House of Blackmail

(1953) House of Blackmail CRIME THRILLER/ MYSTERY

It has a blackmailer, Markham (Alexander Gauge) demanding five thousand pounds from Billy Blane (Barry Wynne) by Saturday. And he manages to convince him to get it from his sister, Carol Blane (Mary Germaine) since he does not have that kind of money. During the meeting with his sister, and as it turns out Billy forged his mother's signature to purchase something and was caught. She agrees to pay 5,000 with conditions that she would get to meet the blackmailer himself. And as she is driving down the highway, she then cross paths with a drifter who claimed to be homeless, he says his name is Jimmy (William Sylvester). Meanwhile, on the next stop Jimmy also appears to fit the description of an escape fugitive, James Corbett. And for some reason, Carol who picked him up from the highway, trusts him enough to ask him to pretend to act like her husband and lawyer, for the intention of grabbing the fraudulent check her brother forged the mother's signature on. And upon their arrival, it was their they meet the owner of the house, Pete Carter (John Arnatt); the blackmailer, Markham; the doctor, Welich (Hugo Schuster); the servant, Basset (Denis Shaw) and maid, Emma (Ingeborg Wells). As soon as Marham is found dead some time during the night and the phone wire has been cut, the owner then ordered all the current guests to stay at the residence until authorities showed up.

For a short running time of less than a hour and a half there is many twists and turns and surprising unexpected revelations that cannot be predicted for not everything is what it appears to be.

From the theme music I was expecting a comedy but it turned into an above average thriller I thought the 2 leads bounced off each other well and mary germaine held her own as genuine costar but the other men in the house were poorly written.but with the short run time it didn't drag and held my attention throughout.

A foolish young man named Billy Blane has forged a cheque for £200 and is threatened with arrest unless he pays £5,000 to the urbane and wealthy Markham. His artist sister, Carol (Mary Germaine) tries to get him out of it by agreeing to meet Markham in his old country house. On the way, she picks up a good-looking and garrulous hitch-hiker (William Sylvester) who calls himself Jimmy. The radio, meanwhile, speaks of an escaped convict from a nearby prison. Jimmy agrees to accompany Carol to the house and pose as her lawyer in an attempt to unnerve Markham.

There, they meet Markham (Alexander Gauge) and his two associates, an elderly Eastern European doctor (Hugo Schuster) and a sharp-tongued American (John Arnatt), also a Polish maid (Ingeborg von Kusserow) and a seedy, spying butler (Denis Shaw). After some sparring from Jimmy, Carol agrees to pay the money, but is unable to withdraw it from her bank until morning. The pair must remain until then and, with the windows electronically secured, there is no way to escape. During the night, Markham is murdered, and the killer could only have been someone staying at the house...

There is much intrigue and some witty dialogue to be enjoyed in this early fifties B-film, which reveals its small budget with its studio-bound setting and recycled score (at one point, it sounded like something from a Norman Wisdom film!). American William Sylvester is ebullient as Jimmy and, with his mid-Atlantic accent, could well have made an excellent Saint. As usual, Alexander Gauge is wonderfully erudite as the disreputable Markham, another of his reasonable-criminal roles, while the British actor John Arnatt displays a convincing American accent as the man who takes charge. There is also some decent characterisation - for example, with Bassett the butler and his listening at keyholes and room of pin-ups - and much creepy sneaking about, which I always love. Despite the gothic aesthetics, however, this is emphatically a mystery, not a thriller, and a pretty straightforward one at that. It's about the characters' interaction - not wanting to be alone or with any of the others either - and also keeps us guessing as to whether Jimmy is the escaped prisoner or not. The ending is neat, simple and reasonably satisfying, while everything before it is enjoyable too. An average film, of course, but that should be no insult when such things are as fun as this.

Really feels quite a bit earlier than the 50s and the cheap film stock doesn't help matters any. It's not just that though. The plot itself reminds me of 30s films, as does the soundtrack. I know I recently said this about a previous film I watched but this is very Edgar Wallace, Maybe I only feel that way because I've been reading him lately but then again his impact on mysteries and thriller since the 20s is not only undeniable but prodigious. This is quite an entertaining little film, falling squarely into the Mystery/whodunit genre and not really veering anywhere towards noir or even thriller. So it's good but quite safe. I'm thankful there's not too much comedic relief, as there often is with films of this kind, but it isn't dark or energetic either. A solid middle of the road mystery film.

William Sylvester used to pop up in some many British productions I always thought he was a British actor. This was until I saw him in the US movie, The Lawyer which spun off the television series Petrocelli.

Sylvester plays mysterious hitchhiker Jimmy who comes across fashion photographer Carol Blane. She is on her way to a house to talk to Markham who is blackmailing her brother for a bounced cheque. He demands £5000.

At a cafe, Carol who comes across a report of an escaped convict that matches Jimmy's description persuades him to accompany her for £50. Carol asks Jimmy to play the part of a lawyer.

They both engage with Markham and his associates. The house has a butler who likes to listen in through the keyhole. Later that night Markham is found dead. Both Jimmy and Carol are suspects.

This is an unpretentious murder mystery B movie and a rather effective one as well. There is comedy, mystery and plenty of suspects. Sylvester does well in keeping his motives mysterious.

I think the blackmail angle would had worked better, if Carol's brother was being blackmailed for being gay rather than a bounced cheque.