[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Dr. Who - O Senhor do Tempo

Título original: Doctor Who
  • Filme para televisão
  • 1996
  • TV-14
  • 1 h 29 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,3/10
11 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Eric Roberts, Paul McGann, Daphne Ashbrook, and Yee Jee Tso in Dr. Who - O Senhor do Tempo (1996)
Ficção científica espacialViagem no tempoAventuraDramaFicção científica

Um Doutor recém-regenerado precisa enfrentar o Mestre e salvar o Universo na virada do milênio.Um Doutor recém-regenerado precisa enfrentar o Mestre e salvar o Universo na virada do milênio.Um Doutor recém-regenerado precisa enfrentar o Mestre e salvar o Universo na virada do milênio.

  • Direção
    • Geoffrey Sax
  • Roteiristas
    • Matthew Jacobs
    • Sydney Newman
    • Donald Wilson
  • Artistas
    • Paul McGann
    • Eric Roberts
    • Daphne Ashbrook
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,3/10
    11 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • Roteiristas
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • Artistas
      • Paul McGann
      • Eric Roberts
      • Daphne Ashbrook
    • 138Avaliações de usuários
    • 27Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total

    Fotos44

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 37
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal21

    Editar
    Paul McGann
    Paul McGann
    • The Doctor
    Eric Roberts
    Eric Roberts
    • The Master…
    Daphne Ashbrook
    Daphne Ashbrook
    • Dr. Grace Holloway
    Sylvester McCoy
    Sylvester McCoy
    • The Doctor
    Yee Jee Tso
    Yee Jee Tso
    • Chang Lee
    John Novak
    John Novak
    • Salinger
    Michael David Simms
    Michael David Simms
    • Swift
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    • Wheeler
    • (as Catherine Lough)
    Dolores Drake
    Dolores Drake
    • Curtis
    Will Sasso
    Will Sasso
    • Pete
    • (as William Sasso)
    Jeremy Radick
    Jeremy Radick
    • Gareth
    Eliza Roberts
    Eliza Roberts
    • Miranda
    Bill Croft
    Bill Croft
    • Motorcycle Policeman
    David Hurtubise
    • Professor Wagg
    • (as Dave Hurtubise)
    Joel Wirkkunen
    • Ted
    Dee Jay Jackson
    • Security Guard
    Gordon Tipple
    Gordon Tipple
    • The Old Master
    Mi-Jung Lee
    • News Anchor
    • Direção
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • Roteiristas
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários138

    6,311.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    G.Spider

    Watchable, but hardly Dr Who at its best.

    At last people can stop taking the proverbial out of the special effects in Dr Who! Instead they can take the proverbial out of the limp plot (if you can call it that). Eric Roberts isn't a patch on either of the previous incarnations of the Master. Paul McGann, however, makes an original Doctor and it's a shame a potentially interesting incarnation of the great Time Lord wasn't allowed to develop. There was a lot of complaining about the kissing scene, but I personally didn't see what was wrong with it as long as the Doctor doesn't turn into James Bond or Captain Kirk. Anyway, since the Doctor has a grand-daughter (Susan) then he must have done more than kiss a woman at some point in his life! But I did see what was wrong with the 'half-human' business. Can't people accept somebody who is an alien?

    This film certainly has its moments and shows great potential for a new series, but it's just a shame Fox couldn't get their act together and make that series instead of allowing it to fall back into the clutches of the money-minded BBC where it'll probably never be seen again.

    Not an example of Dr Who at its best by any means, but if you're a fan of the program like me then it's worth watching just to see the Doctor back in action, if only for one adventure.
    7JeffG.

    A wonderful (if brief) return!

    The only bad thing I can think about the Doctor Who TV movie is that it didn't become a new series. Paul McGann did an excellent job as the Doctor. Hopefully, he'll get another chance to play the role again someday. Loved the new TARDIS console room as well. The movie did a fine job in appealing to both long-time Doctor Who fans and people unfamiliar with the show.
    keenan-1

    Oh, dear.

    The summary says it all: Oh, dear.

    I don't particularly like it when Hollywood attempts to "glamourize" an existing phenomenon in order to rope in lots and lots of new viewers (to make money, of course, what other reason can there be?) but I've grown to accept the fact that it's an established part of the entertainment business. I approached this movie with what I hoped was an open mind, and I was even slightly intrigued by the first five minutes or so of the movie...

    This changed, of course, when suddenly stuff started blowing up, pointless FX started popping up all over the place, and the scriptwriters apparently forgot that they were writing for DOCTOR WHO and seemed to think that they were employed by Chris Carter and the X-FILES, as they started a direct rip-off of the black oil creature, which is suddenly all that's left of the Master. (That this flies in the face of all previous background established by a show that had run for over twenty-five years is only to be expected; after all, it was only a cheesy little British sci-fi show and everyone KNOWS that Hollywood knows best, after all!) I was left with my mouth hanging open, aghast at the mess to which I was being subjected.

    Paul McGann tried. God, how he tried. I can almost see him as the Doctor if I squint. This has nothing to do with the man's acting ability, which is superb, nor does it have to do with his comparatively young age--he was about the same age as Peter Davison was when he took over the role, after all. I just could not believe in a Doctor who was playing second fiddle to a completely new and fictitious TARDIS--say, last time I looked, wasn't the Eye of Harmony something to do with Rassilon back on Gallifrey?

    Let us mercifully pass over the spectacle of the Doctor's first on-screen kiss--except to say that if he was never tempted by some of the companions in his past (particularly Romana, who at least was of the same species!) then why the heck would he be tempted by some jittery Earth woman who didn't particularly like him?

    Please, o scriptwriter, if you're going to use characters and equipment that have been established over a quarter of a century, does it not make sense to have some passing familiarity with what you are writing? Or am I being ridiculous?

    Never mind. At least I still have access to all of the videos of the classic episodes. Be sure that this travesty is one that I have zero interest in acquiring. If you're a fan of the television series, avoid this movie or spend the duration of it weeping for the mess they've made of DOCTOR WHO. If you've never seen the series and are a big fan of on-screen stuff that is really special effects in search of a movie, well, this will be right up your alley. Just don't subject a true fan to this nightmare, please.
    georox29

    What if the movie had worked?

    Just suppose the film had been a reasonable success and maybe gained 10 million viewers in the United States, not that I agreed at all with a US co-production. £3.3 m is not a lot of money, even in 1996 for the BBC themselves to fork out.

    According to Bidding Adeau, there would have been at least 6 other films. Perhaps the next set in the future on a space station penned by Terry Nation? Maybe another with The Cybermen and one with the Daleks?

    I think if the TV series in 2005 works. There should be in parallel like DS9 ran along with Voyager, there should be an attempt to fill the gaps without running into Attack of the Cybermen syndrome. Maybe a few McGann films to see what happens between him and Christopher Eccleston's first appearance.

    The half-human thing and kiss can be all but forgotten. A new TARDIS set.

    If anything I would like to see more of McGann's Doctor. In that rape programme Lying he looked fantastic, still young enough.
    Daggernow

    Not as big a disaster as some of the reviews say it is.

    This attempted pilot for a new Doctor Who series may have faults but I think some of the criticism is off-base. The original Doctor Who series was never a slave to realism or it's own continuity the way shows like Star Trek or The X-Files were. It was more like a long-running comic strip with it's light "who cares about obsessive fan-boys and fan-girls" approach. This show always played fast and loose with it's own continuity and often contradicted what had gone before for the sake of the present story being aired. So many fans went bananas over things like the Doctor being half-human and the Eye of Harmony being on board the Tardis and the Master being able to slither around in that black snake form to find a new host body or why he was put on trial by the Daleks. For a show that always pretty much made it up as it went along that's a waste of time. I've got some random thoughts to throw out about this attempt to revive the series.

    As for the Doctor being half-human I'll repeat my remark about this show making it up as it went along. From what I recall the show was on the air for years before it even established that he was a Time Lord so a sudden revelation about a half-human heritage isn't as way out as it first seems.

    My view on the Master being able to slither around in snake form is also to repeat that this show was never a slave to it's own continuity. I'd like every Dr Who fan who can't sleep at night fretting over this bit to explain to me what the White Form in the story where Tom Baker regenerated into Peter Davison was and why the other regeneration scenes took place without such a White Form "merging" with the Doctor.

    As for why the Eye of Harmony was on board the Tardis I'll say that if a new Doctor Who series had resulted from this pilot movie they could have done a flashback story at some point featuring Sylvester McCoy's Doctor and explained all that.

    I thought the Master being put on trial by the Daleks was kind of cool - sort of like they were saying "This guy is so evil even the Daleks are outraged!" If a new series had resulted they could have done another Sylvester McCoy flashback story at some point to explain what led up to the Master being put on trial by the Daleks. Maybe he tried to take over Skaro and turn all the Daleks into his own personal hit-squad or some other nonsense.

    Sylvester McCoy was pretty cool for agreeing to appear in this movie to give the potential new Doctor Who series a legitimate link to the original British show. The poor guy had to come in with a lame regeneration scene and went out the same way and the effort was for nothing since the show's own fans turned up their noses at this film and the new series was never given a chance. A new Doctor Who series that didn't live up to the continuity geeks' vision of the show would have been better than no Doctor Who series at all. Just another example of the down-side to cult shows.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    9,0
    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    Doctor Who
    6,1
    Doctor Who
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    8,4
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    Doctor Who
    8,5
    Doctor Who
    Torchwood
    7,7
    Torchwood
    Dr. Who e a Guerra dos Daleks
    5,6
    Dr. Who e a Guerra dos Daleks
    Uma Aventura no Espaço e Tempo
    8,2
    Uma Aventura no Espaço e Tempo
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    8,0
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    7,4
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    Night and the Doctor
    8,2
    Night and the Doctor
    Doctor Who: Shada
    7,2
    Doctor Who: Shada
    K-9 and Company
    6,0
    K-9 and Company

    Interesses relacionados

    Leonard Nimoy and William Shatner in Jornada nas Estrelas (1966)
    Ficção científica espacial
    Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd in De Volta para o Futuro (1985)
    Viagem no tempo
    Still frame
    Aventura
    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight: Sob a Luz do Luar (2016)
    Drama
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in Star Wars: Episódio V - O Império Contra-Ataca (1980)
    Ficção científica

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play The Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • Erros de gravação
      Despite losing all of the possessions that were on his person after being checked into the hospital, The Doctor still produces his trademark bag of jelly babies twice. Where did they come from?
    • Citações

      The Doctor: Wait, I remember. I'm with my father, we're lying back in the grass, it's a warm Gallifreyan night...

      Grace: Gallifreyan?

      The Doctor: Gallifrey. Yes, this must be where I live. Now where is that?

      Grace: I've never heard of it. What do you remember?

      The Doctor: A meteor storm. The sky above us was dancing with lights. Purple, green, brilliant yellow. Yes!

      Grace: What?

      The Doctor: These shoes. They fit perfectly!

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play the Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • Versões alternativas
      The version broadcast and released on video by the BBC in 1996 had the following cuts (totalling 1 min 6 secs):
      • The caption "Based on the original series broadcast by the BBC" is removed, although no footage is edited.
      • Chang Lee's gang firing at the departing car.
      • Chang Lee's two friends being shot.
      • The third and fourth gunmen aiming at Chang Lee.
      • The gunmen firing at the TARDIS.
      • The operating scene is heavily edited with many cuts of Grace and her attempts to retrieve the probe from the Doctor's body. The sound of the Doctor's final scream was also removed.
      • A closeup of Chang Lee's neck being twisted and the sound of Bruce's wife's neck snapping. These cuts were waived for the 2001 DVD release.
    • Conexões
      Edited into Comic Relief: Doctor Who - The Curse of Fatal Death (1999)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      In A Dream (I Called Out Your Name)
      Written by Barbara L. Jordan and William Peterkin

      Performed by Pat Hodges

      Courtesy of Heavy Hitters Music

      Played on a grammophone when the Doctor is sitting in the lounge of his Tardis, just before the Master escaped

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes2

    • Is this Dr Who movie definitively linked to both the 1963 and 2005 Dr Who series?
    • Is Paul McGann and his role as the 8th Doctor considered Canon?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 27 de julho de 2000 (Brasil)
    • Países de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
      • Reino Unido
    • Central de atendimento oficial
      • Official site (United Kingdom)
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Doutor Who - O Senhor do Tempo
    • Locações de filme
      • 1988 Odgen Avenue, Vancouver, Colúmbia Britânica, Canadá(Grace's house)
    • Empresas de produção
      • Universal Television
      • BBC Worldwide
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 5.000.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 29 min(89 min)
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby
    • Proporção
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.