[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
IMDbPro

The Old Man and the Sea

  • Filme para televisão
  • 1990
  • Not Rated
  • 1 h 33 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,7/10
1,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
The Old Man and the Sea (1990)
Drama

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaBased on the novel by Ernest Hemingway. Santiago goes out on his usual fishing trip and makes a huge catch, the biggest of his life. Then a shark attacks and tries to steal his catch. Santia... Ler tudoBased on the novel by Ernest Hemingway. Santiago goes out on his usual fishing trip and makes a huge catch, the biggest of his life. Then a shark attacks and tries to steal his catch. Santiago battles with the shark for days. He returns to the shore beaten, tattered and torn, and... Ler tudoBased on the novel by Ernest Hemingway. Santiago goes out on his usual fishing trip and makes a huge catch, the biggest of his life. Then a shark attacks and tries to steal his catch. Santiago battles with the shark for days. He returns to the shore beaten, tattered and torn, and his catch consisting now of mostly bones.

  • Direção
    • Jud Taylor
  • Roteiristas
    • Ernest Hemingway
    • Roger O. Hirson
  • Artistas
    • Anthony Quinn
    • Gary Cole
    • Patricia Clarkson
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,7/10
    1,8 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Jud Taylor
    • Roteiristas
      • Ernest Hemingway
      • Roger O. Hirson
    • Artistas
      • Anthony Quinn
      • Gary Cole
      • Patricia Clarkson
    • 32Avaliações de usuários
    • 6Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Indicado para 3 Primetime Emmys
      • 1 vitória e 3 indicações no total

    Fotos5

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal15

    Editar
    Anthony Quinn
    Anthony Quinn
    • Santiago
    Gary Cole
    Gary Cole
    • Tom Pruitt
    Patricia Clarkson
    Patricia Clarkson
    • Mary Pruitt
    Joe Santos
    Joe Santos
    • Lopez
    Valentina Quinn
    Valentina Quinn
    • Angela
    Francesco Quinn
    Francesco Quinn
    • Santiago as a Young Man
    Paul Calderon
    Paul Calderon
    • Anderez
    Sully Diaz
    • Maria
    Jamie Tirelli
    Jamie Tirelli
    Raúl Dávila
      James McDaniel
      James McDaniel
      Rene Raymond Rivera
      Rene Raymond Rivera
        Steven Rodriquez
        Manuel E. Santiago
        • Gomez
        • (as Manuel Santiago)
        Alexis Cruz
        Alexis Cruz
        • Manolo
        • Direção
          • Jud Taylor
        • Roteiristas
          • Ernest Hemingway
          • Roger O. Hirson
        • Elenco e equipe completos
        • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

        Avaliações de usuários32

        6,71.8K
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10

        Avaliações em destaque

        shadowx2302

        read the book first

        I watched the Old Man and the Sea at school for English and I thought it was okay. The plot seems real enough but there is fault in the characters. I read the book and expected that they would make changes, so finding that the old man had a daughter was not a shock to me, but her bad acting contributed to reason this movie was not such a hit. Also Santiago was supposed to be Cuban yet this actor's accent was horrible and he wasn't Cuban. I even heard that he was a famous actor back then and that is why he got the part. Some of the flashbacks were also not in the book which I understand but some had nothing to do with the plot of the story. Santiago was supposed to dream of lions on the beach but instead he dreams of his youth. There were also some good points though, the actor who played Santiago was very good and so was the boy also adding the author of the book into the movie was genius. The big blue marlin at some point looked fake, and the background of the sea, also fake. The scenery of the beach was beautiful though, and it kind of reminded me of my home country. In book and movie, Santiago shows the endurance courage and compassion for the fishes he catches and that is probably what drew people to watch it the first time but know it is not all that popular anymore and would not be a good choice to pick if you wanted to see a good movie. For ratings I would give this movie a four out of ten for good effort even though it really did suck.
        madkeithdog

        This Movie is boring!!!!!!!!!!!

        We watched The Old Man in the sea in English I really did like the movie. There were a lot of good parts. For example when the sharks started attacking the marlin and Santiago was defending the marlin. The book was really different movie because in the movie he had a daughter and the book didn't. There were some parts that were like told over and over again. Also some of the scenes really looked fake like when the marlin jumped out and when the sharks attacked. Also when the sharks came it looked like it was cut out of another movie and put in. But other wise it was really good and there was scenes of Cuba and those were really good parts. Comparing them both I liked the book because it was really detailed and interesting. Also when there was shark coming they said that he caught it but he really didn't. I have seen a lot of parts in the story that were put into the movie. It was really suspenseful at times like when he was attacking the sharks and when he trying to catch the marlin. At times it was really boring and then like after awhile it got rally good again. Over all I thought it was really good, but it was really short and that at the end it didn't make senses. It should have gone on longer then it would make a lot more sense. I would've liked to see when he went to see his grandchildren and how life went for him after the two day journey. I think that people would enjoy it better and people would gave the movie a lot more stars. Over all I would give this movie 6 stars because the way the move came out.

        madkeithdog
        kite288

        A movie so boring I almost cried

        The 1990 version of The Old Man and the Sea is a movie you shouldn't see if you didn't read the book. I watched this movie in my high school English class, and I actually found the book pretty good. When I watched the movie I was really disappointed in what I saw. It had poor graphic quality and most of the cast acted very badly. This movie made me lose all my interest in the book. WARNING SPOLLERS!!! The movie was similar to the book in the way that it put everything in order from beginning to end, with very few things changed. But the main part that was changed is that in the movie Ernest Hemingway's character was in it. He played his role but he was pathetic and ever so false. To me the only character that acted like he was supposed to was Anthony Quinn, but everyone else really sucked. This movie, though similar to the book was very stupid in my opinion. If you are planning to show it for class I recommend that you don't. In all honesty I enjoyed reading the book more than I did watch the movie. It was so boring I almost cried. I wish it wasn't true but the acting just put me to sleep. It was really old fashion and it looked really false. If you were hoping to watch this movie for clarifications, don't, it will just get you really lost. Feel free to watch the movie and disprove me if you want this is just my own opinion. But if you're disappointed at what you see don't say I didn't warn you. I give this movie 3 out of 10. Read the book it's a lot better than the movie.
        8mstomaso

        Excellent TV Adaptation

        Anthony Quinn makes a much better Santiago than Spencer Tracey did, and director Jud Taylor and screenwriter Roger Hirson manage to make the right decisions regarding editing and plot, distilling Hemingway's simple, powerful, story to its fundamental human elements and adding elements of characterization which a more 'faithful' adaptation would have missed.

        It is remarkable that this film was made for television broadcast. It sports a cast and a pedigree well above the typical TV movie of its time, and - with a little more budget - would have made a fine big screen film.

        Santiago is an old man in a small fishing village in Cuba. Some of the local men feel that his failure to catch fish for the last 84 days has brought a curse on the village, and they long for his retirement. Others, including Santiago himself, simply believe that he has had a run of bad luck. Inspired by a young man who worships the kindly old fishermen, a respectful innkeeper, and indirectly, by the sympathetic sentiments of a foreign writer (Tom Pruitt played by Gary Cole) staying in the village, Santiago begins what may be his final voyage out to sea, in search of a big catch.

        Hemingway's story is one of many where the great writer expounds on his unusually sensitive and intelligent views of masculine ideals. In this adaptation of The Old Man and the Sea, however, Hemingway's tendency to diminish female roles in order to make room for men - thankfully - does not come through. Instead, the production team decided to add relationships (such as Santiago and his daughter) which nicely embellish the development of the central character as a passionately independent man who nonetheless loves those around him despite their refusal to understand him (except for his protégé, the young fisherman). The film also nicely touches on issues of aging.

        Tom Pruitt (Gary Cole), is - basically - Hemingway. And this character interprets the old man for us, but subtly, and only as he learns from the example the old man sets - never as an omniscient god-figure who creates and sees clearly. As such, Pruitt and his lover (Patricia Clarkson) reveal something intimate about Hemingway's famously tortured relationship with his craft.

        The story is shot and edited exactly as it should have been, and the feeling of Hemingway's story is much better developed than in the previous Oscar winning Spencer Tracey version. This is true despite the fact that Taylor's film strays much further from the original Hemingway story.

        The film depicts a man struggling with the sea, a crisis of self-confidence, and accusations of uselessness - but who never once loses sight of his prospects and inner strength. The dignity of the character is very admirable, and Anthony Quinn's performance is mesmerizing. Quinn pours his soul into Santiago - and it is clear that the great actor understood his character perfectly. Excellent support is provided by Patricia Clarkson and a very good but largely unknown Latin American cast) Unfortunately, Gary Cole's portrayal of Hemingway is not one of his better efforts and some of his scenes are unconvincing.

        Recommended for Hemingway and Quinn fans - but not for purists. Recommended for patient fans of human drama. Not recommended for people with limited attention spans.
        4lmiller_10

        It was a good effort - - -but

        This was not a film worthy of Tony Quinn. It pales when compared with the Spencer Tracy version. The Quinn effort did not follow the book except a little. People were brought in for some unknown reason who were not in the book and didn't add anything to the story line. The original was a LOT better and followed the book almost to the letter. I realize that the original version was become hard to find, but I bet a look on ebay, Google, or Amazon would turn up a copy. I think that you would really enjoy it. I have a copy of the original Spenser Tracy version and plan to watch it with the book in hand to see how close it is to the book

        Mais itens semelhantes

        O Velho e o Mar
        6,9
        O Velho e o Mar
        Moby Dick
        6,2
        Moby Dick
        O Curandeiro da Selva
        6,0
        O Curandeiro da Selva
        Fugindo do Futuro
        6,4
        Fugindo do Futuro
        Longstreet
        7,8
        Longstreet
        O Velho e o Mar
        8,0
        O Velho e o Mar
        Em Nome do Amor
        7,6
        Em Nome do Amor
        Jacknife
        6,4
        Jacknife
        Zorba, o Grego
        7,6
        Zorba, o Grego
        O Confronto Final
        7,1
        O Confronto Final
        O Leão do Deserto
        8,2
        O Leão do Deserto
        Quando os Bravos se Calam
        7,0
        Quando os Bravos se Calam

        Enredo

        Editar

        Você sabia?

        Editar
        • Curiosidades
          Anthony Quinn requested his part as a birthday present (his 75th) from his producer.
        • Conexões
          Version of O Velho e o Mar (1958)

        Principais escolhas

        Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
        Fazer login

        Detalhes

        Editar
        • Data de lançamento
          • 25 de março de 1990 (Estados Unidos da América)
        • País de origem
          • Reino Unido
        • Central de atendimento oficial
          • arabuloku.com
        • Idioma
          • Inglês
        • Também conhecido como
          • İhtiyar Adam ve Deniz
        • Locações de filme
          • Tortola, Ilhas Virgens
        • Empresas de produção
          • William F. Storke & Robert E. Fuisz
          • Yorkshire Television (YTV)
        • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

        Especificações técnicas

        Editar
        • Tempo de duração
          1 hora 33 minutos
        • Mixagem de som
          • Stereo
        • Proporção
          • 4:3

        Contribua para esta página

        Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
        The Old Man and the Sea (1990)
        Principal brecha
        By what name was The Old Man and the Sea (1990) officially released in Canada in English?
        Responda
        • Veja mais brechas
        • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
        Editar página

        Explore mais

        Vistos recentemente

        Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
        Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
        Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
        Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
        Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
        Para Android e iOS
        Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
        • Ajuda
        • Índice do site
        • IMDbPro
        • Box Office Mojo
        • Dados da licença do IMDb
        • Sala de imprensa
        • Anúncios
        • Empregos
        • Condições de uso
        • Política de privacidade
        • Your Ads Privacy Choices
        IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

        © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.