AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,7/10
1,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaChuck brought sorrow to his family when he shot his father who is now a semi-invalid. After 15 years of self destruction, he returns home to seek forgiveness.Chuck brought sorrow to his family when he shot his father who is now a semi-invalid. After 15 years of self destruction, he returns home to seek forgiveness.Chuck brought sorrow to his family when he shot his father who is now a semi-invalid. After 15 years of self destruction, he returns home to seek forgiveness.
Bobby Di Cicco
- Tony
- (as Bobby DiCicco)
Tom Wood
- Lt. Fontana
- (as Thomas Mills Wood)
Avaliações em destaque
Paced akin to that of a funeral, Tiger Warsaw sees the loveable Patrick Swayze trapped in time as a 70s greaser coming home in a melodramatic tale of reconciliation. There is no other reason to seek this out outside of Swayze, who broods sentimentality throughout the movie with an unshakeable boyish charm, he's just been saddled with a truly terrible screenplay. Drifting drearily along until, with about 10 minutes to go, it ends in a rushed wrap, as though somebody suddenly realized that time was up. It's mainly just a series of encounters with no oomph or style while Amin Q. Chaudhri's direction leaves most of the film completely incomprehensible with poorly lit and uncomfortably long shots dominating the runtime. If I can give it any form of praise outside of its main star, some of the songs on the soundtrack do slap but, other than that, Tiger Warsaw is a fraught movie that lurches between trauma and tearjerker. Driving towards a predictable conclusion, carrying the dubious message that matrimonial bliss and domestic harmony is the ultimate aspiration.
It's hard to honestly express the virtues of a film that is generally regarded as sub-par without going too far in the other direction. It's not that "Tiger Warsaw" is a complete success, indeed, there are many things that just don't quite work. Patrick Swayze, though his top billing is certainly the only reason this film has reached its relatively small audience, never quite fills out his character believably. That, and the somewhat low key feeling of the overall production, serves to play against the very same things that most potential viewers are looking for.
But there are very many good points. This is an exceptionally beautiful film to look at. Robert Draper's cinematography is cold, aching, with a powerful understanding of light. These scenes feel like real life of the kind we all know, not some imitation or expression of style. The director, Amin Q. Chaudhri (who made the similarly quiet drama "An Unremarkable Life" the following year), pulls back from his actors in the best possible way, observing their simple actions rather than trying to be over-dramatic. The story is well-realized in execution, but not entirely well-written. Roy London has a certain understanding of dialogue and character that is evident, but his plotting leaves something to be desired. There are avenues taken that seem unlikely, and others left untouched that could have been effectively explored.
But this is a real film. There's no over-acting, no showing off. There's a lot of humanity, and some heartbreaking performances. Piper Laurie is incredibly human, fully alive in her role. She might be remembered for more extreme roles like in "Carrie", but it's films like "Rising Son" and this production that show her depth.
I recommend this for its visual beauty, and its quiet understanding.
But there are very many good points. This is an exceptionally beautiful film to look at. Robert Draper's cinematography is cold, aching, with a powerful understanding of light. These scenes feel like real life of the kind we all know, not some imitation or expression of style. The director, Amin Q. Chaudhri (who made the similarly quiet drama "An Unremarkable Life" the following year), pulls back from his actors in the best possible way, observing their simple actions rather than trying to be over-dramatic. The story is well-realized in execution, but not entirely well-written. Roy London has a certain understanding of dialogue and character that is evident, but his plotting leaves something to be desired. There are avenues taken that seem unlikely, and others left untouched that could have been effectively explored.
But this is a real film. There's no over-acting, no showing off. There's a lot of humanity, and some heartbreaking performances. Piper Laurie is incredibly human, fully alive in her role. She might be remembered for more extreme roles like in "Carrie", but it's films like "Rising Son" and this production that show her depth.
I recommend this for its visual beauty, and its quiet understanding.
A lot of people didn't enjoy this, but I did. It shows a real life situation that can & does happen in any Family. Hardly any sex, swearing, drug takihg & no violence. Give it a go & have a watch if you haven't seen it. Patrick has done a lot better but when he shows his sensitive side I think he is a much better actor.
The stage curtains open ...
The first time I saw the poster to this movie, I thought it was going to be another action-filled vehicle similar to "Road House", but it was nothing like that. When I read the synopsis to the film on the back, I realized it was the exact opposite - a family drama that hit on a few heavy topics. Regardless, I picked up a copy and watched it. I like a good drama as much as the next person.
It is the story of a prodigal son, outcast from his family after a harrowing event (of his doing) that emotionally scars them, and himself. Fifteen years later, after living a lost life, he returns home hoping to find reconciliation and forgiveness with his mother, sister, and most importantly, his father who hasn't been the same since. His sister has moved on with her life, getting ready to be married. All of his friends are married with kids, and his parents are living a quiet life, finding respite with each other. Finally, things come to a head and heavy decisions have to be made.
I can see how some have enjoyed this film. Overall, the acting is pretty good, though a bit over dramatic in some parts, and underwhelming in others. The consistency here is sorely lacking, and the movie ultimately comes off as completely disjointed and nonsensical. This is clearly one of Patrick Swayze's worst films, as even he didn't seem to be invested into his role. Everything was off kilter ... the plot and character development never happens. The level of believability is next to none. Even with some good actresses on board with Piper Laurie and Mary McDonnell, it all crumbles to the ground.
I can't justifiably recommend this movie, not even to a die hard Swayze fan. It was a disappointment on most levels. It actually had the feel of a made-for-tv movie, and not a very good one at that. This is a pass, and gets 3 stars out of 10 at best. There are some other, much better, Patrick Swayze films out there ... and that is where your focus should be.
The first time I saw the poster to this movie, I thought it was going to be another action-filled vehicle similar to "Road House", but it was nothing like that. When I read the synopsis to the film on the back, I realized it was the exact opposite - a family drama that hit on a few heavy topics. Regardless, I picked up a copy and watched it. I like a good drama as much as the next person.
It is the story of a prodigal son, outcast from his family after a harrowing event (of his doing) that emotionally scars them, and himself. Fifteen years later, after living a lost life, he returns home hoping to find reconciliation and forgiveness with his mother, sister, and most importantly, his father who hasn't been the same since. His sister has moved on with her life, getting ready to be married. All of his friends are married with kids, and his parents are living a quiet life, finding respite with each other. Finally, things come to a head and heavy decisions have to be made.
I can see how some have enjoyed this film. Overall, the acting is pretty good, though a bit over dramatic in some parts, and underwhelming in others. The consistency here is sorely lacking, and the movie ultimately comes off as completely disjointed and nonsensical. This is clearly one of Patrick Swayze's worst films, as even he didn't seem to be invested into his role. Everything was off kilter ... the plot and character development never happens. The level of believability is next to none. Even with some good actresses on board with Piper Laurie and Mary McDonnell, it all crumbles to the ground.
I can't justifiably recommend this movie, not even to a die hard Swayze fan. It was a disappointment on most levels. It actually had the feel of a made-for-tv movie, and not a very good one at that. This is a pass, and gets 3 stars out of 10 at best. There are some other, much better, Patrick Swayze films out there ... and that is where your focus should be.
The interesting thing about Swayze is that he "did" this movie... more or less after Dirty Dancing. After the success of Dirty Dancing Swayze could've done anything - instead he decides to tell the simple and sad tale of one families personal tragic past.
A big career mistake? I don't think so, this is a fine movie and a fine vehicle for Swayze to explore his talent. In all fields this film has strength... the acting and cast are rock solid... the location work is fabulous and the story, although tame compared to todays standards still hits the target solidly. The only thing that shows through in parts is the budget is lacking. Swayze does well as the out casted son weaving his sentimental spell as the movie unfolds its mystery. The simple sense of futility and overwhelming sadness in this film is all due to Swayze acting his part so well.
Sure this is not a blockbuster - and on it's budget it wasn't supposed to be, but as entertainment value (which is what movies are all about) this is a fine piece of work. Watch it!
A big career mistake? I don't think so, this is a fine movie and a fine vehicle for Swayze to explore his talent. In all fields this film has strength... the acting and cast are rock solid... the location work is fabulous and the story, although tame compared to todays standards still hits the target solidly. The only thing that shows through in parts is the budget is lacking. Swayze does well as the out casted son weaving his sentimental spell as the movie unfolds its mystery. The simple sense of futility and overwhelming sadness in this film is all due to Swayze acting his part so well.
Sure this is not a blockbuster - and on it's budget it wasn't supposed to be, but as entertainment value (which is what movies are all about) this is a fine piece of work. Watch it!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe restaurant that looks like it has a front of train painted on building is actually a real train engine in front of the restaurant.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe scene where Tiger has a breakdown while stopped at the railroad crossing was filmed on Pitt Street in Sharon, PA. Pitt Street is a one way street and the cars are all going the wrong way on the street.
- ConexõesFeatured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: The Worst Films of 1988 (1989)
- Trilhas sonorasDirty Water
Written by Ed Cobb
Published by Equinox Music
Performed by The Standells
Master Recording Courtesy of AVI Record Productions, Inc.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Tiger Warsaw?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 422.667
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 422.667
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente