Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaProfessor returns to estate with young wife. Uncle Vanya manages farm. Dr. Astrov visits. Yelena attracts Vanya and Astrov, rejecting both. Sonya loves Astrov unrequited. Professor plans to ... Ler tudoProfessor returns to estate with young wife. Uncle Vanya manages farm. Dr. Astrov visits. Yelena attracts Vanya and Astrov, rejecting both. Sonya loves Astrov unrequited. Professor plans to sell estate. Vanya attempts to kill him.Professor returns to estate with young wife. Uncle Vanya manages farm. Dr. Astrov visits. Yelena attracts Vanya and Astrov, rejecting both. Sonya loves Astrov unrequited. Professor plans to sell estate. Vanya attempts to kill him.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Indicado para 1 Primetime Emmy
- 1 indicação no total
Fotos
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
There were quite a number of reasons for watching this filmed version of 'Uncle Vanya'. One big reason being the play itself, which is one of Chekhov's best with it being a masterpiece of complex characterisation and bleak and intensely poignant mood. Another major reason being the cast, Laurence Olivier and Joan Plowright were seasoned Chekhov interpreters and Michael Redgrave was also a fine actor (very fond of his Terrence Rattigan adaptations).
1963's 'Uncle Vanya' is an invaluable document of how Chekhov was performed back then. Of all the filmed adaptations of Chekhov's plays seen, this is definitely up there as among the best and one of the few outstanding adaptations that in my mind nails Chekhov and what he's about. So much better than Olivier's later Chekhov adaptation 1970's 'Three Sisters', which was incredibly well acted but too stage bound. Whereas this was incredibly well acted while managing to not feel too stagy despite it being a filmed production.
Maybe the production could have brought out more of Vanya's cynicism.
Otherwise, this 'Uncle Vanya' is wonderful and this immensely difficult to adapt play is adapted and performed in a way as if it came easy to those involved. It is beautifully and moodily photographed, in a way that doesn't come over as too static. The setting also has atmosphere and is appropriately oppressive. The audio is suitably haunting without being melodramatic. Chekhov's dialogue is amazing, his prose was met with a lot of scorn and criticism in his day but while wordy it has never been a problem with me. The emotion is absolutely there without being overwrought and is full of meat and not too much fat.
Likewise with the character writing, they are not what one calls "likeable" but they are realistically flawed and psychologically fascinating. The stage direction is intelligent and moving, especially in the later stages. Personally did not find it too stylised or too polite, and thought the bleakness of the play was captured very well. While also not being overly serious. The performances all round do convey the key themes of loneliness and desperation very well and they nail their character traits and psychology. The smaller moments in the character interaction particularly come off well.
Of the performances, Michael Redgrave's subtle and very powerful Vanya and Joan Plowright's sweetly affecting Sonya are particularly notable. Rosemary Harris' Yelena isn't as understated but is still a riveting and searing portrayal, while Olivier succeeds in making Astrov a complex character of many emotions. The intensity of the character interaction is always obvious and the ending is moving.
All in all, wonderful. 9/10.
1963's 'Uncle Vanya' is an invaluable document of how Chekhov was performed back then. Of all the filmed adaptations of Chekhov's plays seen, this is definitely up there as among the best and one of the few outstanding adaptations that in my mind nails Chekhov and what he's about. So much better than Olivier's later Chekhov adaptation 1970's 'Three Sisters', which was incredibly well acted but too stage bound. Whereas this was incredibly well acted while managing to not feel too stagy despite it being a filmed production.
Maybe the production could have brought out more of Vanya's cynicism.
Otherwise, this 'Uncle Vanya' is wonderful and this immensely difficult to adapt play is adapted and performed in a way as if it came easy to those involved. It is beautifully and moodily photographed, in a way that doesn't come over as too static. The setting also has atmosphere and is appropriately oppressive. The audio is suitably haunting without being melodramatic. Chekhov's dialogue is amazing, his prose was met with a lot of scorn and criticism in his day but while wordy it has never been a problem with me. The emotion is absolutely there without being overwrought and is full of meat and not too much fat.
Likewise with the character writing, they are not what one calls "likeable" but they are realistically flawed and psychologically fascinating. The stage direction is intelligent and moving, especially in the later stages. Personally did not find it too stylised or too polite, and thought the bleakness of the play was captured very well. While also not being overly serious. The performances all round do convey the key themes of loneliness and desperation very well and they nail their character traits and psychology. The smaller moments in the character interaction particularly come off well.
Of the performances, Michael Redgrave's subtle and very powerful Vanya and Joan Plowright's sweetly affecting Sonya are particularly notable. Rosemary Harris' Yelena isn't as understated but is still a riveting and searing portrayal, while Olivier succeeds in making Astrov a complex character of many emotions. The intensity of the character interaction is always obvious and the ending is moving.
All in all, wonderful. 9/10.
George Steiner wrote of Chekhov that his plays were "a musical score for speaking voice". This Vanya is just that. The performances here of Laurence Olivier, Michael Redgrave, Rosemary Harris, Joan Plowright, Max Adrian and Sybil Thorndike are operatic in range and emotion. The translation of Constance Garnett is no less important to success - perfect in its rhythm and concision.
This recording survives as a wonder of the 1960s Golden Age in British theatre. Yes, John Gielgud, Ralph Richardson and Richard Burton are not in the cast but never mind; this production was immortal, one of the supreme nights in the theatre in our lifetimes.
This recording survives as a wonder of the 1960s Golden Age in British theatre. Yes, John Gielgud, Ralph Richardson and Richard Burton are not in the cast but never mind; this production was immortal, one of the supreme nights in the theatre in our lifetimes.
9jcpo
Chekhov's fascination with the inability to act makes him a spiritual ancestor of Samuel Beckett. I find the acting very satisfying, and what an all-star cast! Michael Redgrave is greatly moving in the title role, caught in the trap of upper-class ennui. And the women, particularly Rosemary Harris as Yelena are marvelous, each stuck in inescapable comfort. The modest scenery increases the oppressive claustrophobia of the atmosphere.
One definitely should see this production and immediately follow with Vanya on 42nd St.
A commercial DVD of this excellent production is available from a Canadian company called Learmedia.
One definitely should see this production and immediately follow with Vanya on 42nd St.
A commercial DVD of this excellent production is available from a Canadian company called Learmedia.
Obvious, it represents more than a beautiful adaptation. It is a fair, honest and wise exploration of Cekhov univers, in precise terms, with high care for details and the expected inspired atmosphere. And it is not a surprise, the cast offering the guarantee of a beautitul to great adaptation, Astrov of Laurence Olivier, like Vanya proposed by Michael Redgrave reminding the spirit of play in each its nuance.
The story of wasted lives and clashes between visions are familiar.
But this adaptation has, obvious, the desire and gift to offer more than a new represented play. A sort of reflection, about himself, of viewer and this intention is wonderful used scene by scene.
So, Cekhov in pure traits.
The story of wasted lives and clashes between visions are familiar.
But this adaptation has, obvious, the desire and gift to offer more than a new represented play. A sort of reflection, about himself, of viewer and this intention is wonderful used scene by scene.
So, Cekhov in pure traits.
This film is a record of probably the most famous English-language Chekhov production. Of course it's not the same as actually being in the theatre with Olivier and Redgrave, but it's still terrific.
Another reviewer commented negatively about the difference between stage and film acting, but in fact this "Vanya" offers one of Olivier's best *film* performances -- it's subtle and biting, cold-hearted and sweet-natured, incredibly complex and great. And Redgrave isn't far behind him.
10 out of 10
Another reviewer commented negatively about the difference between stage and film acting, but in fact this "Vanya" offers one of Olivier's best *film* performances -- it's subtle and biting, cold-hearted and sweet-natured, incredibly complex and great. And Redgrave isn't far behind him.
10 out of 10
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThis was a television record of a famous stage production, although it was transferred from videotape to film and shown in cinemas in some territories.
- ConexõesEdited into NET Playhouse: Uncle Vanya (1967)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração2 horas
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Uncle Vanya (1963) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda