[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Manos: As Mãos do Destino

Título original: Manos: The Hands of Fate
  • 1966
  • Not Rated
  • 1 h 10 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
1,7/10
38 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Manos: As Mãos do Destino (1966)
B-HorrorHorrorTerror popularTerror sobrenatural

Uma família se perde na estrada e tropeça em um culto oculto, subterrâneo e adorador do diabo, liderado pelo temível Mestre e seu servo Torgo.Uma família se perde na estrada e tropeça em um culto oculto, subterrâneo e adorador do diabo, liderado pelo temível Mestre e seu servo Torgo.Uma família se perde na estrada e tropeça em um culto oculto, subterrâneo e adorador do diabo, liderado pelo temível Mestre e seu servo Torgo.

  • Direção
    • Harold P. Warren
  • Roteirista
    • Harold P. Warren
  • Artistas
    • Tom Neyman
    • John Reynolds
    • Diane Adelson
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    1,7/10
    38 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Harold P. Warren
    • Roteirista
      • Harold P. Warren
    • Artistas
      • Tom Neyman
      • John Reynolds
      • Diane Adelson
    • 759Avaliações de usuários
    • 85Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos55

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 48
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal17

    Editar
    Tom Neyman
    Tom Neyman
    • The Master
    John Reynolds
    John Reynolds
    • Torgo
    Diane Adelson
    • Margaret
    • (as Diane Mahree)
    Harold P. Warren
    • Michael
    • (as Hal Warren)
    Stephanie Nielson
    • Master's Wife
    Sherry Proctor
    • Master's Wife
    Robin Redd
    • Master's Wife
    Jackey Neyman Jones
    Jackey Neyman Jones
    • Debbie
    • (as Jackey Neyman)
    Bernie Rosenblum
    • Teenager in Car
    Joyce Molleur
    • Teenager in Car
    William Bryan Jennings
    • Cop
    Jay Hall
    • Girl in Convertible
    Bettye Birns
    • Master's Wife
    Lelanie Hansard
    • Girl in Convertible
    Pat Coburn
    • Master's Wife
    Pat Sullivan
    • Master's Wife
    George Cavender
    • Cop
    • Direção
      • Harold P. Warren
    • Roteirista
      • Harold P. Warren
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários759

    1,738.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    Alienator

    'Manos': An Enigma of Celluloid

    When I watch a film for the first time it is generally quite easy for me to establish an initial opinion of the film at hand. At times I will come to this very website and submit a rating of the given film or perhaps I will turn to a friend and give my thoughts of the film (which tend to be quite clear). Well, after reading quite a few extremely hyped reviews and discussions throughout the internet, I decided to try my luck and buy the alleged worst film of all time: ''Manos': The Hands of Fate'. Let it be clear that this review does not pertain to the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version of the film; rather it applies to Hal P. Warren's original, cut-and-dry, El Paso-born version of the film. ''Manos': The Hands of Fate' may very well be, one of the only films of which classification is painstakingly difficult to near-impossible. The film leaves a quaint, surreal, and indecisive effect upon the viewer which is what leads to the formulation of this strange conclusion.

    Warren's film opens on a vacationing family traveling through El Paso, Texas. The family consists of little Debbie (Jackey Neyman), Margaret (Diane Mahree), and Mike (played by our very own Hal P. Warren). Surely enough, the travelers are soon found lost on the way to their vacation site. They eventually turn onto a long dirt road marked by a sign promising a "Valley Lodge". After a great deal of aimless meandering throughout the backwoods of El Paso, the vacationers come across a mysterious Lodge run by an awkward and deformed Satyr named Torgo (John Reynolds). Seeing as it is getting late, the visitors ask about staying the night only to be deterred by Torgo's ominous words "The master would not approve." After some pressure from the family, Torgo folds and allows the newcomers to stay. As the visitors enter the lodge they are welcomed by a mantel full of strange hand-like pagan icons and sculptures, accompanied by a strange portrait of presumably The Master and his hound. As Michael and his wife Margaret observe the strangeness of the portrait and their surroundings, a strange howl is heard from outside in the desert. Soon strange happenings begin around this lodge of sins, as Michael and his family's fate is determined by "the hands of fate"

    To be blunt, the film is simply quite technically limited. Supposedly the film was shot entirely on one camera which was only capable of shooting 60 seconds of film at a time. To say that this hurt the film would be an untrue, if anything it helped the pacing of this little low-budget flick. Hal P. Warren was a director with literally no experience or conceived directorial abilities; he had no knowledge of pacing or camera work (if he had any it was most likely limited to home videos). The acting for the most part is quite dismal, the only exception being a wonderful character conceived by Warren named Torgo. Reynolds' portrayal of Torgo is supreme; although having no professional training or profession acting experience in cinema he creates a one of-a-kind character, which has been quite unparalleled in cult-cinema. No matter how much one hates this film, they will always remember the timid and tormented Torgo, uttering his infamous line: "The Master would not approve." The music featured in the film is quite repetitive and amateur, although at times it does add to the feel, aid the pacing, and promote the overall camp-factor of the film (which was sometimes delightful). The cinematography is certainly not note-worthy, nor is the lighting. The editing seemed to have been done with haste and is one of the key factors which seems to have earned this film its reputation. One thing however, which is not widely criticized by viewers is the plot. It is a plot with great potential that was realized by Warren; at the time it would have been quite fresh. Interestingly enough, it could vaguely be seen as a blundering, early version of 'The Texas Chain Saw Massacre' (not to say that Tobe Hooper drew any influence from ''Manos': The Hands of Fate').

    Well, this is widely considered to be the downright worst of the worst – the bottom of the bottom. As stated earlier, I cannot place this film on a scale of one to ten, yet I can argue that this is a false statement. Almost every aspect of the film is done poorly, yet as odd as it sounds, the movie generates a charming and enjoyable little atmosphere; it simply does not feel like the worst one out there. There are plenty of films which are far less enjoyable to watch than Manos. Technically speaking the assumption can be made that it is the worst, but then again there are films with far more dismal lighting, far more sloppy camera work and far worse pacing. One could contend that the acting is downright dismal and corpse-like in every respect, yet there are films with worse acting and absolutely no memorable or quotable (Torgo - whether it be mocking or homage) characters. Hence, in many respects Hal Warren's single 1966 production isn't the worst piece of celluloid out there, yet at the same time it possess many, if not all of the qualities which could be attributed to the worst film of all time. However, the goal of this review was not to debunk the position in cinema history ''Manos': The Hands of Fate' has achieved, but rather to offer a little insight into what this film has to offer. In all fairness, I enjoyed it in a wonderful, campy, and surreal sort of way... after all, what other film is out there like this? What film is there that was made on possibly the lowest budget of all time, featuring the work of the most cinematically inept individuals, yet despite these obvious flaws has kept people talking about it for years to come?
    markagudsnuk

    Manos as experimental film

    We search for entertainment when watching movies and videos.

    Upon starting this DVD entitled "Manos:The Hands of Fate" I was immediately impressed by the sincere tackiness during the intro sequence. The inappropriate music, voice overdub and the poor color quality and graininess of the film do create an atmosphere.

    Perhaps the most striking first impression is the illogical use of a grown woman's voice to overdub the little girl's voice. It cuts to the heart of the production values and most importantly post production technique. The use of the adult's voice for the little girl immediately tells us that the film will be asking a lot from the audience-perhaps too much. It is beyond reason that a editor would use this technique unless as an absolute last resort. The use of this voice for dubbing the little girl's lines is way beyond our expectations of even very problematic editing. It immediately tells us there are real problems with this film. It also tells us that we are going to see and hear something which we will not see very often on video.

    For this reason we must continue to watch the movie. We must see how intense this technique will become. We must see what the next mistake is and how it will happen and what the film will ask us to accept next.

    This is one of the keys to watching "Manos". We want to see the mistakes, the poor editing, amateur acting errors (the actors overall were good in this film-they only made the mistakes of beginning actors) the inappropriate music and improperly timed sound edits, the incredibly long pauses and illogical cut aways.

    The use of a silent camera may have actually influenced the actors and directing on this movie. They may have began acting as if they were in a silent movie ( making gestures, over expression of the face was often used to communicate in silent films).

    The actor John Reynolds gives a most inventive, quirky and yet sincere interpretation of the Igor type character. He is actually very good in several scenes-both comic and serious. The scene where he is deciding whether to allow the family into the "Master's" house is very intensely acted. The First Bride also gives a good performance. She is relaxed, comfortable and yet concentrated.

    The filmmaker/lead actor Hal Warren gives the impression he's in a hurry to get film finished. The film ends with his image greeting the next group of visitors.

    There is no question that Warren was out to get the job done-the movie made. He accomplished this but in the post production it seems stopped "putting a film together" and truly just did a rough assembly of scenes and sound track.

    Unlike Herk Harvey (Carnival of Souls)who had tremendous experience in film-making, and Ed Wood Jr.(Plan 9 From Outer Space) who evidently had professionals working on his productions and post productions- Hal Warren had no funding for post nor experience.

    He seems to have relied on rough, haphazard and truly mistaken editing and thus cinematic storytelling. For this reason we must watch. Because after awhile of watching this movie we begin see what is happening occasionally is that our perspectives and paradigms of what is expected in film are not only being broken and disregarded; they are being smashed apart. This is a common goal of the experimental film.

    Although this is most assuredly not what Warren intended, he accidentally did create a film to watched and appreciated for its often illogical sights and sounds.
    1BA_Harrison

    I Survived Manos: The Hands of Fate.

    Manos: The Hands of Fate, currently ranked #5 on IMDb's Bottom 100, is a rite of passage for serious fans of trashy horror movies, marking the transition from 'merely bad' to 'completely and utterly inept in every way imaginable. It's a test of fortitude that sees many fall by the wayside; however, those who do manage to go the distance can wear their achievement as a badge of pride, knowing that they have taken the very worst that z-grade horror can throw at them and survived the ordeal (albeit with possible mental scarring).

    The one-and-only film from Harold P. Warren, who obviously realised thereafter that film directing wasn't his forté, Manos opens with a family driving through the desert on their way to Valley Lodge for a vacation. Unfortunately, father Michael (Harold P. Warren, proving that acting wasn't his forté either), his wife Margaret (Diane Adelson), and daughter Debbie (Jackey Neyman) soon find themselves lost, eventually pulling up to a strange desert hostel where they are greeted by twitchy manservant Torgo (John Reynolds), who looks like he stores bags of popcorn or cotton wool down his trousers.

    Torgo warns that his master (Tom Neyman) won't be happy if they stay the night, but they won't take no for an answer; their stubborn insistence puts them in serious peril, for the master is the head of a Satanic cult and he wants to add Margaret to his collection of brides.

    To list everything that is wrong with this film would take longer than it took me to watch it (including the times where I fell asleep and had to rewind), suffice to say that there are fewer examples of poor editing, dreary pacing, atrocious direction, woeful acting, and diabolical dubbing. Quite how Warren and company managed to mess up in all departments is one of the great mysteries of cinema, ranking right up there with the inexplicable popularity of Seth Rogen, but it has ensured the film a notoriety that means it will never be forgotten.
    1mst-2

    Amazingly Awful!

    The leading man is a Frank Zappa lookalike with only a fraction of the talent Zappa (being dead) has.

    However, the real star of the film, Torgo (a goat-man), performed in some of the best walking-from-one-end-of-the-set-to-another scenes I have seen since 1950s Corman films.

    Finally, the fights (or are they orgies?) between Manos' wives, which we are asked to believe to be deadly, are utterly hilarious.

    The MST3K version of this incredibly dreadful bit of late 60s trashola is one of Joel and the Bots' best, but even their antics fail to make this movie wholly tolerable.

    Rated: For Insomniacs Only.
    1aesgaard41

    Bad Movie Makes Good MST3K

    This movie should serve as warning to anyone who tries to make up a movie as you go along. An overused concept (family gets lost) meets a cliche (wierd guy who talks of a master)and then degrades into one big mess. The couple's little girl vanishes during filming or seems to be and a wierdo shows off his girl collection; they may or not be vampires or zombies, you never know. The story is missing, the flow is ambigous and it moves like words in an alphabet soup. Nonsense and confusion are the result. Thank you, but no thank you, Doctor Forrester.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Birdemic: Choque e Terror
    1,7
    Birdemic: Choque e Terror
    Super-Heróis: A Liga da Injustiça
    1,9
    Super-Heróis: A Liga da Injustiça
    Universidade do Prazer
    1,7
    Universidade do Prazer
    Daniel der Zauberer
    1,2
    Daniel der Zauberer
    A Gostosa e a Gosmenta
    2,0
    A Gostosa e a Gosmenta
    Manos Returns
    3,1
    Manos Returns
    Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam'in Oglu
    1,5
    Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam'in Oglu
    Smolensk
    1,2
    Smolensk
    Elk*rtuk
    1,5
    Elk*rtuk
    House of the Dead: O Filme
    2,1
    House of the Dead: O Filme
    Radhe
    1,8
    Radhe
    Manos: The Rise of Torgo
    4,7
    Manos: The Rise of Torgo

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Cast and crew recall that John Reynolds was on LSD during filming. It explains his confused behavior and incessant twitching in virtually all of his scenes.
    • Erros de gravação
      The female teenager in the car misses her cue, looks directly into the camera, then delivers her line.
    • Citações

      Torgo: I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      The End?
    • Versões alternativas
      The DVD version is a few seconds shorter than the original. For example, the film once started with the car (with mom, dad and Debbie) pulling up and stopping BEFORE the dialog starts. There is also a little music that was cut out. The full opening can be seen in the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version of the film.
    • Conexões
      Edited into Manos: The Fans of Hate (2009)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      Row, Row, Row Your Boat
      (uncredited)

      English language nursery rhyme

      Sung by Diane Adelson and Harold P. Warren

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes

    • How long is Manos: The Hands of Fate?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • Is there a restored non MST3K version of Manos?
    • Where was the family heading?
    • Is it true that three cast members killed themselves out of embarrassment after the release of the movie?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 15 de novembro de 1966 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Fingers of Fate
    • Locações de filme
      • 2310 Scenic Dr., El Paso, Texas, EUA(opening shot at scenic overlook)
    • Empresas de produção
      • Sun City Films
      • Norm-Iris
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 19.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      1 hora 10 minutos
    • Mixagem de som
      • Mono
    • Proporção
      • 1.37 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    Manos: As Mãos do Destino (1966)
    Principal brecha
    What is the French language plot outline for Manos: As Mãos do Destino (1966)?
    Responda
    • Veja mais brechas
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.