[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

O Monstro de Mil Olhos

Título original: Return of the Fly
  • 1959
  • Approved
  • 1 h 20 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,7/10
5,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
O Monstro de Mil Olhos (1959)
Home Video Trailer from 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
Reproduzir trailer1:37
1 vídeo
53 fotos
DramaFantasiaFicção científicaHorrorSuspense

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaPhilippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.Philippe Delambre, the now-adult son of "The Fly", does some transportation experimentation of his own.

  • Direção
    • Edward Bernds
  • Roteiristas
    • Edward Bernds
    • George Langelaan
  • Artistas
    • Vincent Price
    • Brett Halsey
    • David Frankham
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,7/10
    5,5 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Edward Bernds
    • Roteiristas
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • Artistas
      • Vincent Price
      • Brett Halsey
      • David Frankham
    • 68Avaliações de usuários
    • 48Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Vídeos1

    Return of the Fly
    Trailer 1:37
    Return of the Fly

    Fotos53

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 45
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal21

    Editar
    Vincent Price
    Vincent Price
    • Francois Delambre
    Brett Halsey
    Brett Halsey
    • Philippe Delambre
    David Frankham
    David Frankham
    • Ronald Holmes, alias Alan Hinds
    John Sutton
    John Sutton
    • Insp. Beecham
    Dan Seymour
    Dan Seymour
    • Max Barthold
    Danielle De Metz
    Danielle De Metz
    • Cecile Bonnard
    Jack Daly
    • Granville (reporter)
    Janine Grandel
    • Mme. Bonnard
    Michael Mark
    Michael Mark
    • Gaston (watchman)
    Richard Flato
    • Sgt. Dubois
    Gregg Martell
    Gregg Martell
    • Cop
    Barry Bernard
    • Lt. MacLish
    Pat O'Hara
    Pat O'Hara
    • Insp. Evans
    Francisco Villalobos
    • Priest
    • (as Francisco Villalobas)
    Joan Cotton
    • Nurse
    Court Shepard
    • Policeman
    • (não creditado)
    Florence Strom
    • Nun
    • (não creditado)
    Rick Turner
    • Policeman
    • (não creditado)
    • Direção
      • Edward Bernds
    • Roteiristas
      • Edward Bernds
      • George Langelaan
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários68

    5,75.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    5Doylenf

    A quickie capitalizes on the popularity of the original...

    BRETT HALSEY is one of those handsome young actors from the '50s who never quite made it to stardom, and following the trend of other such actors, he fled to Europe where he found a niche for a decade or so in adventure films. He was certainly a competent enough actor and it's a shame Fox never groomed him for major stardom.

    Nor did Fox have enough faith in this one to use technicolor (as they did for the original). As sequels go, it's just a fair job on an obviously shoestring budget--and basically, without giving any of the storyline away, it's a story of revenge.

    It's all suitably photographed in low key B&W lighting that gives it the proper atmosphere. The performers are capable enough--including Halsey, Vincent Price, John Sutton and Dan Seymour--but their material is scarcely worthy of their combined talents. Fans of this sort of science fiction will no doubt find it has a certain amount of interest.

    Anyone who enjoyed "The Fly" will want to see this and probably not be too critical of the shortcomings--although the special effects are not quite as harrowing as they could be.

    Summing up: Okay for a viewing, but not likely to be the kind of horror flick anyone will want to revisit.
    Snow Leopard

    Works Well As Light Entertainment, As Long As It's Not Compared With the Original

    This is the kind of sequel that can be rather enjoyable as long as you don't hold it up to the standard of the original. It does bear the signs of a movie that was conceived primarily to capitalize on the popularity of its predecessor, and as a result it is hardly as carefully constructed. But as light entertainment, it works well enough.

    The first part of the movie connects things up pretty efficiently with the original story, and it's kind of fun to go back to André's wrecked lab, which looks just as it should. Brett Halsey plays André's son Philippe, who is determined to follow in his father's footsteps. While the setup could have led in a number of different directions, the story that actually follows puts an emphasis on action, and it uses the special visual effects rather more freely than in the original "Fly".

    From a scientific viewpoint, the whole premise of both movies is far-fetched at best, but in the original, you rarely thought about it because the story was so tightly constructed. In the sequel, the implausibility of the whole thing is harder to ignore. It doesn't detract that much from the entertainment value, but it is a noticeable difference from the first movie.

    Except for Vincent Price, the cast is new, but solid. While the production might have a couple of rough edges this time, most of it still looks good enough. Overall, with the right expectations this is a generally entertaining light feature.
    Brevity

    It's quite hilarious, which, you know, wasn't probably the intention

    While the fly "makeup" is as ridiculous as in the original, it's got nothing on the guinea pig paws. Add in obvious, under-lining music, delayed reactions, a clumsy fly-man, some overacting, action reminiscent of the old "Batman" series, "help me, help me" revisited, some fly-staring, 50s special effects - the "disintegrator-integrator" machine of the old beep-beep type (you can imagine the sounds), not to mention the creatures themselves, is amusing as anything - and some rodent-squelching, and you got yourself laughs aplenty.

    The editing is really messy and ugly; there's much dead air in between, even though the film barely runs for 80 minutes! The camera-work is awkward as well.

    The cliché-filled dialogue is often amusing, intentionally or not, with some of the highlights being the "if I tell you, it'll haunt you for the rest of your life" exchange, the whole bad guy routine and "the murderous brain of the fly". The what?

    I don't think this was done tongue-in-cheek. It's basically the same story as in the original, which makes it seem redundant, but hey, it's mostly entertaining, so I guess that evens it out. Notice how I used the word "mostly".
    7Vomitron_G

    Return of the classic buzz!

    Nice black & white follow-up to the colorful 1958's original. Philippe Delambre decides to continue his father's work, at the disapproval of his uncle François (an ever so great Vincent Price, reprising his role from the first film, this time having a lot more screen time). Inevitably, things go wrong again, but not the way one might expect they would. Actually, the subplot about betrayal and revenge is the one that drives this film and keeps it all interesting. And if you want to know what comes out of the second tele-pod when you throw a human and a hamster together in the first, then all you have to do is watch this sequel to know the answer. Decent classic horror entertainment. And a damn decent sequel to boot.
    6lost-in-limbo

    Following in father's footsteps.

    Phillippe the son of the infamous Dr. Delambre, who still has an air of mystery around his death, is now a young man who has taken over his father's work, which his uncle Francois wants him to forget about. Though he gets conned into backing the experiment and that's only if he can supervise the project, so it doesn't happen again. The experiment is going quite well, up until later on when Phillippe finds out his mischievous assistant has betrayed him, as he's secretly selling the idea of the teleportation device to another backer. So, to stop the word getting out, his assistant provides him with the same fate that his father had fought. Now, it's a race against time for Francois and Inspector Beecham to save Phillippe from the same aftermath of his father.

    Right of the back of the original film, comes a rather quickie of a sequel that doesn't push any limits. Firstly, no way does it come close to the superior original, but as an automatic b-grade monster feature, it's provides enough rollicking fun. Well, when you got Price on show, how can you go wrong? What we get is a bland story structure that lacks an ounce of life and astuteness, though it does have a few inspired moments, but these are far and in between many inferior sequences that come off just plain ordinary with some confusing plot details. The original managed to work around the silly context, but here it tends accept it by working in laughable story turns and monster effects. Even the dialog seems more like schlock, without the savvy and witty dialog that made the first film naturally engaging. The performances are all but cold and lifeless, but with the obvious exception of Vincent Price. He just has a spellbinding presence that when the words roll of his tongue, it has a Shakespearean vibe, no matter how bad the lines were. Price's performance is definitely this film's anchor. The rest of the characters I didn't care for, as they are rather unsympathetic and foolish.

    There was just more attention to fabricating unpleasant and cheap thrills, which are more out of control with a monster out for revenge hook-line. It's more violent than its predecessor too. I give it credit that it's more exciting in its basic dementia of its creation, but hell the treatment of the story and effects were laughable. That's unintentionally, though. This one seems more serious, but it's outlandishly executed in a drab fashion. But ironically everything works out in the long run with a happy ending for all… well for the good guys. Now the effects are decent, but when it came to the fly's head on the human body. Why was it that huge!? It looks stupid! Sure, it looks even more hideous, but you got to be kidding, it was funny watching the guy running along while holding onto it, so it doesn't fall off. You could easily tell the guy was having trouble with it, even so when walking! They really out did themselves on that one.

    Another note was that the pacing is rather brisk, gladly. Also it does provide slight dose of suspense and atmosphere, but more so it's preoccupied in its second-rate chills and mayhem instead. The flick is shot in black and white, and it does look rather sharp and crisp in detail. Plus there's some showy photography and framework that adds a bit more creative eye to the wailing production. The story's actions on this occasion were just too ridiculous to take seriously with it getting more risible the further it goes, but it seems pretty unaware to all of that.

    It's not all that bad, but the quality is replaced by big chunks of camp that's more interested in wowing us with ludicrous action, rather then the strain it has on the characters and their relationships. Still, there's b-grade fun to be had here.

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Vincent Price signed on for the film after reading the first draft of its script; however, the studio demanded re-writes in order to reduce production costs. The re-writes reportedly removed much of what Price liked about the film's first draft.
    • Erros de gravação
      In the film, when Francois and Philippe visit Andre's laboratory from the previous film A Mosca da Cabeça Branca (1958), the messages Andre wrote to Helene on the blackboard can still be seen on it. But at the end of that same film, Helene had told Inspector Charas that she had erased them all off of the blackboard in order to cover up all traces of Andre's experiment.
    • Citações

      Philippe Delambre: [as a housefly] Cecile! Help me! I'm here on the floor! Cecile! Help me!

    • Versões alternativas
      For UK cinemas, the BBFC imposed a brief cut to remove the shot of Alan crushing the hybrid guinea pig with his foot. Later video releases were uncut.
    • Conexões
      Featured in Creature Features: Return of the Fly (1971)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes19

    • How long is Return of the Fly?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • Is "Return of the Fly" based on a book?
    • How long after "The Fly" ends does "Return of the Fly" take place?
    • Why was this sequel shot in black-and-white when the original was in color?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 22 de julho de 1959 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idiomas
      • Inglês
      • Francês
    • Também conhecido como
      • A Volta do Homem Mosca
    • Locações de filme
      • 20th Century Fox Studios - 10201 Pico Blvd., Century City, Los Angeles, Califórnia, EUA
    • Empresas de produção
      • Twentieth Century Fox
      • Associated Producers (API)
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 225.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 1 h 20 min(80 min)
    • Cor
      • Black and White
    • Proporção
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.