[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Stereo (Tile 3B of a CAEE Educational Mosaic)

  • 1969
  • Not Rated
  • 1 h 5 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,1/10
2,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Stereo (Tile 3B of a CAEE Educational Mosaic) (1969)
Ficção científica

Sete jovens adultos se voluntariam para passar por uma forma de cirurgia cerebral que remove sua capacidade de falar, mas aumenta seu poder de comunicação telepática.Sete jovens adultos se voluntariam para passar por uma forma de cirurgia cerebral que remove sua capacidade de falar, mas aumenta seu poder de comunicação telepática.Sete jovens adultos se voluntariam para passar por uma forma de cirurgia cerebral que remove sua capacidade de falar, mas aumenta seu poder de comunicação telepática.

  • Direção
    • David Cronenberg
  • Roteirista
    • David Cronenberg
  • Artistas
    • Ronald Mlodzik
    • Jack Messinger
    • Paul Mulholland
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,1/10
    2,8 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • David Cronenberg
    • Roteirista
      • David Cronenberg
    • Artistas
      • Ronald Mlodzik
      • Jack Messinger
      • Paul Mulholland
    • 25Avaliações de usuários
    • 43Avaliações da crítica
    • 42Metascore
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos155

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 151
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal7

    Editar
    Ronald Mlodzik
    Ronald Mlodzik
      Jack Messinger
      Paul Mulholland
      Iain Ewing
      Arlene Mlodzik
      Clara Mayer
      Glenn McCauley
      • Direção
        • David Cronenberg
      • Roteirista
        • David Cronenberg
      • Elenco e equipe completos
      • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

      Avaliações de usuários25

      5,12.7K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Avaliações em destaque

      7gavin6942

      A Great Study of Cinema

      Sometime in the future, the Canadian Academy for Erotic Inquiry is investigating the theories of parapsychologist Luther Stringfellow. Seven young adults volunteer to submit to a form of brain surgery that removes their power of speech but increases their power for telepathic communication.

      If you are looking for a film to show at a party, this is not that film. It is black and white, slow-paced and almost entirely silent. Your party people will fall asleep and call you a loser.

      If you are someone who loves David Cronenberg or enjoys the study of film and camera techniques, I think you might find an interesting film here. While set up as a faux documentary about the study of "telepathists" at the "Center for Erotic Inquiry", there is very little plot and mostly just interesting scenes and visuals.

      Watch the lighting, angles. Pretend you are a guest in the room, a voyeur but not a participant. Notice the dark and creepy feel, despite the fact the story itself is not creepy and no music is added. The angles and lighting alone can give the feeling of darkness and depression.

      A beautiful film, and one that really laid the foundation for the next thirty years of Cronenberg greatness. His themes of medical oddities, unusual science and body horror are evident here. The exploration (voluntary or otherwise) of new states of consciousness via sexual experimentation is a major theme in "Shivers", "Videodrome", "Dead Ringers", "Naked Lunch", "M. Butterfly" and "Crash". To understand Cronenberg, one must understand this film.
      Michael_Elliott

      Well Made But Not All That Entertaining

      Stereo (1969)

      ** (out of 4)

      Ultra bizarre film from David Cronenberg has a group of young people agreeing to have a brain surgery, which will take away their ability to think or feel but they will gain the ability to communicate mentally.

      STEREO was the first feature to be directed by the young Cronenber and many people see a connection between this film and his later hit SCANNERS. This film here is certainly a well-made piece but it's one of those movies that you can respect much more than actually enjoy while watching. I say that because the film is certainly very well-made and it has a terrific atmosphere and visual look. I loved the B&W cinematography and I thought the director did a very good job with the look and style.

      I'd also argue that the actors do a fine job with their roles but, with all of that said, there's very little else going on with STEREO. The film was shot without any dialogue or even sound effects but every few minutes a narrator will fill us in on the "plot." All of this just really doesn't add anything compelling and in the end the film is rather boring and hard to get through even at just 65-minutes.
      5tomgillespie2002

      Although intriguing, ultimately feels like struggling to stay awake in a University lecture

      Although he is better known for his 'body horror' work and scenes of squirm-inducing gore, the most prominent theme that runs throughout the career of David Cronenberg is the idea of finding an extra stream of consciousness through sexual release. From his serial-raping zombies in Shivers (1975), to his portrayal of Carl Jung, Sigmund Freud and Sabrina Spielrein in A Dangerous Method (2011), he has adopted a psychoanalytical aesthetic between scenes of exploding heads and killer tots. His début, Stereo, is his student film that is an early reflection of his fascination with psychology, made on an obviously shoe-stringed budget, shot in one location.

      The film begins with the arrival at what looks like a research facility of a man wearing a black coat. As the narration begins to explain, the man is a telepath, a product of a social experiment to observe behavioural patterns between three telepaths in a closed environment. Having had their ability to speak removed, they must communicate only via telepathy, and through this telepathic bonding, begin sexual experimentation. The experiment is being carried out by the unseen Dr. Luther Stringfellow, who hopes that the powerful relationships which are forged through the telepaths - that evolve to deem such things as sex or physical attraction irrelevant - will come to replace and stabilise the traditional family unit.

      If you could label Stereo as anything, it would have to be ambitious. Although the subject is purely psychoanalytical, the approach is very sci-fi. The film is black-and-white, featuring no sound at all apart from the near-constant narration, which is spoken in the same dreary tone as you would expect from a student vocalising an essay. It's quite clear than Cronenberg was held back by budget constraints and equipment, and although you could forgive the film's narrative flaws, the lack of visual appeal combined with the monotonous, jargon-heavy, quasi- intellectual narration, make the film a struggle to get through, even at only 62 minutes. It would be harsh to say Stereo is for Cronenberg die- hard's only as it is often intriguing, but the film ultimately feels like struggling to stay awake during a University lecture.

      www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
      4lost-in-limbo

      You're getting sleepy.

      At an Canadian Academy a group of people volunteer to be used as test subjects in an experiment to gain telepathic powers to communicate with after their ability to communicate through speech was removed. Then we slowly watch how the results turn out with sudden changes and obstacles put into motion to see how they adapt to it. While, throughout the observers constantly update us with their progress.

      Was it a big mistake that I decided to watch this early Cronenberg art-flick before I went to bed. Maybe so, maybe not? I was fighting to keep my eyes open towards the end, but I can see why people were derailed by this experience. This oddity is real hard to get into and it only goes for about hour, but it does seem longer. Way longer! I wasn't entirely bored from this outing, but I did become rather restless in the final twenty minutes. The film is shot in black & white and there's real no sound, other than a voice-over that crops up every now again. This exhausting narration is bluntly monotonous with it's thick technical jargon that sometimes doesn't always tie in to what's happening on screen and you really have to concentrate to have a clue about what's going. At times I fell in and out of the context, but I still had some sort of an idea to what was happening. It goes on to relate telepathic power with sexual awaking, while looking into the behavioural patterns of these erotic and ESP activities and signals. Most of the time it feels like the film is meandering about aimlessly with a bunch of method actors who are just performing for a live crowd. Like a fellow has user has already mention it does feel like a documentary. While, the intellectual study might be a clever idea, but you can't help but feel disconnected from this lifeless exploration. The look of the film showcases the professional eye that Cronenberg would go on to incorporate into his latter flicks and this was his first 35mm shot project. The atmosphere has a lonely, out-of-this world feel with it's abstract backdrop that lingers on screen. The finesse and execution of such transfixed images is what kept me watching, really. This was the cold and distant style Cronenberg would go one to make his own and the sub-text of the plot shows up again in some way in the film "Scanners".

      If you want to be entertained, look elsewhere because you'll mostly be frustrated. But if you want to see where it all began for Cronenberg look no further than here.
      re-eino

      Unique approach to pseudo science

      I can't say that I'm a Cronenberg fan since I haven't seen many of his movies and those that I have seen consists largely of his later works. I also can't say that stereo was the kind of movie I was expecting, since the topic hasn't been the most popular subject in those movies that can be considered to contain any individuality. I wasn't badly disappointed or gladly surprised because this movie was indeed a bit rough. Still the subject and Cronenbergs approach to it feels quite fresh. Filming takes place in an architecturally interesting building complex. The building is filmed from inside and outside, but in any shots no other buildings can be seen. This gives a nice enigmatic touch on the setting.

      I found it surprising how this movie tried to combine sexual behavior and pseudo scientific telepathy by using scientific biological and psychological approaches. The film doesn't try in any point to explain how telepathy is actually achieved, but instead feeds the viewer with supposedly scientific data that is related to telepathy (for example. functions on how strength of telepathic linkage is correlated on the distance of two telepathic persons, how emotions affect telepathy etc.). Things told by the narrator are related to the images on the screen. He explains how emotions, such as love, are manipulated in an scientific experiment, as a method on gathering information about telepathy. There is no soundtrack, dialog or SFX, only the narrators voice. The fact that all that is happening on the screen is explained in scientific terms/reasoning, without any scientific justification, might make the "story" a little tough piece to swallow.

      Time to time the movie doesn't seem to progress very rapidly: There are some long scenes where expressions are extensively filmed and some of them are almost funny (for example when one subject very slowly raises his hand to his mouth while looking straight forward and one scene where man is eating a chocolate bar, seem to last for an eternity). As the movie is carried forward by the narrator, the scenes where he is silent are completely quiet. I don't consider this helpful while trying to keep audience interested on the subject. Since visual part of this movie can't by itself tell much to audience and is better left on the background to be explained by the narrator. This sure isn't a mainstream movie and it is also a rare piece in it's subject and style. I certainly don't regret watching this, but as a word of warning, it might not be too easy to watch. However this movie wasn't made just to entertain audience, as later works by Cronenberg and despite low entertainment value, it is one of the most interesting movies I have seen from him. If this one feels too heavy to watch, check out 'The Fly' (as you probably already have), though I liked 'Naked Lunch' the best.

      Enredo

      Editar

      Você sabia?

      Editar
      • Curiosidades
        David Cronenberg (26 at the time) secured funding for the film from the Canadian government by pretending he was writing a novel.
      • Citações

        Narrator #1: Now that we have some insight into the concept of experiential space, we may consider interaction among the experiential space continua of a highly unique group of individuals. In general, the study of the varying dimensions of human experience, in the context of man in his society, is known as human social cybernetics. In our experiment, eight category A subjects underwent pattern brain surgery, whose program was developed within the Academy's organic computer dialectic system. The object of surgery was to extend, by a process called biochemical induction, the natural electro-chemical network of the human brain. This extension would provide each subject with telepathic capabilities. A telepathist is one who can communicate with other minds by means which do not involve perception by the senses. Thus, telepathy is a form of extrasensory perception, or ESP. Our subjects were to be kept in isolation at the Institute for three months, where they were to prepare for their first meeting as a group. This meeting was to take place at the Academy sanatorium in the Ontario North Woods.

      • Conexões
        Featured in On Screen!: Shivers (2008)

      Principais escolhas

      Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
      Fazer login

      Perguntas frequentes13

      • How long is Stereo?Fornecido pela Alexa

      Detalhes

      Editar
      • Data de lançamento
        • 20 de junho de 1969 (Canadá)
      • País de origem
        • Canadá
      • Idioma
        • Inglês
      • Também conhecido como
        • Stereo
      • Locações de filme
        • University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Toronto, Ontário, Canadá(aka Scarborough College, main location, all interiors and exteriors)
      • Empresa de produção
        • Emergent Films Ltd.
      • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

      Bilheteria

      Editar
      • Orçamento
        • US$ 3.500 (estimativa)
      Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

      Especificações técnicas

      Editar
      • Tempo de duração
        • 1 h 5 min(65 min)
      • Cor
        • Black and White
      • Mixagem de som
        • Mono
      • Proporção
        • 1.66 : 1

      Contribua para esta página

      Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
      • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
      Editar página

      Explore mais

      Vistos recentemente

      Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
      Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      Para Android e iOS
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      • Ajuda
      • Índice do site
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Dados da licença do IMDb
      • Sala de imprensa
      • Anúncios
      • Empregos
      • Condições de uso
      • Política de privacidade
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.