AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,6/10
2,7 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA crazed hunter kidnaps people and turns them loose on his private estate, where he hunts them for sport.A crazed hunter kidnaps people and turns them loose on his private estate, where he hunts them for sport.A crazed hunter kidnaps people and turns them loose on his private estate, where he hunts them for sport.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
June Kenney
- Betty Scott
- (as June Kenny)
Eugene Persson
- Pete Garwood
- (as Gene Persson)
Brianne Murphy
- Trophy
- (não creditado)
Harry Wilson
- Trophy
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
The umpteenth version of "the most dangerous game" ,in which only Wilton Graf as the mad hunter ,plays his game well: his character is not too much cardboard : after all ,he was a sniper, a sharp shooter,it's only natural he has developped a taste for killing his fellow men ,who are criminals,convicts ,provided by the sailor :blame it on the war .
But this time ,the preys are not convicts but innocent young boys and girls :will they escape from the terrible fate which lays in store for them?
All the actors but Graf play like zombies ,but the principal shows sadism and takes his greatest pleasure in watching his victims' final instants .Directing is flat and static and the jungle looks like an exotic public garden .
But this time ,the preys are not convicts but innocent young boys and girls :will they escape from the terrible fate which lays in store for them?
All the actors but Graf play like zombies ,but the principal shows sadism and takes his greatest pleasure in watching his victims' final instants .Directing is flat and static and the jungle looks like an exotic public garden .
"Bloodlust" is another shameless repeating of "The Most Dangerous Game" premise (a groundbreaking classic from 1932), only it's a really dire and uninteresting one. This is a very bad film, but not even in an amusing way. Colorless characters, tedious and overlong speeches and no action at all. Two young couples strand on an island owned by an elderly, supposedly eccentric man. He explains that the military taught him to kill human beings and it quickly turned into an obsession. So, after he did his service, he bought himself an island where accomplices regularly provide him with new hunting-targets. The screenplay is incredibly stupid (for example, the four just politely listen to how they'll get killed instead of try and overmastering him) and the remote-island location is totally neglected. You haven't seen wooden acting until you witness some of the performances here and I was really surprised that the film only lasted 68 minutes... It seemed to take hours! There isn't much to say abut "Bloodlust!", except that you should never consider watching it. Not even when someone holds a loaded gun to your head and threatens to kill you.
This is a forgettable movie -- even the MST3K version is tepid compared to other episodes of that great show. But one scene stands out for me in this odd little film about an insane island-dwelling man who likes to hunt people. A man -- apparently part of his "stocked prey" program -- wanders up to our protagonists. He's dirty, clothes torn, beard overgrown, obviously been there for awhile. He wants to say something to the gang -- he's down on his knees, pleading with arms raised in supplication -- but all he says is "Ahh! Ahh! Ahh!" And you can tell this actor was really giving it his "Stanislavsky Method" all, and the director was probably yelling at him, "I want more torture in your 'Ahhs'!" In the end, he looks like a mute Al Jolson on skid row. It's worth watching the film for the giggle you'll get from this poor dope.
Bloodlust! is a remake of the superior The Most Dangerous Game (1932), or should I say one of many many many remakes.
At time of writing it has a 3.2 on IMDB, insanely low so it's clearly an unappreciated remake. I can understand why, but not why it's quite that low.
Telling a remixed version of the classic tale we see a group of friends stuck on an island with a madman who hunts humans for sport.
Again this is a somewhat modified version of the tale and truth be told I don't like the changes that have been made. It's not bad by any means, it's just inferior, hammy and considering it's age looks really dated.
This was filmed in 1959, released in 1961 and yet still in black and white whereas the previous remake Run for the Sun (1956) was in color.
For an enjoyable version of this classic tale, stick with the 1932 original or for a modern adaptation watch Mindhunters (2004).
The Good:
Some interesting elements
The Bad:
Looks badly dated for its age
Frustratingly annoying stereotypical non-stop screaming ladies
Certain elements are plain silly
At time of writing it has a 3.2 on IMDB, insanely low so it's clearly an unappreciated remake. I can understand why, but not why it's quite that low.
Telling a remixed version of the classic tale we see a group of friends stuck on an island with a madman who hunts humans for sport.
Again this is a somewhat modified version of the tale and truth be told I don't like the changes that have been made. It's not bad by any means, it's just inferior, hammy and considering it's age looks really dated.
This was filmed in 1959, released in 1961 and yet still in black and white whereas the previous remake Run for the Sun (1956) was in color.
For an enjoyable version of this classic tale, stick with the 1932 original or for a modern adaptation watch Mindhunters (2004).
The Good:
Some interesting elements
The Bad:
Looks badly dated for its age
Frustratingly annoying stereotypical non-stop screaming ladies
Certain elements are plain silly
I've seen this movie in the MST3K version, and I have to agree with those who've previously said that it didn't deserve to be there. It was, as many have pointed out, a decent (although not a blockbuster, it didn't try for that) movie version of the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell. This one was fun, and while it was not always perfect, it did come across as a worthwhile movie.
This is not to say that Mike and the 'bots comments weren't deserved - the movie is not spectacular, and there are parts that deserve the snide comments. But all in all, the movie itself did not deserve the MST treatment.
This is not to say that Mike and the 'bots comments weren't deserved - the movie is not spectacular, and there are parts that deserve the snide comments. But all in all, the movie itself did not deserve the MST treatment.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesRobert Reed's first credited role in a movie.
- Erros de gravaçãoIn most shots, Robert Reed (6'3") is visibly taller than co-star June Kenney (5'2"). But in some scenes (eg, when they are exploring the mansion), she appears to be only a few inches shorter than he is.
- Citações
Dean Gerrard: I can't go on forever pretending to be a useless drunk.
- ConexõesFeatured in Mystery Science Theater 3000: Bloodlust! (1994)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Bloodlust!?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Sed de Sangre
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 8 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Bloodlust! (1961) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda