Canibais do Apocalipse

Maybe the fact that this particular cannibal movie wasn't directed by one of the usual suspects (Lenzi, Deodato) is what makes it so tolerable. Saxon plays a soldier who goes back to some south Asian country to rescue his POW buddies. He doesn't seem too bothered by the fact that when he finds him, they're eating human flesh, or that one of them bites him, and infects him with some kind of cannibal virus. Fast forward a number of years, and Saxon is gettin a hankerin for some human meat. This all happens about the time that his buddies decide to break out the mental hospital they're in. It all ends up with Saxon and his buddies infecting a bunch of people, and running from the law in the sewers. Cannibal city, baby.

Radice getting his abdomen blown clean out with a shotgun is reason alone to watch this movie (if you can figure out how they did this effect, let me know). The rest is pretty standard, as far as movies go, but it is a lot better than most cannibal movies. At least it takes place in the city and not in some jungle. Worth a look, if you're a cannibal or John Saxon fan.

While on a mission to rescue two servicemen captured by the Viet Cong, "Captain Norman Hopper" (John Saxon) is bitten by one of these men when he attempts to pull him from the pit. Afterward both of the men are committed to a psychiatric hospital while Captain Hopper is allowed to return to civilian life. Unfortunately, it doesn't end there as one of the men named "Charlie Bukowski" (Giovanni Lombardo Radice) is temporarily released and not long afterward suddenly goes berserk which results in the deaths of at least two people. Then upon being returned to the psychiatric hospital he and the other serviceman by the name of "Tom Thompson" (Tony King) manage to escape along with a nurse named "Helen" (May Heatherly) who was bitten by one of them and shares the same craving for human flesh as they do. Now rather than reveal any more of this movie and risk spoiling it for those who haven't seen it I will just say that this turned out to be a fairly decent type of "zombie film" even though it didn't necessarily fit the technical parameters for that particular sub-genre. The acting was decent and the plot moved along quite well. In any case, for what it's worth I liked the movie and I have rated it accordingly. Slightly above average.

Renting this movie I thought it would be the usual cannibal carnage only set in the city and it was but with a surprising difference it had a zombie type virus in it as well.Two of my favourite genre's in one and I thoroughly enjoyed it.Its about a group of vietnam vets who return to America with a cannibal virus and anyone they attack also become cannibals.It stars John Saxon,Tony King and Giovanni Lombardo Radice(my favourite actor)as the vietnam vets. I recommend this movie to any cannibal and/or zombie movie fan so check it out if you can find it.

Cannibals in the Streets occupies that peculiar middle ground where ambitious exploitation cinema meets budgetary reality, resulting in a film that's neither memorably trashy nor genuinely effective. This 1980 entry into Italy's zombie boom feels like a workmanlike effort from a director clearly more comfortable behind the camera than wrestling with coherent storytelling.

The film's greatest asset lies in its grimy urban atmosphere. Margheriti and his cinematographer capture a decaying cityscape that feels authentically post-apocalyptic, with shadowy alleyways and abandoned buildings providing a suitably oppressive backdrop. The practical effects, while uneven, occasionally achieve moments of genuine visceral impact - particularly in the film's more intimate attack sequences where close-quarters camera work heightens the claustrophobic terror.

John Saxon delivers a committed performance as the weary scientist, bringing gravitas to material that doesn't always deserve it. His weathered presence anchors scenes that might otherwise drift into unintentional comedy. Elizabeth Turner, as the resourceful journalist, demonstrates solid screen presence despite being saddled with dialogue that veers between exposition-heavy and laughably stilted.

Where "Cannibals in the Streets" stumbles is in its pacing and tonal consistency. Margheriti seems uncertain whether he's crafting a serious horror film or embracing the genre's more exploitative elements. This indecision results in sequences that feel disconnected, with momentum frequently grinding to a halt for unnecessary subplot diversions. The film's final act, while featuring some of its most intense moments, feels rushed and somewhat arbitrary in its resolution.

The score deserves particular mention for its effectively minimalist approach, using synthesized drones and sudden musical stings to create unease without overwhelming the sound design. However, some dubbing issues typical of the era occasionally pull viewers out of crucial dramatic moments.

John Saxon has spoken out against this movie many times and seems ashamed for having been involved in it. The way he goes on about it you would think that he was tricked into making an exploitation movie via some kinda 'Caligula'-esque ruse. But all I can say is a)just look at Saxon's career. I love the guy but c'mon, 'Queen Of Blood', 'Enter The Dragon', 'Mitchell', 'The Bees' and 'Battle Beyond The Stars' aren't exactly Jean Luc Godard, know what I'm saying? And b) I think if you sign up for a movie that involves Vietnam vets infected with a "cannibal virus" you kinda KNOW what you're getting in for, don't you think?

'Cannibal Apocalypse' attempts to cash in on both the 70s Italian cannibal cycle started by Deodato, and the the success of 'The Deerhunter' and 'Apocalypse Now'. It is absolutely stupid in concept, above average in execution, and isn't totally successful because of its timidity in showing disturbing in your face gore. I like the way Saxon and most of the others play the ludicrous material with a straight face, but unfortunately there are too many dull sections and not enough cannibalism! The movie begins well enough in the all too brief Vietnam sequence, but never lives up to the promise shown in the first ten minutes. It's quickly downhill all the way after that, only rescued by one or two blackly humorous scenes. What you end up with is a half-baked Romero rip-off. I say go straight to 'Dawn Of The Dead' or 'The Crazies'.