Cyborg 2087

Often dismissed as a "quickie" movie using a great deal of television elements, "Cyborg 2087" is a prime example of what Hollywood was trying to do between the late fifties and mid-sixties: get people (especially the kids) away from the television set and back into the movie theaters. This film tried (sometimes successfully) to combine two popular genres of t.v. at the time; westerns and science fiction. Half-human robots, having a "shoot out" in a western town using ray guns to rescue the girl (played by a former "Mouseketeer", no less). Listen for the Paul Dunlap soundtrack, which should be familiar -- it was used for several t.v. shows, movies, and even Hanna Barbara cartoons! Also, check out the "hip lingo" used by the teens.The sad part is to see classically-trained actor Michael Rennie trying to make a living wearing a silver spacesuit after being typecast as a "sci-fi guy" in "The Day The Earth Stood Still".

Sim to TERMINATOR great cast of character actors.

The premise for "Cyborg 2087" is similar to the "Terminator" series...but it's not exactly the same plot. In "Terminator", a man comes from the future and is pursued by a seemingly unstoppable cyborg. In its sequel, there's a good cyborg being pursued by an evil cyborg. In both, the evil cyborgs are trying to kill someone who can positively impact the future and prevent a robot apocalypse. In "Cyborg 2087" you have a lot of similarities. A good cyborg (Michael Rennie) goes to the past to stop a scientist from releasing his newest invention because it will be misused to enslave mankind. And, inevitably, he's pursued by evil cyborgs. Obviously the writers of the "Terminator" films must have been inspired by this earlier low-budgeted film.

The film begins in the 2080s. A couple scientists are able to send the good cyborg to Earth in 1966. Its mission is to find Dr. Marx (Eduard Franz) and convince him NOT to release his latest invention...or kill him if he won't agree. This is because his invention is later used to control mankind...by implanting a mind-control device in the brains of every man, woman and child! Once he arrives, evil cyborgs are dispatched as well and humanity's fate hangs in the balance.

For 1966, this actually isn't just another cheapo sci-fi film. Sure, it doesn't have fancy special effects....but no films did in 1966. Plus, it's got an amazing cast of good character actors, including: Michael Rennie, Warren Stevens, Wendell Corey, Eduard Franz, Harry Carey Jr., and Karen Steele. It's too easy in 2023 to look back and laugh at the film when we've gotten used to incredibly realistic effects...and the filmmakers did a great job with what they had.

So is the film good or bad? After all, the reviews for this are all over the place...so it's hard to know what the film is actually like. Well, my answer is that it is an excellent film...and I am very glad I watched it because of its very intelligent script.

By the way, although I liked this film, I must admit that it was rather sad watching Wendell Corey's performance. He was in the late stages of alcoholism and it impacted his performance...and he sounded a bit slurred.

From the titular year, a cyborg called Garth A7 (Michael Rennie) is sent back in time to 1966 in order to stop an event that will lead to the subjugation of humanity. Garth A7 enlists the help of humans, while two super-soldiers from 2087 arrive to eliminate him.

The idea of a time-traveling cyborg, sent by a group of freedom fighters to stop a scientist from developing an advanced technology, is familiar indeed! James Cameron simply must have seen this movie. Even the scene when Garth A7 shows a scientist the proof that he's a machine is extremely reminiscent of a similar revelation in Cameron's T2! Of course, this film had neither the astronomical budget, nor the advantage of a Cameron to direct it. In spite of this, CYBORG 2087 is a lot of fun to watch, and deserves to be rediscovered...

The term, cyborg, meaning cybernetic organism, relates to a human enhanced with mechanical parts, often robotic in nature.

Thus gave us the first glimpse into this genre. Albeit low budget (I mean, instrumentation from the future labeled with Dymo Label Maker Tapes?) and featuring actors who were at their peak not just a few short years before, including Michael Rennie, Klaatu from "The Day The Earth Stood Still" or "The Keeper" from "Lost In Space", or Warren Stevens, Doc Ostrow from "Forbidden Planet ("Monsters! Monsters from the ID!") and throwing the tem-oral twist of alternative time lines, this cyborg pre-dated "The Six Million Dollar Man" (and Martin Cadin's novel it was based on, "Cyborg"), the Jean Claude Van Damme dystopic future wasteland adventure, even Star Trek: The Next Generation's most relentless enemies, the Borg (sounds Swedish!...sorry. I couldn't resist).

Add to that the obvious Terminator references (and people still forget about Harlan Ellison's own legal action against Cameron due to similarities in his Outer Limits scripts "Demon With the Glass Hand" and "Soldier") and you have a low-budget oddity that hasn't made the rounds in the post-midnight TV info-mercial circuit in years, being swept aside by other B-Movie kings like the Band Brothers' Full Moon Productions or Bert I. Gordon's & Brian Yuzna's Lovecraft micro-epics.

Yesterday, I saw the last of the three "Rings" movies. Ho-hum. CGI is great. So is a good book. CGI of a good book is, however, just eye-candy. "Cyborg" is a movie that, lacking money and computer graphics, was forced to tell a story. Michael Rennie (you know him as "Klaatu") is a man/machine from the future, come back to correct a few mistakes. His "high" tech looks a bit like your grand-dad's ham radio did about the same time this movie was made, but so what? Garth (Rennie) isn't here to show us ray guns or cell phones. (Who knows? Maybe his gizmos are all camouflaged to resemble '60s-era devices.) What he is here for is to undo the damage of some bad decisions (many of which will remind you of "The Terminator's" SkyNet, but you decide yourself if there's a connection).

Alas for Garth, if he succeeds, it may have dire consequences for him personally. That fact gives him a poignant nobility that many films, then and now, could use, but lack. Time-travel stories often rely on that kind of wrinkle for their drama, and I think that's an inherent weakness of the time-travel sub-genre: they all tend to ask the same question. Still, this one asks it well and Rennie's skillful performance leaves you exquisitely uncertain of just what the Right Thing to Do would be, in such a situation as his character finds himself.

Yeah, "Rings" was great. But so was this, and they don't make 'em like this one anymore.