AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
509
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
O covil do vampiro Anton Voytek é perturbado pela inauguração de uma nova igreja. Anton tenta começar uma vida moderna usando sua riqueza acumulada, mas descobre que ela foi confiscada pelas... Ler tudoO covil do vampiro Anton Voytek é perturbado pela inauguração de uma nova igreja. Anton tenta começar uma vida moderna usando sua riqueza acumulada, mas descobre que ela foi confiscada pelas autoridades.O covil do vampiro Anton Voytek é perturbado pela inauguração de uma nova igreja. Anton tenta começar uma vida moderna usando sua riqueza acumulada, mas descobre que ela foi confiscada pelas autoridades.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Brendan Dillon
- Father Devlin
- (as Brendon Dillon)
Herbie Braha
- Felon
- (as Herb Braha)
Adam Farrar
- Tommy Parker
- (as Adam Starr)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Next to the original "The Nightstalker" this may well be the best made-for-TV vampire flick there is. A superb cast led to a superior offering. Special effects were correctly kept to a minimum, allowing the story and performances to carry this hidden gem. Jason Miller gave a wonderful, sympathetic performance. I read where his portrayal of the vampire Voytek is Richard Lynch's favorite role, and well it should be - he is marvelous! I only wish that he would have been able to reprise his role in the series that never was.
It is a rare film that leaves a favorable impression after 27 years. Rarer still one that was produced for the small screen. Vampire, for me, is such a film. To the Powers That Be: please release this on DVD soon. It is long overdue. A few extras would be nice too.
It is a rare film that leaves a favorable impression after 27 years. Rarer still one that was produced for the small screen. Vampire, for me, is such a film. To the Powers That Be: please release this on DVD soon. It is long overdue. A few extras would be nice too.
Vampire is a great revenge horror film. The revenge element is the major driving force, and a great twist... It's the Vampyre who's out for revenge, and his vengeance is evil.
1979 was an exceptional year for the fanged bloodsuckers. It saw Stephen King's epic Salem's Lot captivate the nation when it aired on television. While movie theatres screened Klaus Kinski's colourful remake of Nosferatu. It still amazes me that the two big Vampires of '79' looked so alike.
This TV Movie isn't as great as King's tale, but writers Steven Bochco and Michael Kozoll give us a worthy contender. Their story revolves around Prince Anton Voytek.
The Prince's been alive for millennia. In this time he has surmounted a fortune and a substantial quantity of priceless artwork. Unfortunately for him, he's been defeated and imprisoned. However, when a company begins construction on the site for a new church, the erected cross casts a shadow over his tomb. The ground burns in the cross' shadow awakening Voytek. He then begins to suck the lifeblood from the indigent of the city.
After regaining his strength, he sets about recovering his treasures.
He enlists the help of architects John and Leslie Rawlins. Once they retrieve the prized artwork the Rawlins suspect it may be stolen and call in the police. Voytek's arrested and imprisoned once again. This he cannot forgive. His new mission, to seek retribution on his captors...
The writers are skilled at creating believable characters.
In particular, Harry Kilcoyne, John Rawlins, and Andrea Parker, who form the backbone of the story. Their interaction with one another is genuine. It's easy to see why they become friends and allies; it's a natural progression. This realism, not only allows the audience to relate to them, but also helps hold the story together.
As for the Vampyre, it's his actions that create most of the tension. Humans are less than playthings to him. They're to be possessed, used, and discarded when finished with. The best scene to show this is when Kilcoyne and Rawlins visit Nicole DeCamp. She's the lawyer who held parties to introduce the Prince to high-society. Once her function is complete, he takes great pleasure in making her crawl to him. The fresh bruises and scars are visible on her face as tears run down her cheeks.
Voytek isn't only cruel and manipulative, he's cunning. The writers show this in his exploitation of Rawlins' and Kilcoyne's feelings for friends and family. His acts are cold, precise, and designed to prove he's in control of the situation. If our heroes pursue him, it may lead to their deaths.
E. W. Swackhamer (don't you just love that name(?)) does a great job in letting the story unfold on the screen. He throws in some great iconic shots. I particularly liked the scene where Voytek has to get home before sunrise. Swackhamer frames him centre screen as he runs an uphill street. His long coat billowing out behind him, smoke rising gently from it as the dawn shifts to day. Very nicely handled.
He shoots most of the film in standard fashion. However, this is fine as the story and the characters are strong enough to keep the attention of the audience. The few innovative touches are a bonus.
Swackhamer's management of the film's pacing could be better. It's told at one pace. Accepted, it's a good trot, so you won't get bored. But variations in tempo would add to the audience's immersion. The chase scenes would be more exciting with quicker and sharper cuts. When Rawlins and Kilcoyne are on the hunt a smidge slower pace would build the tension. These are minor issues, the film is enjoyable as it stands.
The acting is superb. I cannot understand why Jason Miller has been so under-used. Not in this film, but as an actor. He was the best thing in The Exorcist and he was perfect in The Exorcist III "Legion". NB; Legion is much better than any of the films in the series, and works as a stand-alone story - if you've not seen it then get a copy. He's such a powerful and credible actor that he brings a great essence and persona to Rawlins and the film.
I've been a fan of E. G. Marshall's since I saw him in 12 Angry Men (another must watch film - the original 1957 movie). He too is a powerhouse of an actor and brings all his skills to the role of Kilcoyne.
Even the part players, such as Jessica Walter who plays DeCamp, are superb in their roles. Her portrayal in the scene I described above would not have been so touching if she hadn't given her all.
Even Richard Lynch, who I wouldn't have chosen for The Prince, comes across as stately and aristocratic. I was amazed and shocked... and pleased. It was the icing on the cake.
Do you like revenge thrillers? Do you like your horror films? Are you a Vampyre lover? If the answer is yes to one or all these questions, then you need to get a copy of this film and enjoy.
Ratings: Story 1.5 : Direction 1.25 : Pace 1 : Acting 1.5 : Enjoyment 1.25 : Total 6.5 / 10
Race over to see where this fangtastic flick ranked in my Absolute Horror list.
Take Care and Stay Well.
1979 was an exceptional year for the fanged bloodsuckers. It saw Stephen King's epic Salem's Lot captivate the nation when it aired on television. While movie theatres screened Klaus Kinski's colourful remake of Nosferatu. It still amazes me that the two big Vampires of '79' looked so alike.
This TV Movie isn't as great as King's tale, but writers Steven Bochco and Michael Kozoll give us a worthy contender. Their story revolves around Prince Anton Voytek.
The Prince's been alive for millennia. In this time he has surmounted a fortune and a substantial quantity of priceless artwork. Unfortunately for him, he's been defeated and imprisoned. However, when a company begins construction on the site for a new church, the erected cross casts a shadow over his tomb. The ground burns in the cross' shadow awakening Voytek. He then begins to suck the lifeblood from the indigent of the city.
After regaining his strength, he sets about recovering his treasures.
He enlists the help of architects John and Leslie Rawlins. Once they retrieve the prized artwork the Rawlins suspect it may be stolen and call in the police. Voytek's arrested and imprisoned once again. This he cannot forgive. His new mission, to seek retribution on his captors...
The writers are skilled at creating believable characters.
In particular, Harry Kilcoyne, John Rawlins, and Andrea Parker, who form the backbone of the story. Their interaction with one another is genuine. It's easy to see why they become friends and allies; it's a natural progression. This realism, not only allows the audience to relate to them, but also helps hold the story together.
As for the Vampyre, it's his actions that create most of the tension. Humans are less than playthings to him. They're to be possessed, used, and discarded when finished with. The best scene to show this is when Kilcoyne and Rawlins visit Nicole DeCamp. She's the lawyer who held parties to introduce the Prince to high-society. Once her function is complete, he takes great pleasure in making her crawl to him. The fresh bruises and scars are visible on her face as tears run down her cheeks.
Voytek isn't only cruel and manipulative, he's cunning. The writers show this in his exploitation of Rawlins' and Kilcoyne's feelings for friends and family. His acts are cold, precise, and designed to prove he's in control of the situation. If our heroes pursue him, it may lead to their deaths.
E. W. Swackhamer (don't you just love that name(?)) does a great job in letting the story unfold on the screen. He throws in some great iconic shots. I particularly liked the scene where Voytek has to get home before sunrise. Swackhamer frames him centre screen as he runs an uphill street. His long coat billowing out behind him, smoke rising gently from it as the dawn shifts to day. Very nicely handled.
He shoots most of the film in standard fashion. However, this is fine as the story and the characters are strong enough to keep the attention of the audience. The few innovative touches are a bonus.
Swackhamer's management of the film's pacing could be better. It's told at one pace. Accepted, it's a good trot, so you won't get bored. But variations in tempo would add to the audience's immersion. The chase scenes would be more exciting with quicker and sharper cuts. When Rawlins and Kilcoyne are on the hunt a smidge slower pace would build the tension. These are minor issues, the film is enjoyable as it stands.
The acting is superb. I cannot understand why Jason Miller has been so under-used. Not in this film, but as an actor. He was the best thing in The Exorcist and he was perfect in The Exorcist III "Legion". NB; Legion is much better than any of the films in the series, and works as a stand-alone story - if you've not seen it then get a copy. He's such a powerful and credible actor that he brings a great essence and persona to Rawlins and the film.
I've been a fan of E. G. Marshall's since I saw him in 12 Angry Men (another must watch film - the original 1957 movie). He too is a powerhouse of an actor and brings all his skills to the role of Kilcoyne.
Even the part players, such as Jessica Walter who plays DeCamp, are superb in their roles. Her portrayal in the scene I described above would not have been so touching if she hadn't given her all.
Even Richard Lynch, who I wouldn't have chosen for The Prince, comes across as stately and aristocratic. I was amazed and shocked... and pleased. It was the icing on the cake.
Do you like revenge thrillers? Do you like your horror films? Are you a Vampyre lover? If the answer is yes to one or all these questions, then you need to get a copy of this film and enjoy.
Ratings: Story 1.5 : Direction 1.25 : Pace 1 : Acting 1.5 : Enjoyment 1.25 : Total 6.5 / 10
Race over to see where this fangtastic flick ranked in my Absolute Horror list.
Take Care and Stay Well.
It's been close to 30 years since I watched this movie with Richard Lynch as the blonde vampire, and who played the part to perfection. For the younger people expecting blood, gore and action, this isn't the one to watch. Vampire is more of a 'reader's' film, where the imagination fills in today's 'action' in movies. An earlier film I saw him in is called The Premonition, where he portrayed a rather creepy carny; also a fascinating film. I've been looking for this movie, Vampire, for all these years and would love to see it released on DVD. I'd wondered for years whatever became of Lynch and am glad to see he remained active for some time. I was surprised to read in his mini-biography that he'd been burnt in a drug related fire. I always had the idea he'd been a burn victim at one time. Although I believe him to be an excellent actor, ultimately it was his voice and unconventional good looks that drew me in.
This was a great movie. It stars Richard Lynch who gives an outstanding performance as the vampire,it also stars the guy who played "Father Karras" in "The Exorcist" who also does a great job. This movie clicks on all levels,story as well as acting. If it were available on dvd or tape,I'd buy it in a heartbeat. Unfortunately I believe the only way to ever see it is on late,late night tv but if you can catch it,I highly recommend you watch it. You'll be glad you did,it's how vampire movies should be done.
Slow place but great acting which makes this Vampire tale interesting and enjoyable to watch. Vampire 1979 had all of the classic vampire traits one would expect, except the fangs, considering of course one likes classic vampire mythology and not modern versions which in my opinion fail to do justice to vampires themselves. Come on, if someone told you they saw a vampire, would you believe them?
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThis was a pilot for a never developed television series.
- Citações
John Rawlins: He killed her and mutilated her and nothing is being done about it?
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente