12 Horas de Aflição

Nick (Richard Dix) is the reporter, trying to get the goods on local mob boss (Cy Kendall) running the town, but Paula Sanders and her brother ( Lucille Ball, Allan lane) get in the way. You'll recognize Donald MacBride as the Detective... MacBride always yelled "Jumpin Butterballs!" in the marx brothers films. Granville Bates is McEwen, but Bates keeps looking off to the right... appears to be reading the lines off a card. Lucy had been making shorts and un-credited film roles since the early 1930s, but had just recently started getting bigger, credited parts. it all works. very linear. they get taken by the crooks,and have to figure out how to get out of it. no suspense. it's all very flat-line average. another pretty small role for Lucy, but she's on her way, after all those un-credited roles. Dix (and his son) both died quite young, as did Kendall. Directed by Lew Landers. made four films with Lucy. they never really knew what to do with her, until she got her own series.

While I have always liked Richard Dix, I must admit that this is one of the more ordinary films he made. Dix stars as a newspaper man--one that is frankly too glib and clever to be real. When a coworker is killed, Dix thinks a gangster is responsible and soon steals $80,000 from the crook. Much of the rest of the film is spent with the crook and Dix talking...a lot. Their tough banter seemed stagy and the film went no where for a very long period. By the end, I frankly didn't care who killed who--I was just bored and looking forward to another film.

Dull writing, clichéd characters and a complete waste of Lucille Ball in a supporting role (she could have just as well been played by a ball of lint--the part was dull and shallow). While it's not a bad film, it's also not particularly good and seemed to be just another B-movie from RKO.

Newspaper investigative reporter Nick Green is searching for dance instructor Paula Sanders (Lucille Ball)'s wayward brother Dave who is headed for trouble. Indeed, he has gotten in trouble with gangster George Costain and his bag.

Of course, I'm watching this for Lucille Ball. This is not really a showcase for her. She's just the blonde dame. Mostly, this is a weakly-made crime drama. This may be an early example of somebody trying to make a shaky-cam movie or the camera is swaying back and forth for no reason. Probably the latter and it's making me nauseous. It must be in post-post production because even the the closing cards are swaying back and forth. This must be a recording of a recording. Honestly, I don't know why anybody cares about Dave or any other character in this movie. I'm not really following that closely and I don't like any of these characters.

This is a decent 1939 crime drama. Richard Dix is good and Lucille Ball is as well, in a non-comedy performance. Worth watching but not the kind of thing that would make any "best of the decade" lists or anything.

Poor Lucy. It's a wonder she ever got any of the big breaks that came her way when you see how she was mistreated at RKO in a bunch of ingenue roles that required not even one-third of her talent.

She's barely even visible in this trifle, a gangster movie that has RICHARD DIX getting most of the attention as a newspaper reporter on the heels of a rackets number gangster (CY KENDALL) while Lucy sits on the sidelines and pops up in only a few scenes. Even in the scenes she's in, she's hardly given more than a few lines to speak.

The plot is nothing special, just a series of car chases and shootouts that make little sense since none of the characters are anything more than cardboard fixtures. Lucy's not the only one wasted here. ALLEN LANE as her kid brother has virtually nothing to do and DONALD MacBRIDE does his usual turn as an exasperated police officer.

Trivia note: JOHN ARLEDGE, who plays "Red", and serves as the juvenile comedy relief, played a dying soldier this same year (1939) in GONE WITH THE WIND. And incidentally, Lucille Ball was sent to audition for David O. Selznick as a Scarlett O'Hara hopeful. Can you believe it???