David (either 2 separate films by era or probably originally a mini-series), I think it does contain the classic film from the '50s, "The 10 Commandments" (some consider it the best Bible adaptation of all but I think several from this 6-pack are better) and if I find the site I will post comments again. It looks really worth owning.

I don't want to set anyone's expectations too high.. As I have said, this is not the most interesting story to some people but if you go in to it with that in mind I think you will be pleasantly surprised.

It was nice to see the things visually which we read in bible about Jacob. The film focuses on Jacob's hardships in life, even if he gained his father's blessings.

Jacob deceived his father saying he is Esau...through this film another thing is made clear...he too got deceived by his father-in-law as payback.I didn't noticed that fact before....

I liked the way in which Leah was portrayed in the film.The girl's feelings are shown carefully in it. Also Rachel's heart is broken on learning about her father's cunning nature.In pain, she tells the family that Jacob's God will punish you for this.

I had to watch 'Jacob' for my freshmen religion class. While it is interesting enough, I don't think anyone would find it a 'fun' movie. I think the movie requires that you have some sort of religious background. The story of Jacob and Esau is interesting, but I don't think it translates well into film. I'll give it a B-.