AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,2/10
768
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA married movie studio executive's life starts to unravel when he is stalked by a seductively beautiful woman he claims he does not know.A married movie studio executive's life starts to unravel when he is stalked by a seductively beautiful woman he claims he does not know.A married movie studio executive's life starts to unravel when he is stalked by a seductively beautiful woman he claims he does not know.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
André Mikhelson
- Steve Vadney
- (as Andre Mikhelson)
Jay Denyer
- Danny
- (não creditado)
Wilfred Downing
- Dave
- (não creditado)
Richard Grant
- Harry
- (não creditado)
Gordon Harris
- Actor
- (não creditado)
Douglas Hays
- Draper
- (não creditado)
David Hurst
- Dave Pearson
- (não creditado)
Edna Landor
- Miss Tyson
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
This film is one which I saw on TV many many years ago on Yorkshire and eventually obtained an American copy a few years back. Directed by Joseph Losey this film has great atmosphere and some great stars too. Unusual for the time there are good location shots and realistic studio backgrounds too. My copy "Finger of Guilt" is the edited version which was distributed by RKO but in spite of this I love the twists and turns of the plot and if you get the chance watch it vote on it too. This film is a high-spot in the history of Merton Park and shows what can be done on a modest budget with actors who know their stuff. Richard Basehart is brilliant as he struggles to solve the question "was it true" and Roger Livesey is believable as the studio boss. Look out to for a host of Merton Park regulars such as Andre Mikhelson who plays a designer in this film.
Erotomania is the psychological term used to describe someone who is delusional and has convinced themselves that another person loves them...a person who they possibly never even met. It often happens with crazed fans in love with a famous person but the fixation could occur on a normal, everyday person as well. Erotomaniacs are not obviously insane, but this delusion is difficult, and sometimes impossible, to rid the person of despite therapy. I mention this because through much of "Finger of Guilt" you aren't sure whether this has occurred to Reggie Wilson (Richard Basehart) or whether he's a total cad and simply is lying to hide an affair.
When the film begins, Reggie has moved to the UK following some sort of scandal he was involved in with some married woman. Now he's married to the boss of a British studio and has a very important job producing movies. However, he begins receiving letters from a lady in Newcastle asking him why he is ignoring her and demanding he contact her. But he insists he has no idea who the woman is and even tells his father-in-law about this situation. And then, the women begins calling the studio...demanding to talk with him. By this point, Reggie's wife has heard about all this and it's obvious that she's beginning to suspect her hubby is a lying troll. So, Reg takes the wife up to Newcastle to confront the lady...and the lady INSISTS she and Reggie have been lovers, though she can provide no concrete proof. Who are you to believe? So is this any good? And is it really a case of erotomania? See the film and learn for yourself.
The fact that Richard Basehart is in a British film isn't too surprising. Basehart was a very minor star in the States and made movies in Europe (including a film for Fellini) for several years. This is because European studios thought that by putting an American or two in the leads, it would increase the marketability of the films internationally.
All in all, a pretty good film. I didn't love the ending...and part of it is because it wasn't 100% convincing. Still, an interesting and unusual story.
By the way, this film does make you wonder how many people and marriages have been destroyed by erotomaniacs. While this is relatively common with celebrities and accepted as a normal part of fame, what about common folk who suddenly have women or men insisting they love them? For an amazingly good film about this, try to see the French film "He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not"....it's among the very best French movies of the last several decades!
When the film begins, Reggie has moved to the UK following some sort of scandal he was involved in with some married woman. Now he's married to the boss of a British studio and has a very important job producing movies. However, he begins receiving letters from a lady in Newcastle asking him why he is ignoring her and demanding he contact her. But he insists he has no idea who the woman is and even tells his father-in-law about this situation. And then, the women begins calling the studio...demanding to talk with him. By this point, Reggie's wife has heard about all this and it's obvious that she's beginning to suspect her hubby is a lying troll. So, Reg takes the wife up to Newcastle to confront the lady...and the lady INSISTS she and Reggie have been lovers, though she can provide no concrete proof. Who are you to believe? So is this any good? And is it really a case of erotomania? See the film and learn for yourself.
The fact that Richard Basehart is in a British film isn't too surprising. Basehart was a very minor star in the States and made movies in Europe (including a film for Fellini) for several years. This is because European studios thought that by putting an American or two in the leads, it would increase the marketability of the films internationally.
All in all, a pretty good film. I didn't love the ending...and part of it is because it wasn't 100% convincing. Still, an interesting and unusual story.
By the way, this film does make you wonder how many people and marriages have been destroyed by erotomaniacs. While this is relatively common with celebrities and accepted as a normal part of fame, what about common folk who suddenly have women or men insisting they love them? For an amazingly good film about this, try to see the French film "He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not"....it's among the very best French movies of the last several decades!
Quite frankly, this is probably the weakest Losey film I have yet had to sit through. Admittedly, I watched the 84-minute long version of INTIMATE STRANGER, 11 minutes shorter than the recognized original version.
Perhaps that made a difference, but I have to say that beginning with the director credited as Joseph Walton, instead of Losey, there was something dishonest and off about this flick (though I know that both he and scriptwriter Koch were on the run from HUAC, Senator McCarthy and the commie witch hunting in the USA, I find it hard to accept that such concerns should make them use false names in a UK production).
Not seeming overly interested in the role, Richard Basehart plays Reggie Wilson, a movie executive who appears to have enough doubts about his memory as to question his doctor whether he might have more than one personality.
He keeps getting letters from one Evelyn Stewart slyly played by Mary Murphy, after an affair with Constance Cummings, all suggesting that he has betrayed his wife many more times. Meanwhile, his wife and his father in law are also investigating... which sounds cogent enough, except that the viewer is never unambiguously told that Wilson is schizo - or not.
With a very good British support cast on paper, pity that a great actor like Roger Livesey is so ineffectively used as to seem and sound wooden.
The version that I watched on Youtube was poor, faces unfocused, so I cannot rate cinematography any great shakes.
If you can get the uncut version, try it. The 84' version is best avoided. 6/10.
Perhaps that made a difference, but I have to say that beginning with the director credited as Joseph Walton, instead of Losey, there was something dishonest and off about this flick (though I know that both he and scriptwriter Koch were on the run from HUAC, Senator McCarthy and the commie witch hunting in the USA, I find it hard to accept that such concerns should make them use false names in a UK production).
Not seeming overly interested in the role, Richard Basehart plays Reggie Wilson, a movie executive who appears to have enough doubts about his memory as to question his doctor whether he might have more than one personality.
He keeps getting letters from one Evelyn Stewart slyly played by Mary Murphy, after an affair with Constance Cummings, all suggesting that he has betrayed his wife many more times. Meanwhile, his wife and his father in law are also investigating... which sounds cogent enough, except that the viewer is never unambiguously told that Wilson is schizo - or not.
With a very good British support cast on paper, pity that a great actor like Roger Livesey is so ineffectively used as to seem and sound wooden.
The version that I watched on Youtube was poor, faces unfocused, so I cannot rate cinematography any great shakes.
If you can get the uncut version, try it. The 84' version is best avoided. 6/10.
Reggie Wilson (Richard Basehart) is worn out and recounts his story to his doctor. His Hollywood career ended after an affair with his boss's wife. He decided to pick up the pieces and move back to England. He married Lesley, daughter of a film producer and he's back in the game. It is all under threat when he starts receiving blackmail letters from a woman whom Reggie claims not to know.
I really like the premise. I don't like the progression of the last act. I don't get the pub meeting. I don't get their conversation. I don't get him for that section. There are obvious possible answers to the mystery woman. I kept waiting for him to get there. I don't like him discovering her with him on that set and redoing the dialogue. I'm not impressed with the reveal. I would redo the whole third act.
I really like the premise. I don't like the progression of the last act. I don't get the pub meeting. I don't get their conversation. I don't get him for that section. There are obvious possible answers to the mystery woman. I kept waiting for him to get there. I don't like him discovering her with him on that set and redoing the dialogue. I'm not impressed with the reveal. I would redo the whole third act.
This is a stylish and engrossing noir. The music seems a bit dated but the use of background sound is inventive and seems to presage Godard's. Is this Joseph Losey's best? No. "Time Without Pity," a year later, is far more powerful and less predictable. Not at all predictable, actually, and this one is. The resolution is not a surprise, exactly, but it is powerfully presented and moving.
Mary Murphy played a good bitch. I haven't seen her in many movies but it seems that she often was cast in this was. Losey uses the clattering of her high heels effectively. Actually, she is not a thoroughly bad character. She feels remorse.
Constance Cummins is excellent as the star imported for the main character's big project. Her helping him out of his predicament is touching. And Richard Basehart: One of the best American actors, he is superb here. He did not win the conventional awards but will long be remembered, if only for his beautiful playing in "La Strada" (and for his mousy pharmacist in what I consider the perfect noir: "Tension.")
Mary Murphy played a good bitch. I haven't seen her in many movies but it seems that she often was cast in this was. Losey uses the clattering of her high heels effectively. Actually, she is not a thoroughly bad character. She feels remorse.
Constance Cummins is excellent as the star imported for the main character's big project. Her helping him out of his predicament is touching. And Richard Basehart: One of the best American actors, he is superb here. He did not win the conventional awards but will long be remembered, if only for his beautiful playing in "La Strada" (and for his mousy pharmacist in what I consider the perfect noir: "Tension.")
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesOn this film's release, the director credit was given to producer Alec C. Snowden rather than to the (then) blacklisted Joseph Losey. Several prints give the credit to "Joseph Walton" - the director's full name was Joseph Walton Losey.
- Erros de gravaçãoIn the pub with Evelyn, the bottle of whiskey is still filled to the top of the label when Reginald gets up, but when he sits back down a moment later and Evelyn asks for her glass to be refilled, the bottle is only filled to the bottom of the label.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Finger of Guilt?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Finger of Guilt
- Locações de filme
- Walton Studios, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(used for Commonwealth Pictures studio)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 125.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 35 min(95 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente