A amante de um oftalmologista ameaça revelar seu caso para sua esposa enquanto um documentarista casado está apaixonado por outra mulher.A amante de um oftalmologista ameaça revelar seu caso para sua esposa enquanto um documentarista casado está apaixonado por outra mulher.A amante de um oftalmologista ameaça revelar seu caso para sua esposa enquanto um documentarista casado está apaixonado por outra mulher.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Indicado a 3 Oscars
- 16 vitórias e 26 indicações no total
- Sharon Rosenthal
- (as Stephanie Roth)
- Photographer
- (as George Manos)
- T.V. Producer
- (as Joel S. Fogel)
- T.V. Producer
- (as Thomas P. Crow)
Avaliações em destaque
It is universal. It has the references to many Artists and cultures - Chekhov, Dostoyevsky, and Bergman among the others but it is so undeniably and uniquely Allen. It could not have been made by any other director.
It is the movie Allen will be remembered for.
But the problem is that we're given pretty thin broth up until that point. Woody tries to be as honestly raw as Chekhov and as deeply symbolic as Kafka. Instead we get a sophomoric effort.
God's eyes are mentioned a dozen times. And the protagonist is an eye doctor who is treating a rabbi who goes blind. `Get it?' Woody shouts. To set up the self-referential last scene, we are treated to Woody playing an unappreciated filmmaker making a film inspired by a Jewish philosopher who seems happy but is not. `Get it?' Woody nudge nudges. To underscore that in the theater, we are the eyes of God, Woody bluntly demonstrates by inserting his own viewing of films and philosophizing about film.
This is not intelligent filmmaking, my friends. It is the clumsiness of someone smart enough to see what art is, but not clever enough to create it. Maybe he thinks 90% of creating art is showing up.
Along the way, we get an interesting performance from Alda. But it is all too obvious that every character's dialog is Woody's and they are acting just as Woody has demonstrated to them. Check out their mannerisms. Maybe his comedies will be better. His books are excellent.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWoody Allen felt that he had been too "nice" to the characters in the end of Hannah e suas Irmãs (1986), so he wrote this film as a response to those feelings.
- Erros de gravação(at 1:31:03) While they are celebrating at the wedding party the theme "Crazy Rhythm" is been played by the jazz orchestra, a muted trumpet can be heard but the trumpet player isn't using one.
- Citações
[last lines]
Professor Levy: [voiceover] We are all faced throughout our lives with agonizing decisions. Moral choices. Some are on a grand scale. Most of these choices are on lesser points. But! We define ourselves by the choices we have made. We are in fact the sum total of our choices. Events unfold so unpredictably, so unfairly, human happiness does not seem to have been included, in the design of creation. It is only we, with our capacity to love, that give meaning to the indifferent universe. And yet, most human beings seem to have the ability to keep trying, and even to find joy from simple things like their family, their work, and from the hope that future generations might understand more.
Principais escolhas
- How long is Crimes and Misdemeanors?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Crimes and Misdemeanors
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 19.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 18.254.702
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 911.385
- 15 de out. de 1989
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 18.254.702
- Tempo de duração1 hora 44 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1