A Menina e o Porquinho

I just rented this for my kids (ages 4 & 6) and had completely forgotten that adults can enjoy it, too. I'm quite weary of the obnoxious Disney-fication of most kids movies these days. (Spare me any more simpering princess stories.) The story of the clever spider who tries to save a pig from becoming breakfast meat is a familiar one and can be appreciated by many. The voice talent here is so superb that the movie doesn't make you rue the day they decided to animate the book. The songs aren't overly saccharine and are actually quite catchy. The movie is worth it alone for Templeton's trip to the fair and "a fair is a veritable smorgasbord-orgasbord-orgasbord" song. Debbie Reynolds' Charlotte is warm and wise, Wilber is naive and friendly, and Templeton provides the perfect foil as a spoiled rat who's just in it for himself. Agnes Moorehead as the goose became a sort of comedic extra to make the little ones laugh in the face of the rather adult plot about life and death. Overall, it's a movie for the whole family.

This animated version of the E.B. White children's classic is short on spectacular animation but long on heart and boasts a wonderful cast of voice talents. Earl Hamner, Jr., of "The Waltons" fame, creates a seamless plot which retains the true flavor of the book while cleverly rearranging the order of events and giving some of the better lines to different characters. The story of Wilbur, the runt pig saved by Fern Arable and later shipped to her Uncle Zuckerman's farm, only to discover that he's slated for the butcher's knife, is lively and fun. Charlotte, the wise and well-spoken spider played wonderfully by Debbie Reynolds, devises a scheme to save Wilbur's life. Henry Gibson is right on as the naive and nervous but generally happy Wilbur. Agnes Moorhead shines as the haughty and stuttering goose: "I'm no flibberty-ibbity gibbet!" Paul Lynde easily steals the show as Templeton, the smarmy barn rat; his late-night gorge-fest at the fair is a hilarious highlight of the movie. The songs written for the movie are a bit on the syrupy side, but Debbie Reynolds' sweet singing voice and some clever, funny lyrics make them bearable to adults.

During the Spring time, a little of pigs is born including one runt at the Arable farm. As John (John Stephenson) prepares to "do away" with the runt, his daughter Fern (Pamelyn Ferdin) objects saying he shouldn't be killed for simply being small with John agreeing to let Fern take care of him. Fern names the pig Wilbur (Henry Gibson) and the two form a strong bond as Wilbur continues to grow. Eventually the time comes for Wilbur to be sold despite Fern and Wilbur's objections otherwise with Wilbur now living at the farm of Fern's uncle Homer Zuckerman (Bob Holt). While initially despondent, Wilbur is encouraged to talk by a good hearted mother goose (Agnes Moorehead) and begins seeking a friend among the farm. Eventually Wilbur learns he is fated to be killed during the Winter to become bacon and ham leading to further despair. Wilbur is then approached by a spider named Charlotte A. Cavatica (Debbie Reynolds) who befriends Wilbur and tries to help save Wilbur's life.

Charlotte's Web is a 1973 animated film adaptation of E. B. White's 1952 Children's book of the same name. Attempts have been made been as far back as 1967 when husband and wife team of John and Faith Hubley were interested in the film rights and while White liked them, the project fell apart due to lack of financing. The rights eventually landed at Sagittarius Productions and while the film's creative team saw many come and go until Hanna-Barbera got involved through a two-picture deal with Charlotte's Web one of the film's to be produced. The film was cast with some familiar names including Debbie Reynolds who said she'd be willing to join the project without being paid. While critical reception was positive skewing (albeit with many saying the animation was only passable), the biggest critic of the film was White himself. Despite the film being fairly faithful to the novel, White voiced displeasure with tonal issues in the film such as the Sherman Brothers' musical numbers and the depiction of the State Fair in the final act of the film which White claimed was too fantastical in comparison to his more realistic take. Despite only being a modest performer in its day, Charlotte's Web much like Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory found a second wind through TV airings and home video including becoming a top seller in 1994 on VHS. Charlotte's Web doesn't reach the level of other children's classics, but the strength in the writing retains the key themes from the novel.

The movie does a good job of setting up the emotional weight of the film especially in its first act where Fern and Wilbur bond and you care about the two. There's a very tough "slice-of-life" element to the story in spite of its lowkey fantastical nature which makes sense when you consider White mined his experiences from growing up on his family farm in Maine for certain events in the novel. While there is that looming shadow of the threat of Wilbur's death lingering over the story, it never becomes overwrought as levity is provided by Debbie Reynolds' Charlotte and Paul Lynde's Templeton. While Charlotte is a kind and altruistic character, she's also assertive and shows a limited tolerance for Wilbur's neuroses such as a recurring gag of Wilbur fainting. Paul Lynde is also good as Templeton and despite being a late addition to the film replacing Tony Randall, Lynde's iconic delivery fits Templeton's care-free self-interested character perfectly and leads to some amusing moments throughout. In terms of the Sherman Brothers' songs, I only partially agree with White on them. While songs such as "I Can Talk", "Chin Up" and "We've Got Lots in Common" don't provide much aside from tangents in the main story, some such as "There Must Be Something More", "Deep in the Dark", and "Charlotte's Web" do feel more tonally appropriate to this story. And while not strictly necessary I do like Lynde's energized "A Veritable Smorgasbord" coupled with the accompanying animation.

Charlotte's Web is a good film that's inches away from greatness. You can tell that the main issue at play is one of tonal consistency despite the movie being mostly faithful to the original novel's content. While not without issues, the film is nonetheless a solid family film with a good emotional core.

I think every kid has to see this movie. It's a charming and delightful little flick. I wish they would make more movies like this than all the fancy computer effect movies of today. I'm serious, I think this is more impressive as far as animation goes. Charlotte's Web is a great flick to watch. Even though I enjoyed the book more as a child, I still loved to watch this film. I would recommend it for children. It's a little cheesy at times. But it has good lessons and morals. Hence, why I say it's for kids. There are some catchy toons though. Even the adults might still get into it.

8/10

So far, I've seen two completely different points of view in the comments for this movie. One was so-so, the other thought it was completely awful. Well, I would like to add a third: I thought it was charming.

"Charlotte's Web" is my absolutely favourite story, and one of the most treasured books in my personal library. This movie, while far from perfect, does stay very true to the original story (which, in case Negative Nellie may have missed, Disney does NOT do -- even though I love Disney, too).

It's true the animation isn't the best, but you have to realize that "Charlotte's Web" was made in 1973, WAAAAAY before the computer-animated wonders of the '80's and '90's. The animation in the '70's was still stuck in the Saturday-morning-cartoon format, where, instead of animating every single cel, the animators would animate every third or fifth cel. It saved time, money, and you still got animation -- just not very sophisticated animation. Disney and Max Fleischer were really the only ones that were trying to push animation beyond the extremely confined limits it was once stuck in. So you can't really fault the movie for that, it was a common fault 20 years ago to get stuck in a rut. (It's still happening today, or hasn't anyone watched "Godzilla", "Armageddon", or "Starship Troopers"? Just because the animation is more advanced doesn't mean that it isn't becoming redundant).

Other than the animation, "Charlotte's Web", taken from a purely entertainment level, is really not that bad. I still enjoy watching this movie, and the voice actors actually closely match the voices I've made in my head for the characters in the book over the years. Especially Templeton. His scene when he comes back from his night of gorging at the fair cracks me up. "In case you haven't noticed, there are over 8,000 eggs in that tiny little sac." "This HAS been a night!" HA!

The songs seem a little out of place at times, but on the whole, I still find this movie very enjoyable. It's not deep, it's not profound, it's a piece of mindless fluff, with some very nice performances from the voice actors and a lot of very cute moments. It's children's fare, folks, so just take it as such, and it's a lot easier to take. I liked it. So there.