The Keeper

The Keeper is a poor attempt at a psychological horror film in which Lee plays the head of an asylum that caters to rich families with unstable family members whom they want to keep out of public. What really sinks this film is the incredibly amateurish look. You'd swear that it was made by film making students. There are no scares and the plot has some really stupid holes and characters, especially a dopey policeman who gets hypnotized. Lee looks like he wishes he were elsewhere throughout the film. Can't say that I blame him!

`You are with The Keeper, and The Keeper will keep you alive!,' so says the evil Keeper in this 1975 Lionsgate offering, perhaps the rarest and hardest to find Christopher Lee film. This one is not even catalogued in Leonard Maltin's 2002 Movie and Video Guide. Lee is indeed the keeper at Underwood Asylum, where wealthy patients check in and soon after their relatives begin to die, leaving The Keeper (who apparently had no name) the sole heir of their well-being and bankbooks. Private investigators Dick Driver and Mae B. Jones are hired to get to the bottom of it and almost pay the ultimate cost in doing so. This is where the seriousness of this film ends and the silliness begins. The Keeper could not quite make it's mind up as to whether it is a serious horror film or comedic horror spoof. Some of Lee's scenes show him at a huge control panel torturing his hapless patients electronically and those are truly disturbing. Other scenes, particularly the ones involving exchanges between the police and private investigator Driver, are intended to be humorous but come off as embarrassingly amateurish. Lee, who appeared to phone his performance in, and Tell Schreiber as the male private eye Driver are the only two notable performers here, with the exception of Ian Tracey as the streetwise shoeshine boy. The Keeper suffers from subpar production values, as it appears grainy at times with poor dialogue, and the camera angles are poorly done. At times, one would think beginning film students made this film but then again even beginners could probably do as well or better. In the end, the police and private eyes get their man and they all leave Underwood asylum to apparently live happily ever after. The Keeper is notable only because of it's lack of availability and presence of Lee, whose body of work over the course of his lengthy career is extraordinary.

I give this film 2 points for hiring a well known actor like Lee. I give it another point for making it a historical film(set in the 40s or so)without any glaring anachronism and another point for having adequate camera and sound (which should be a given but I'll be kind as it was made in my place of birth).

This is a terrible boring film. Likely the worst Christopher Lee film I have watched--even worse than his Jess Franco Fu Manchu movies. Worse than the Star Wars prequels. Worse than the Crimson Cult. Worse than Howling 2.

By general bad movie standards it is worse than Dracula vs Frankenstein. At least those films had some entertainment value--this really has none other than wondering what Lee must have thought as he was making it.

Canadian movies can and often do lack passion, imagination, and when all else fails turn into feeble comedies. 9 times out of 10, if you hear about a Canadian sci-fi or horror movie made by native-born Canadians, chances are its a /comedy of some sort.

In this case the film is likely inspired by Chinatown and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest combined with 1930s street drama and any kind of mad doctor story you can think of just to make it have low budget commercial appeal.

The private investigator Driver attempts to act suave and cool like Sam Spade and fails, but isn't aware of it. It isn't funny in a Leslie Nielsen kind of way.

The dialogue is disjointed and poorly thought out so you get exchanges like this: Private Eye: Has there been any murders at the asylum? Police Chief: Yes, seven--but what troubles me is, what if these deaths were actually murders? Its an amateur film on almost every level except the picture and sound are functional (perhaps to the viewer's detriment) with a decent enough use of locations and period costumes. There's no attempt at moody lighting, and the soundtrack is a 70s electronic score of some kind --not keeping with the era it is presenting.

This is the first Canadian genre film made in British Columbia by Canadians (other than a porn film) and it is a complete failure. Not even useful as a so bad it is good kind of experience. If you don't believe me, waste an hour and a half of your life and find out.

The Keeper is actually a 1976 film that was never released theatrically. It finally aired for the first time on television in 1985 as a CBS late movie after sitting in a vault for around 9 years.

This is one of the worst movies that Christopher Lee has ever made. I do agree with others that C. Lee agreed to do this film for the money only - he must have needed it.

It's a film that is worth watching only for die-hard Christopher Lee fans, or for those that like to watch rare and awful movies for the sake of it. I don't recommend this film to fans of horror in general though, it's pretty bad. There is a reason this film never made it into theaters and was kept in a vault for all those years.

3/10

I have recently become a fan of British horror film actor Christopher Lee. I have found that there are bad Christopher Lee movies such as "The Passage," "End of the World," "To The Devil A Daughter," "Bear Island," and "Howling II."

And, then, there is "The Keeper."

Lee plays a psychiatrist who runs a mental asylum for the wealthy and is murdering the relatives of his patients so he can gain access to their fortunes. Many of these murders have been set up to appear as accidents. A private investigator and the police hope to eventually "catch him in the act."

Not even Christopher Lee can save this movie. I found this movie in the Horror section of my video store but it is actually more of a detective movie((Another Lee movie, "The Wicker Man," also combined different genres(Including the Horror movie and Detective story), but please don't try to compare this movie to "The Wicker Man." There is absolutely no comparison.)) At best, parts of the story are unclear. The screenwriters don't even give Lee's character an actual name; he is simply referred to as "The Keeper." Lee's character is somewhat physically disabled and operating completely on his own, so it's not made clear how he is able to commit all of the murders so adeptly. Lee's performance is fine but the rest of the acting in the film is hopelessly amateurish. The film is apparently meant to be a serious suspense film but lame humor is inexplicably weaved throughout the entire story. The hypnosis sequences in the film are absolutely laughable.

For a great Christopher Lee film, see "The Wicker Man," "The Devil Rides Out," and the ORIGINAL "Horror of Dracula."