Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaHistory is only slightly rewritten: instead of experienced sailors, there are only convicts whose last and only meeting with H2O was their prison diet of bread and water. And Columbus doesn'... Ler tudoHistory is only slightly rewritten: instead of experienced sailors, there are only convicts whose last and only meeting with H2O was their prison diet of bread and water. And Columbus doesn't have his own map.History is only slightly rewritten: instead of experienced sailors, there are only convicts whose last and only meeting with H2O was their prison diet of bread and water. And Columbus doesn't have his own map.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
This film is a tragic waste of the talent assembed to produce it. I'm not sure whether it's the script, the editing, the direction or all three which conspired to make it so bad but it's almost an achievement in itself that so many fine comedy actors were employed in pursuit of such a lost cause.
The Carry On franchise was never intended to be thought-provoking but it's irreverence and cheekiness evoked a more innocent time which, while it may not have really been as innocent as it made out, was well and truly over by the time Columbus hit our theatres. Even with those qualities intact it would have been fairly excruciating in 1992, but it wasn't even that good. It isn't so much of an anachronism as an embarrassment and I'll bet there were a few tense conversations between actors and agents in the period following its release.
We often bemoan the demise of the British film industry, yet we seem to be almost incapable of turning out any decent films with the resources we have.
It's better then the previous two, but that's not saying much, Carry on for me conjures up Sid James, Kenneth Williams, Hattie Jacques, Bernard Bresslaw and Joan Sims. Four couldn't do it and one had the sense not to. So the film is just lacking what it is to be a Carry of film, I'll give plaudits to Jim Dale for battling hard against the awful script he was given.
I've tried to pick out a good bit, I've tried very hard, but I can't find one in there, it's too forced.
I applaud them for trying to continue the line, and for forming a 'new' batch of British comics, sadly it just didn't quite work. 3/10
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesMany of the younger cast members from "alternative comedy" backgrounds attempted to improvise their own material, but director Gerald Thomas angrily vetoed all their attempts, as he wanted this film to be true to the spirit of the prior Carry On entries. However, in the interests of fairness this also meant that Thomas had to forbid improvising by the few remaining Carry On veterans in the cast, something he later admitted worked to the film's detriment.
- Erros de gravaçãoAlthough the film is admittedly a parody and not meant to be historically accurate in any way, it completely eliminates the two other ships that were a part of Columbus's journey - the Nina and the Pinta.
- Citações
Fatima: You mean, the sharks won't eat me whole?
Marco the Cereal Killer: Oh, no! I'm told they spit that bit out first!
- ConexõesFeatured in What's Up Doc?: Episode #1.6 (1992)
- Trilhas sonorasCarry on Columbus
Written and Produced by Malcolm McLaren and Leigh Gorman (as Lee Gorman)
Performed by Jayne Collins and Debbie Holmes
Published by Chrysalis Music/Warner Chappell Music/Island World Music
Principais escolhas
- How long is Carry on Columbus?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Carry on Columbus
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- £ 2.250.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 31 min(91 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1