O Filho da Pantera Cor-de-Rosa

O.K. is the only possible way of analyzing this movie. It does what it set out to do. But if you have seen this movie and were disapointed, did you really think it was going to be as funny or enjoyable as earlier entries in the Pink Panther series? The movie's comedy is very lukewarm. Whether this is the fault of Blake Edwards, or maybe he intended it to be that way is unknown. Roberto Benigni is the Son. O.K, he is now an academy award winner, but in 1993 a complete unknown. If anyone on the movie wanted it to be a success then a bigger name should have been chosen, a David Jason, Dudley Moore or Rowan Atkinson. Benigni, does quite a good impersonation of Peter Sellers throughout the movie, but this aside isn't very funny or charming. The return of cast members like Herbert Lom, Graham Starke, Burt Kwouk and Liz Smith is good. But overall the movie seems forced and is something of a hit and miss. Lets hope the upcoming Mike Myers remake breathes new life into this series.

The "Pink Panther" franchise has spawned a number of movies. The last one in the series is "Son of the Pink Panther." It stars Roberto Benigni as the original Inspector Jacques Clouseau's son. He does a good job stumbling and bumbling his way through the story. It's easy to picture Benigni as a Clouseau-type stumblebum. And a number of characters appear that, although they did not appear in "The Pink Panther," have become familiar in other "Panther" movies. But the last in the line differs somewhat from the original. Its tone isn't quite as lighthearted as the first. It has a lot of violence that seems to taint the movie. Although there are a few good scenes, this movie reminds us all how sorely Peter Sellers is missed.

While riding the subway eight years ago, I saw the billboards for "Son of the Pink Panther" and I really didn't think much about it then. I had yet to become a fan of Blake Edwards' work, and I really hadn't seen any of the previous Panther films.

Flash forward to 1999. Turner Classic Movies had shown the first six entries in the Panther series and I had watched them in chronological order, which I think is a good idea for anyone to do. I had seen "Curse" on tape and I decided to check out "Son of the Pink Panther" just out of curiosity. I had read some reviews, which were pretty dismal. So I had no reason to expect anything great.

Imagine my surprise when I found myself laughing a lot during the 95 minute running time of "Son". This was a clever, funny and very original entry in the long-running "Panther" series. Blake Edwards' instinct was right on the money when he cast Italian comedian Roberto Benigni in the role of Clouseau's illegitimate son. Benigni displays all the traits that made Peter Sellers such a great talent. He plays the comic scenes very straight which sells it so much better than if he had played it slyly. And the films he has made since ("The Monster", "Night on Earth" and "Life Is Beautiful", which was sort of his own "Being There") just confirms my initial reaction. And of course, what is a Panther film without Dreyfus, played as always by Herbert Lom, who works well with Benigni in many memorable sequences.

If I have a complaint about "Son", it is that it tends to get too preoccupied with the plot. The best Panther films didn't depend on plot as much as characterization and "Son" suffers because of it as did Edwards' previous disappointment "Switch". But "Son" has a manic comic energy and polish that "Switch" lacked and the payoffs work as in "Switch" they did not.

"Son of the Pink Panther" is a better film than "Curse", "Revenge" and the original film, but not "Strikes Again", "Return" and "A Shot in the Dark" (of which this film has its roots in) Sadly, Edwards retired from theatrical features after this although he still works in TV. He showed so much vigor and life in "Son" that makes me want to see him make another Panther film, especially with Roberto Benigni. I'm still waiting.

***1/2 out of 4 stars

For hardcore Clouseau/Sellers fans: Go ahead and skip this one. The missing element of Sellers really robs the Pink Panther series of its essence.

For true Edwards fans such as myself: Please see this movie. I don't quite know why Edwards made this, but it was nice to see some of the familiar Panther faces; and slapstick routines that were new to this film. The hospital bed scene with the remote control is classic Edwards. It seems to me he could have used this gag in any new non-panther movie since he has frequently used this type of humor in many other films like "A Fine Mess", "Blind Date", "S.O.B.", "High Time", "What Did You Do In The War, Daddy?", "Victor/Victoria", and "10". Perhaps he was trying to use up some remaining gags he had in his script closet. I guess I'll have to keep waiting patiently for a new Edwards film. And does it always have to be the same comedy routines? Another poignant film like "That's Life" would be nice as well as another thriller like "Experiment in Terror".

I had mixed feelings about the appearance of Claudia Cardinale in this movie. Obviously she is a Pink Panther veteran where she played the Princess so it was nice to see her. In this movie she played the character of Maria Gambrelli which was originally played by Elke Sommer in "A Shot In The Dark". Why she didn't play the same character is strange to me, but then Panther fans may recall that Graham Stark has played several different characters throughout the Pink Panther series, and when Christopher Plummer played David Niven's role in "Return of the Pink Panther", his wife (also a different actress from the original) had a new name. Did he get a divorce? However in "Trail of the Pink Panther" I guess Niven and Capucine reconciled since they once again played the roles of the Phantom and Simone:) ????????? So I guess it was nothing that strange to see Claudia Cardinale appear in the film in a different role.

No pun intended - obviously Peter Sellers was no more by that time. But you have a lot of people involved who were there at the conception of the series (and what a story that is - check it out if you can, how the character came to be) ... and yet you can feel that the most important ingredient is missing. Even Steve Martin couldn't step into the (big) shoes ... not easy to fill.

Same is true for Roberto Begnini ... he has done some ... wonderful movies (see what I did there?), but this is not one of them. At least I wouldn't call it that. We have a love interest, we have again players you could be familiar with if you have seen the other movies ... and yet ... there is a big hole .. there is Sellers missing.

On the other hand, if you are able to just go with the flow ... just accept the silliness this serves you ... a good example is the Son dressed as a doctor "examining" the bad guy ... this is beyond ridiculous ... you'll either find it super funny or be super annoyed by it ... this informs how you feel about the rest of it.

The beginning of the movie with the chase scene is the same .... funny or not - your choice ... I've seen worse of course ... but also way better.