AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
2,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.The English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.The English gentleman known as Horse, returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
William Lucking
- Tom Gryce
- (as Bill Lucking)
Claudio Brook
- Chemin De Fer
- (as Claudio Brooke)
Pedro Damián
- Standing Bear
- (as Pedro Damian)
Humberto López
- Thin Dog
- (as Humberto Lopez)
Susan Dury
- Lord John's fiancee
- (não creditado)
Rigobert Rico
- Owl
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
This is a gritty, tremendous sequel, and I would say, better than the first film, from director Elliot Silverstein. Not for the squeamish, it is bloody, realistic in terms of action and battle, fights sequences. I agree that the bad white men and the good Indians was not that new in 1976 film industry - a good thing though - but it doesn't matter for me. Richard Harris is better than ever in this second movie of the franchise. The Indians way of life, daily life is very authentic, and I guess the research for writing was very serious, accurate and that adds much to the power of this film. Among the best westerns dedicated to Indians.
I loved the movie,because it showed the beautiful people,that the American Indians are. They are really, very spiritual people. I lived with a family (who did the dance),for about 4 months and it was by far the most interesting period of my life,so far. I learned a lot from this Wonderful family,I could go on. But my point that I want to make,is I understand why the Richard Harris character returned to help his old family. I have experienced many of the ways of the Indians in modern society. Seeing an Eagle fly,now makes me touch my heart with the knowledge of what it signifies.Their spirituality will touch your heart,IF you let it in.
This is a weak sequel: it lacks the interest and light touch of the magnificent "Man Called Horse" in nearly every aspect and when compared to each other they hardly seem to be the same genre.
The Return is almost a parody of the first and tries to evoke different Indian ceremonies but comes across as trying way too hard to bottle the magic of the first. In this film the tribe is lost and abandoned, having lost their homelands, modern life has encroached on paradise and they are living in abject misery and poverty. Perhaps this is the point: the first film took us to a place where we would want to be, a simpler time. This takes us to broken Indians in a miserable world and the White Man is the hero and savior which rather negates the whole idea of the film.
The beauty of the first lay in the fact that the white man learnt and discovered that real civilization lies in values rather than western materialism. In the second film this is all but lacking and so we end up with a weak film.
A huge disappointment.
The Return is almost a parody of the first and tries to evoke different Indian ceremonies but comes across as trying way too hard to bottle the magic of the first. In this film the tribe is lost and abandoned, having lost their homelands, modern life has encroached on paradise and they are living in abject misery and poverty. Perhaps this is the point: the first film took us to a place where we would want to be, a simpler time. This takes us to broken Indians in a miserable world and the White Man is the hero and savior which rather negates the whole idea of the film.
The beauty of the first lay in the fact that the white man learnt and discovered that real civilization lies in values rather than western materialism. In the second film this is all but lacking and so we end up with a weak film.
A huge disappointment.
Well reviewed here to date, I would like to give a different slant in the hopes it may give pause to reflect to one or two of you. I enjoyed the movie, however the experience was upgraded since it was with a gang of friends that piled into my semi-antiquated but proportionately generous 1964 Chrysler Imperial to see the movie previewed at the studio. As one of us was the proud ex- of one the the villains in the cast, we looked forward to a free night on the town. Meeting one of the producers, cast members, and an old favorite of my dear Mother-Gale Sondergaard making perhaps somewhat of a comeback after many years-added spice to the event for us humble non-industry types. Realizing this is a silly and non-conforming review, the point is: "If you're getting out, make a night of it!" Happy Hour before at Yamashiro, after hours at a private party, whatever, try not to give up too soon, even if the flick is less than stellar. Just a thought.
The movie, by the way, was indeed a decent sequel, with reasonable production values throughout.
The movie, by the way, was indeed a decent sequel, with reasonable production values throughout.
The English gentleman known as Horse (Richard Harris), returns to the American west to save his adopted Indian tribe from extinction.
According to Roger Ebert, "The film reveals its basic white-chauvinist bias, but it certainly seems to take itself seriously. It's of average length, but paced like an epic. There are four main movements in the plot: Return, Reconciliation, Revenge and Rebirth. If this seems a little thin for a two-hour movie, believe me, it is, even with all that portentous music trying to make it seem momentous." The film as a whole is not remarkable. Allegedly this is the film that convinced George Lucas to hire the director for "Empire Strikes Back", arguably the best of the "Star Wars" franchise. But this movie, I don't know... aside from the race issues (a white man intervening t save the Indians, and the Indians being played almost entirely by whooping, stereotypical white actors) it is just a bland movie. Even by sequel standards. Richard Harris is great, but he can't save this one.
According to Roger Ebert, "The film reveals its basic white-chauvinist bias, but it certainly seems to take itself seriously. It's of average length, but paced like an epic. There are four main movements in the plot: Return, Reconciliation, Revenge and Rebirth. If this seems a little thin for a two-hour movie, believe me, it is, even with all that portentous music trying to make it seem momentous." The film as a whole is not remarkable. Allegedly this is the film that convinced George Lucas to hire the director for "Empire Strikes Back", arguably the best of the "Star Wars" franchise. But this movie, I don't know... aside from the race issues (a white man intervening t save the Indians, and the Indians being played almost entirely by whooping, stereotypical white actors) it is just a bland movie. Even by sequel standards. Richard Harris is great, but he can't save this one.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesOn account of this film, which George Lucas found to be better than its predecessor, he hired Irvin Kershner to direct Star Wars: Episódio V - O Império Contra-Ataca (1980).
- Erros de gravaçãoDuring the sun ceremony, John Morgan (Richard Harris) didn't have any scarring from the first time he underwent the ritual from five years earlier in the original film "A Man Called Horse".
- Versões alternativasGerman VHS version was cut in the scene where Harris makes a fire on the man who followed him.
- ConexõesFollowed by O Triunfo de Um Homem Chamado Cavalo (1983)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- El regreso de un hombre llamado Caballo
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 4.000.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 9 min(129 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente