Dan Patch, o Puro Sangue

I got this movie in a package and thought that it did not look like anything that I would like. I'd never seen Dennis O'Keefe, who is quite watchable... He plays a pretty good role, as does Ruth Warwick as his highly unlikeable, social climbing wife... Lots of good character parts, although the woman that Dennis thinks of leaving his wife for is a bit on the boring side, tho true blue. This is no Seabiscuit, and there are no huge surprises; however, for a fluff movie, the issues of divorce and possible adultery are quite intriguing (for the era). So you see, I thought the movie was much more about the people. I can't quite tell if my comments look as if I liked the movie or not... I did like the movie.

Surprisingly good.

Gail Russell is always wonderful and she's fine in this. She's one of the best. When you think how she died at such a young age from alcoholism, it's tragic. (For more details on her life, see the 12-minute documentary about her on the DVD release of Seven Men from Now.)

She's the main reason I went looking for this movie, and I wasn't disappointed.

Any movie with some of my favorite actors all working in the same scene is worth watching. Seeing John Hoyt, Henry Hull, and Gail Russell in several scenes together...a delight.

The movie's also got Ruth Warrick (the wife in Citizen Kane), Charlotte Greenwood, Dennis O'Keefe, Arthur Honeycutt, Clarence Muse, Harry Lauter, Davis Roberts, and Earle Hodgins in a tiny role (one line)--all of them among my favorites and all of them highly enjoyable.

The story's not bad and those performances are first rate.

One of the only drawbacks is a typical one of the times when this was made: the black characters are all subservient, but they were at least treated by the other characters and by the story itself with respect and they've got some depth of character to play.

The script gets a little preachy toward the end, laying in a message about a mismatched marriage, and it's a message we've already gotten in this story well before the ending.

One thing really stands out in the performances, something true to the era the story's set in, the late 1890s and early 1900s. People in those days held a lot back, they didn't just gush their emotions out. And the actors are subtle. They hold back a lot. The first scene between father and son (Hull and O'Keefe) is impressive. The joy at their reunion is there, but they keep it inside and don't make a show of it. Same with the relationship between the trainer and his daughter (Hoyt and Russell): restrained, but full of unspoken words and emotions. All the characters perform with the same restraint, the same modulation. The director, Joseph Newman, must've had a hand in that.

Satisfying family fare.

"The Great Dan Patch" is not the sort of film I would normally watch. While some people absolutely adore horses and movies about them, I really don't care much for them one way or the other. I mostly watched it because I like Dennis O'Keefe and he stars in this one.

I had never heard of Dan Patch and didn't realize what an amazing horse he was. Apparently, he had the distinction of being an unbeaten horse in trotting races....something that seems impossible. He was so dominant that after a while they couldn't get horses to race against him! This movie is a biography which plays a bit fast and loose with the facts....with about as much truth as Hollywood in the story. So, if you only want the full and true story, read up on Dan Patch...don't watch the movie!

The story is essentially about the horse but told much more about the horse's owner and the owner's son, David (O'Keefe). Most of the story centers not on Patch's life and career but on David's marriage to an ornery woman (Ruth Warrick)...and another woman (Gail Russell) who secretly loved him. In support are some excellent actors--Henry Hull, John Hoyt and Clarence Muse.

So is it any good? Well, it is entertaining and the acting is nice....but it IS about horses. So, if you love 'em, see the film. If you're more ambivalent (like me), it's pretty skippable.

This feature is a solid drama based loosely on the career of the famous race horse Dan Patch, with a good emphasis on the lives of the persons who owned and trained him. Although it certainly emphasizes what a unique and nearly unbeatable horse Dan Patch was, it looks even more closely at the dramas taking place among the human characters.

Much of the story focuses on the son (played by Dennis O'Keefe) of the horse's original owner, who is torn between a successful career and an ambitious wife on the one hand, and his passion for horses and attachment to old friends on the other. The supporting cast does a good job, with Henry Hull as the father, John Hoyt as the old-time horse trainer, and Gail Russell as the trainer's daughter. Ruth Warrick also succeeds in the thankless role of O'Keefe's wife.

Although most of the production is done in a very straightforward manner, it still works all right because the issues faced by the characters are easy to identify with. Aside from being somewhat predictable and sometimes a bit plain-looking, it's a solid feature.

Saw this movie for the second time on Archive.org (I previously saw it on a community channel from Manitoba; I live in Ontario but have access to Neepawa Access Television Network) while on a Christmas break. This week I've been binge watching movies about or centered around my favorite sports (horse racing and curling); seen Run for The Roses, Ready to Run and this title (and for curling, Gerri Curls and Men With Brooms).

This is overall a decent movie, though not without its flaws. I'm a factional owner of Standardbreds so a few things stuck out at me ;)

Dan Patch (April 29, 1896 - July 11, 1916) was indeed an excellent Standardbred *Pacing* champion (and not a trotter as he was referred to in the movie) who was so strong in open company that connections of other horses refused to race against him. There was. Again, creative licensing.

This movie is *loosely* based on the horse but mainly a fictional telling of the lives of his (movie fictional) connections. If you are looking for a more accurate picture about horse racing unfortunately this isn't it, but there are so few about Standardbreds and it's isn't terrible.