O Porto dos Sete Mares

The credits for this movie say that it is based on Marcel Pagnol's 1931 play Fanny, but that isn't true. It is a very close remake of Pagnol's 1932 movie adaptation of his play, an adaptation that, along with two other Pagnol movies, Marius (1931) and César (1936), served as the source for Joshua Logan's 1961 movie Fanny, which condenses all three of the French movies into one film. (Follow all that?) Because Port of Seven Seas is very much a remake of Pagnol's movie - Preston Sturges, who wrote the script, often simply translated Pagnol's French script - it is impossible not to compare the two. Since the French original is one of the classics of French cinema, something that gets run on French TV over and over, that sets the bar high.

And sometimes this movie comes up to that high bar, primarily with the performance of Frank Morgan (the Wizard of Oz) as Panisse. The original Panisse, Charpin, made this character complex, rich, and unforgettable, and I can honestly say that Frank Morgan performs at the same level. Some of his scenes, such as when he explains to Madelon (Pagnol's Fanny, the only character whose name is changed) why he is happy to marry her even though she is carrying someone else's child, are great moments in American cinema, and certainly worthy of a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. This film is worth seeing for his performance, and if you know Charpin's original you will not find Morgan any less wonderful.

Maureen O'Sullivan is also very fine in this movie as Madelon (Fanny). Given Oriane Demazias's melodramatic performance in the French original, some may even prefer O'Sullivan.

This movie's weak point is the star, however, Wallace Beery. In part he suffers from comparison with Raimu's performance in the French original; Raimu was one of the greatest actors of his age, and Beery did not have his depth and range. In part, however, this is not a good Wallace Beery performance: too often he seems to be just reciting the lines and sounds very unnatural. He had given and would continue to give far better performances in other movies. Even on its own terms, his performance in this movie is not a good. For anyone who knows Raimu's, Beery's is an almost complete loss.

John Beal as Marius drastically overacts, and Whale allows him to come off as too sympathetic in the confrontation scene near the end of the movie where the three male characters decide the fate of the child, which must have confused the first American audiences. Pierre Fresnay in the French original comes off as very unsympathetic, keeping the audience on the side of Panisse.

Cora Witherspoon's part, Honorine, has been shrunk from the French original, but she does a fine job with what she has left, and should have been billed over Beal.

In sum, this is a movie that is worth watching in its own right. If you know Logan's Fanny or Pagnol's, it is a must see and does not come in a poor third. Frank Morgan is definitely much better as Panisse than Maurice Chevalier, and Maureen O'Sullivan plays Madelon (Fanny) differently from Leslie Caron, but certainly every bit as well.

Though my James Whale retrospective was officially over, I managed to get my hands on yet another rarity (I am now only left with his last unreleased work, 1949's HELLO OUT THERE to catch up with) – so I opted to check it out instantly. This was his sole stint at MGM and, though the material is hardly typical of him, he manages to infuse it with great humanity and surprising depth. This is especially remarkable when considering that the 81-minute film is essentially a compression of three lengthy French ones – a particular characteristic of their creator Marcel Pagnol – whose cumulative length exceeds 7 hours (though this effectively tails off at the end of the second)!; interestingly, the adaptation/streamlining was done by none other than Preston Sturges!

As expected, the Marseille waterfront atmosphere is carefully evoked (courtesy of celebrated cinematographer Karl Freund) and the cast (mainly filled by MGM stalwarts) proves another definite trump card here: Wallace Beery plays gruff tavern-keeper Cesar, Frank Morgan is wealthy merchant Panisse (his best friend), Maureen O'Sullivan the market-seller Fanny (albeit awkwardly renamed Madelon!) and John Beal – essentially turning up at the extended finale – as the sailor Marius (Cesar's son). Also on hand is Etienne Girardot as a doddering crony of Beery and Morgan, with the trio's scenes together inserting a welcome dose of humor into the generally melodramatic proceedings.

For those unfamiliar with the narrative, we have Madelon and Marius intending to marry but he finds the call of the ocean irresistible and leaves her and his father behind. When it is discovered that the girl is pregnant, the much-older Panisse (a childless widower) offers to marry her – which is no sacrifice for him since he had repeatedly expressed his love for Madelon – and raise the kid as his own! However, Marius eventually re-appears and claims both for himself…but he finds opposition from everyone (Panisse was willing to relinquish the girl but not the baby), including his own father! The plot, as it stands here, concludes in bittersweet fashion with Cesar persuading Marius to go back to his true love i.e. the sea; the last entry in Pagnol's original trilogy follows the adventures of the grown-up boy.

The film, then, is an underrated achievement – even more so in the face of the 1961 remake called FANNY (which, being an Oscar nominee and featuring the cream of Hollywood's French star imports, has rather stolen this one's thunder!) that actually originated as a stage musical but whose entire song score would ultimately be dropped for its transition to the screen!

Begins with Marius leaving--with letter. CRAPPY--never see him until much later American actors--not a good thing lacks the beauty of the 61 version.

There's also a french made trilogy pagnol.

Until I stumbled upon this film on YouTube, I had no idea that Hollywood made a version of Marcel Pagnol's novel "Fanny" before the much more famous 1961 version. By comparison, this 1938 version is far inferior...and the same can be said when you compare it to the French-made trilogy from the 1930s.

This is a summary based on the Pagnol story: Young Marius is in love with Fanny (here called Madelon due to the Production Code!) and vice-versa. However, he also is obsessed with going off to the sea on a merchant ship and Marius chooses the former. Unbeknownst to him, Fanny is pregnant! Not wanting to raise an illegitimate child, she marries an old man, Panisse, who loves her and adores the son that he takes for his own. Eventually, much later, Marius returns and expects to pick up where he left off.

The 1938 film begins strangely. It starts at about the same place the 1961 version was at the 30 minute mark! Yes, all the wonderful set-up for the story is gone. And, oddly enough, they chose never to show Marius until much, much later in the story--instead using a poor plot device to summarize most of the missing 30 minutes...a letter from Marius!

Additionally, the Production Code was a problem as Madelon/Fanny is supposed to be pregnant and unmarried...something the Code simply wouldn't allow...especially in 1938 when it was at its most restrictive. So how does this film deal with it? They still include it, though they talk around it a bit...again, because of the Code.

This is a film which is a failure on so many levels. None of the actors act or talk as if they are French...and you wonder why they didn't get some French actors to play these roles. In particular, Wallace Beery plays himself (or at least his movie persona) instead of Marius' father! Additionally, the direction by James Whale, a good director but one more adept with directing "Frankenstein", was pedestrian. The 1961 version was directed in a much more poetic, beautiful manner by Joshua Logan and the color cinematography and legitimate French locations made it an incredibly artistic film. In the 1938 film, Madelon is just some girl...in the 1961 version you, the viewer, fall for Fanny...she is just so radiant. My advice to you is to skip this one unless you are a die-hard Pagnol or classic Hollywood fan. I love Pagnol and classic Hollywood...and I was still pretty disappointed.

By the way, the French trilogy is probably almost a good as the 1961 version. While not as pretty, it is definitely more the vision of the author and sticks close to the three plays he wrote about Fanny.