[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Ricardo III

Título original: Richard III
  • 1955
  • Not Rated
  • 2 h 41 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,3/10
5,7 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Laurence Olivier and Claire Bloom in Ricardo III (1955)
Shakespeare's powerful tale of the wicked deformed King and his conquests, both on the battlefield and in the boudoir.
Reproduzir trailer3:06
1 vídeo
99 fotos
Drama de épocaTragédiaBiografiaDramaGuerraHistória

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA tale of the wicked deformed King and his conquests, both on the battlefield and in the boudoir.A tale of the wicked deformed King and his conquests, both on the battlefield and in the boudoir.A tale of the wicked deformed King and his conquests, both on the battlefield and in the boudoir.

  • Direção
    • Laurence Olivier
  • Roteiristas
    • William Shakespeare
    • Laurence Olivier
    • David Garrick
  • Artistas
    • Laurence Olivier
    • Cedric Hardwicke
    • Nicholas Hannen
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    7,3/10
    5,7 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Laurence Olivier
    • Roteiristas
      • William Shakespeare
      • Laurence Olivier
      • David Garrick
    • Artistas
      • Laurence Olivier
      • Cedric Hardwicke
      • Nicholas Hannen
    • 60Avaliações de usuários
    • 28Avaliações da crítica
    • 88Metascore
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Indicado a 1 Oscar
      • 9 vitórias e 3 indicações no total

    Vídeos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 3:06
    Trailer

    Fotos99

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 93
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal48

    Editar
    Laurence Olivier
    Laurence Olivier
    • Richard III
    Cedric Hardwicke
    Cedric Hardwicke
    • King Edward IV of England
    Nicholas Hannen
    Nicholas Hannen
    • Archbishop
    Ralph Richardson
    Ralph Richardson
    • Duke of Buckingham
    John Gielgud
    John Gielgud
    • George, Duke of Clarence
    Mary Kerridge
    Mary Kerridge
    • Queen Elizabeth
    Pamela Brown
    Pamela Brown
    • Jane Shore
    Paul Huson
    Paul Huson
    • Edward, Prince of Wales
    Stewart Allen
    • Page to Richard
    Claire Bloom
    Claire Bloom
    • The Lady Anne
    Russell Thorndike
    • First Priest
    Wallace Bosco
    • Monk
    • (as Wally Bascoe)
    Norman Fisher
    • Monk
    Andrew Cruickshank
    Andrew Cruickshank
    • Brackenbury
    Clive Morton
    Clive Morton
    • The Lord Rivers
    Terence Greenidge
    • Scrivener
    Norman Wooland
    Norman Wooland
    • Catesby
    Alec Clunes
    Alec Clunes
    • The Lord Hastings
    • Direção
      • Laurence Olivier
    • Roteiristas
      • William Shakespeare
      • Laurence Olivier
      • David Garrick
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários60

    7,35.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    angel_de_tourvel

    the masterpiece of the master.... phenomenal

    Henry V was said to be Laurence Olivier's greatest screen role for British Propaganda reasons... he inspired England etc. during World War 2; there is no denying it, his Henry is brilliant. But he surpasses his own genius as Richard.

    "Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York" just seeing Richard's stooped, deformed figure hobble to the camera like some monstrous spider; to hear those bitter words delivered with such articulate power, and to be penetrated by that stony, constant glare is enough to know that this is no ordinary actor... this is a thespian whose legend will leave generations and generations of actors to come hopeless (teeth gritted) Whatever people say, Kenneth Brannagh will NOT be the next Laurence Olivier!!!

    This movie has a fantastic cast: get this! Ralph Richardson AND John Geilgud AND Claire Bloom! Claire Bloom is especially exquisite and I think she plays the soulfully lamenting Lady Anne to perfection. Her scenes with Olivier are great; there is such agitation and irony between the two. I especially like it when he woos her by her husband's tomb... just goes to show how even in a tyrannical role Olivier can still steal a woman's heart with his irresistible seductiveness. She is beautiful and a most accomplished actress; I wonder why she is not better known... is Richard the only Shakespeare film she did????

    Geilgud is wonderful as the doomed Clarence, done to death by the scheming Richard; my only disappointment was in Buckingham, played by Ralph Richardson. Richardson left me with a completely wrong impression of Buckingham, who (or so I learn from the play) is not all that different in character from Richard; but is scheming and devious also. Sad to say, (and I have read Olivier admits it so himself) Richardson was cast wrongly as the Duke of Buckingham... he acts too innocent and unsuspecting.

    I must also give a technical comment on the camera angle; I would have preferred to be nearer Olivier at some parts of his scenes... that said, I must say I liked the scenes theatrical as such... why are other reviewers always moaning about the costumes and the settings? The costumes I liked, the settings I liked, the music by william walton was great (olivier had good taste in music though he was definitely not a musician himself) and really suited the swiftly changing reflective to agitated moods of the characters.

    That said, I believe Laurence Olivier's Richard III to be (with perhaps the exception of his Henry V) the most worthily majestic film ever made in England. The greatest of course, would have been to see such a master of his incandescent talent on stage as Richard since Olivier was finest on stage live, but to be realistic, there is not much of his stage performances recorded, if any, and to be left this masterpiece that Shakespeare himself would have been proud to see performed, is a tribute to the most incredible actor of this century, and most probably, of all time.
    7Doc-57

    A bravura vehicle for Olivier

    Many great actors made their names with this Richard, and it turns out to be Olivier's greatest Shakepearean role as well. He captures the whole production coiling his way around the Crown of England: his asides to us through the camera are lovely. They say all actors love to play a villain. Well, it works for me.

    The movie is beautiful, rich; the costumes are awesome; and the dialogue, of course, is wonderful. He patches in that great speech from Henry VI, part 3: "Why, I can smile, and murder whiles I smile . . .": and the movie wouldn't be right without it.

    The other actors, Britain's elite of the time, seem to be tyrannized by the boss; and the text should have been edited better, because if you don't know the play and practically the whole history you'll get lost. Not to worry, though; the subplots here aren't really important (but they should be), and the thundering battle at the end will leave you satisfied. Special mention of Sir William Walton's music, the vibrant colors, and of course, England itself.
    10o_levina

    The best Shakespearean film ever! Unparalleled!

    I just can't find words to describe how I like this film. It is the most magnificent film I've ever seen. And it is certainly the best work of Laurence Olivier. I came to learn about this film quite accidentally. I was watching on TV some program about Shakespeare's plays and their adaptations. There were a number of fragments from different films and from this one too… It was the moment where Richard is offered a crown, he refuses at first and then accepts. I was stunned when Buckingham approached Richard to congratulate and Richard suddenly made him kneel down and kiss his hand. The gesture was so majestic, imperative and full of evil triumph. I understood at once that it was a great film. I've bought VHS tape as soon as I've found it and I've already seen it about dozen times. It's superb. Everything is splendid – screenplay, costumes, scenery and acting. I like John Gielgud as noble Clarence and Ralf Richardson as cunning Buckingham, and especially Claire Bloom as gentle and unhappy Lady Anne. However I still admire Laurence Olivier more than anybody else. I just can't forget his terrific voice and acting at the scene of first Richard's monologue that reveals malicious ambitious, mercilessness and devilish ingenuity of the Duke of Gloucester. Another scene I adore is his wooing Lady Anne. Both actors are great. Olivier is so convincing and moving that I believe any woman could surrender. Olivier maintains high standards of these impressive scenes through the whole film until the final battle. Richard is desperate and courageous at the end, he is killed but his spirit is not broken (he can be afraid of ghosts, not real enemies). Shakespearean play is brilliant and the film is worthy of the original. It's the most glorious historical movie of all times. I recommend everyone to see it.
    8slokes

    Sportive Tricks With Sir Larry's Tricky Dick

    That "Richard III" is one of the all-time great acting performances is hard to argue with. In the title role, Sir Laurence Olivier manages to be rousing and hate-inducing, menacing and amusing, often all at once. He was the world's greatest stage actor of his time, and Shakespeare was the world's greatest stage writer. So how do they do on the movie screen?

    Quite well. Because "Richard III," like "Patton" or "Scarface," is essentially a one-man show, and Olivier was the best Shakespearean actor of his time or since, we are in good hands. As a director (and uncredited co-writer), Olivier telescopes the action on screen in such a way as to negate the necessary stageiness of Shakespeare's text. He moves us the audience from one scene to another by pulling back a curtain and nodding to us to come closer, as if we were an old friend. He yells some lines, then coos others, his vocal dynamics challenging even seasoned readers of the play in terms of what he chooses to accent and what he does not. Finally, he finds the ample stores of humor Shakespeare gave this, one of his darker plays.

    "A sweeter and a lovelier gentleman...the spacious world cannot again afford," Richard says of one man he killed, and Olivier invests moments like this with a firm tongue in cheek. While wooing that man's wife (strictly for political gain), he actually draws a sword when presenting himself as the widow's new suitor, telling her to plunge it into him if she won't be his bride. She tells him he's a liar. "Then never man was true!" Richard shouts, and Olivier as he says this rolls his eyes shamelessly, like a silent-screen matinée idol. I can't watch that scene without laughing; it's a Mel Brooks moment.

    The film does move slowly, despite Olivier's trims. Entire scenes get cut out, yet the first act is drawn on for nearly an hour with the help of some dialogue brought in from another Shakespeare play. Surely Olivier could have set more up as part of the opening text narrative, and gotten down to business with that famous opening soliloquy.

    A worse fault is the woodenness of some of the actors, like the ones who play Catesby, Brackenbury, and especially Lord Hastings. It doesn't help that they don't get the same chance to address the viewer that Olivier avails himself. Sir John Gielgud even seems lost playing a naive victim of Richard's complots. Seen to better advantage are Claire Bloom as the woman Richard woos, Michael Gough as a murderer, and Patrick Troughton as the nasty child-killing nobleman Tyrell.

    Ralph Richardson gives the second-best performance in the play as the Duke of Buckingham, a half-step behind Richard in guile and cruelty, but trying to catch up in his own cold-blooded way. It's funny to read here that Olivier wanted Orson Welles in the role. Welles would have seemed too crafty. Richardson makes a believable victim as well as conspirator. Also, you have to mention Pamela Brown's Mistress Shore, who has no lines (because Shakespeare wrote none for her) but manages in Olivier's direction to play a central role by currying the bedside favor of King Edward and of Hastings.

    But Olivier of course is the only reason this movie is still watched. And he's worth watching as long as movies are seen. Yes, he may have won World War II making his movie version of "Henry V," and his "Hamlet" was when he became Hollywood's favorite emissary of high culture, but "Richard III" is still the thing to catch the conscienceless of the king, his moment of highest dungeon and merriest perversity. It's movies like this one that remind us why acting can be a noble profession, even for those who aren't knighted for their excellence in it.
    9bkoganbing

    The Summit of Acting Nobility

    It's quite a gap that Laurence Olivier covers between his portrayal of heroic Henry V and the evil Richard III. But he certainly does cover it well.

    In fact this production boasts the talents of five knighted thespians in its cast, Olivier as Richard, John Gielgud as Clarence, Ralph Richardson as Buckingham, Cedric Hardwicke as Edward IV and Stanley Baker as the Earl of Richmond. That is probably some kind of record.

    Once seen you will not forget the heavily made up Olivier with a shylock type nose and hunchbacked form. Unlike in Henry V and in Hamlet the title character's soliliquys are delivered straight to the audience rather than in voice-over. I think Olivier like Shakespeare wanted to emphasize the evilness of Richard as opposed to the tormenting doubts that Henry and Hamlet suffer. No doubts here, he's got his evil course well planned and he's very matter of factly telling his audience what's in store.

    Of course when Shakespeare wrote this he was gearing up the Tudor dynasty propaganda machine. Stanley Baker's Earl of Richmond becomes Henry VII grandfather of the Queen whose patronage Shakespeare enjoyed. It was in Tudor family interest to blacken Richard's name to support their own dynastic claims. There have been several plausible theories put forth to claim the murders of Edward V and his brother were done by others.

    One guy who in all the stories about Richard III who gets a whitewash is the Duke of Clarence. As portrayed by John Gielgud, Clarence is an innocent sacrificed in Richard's march for the throne. Actually Clarence was quite the schemer himself. He was in communication with Louis XI of France looking for aid in some plotting he was doing. Edward IV overlooked an incredible amount of treachery with him.

    One very big flaw is that the film opens with Edward IV being restored to the throne again in 1471 and he has his son with him. Edward IV died in 1483 and the sons have not aged a mite. I believe they were 12 and 9 when they were put to death in the Tower of London in 1483. I'm surprised Olivier had that in his film.

    Still and all it's a fabulous production and one should never miss a chance of seeing all that acting nobility in one film.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Henrique 5º
    7,0
    Henrique 5º
    Ricardo III
    7,3
    Ricardo III
    Hamlet
    7,5
    Hamlet
    The Tragedy of Richard III
    8,2
    The Tragedy of Richard III
    Othello
    7,0
    Othello
    Falstaff, o Toque da Meia Noite
    7,6
    Falstaff, o Toque da Meia Noite
    Júlio César
    7,2
    Júlio César
    Rei Lear
    7,6
    Rei Lear
    Henrique V
    7,5
    Henrique V
    Macbeth - Reinado de Sangue
    7,4
    Macbeth - Reinado de Sangue
    Richard III
    Otelo
    7,5
    Otelo

    Interesses relacionados

    Emma Watson, Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh, and Eliza Scanlen in Adoráveis Mulheres (2019)
    Drama de época
    Casey Affleck and Michelle Williams in Manchester à Beira-Mar (2016)
    Tragédia
    Ben Kingsley, Rohini Hattangadi, and Geraldine James in Gandhi (1982)
    Biografia
    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight: Sob a Luz do Luar (2016)
    Drama
    Irmãos de Guerra (2001)
    Guerra
    Liam Neeson in A Lista de Schindler (1993)
    História

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Michael Gough got his part (Dighton, the first murderer) by making a fuss to his fellow actor friends about only established stars getting cameo parts and leaving nothing for struggling actors like him. One night he got a phone call, and a voice said "You've been stirring it, haven't you? Right little shit." Gough demanded to know, "Who is this?" only to be stunned by the response, "It's Larry", which of course was Sir Laurence Olivier. Olivier was just having some fun at Gough's expense, had taken on-board his criticisms and was ringing to offer him the part of one of the murderers in this movie. When asked which one he wanted to play, Gough quickly said "Whichever one has the most lines", and he got his wish. Olivier arranged matters so that Gough's scenes were split over several days, instead of all being done in one day, so that Gough would maximize his per diem fee.
    • Erros de gravação
      In the scene when Richard tells King Edward of Clarence's supposed treason, two monks are singing hymns from a large book: their lips are not only out of sync with their singing, but with each other.
    • Citações

      Richard III: I'll drown more sailors than the mermaid shall,/ I'll play the orator as well as Nestor,/ Deceive more slyly than Ulysses could,/ And, like a Sinon, take another Troy./ I can add colours to the chameleon, /Change shapes with Proteus for advantages, /And set the murderous Machiavel to school./ Can I do this,and cannot get a crown?/Tut, were it farther off,/ I'll pluck it down.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      Most of the film's credits are shown at the end. The opening credits show only the title of the film, William Shakespeare's name, and the names of the main actors.
    • Versões alternativas
      Released in Great Britain at 155 minutes; some of the prints released in the USA are 139 minutes.
    • Conexões
      Featured in Great Acting: Laurence Olivier (1966)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes17

    • How long is Richard III?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • What is the band shown on Richard's leg during the conclusion of the film?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 11 de março de 1956 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Reino Unido
    • Idiomas
      • Inglês
      • Latim
    • Também conhecido como
      • Richard III
    • Locações de filme
      • La Mancha, Castilla-La Mancha, Espanha(Bosworth Field scenes)
    • Empresas de produção
      • London Film Productions
      • L.O.P.
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 2 h 41 min(161 min)
    • Cor
      • Color

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.