[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

The Flesh and Blood Show

  • 1972
  • R
  • 1 h 36 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,3/10
1,3 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
The Flesh and Blood Show (1972)
Actors rehearsing a show at a mysterious seaside theater are being killed off by an unknown maniac.
Reproduzir trailer2:46
1 vídeo
78 fotos
Terror slasherHorror

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaActors rehearsing a show at a mysterious seaside theater are being killed off by an unknown maniac.Actors rehearsing a show at a mysterious seaside theater are being killed off by an unknown maniac.Actors rehearsing a show at a mysterious seaside theater are being killed off by an unknown maniac.

  • Direção
    • Pete Walker
  • Roteirista
    • Alfred Shaughnessy
  • Artistas
    • Ray Brooks
    • Jenny Hanley
    • Luan Peters
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,3/10
    1,3 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Pete Walker
    • Roteirista
      • Alfred Shaughnessy
    • Artistas
      • Ray Brooks
      • Jenny Hanley
      • Luan Peters
    • 34Avaliações de usuários
    • 42Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Vídeos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 2:46
    Trailer

    Fotos78

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 71
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal25

    Editar
    Ray Brooks
    Ray Brooks
    • Mike
    Jenny Hanley
    Jenny Hanley
    • Julia Dawson
    Luan Peters
    Luan Peters
    • Carol Edwards
    Robin Askwith
    Robin Askwith
    • Simon
    Candace Glendenning
    Candace Glendenning
    • Sarah
    Tristan Rogers
    Tristan Rogers
    • Tony Weller
    Judy Matheson
    Judy Matheson
    • Jane
    David Howey
    David Howey
    • John
    Elizabeth Bradley
    • Mrs. Saunders
    Rodney Diak
    • Warner
    Penny Meredith
    • Angela
    Sally Lahee
    Sally Lahee
    • Iris Vokins
    Raymond Young
    Raymond Young
    • Insp. Walsh
    Carol Allen
    • Librarian
    Alan Curtis
    Alan Curtis
    • Jack Phipps
    Brian Tully
    • Willesden
    Jane Cardew
    Jane Cardew
    • Lady Pamela
    Tom Mennard
    • Fred
    • Direção
      • Pete Walker
    • Roteirista
      • Alfred Shaughnessy
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários34

    5,31.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    6S1rr34l

    A Decent English Slasher Flick... That Needed Better Direction...

    My Ratings: Story 1.25 : Direction 0.75 : Pace 1.25 : Acting 1.25 : Entertaining 1.25 Total 5.75 out of 10.00.

    Boobs. That's what this film has. To be truthful, there are nearly more boobs than actors or actresses. And not one of those scenes needs to be in the movie and is the reason I've marked the direction down accordingly.

    The story isn't too new either. I admit I like the idea and concept behind the bad guy... or gal's motives, which I can't go into fully - spoilers, and all that. A Hodge-Podge of actors and actresses are hired to put on a London stage show. They are to report to the director, Mike, at a disused seaside theatre for rehearsals. However, once there, things take a step into the strange as the cast disappears, one-by-one. Mike even calls in the coppers when he believes he's found one of the missing actresses. They lay her body out on the guillotine prop... sans head. However, when the cops turn up, the body has gone poof! and the wooden mannequin has returned.

    The writer Alfred Shaughnessy, gives the audience an entertaining and tension-filled hour and a half, with abundant twists and clues to pique the interest of the audience... of yes, and boobs.

    Speaking of which, the director, Pete Walker, directs the story relatively well. I particularly liked the way he handled the cramped and confined spaces of the pier's theatre. You almost feel as though the walls are closing in. The way he also conducts the "Near Kill" sequence is outstanding. The way he stays in close and tight to the intended prey as the hunter, the strange hobo'esq character, slides closer on the bench, constantly coughing and wheezing builds the tension. Add to this, the cut-aways to the inside of the theatre and the casts realisation that something bad is happening outside and their swift reaction, which is too slow, build extra tension. This sequence is structured well and plays with the tempo perfectly, pulling the audience into the story.

    The cast isn't too bad in their roles, though a lot is little more than stage dressing and butcher fodder. Robin Askwith, for example, is pretty much in "Adventures of..." mode. Cocky and self-assured, but seldom used. This movie is predominantly driven by Ray Brooks as Mike, Jenny Hanley as Julia, and Patrick Barr as Major Bell.

    Don't get me wrong, everybody does a grand job in their roles. They just needed to and used more fully. It's like they focus on one character, then they get bumped off and it's onto the next. I never fully felt as though they were a unit. Working together to stay alive.

    This is an enjoyable romp of a slasher flick; before they became known as such. And for those reasons, it's worth a watch. I have a feeling I may take a second and third look at this title before I pass on. So, if you enjoy your Chillers and Slashers, with a hint of the supernatural (and there is a hint in there - so I deem this a horror film too) then I recommend you watch this slice of celluloid history.

    Swim on over to my Absolute Horror and Killer Thriller Chillers and The Game Is Afoot lists to see where I rated this English gem.

    Take Care and Stay Well.
    5tonypeacock-1

    Confessions of a low budget 'slasher horror'

    I have been a fan of director/producer Pete Walker's 1970's horror films in the past. I never knew he had a filmography of what shall I call them 'sexploitation' films earlier in his filmmaking career.

    Now this 1972 UK film has elements of sexploitation in a slasher horror film as several members of an acting group are murdered at a disused theatre at the end of an old pier in a seaside town in England, out of season to add to the ambience of proceedings!

    Now my review title is a play on the Confessions films which were hugely successful in the 1970s starring Robin Askwith who is incidentally in this film as well as one of the young actors. Askwith plays a typical Timothy Lea type character from the Confessions franchise and points to the 'sexploitation' scenes in this film, which is a shame in my opinion. It puts the UK film industry of the period in a bad light. Mixed in with the gore of a slasher horror are scenes of the characters in semi-naked scenes.

    Atmospheric and a mediocre early Pete Walker horror. I have found his later 1970's films better if I am honest. This film is very low budget. Scream (1996) it isn't!
    3FieCrier

    a couple good scenes, lots of unnecessary boring dialog; fair amount of live flesh, little or no blood

    The plot is a familiar one. A bunch of people go to an abandoned building to stay there, and some of them start dying.

    Even taken more specifically, this is a group of young actors who go to an old theater, and are killed for reasons relating to the theater's past. The Clown at Midnight (1998) is similar.

    The movie has a lot of dialog, which isn't of much interest. People go off wandering, and sometimes they come back and sometimes they don't. They visit an older couple, and I didn't get a sense of where their house was in relation to the theater, which seemed to be on an island. Police actually are contacted fairly easily early on. The actors continue to stay at the theater far beyond what is sensible.

    There's a fair amount of female nudity, even some full frontal nudity. There is even some full frontal nudity from one of the men. Deaths are not depicted very graphically, to the extent they are barely on screen at all. The killer is a heavy breather, with a black mask and gloves.

    The music throughout reminded me of the incidental music from the original Scooby Doo series!

    There's a flashback scene which is rather surprising, that has a couple having sex in front of a young girl. The girl's scenes were quite obviously edited in (i.e. she wasn't in the room with the nude actors), but it was still a little shocking. That scene was a little better than the rest of the movie, although it started off with a staging of Othello, which was not too involving. There's another good scene in which some of the actors think one of them is shining a spotlight, but it then shines on the person they though was handling it, who was nude. Being a little thick, they don't immediately realize the spotlight must be handled by someone else, nor do they notice how the nude figure doesn't appear to have any life in it.

    At the end of the Monterey Home Video, there were trailers for The Slasher is the Sex Maniac, Night After Night After Night, and The Grim Reaper, all of which looked much better. Although I've seen a cut version of The Grim Reaper AKA Antropophagus (1980), and didn't think it was all that hot, but then the trailer for it was all of five seconds long or so. The other trailers were of ordinary length.
    6HenryHextonEsq

    Nifty enough seaside shocker: Walker's crimson period starts here

    "The Flesh and Blood Show" bookends Pete Walker's 'golden period' of horrors, with "Schizo" (1976) at the other end; it is a gruesome piece of film-making that shows improvements in Walker's work from "Die Screaming, Marianne" - and yet he is still limbering up, in truth.

    Patrick Barr - to be used again by PW - is excellent here, playing 'the Major', the first in a line of Walker protagonists who appear to be harmless English eccentrics, but are actually... well, that would be telling! The youth characters may be rather stereotyped, but that is part of Walker's approach: to set a licentious, permissive youth against a resentful and uncompromisingly vengeful older generation. It is much to Walker's credit that few if any characters could be described as typical heroes. And he doesn't take sides; the photography indeed mimics the voyeur's view at times - implicating the audience, using the trick first deployed by Michael Powell in "Peeping Tom" (1960).

    The out-of-season seaside setting - Cromer, apparently - fits aptly into this dialectic. The troupe of young actors' arrival seemingly doubles the ageing population of the resort, who can seemingly only dream of the past. It can even be argued that there are pre-echoes of Alan Bennett's use of Morecambe in "Sunset Across the Bay" (BBC, 1975) - though of course, lacking quite the same sad humour and dry insight.

    Still, it is an serviceable enough shocker. Not as bizarrely gripping as Walker's subsequent Melodramas of Discontent, but a decisive step in that direction. And with a script by Alfred Shaughnessy (one of the prime wits behind LWT's "Upstairs, Downstairs") and a suitably eerie score from Cyril Ornadel (who composed all of the music for ATV's seminal "Sapphire and Steel"). Oh, and Robin Askwith... who is enjoyably absurd in horror films (see also the ludicrous "Horror Hospital" from the following year), where he is rather more horrific in myriad dire sex comedies to come.
    6Bunuel1976

    THE FLESH AND BLOOD SHOW (Pete Walker, 1972) **1/2

    Walker's first horror film is an intriguing and enjoyable mix of sex and chills set in an abandoned theater; interestingly, in the accompanying interview on the DVD, he states that the nudity was deemed obligatory at the time if the picture was to hope for a distribution deal (particularly since Walker was his own financier).

    The plot starts off by having eight out-of-work actors being convened to the aforementioned remote location by a mysterious employer; though they occasionally indulge in the kind of silly yet pretentious improvisational exercise also at the core of Jacques Rivette's insanely-long (13 hours!) OUT ONE: NOLI ME TANGERE (1971), they're often just interested in getting laid and the girls in particularly act like sluts most of the time!! At first, I was annoyed by this apparent laziness in scripting (by Alfred Shaughnessy, a respected if little-known director in his own right) – but, then, it's revealed that this was the reason these young and 'morally corrupt' folk were called upon to begin with (as the continuation of a notorious incident from the wartime era which had actually caused the theater's closure).

    The male members of the cast are effectively enough led by Ray Brooks (from Richard Lester's Swinging London comedy THE KNACK [1965]) and also include Robin Askwith (soon to rise to dubious prominence with the smutty "Confessions" films) and veteran Patrick Barr (who turns in a bravura performance, particularly once his true identity is exposed). As for the girls, they all look great in and out of clothes – particularly Jenny Hanley (who, interestingly, discovers to have an inextricable link of her own with the gloomy theater) and Luan Peters (who escapes the murderer{s}' clutches the first time but not the second).

    The film attempts a reasonable imitation throughout of the Italian Giallo style (that country, then, paid it the compliment by borrowing its single setting for Lamberto Bava's popular but third-rate DEMONS [1985]) – though it culminates with a rather unnecessary 3-D gimmick (which Walker had already utilized in the lackluster "Rashomon"-type sex comedy THE FOUR DIMENSIONS OF GRETA [1972]). For the record, of the director's horror outings, I've yet to get my hands on SCHIZO (1976) and HOME BEFORE MIDNIGHT (1979)

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Mansão da Loucura Assassina
    5,8
    Mansão da Loucura Assassina
    Loucura Sangrenta
    6,2
    Loucura Sangrenta
    Casa do Pecado Mortal
    6,3
    Casa do Pecado Mortal
    Demência Sinistra
    5,7
    Demência Sinistra
    O Retorno
    5,7
    O Retorno
    Escort Girls
    4,7
    Escort Girls
    Herança Maldita
    5,8
    Herança Maldita
    Scream... and Die!
    5,0
    Scream... and Die!
    Four Dimensions of Greta
    4,5
    Four Dimensions of Greta
    Morra Gritando, Marianne
    4,9
    Morra Gritando, Marianne
    Trauma
    5,4
    Trauma
    Virgin Witch
    4,9
    Virgin Witch

    Interesses relacionados

    Roger Jackson in Pânico (1996)
    Terror slasher
    Mia Farrow in O Bebê de Rosemary (1968)
    Horror

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      When Jenny Hanley refused to appear naked on screen, director Pete Walker inserted full-frontal nudity using a body double (reportedly one of her co-stars), resulting in a formal complaint from Hanley's agent. To make it even worse, the double had much larger breasts than Hanley.
    • Erros de gravação
      As Luan Peters investigates the prop room below the stage she makes a big deal of brushing away cobwebs, but there aren't any.
    • Versões alternativas
      Has had two different releases in the UK, the early eighties 'Vampix video' release presented the flashback scene in 3-d, while the more recent 'Satanica video' release has the flashback sequence in black and white.
    • Conexões
      Featured in 42nd Street Forever, Volume 1 (2005)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes14

    • How long is The Flesh and Blood Show?Fornecido pela Alexa

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • outubro de 1972 (Reino Unido)
    • País de origem
      • Reino Unido
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Flesh and Blood
    • Locações de filme
      • Cromer, Norfolk, Inglaterra, Reino Unido
    • Empresa de produção
      • Peter Walker (Heritage) Ltd.
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 36 min(96 min)
    • Mixagem de som
      • Mono
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.