A Casa Infernal

Jimmy idolizes bootlegger Matt, and when he refuses to implicate his friend, he is sent to reform school. He befriends Shorty, a boy with a heart condition, and escapes to let the world know about the brutal conditions.

Mordaunt Hall observed, "The attempt to pillory reform schools is hardly adult in its attack, but it has a few moderately interesting interludes. The direction of this film is old-fashioned. Pat O'Brien gives a forced performance. Young Durkin's playing is sincere and likewise that of Bette Davis as Peggy."

The biggest problem with this film is how poorly the physical film itself has held up. The Library of Congress has done a great job cleaning it, but it remains a bit of a mess, particularly in the first act. Hopefully some day a better print will be found. The story itself is decent, and tells another angle on the whole gangster theme: what of those who are not gangsters but keep their mouths shut on their behalf?

One of the first films Bette D ever did. and unfortunately, one of the last that Howard Higgin directed. and almost the end of the road for Junior Durkin (played "Jimmy") as well. more about them later. In the film, Jimmy's mom gets bumped off, and he goes to live with relatives. Pat Obrien is "Kelly", a no-good boarder, and Davis is his girl. Jimmy takes the fall for Kelly, and now he's off to reform school. Sound and picture are pretty rough, which is probably why we never see this one on Turner Classics. director Higgin died quite young at 47. and Junior Durkin, the "star" of this also died young, at 19 in a car accident. Durkin also lost his own mother at a young age, just like in this film. The car was driven by friend Jackie Coogan. The film's okay. and a good oppurtunity to see a young Bette Davis in an early, small role. Showing on Moonlight Movies channel.

Plot-- Following his mother's untimely death, young Jimmy (Durkin) is misled into a crime by fast-talking family friend Kelly (O'Brien). Betrayed again by Kelly, Jimmy is sent to a boy's reformatory where he experiences many institutional cruelties, but also meets fellow inmate Shorty (Coghlan), where a fast-friendship is formed. The question is what will become of Jimmy, friend Shorty, and will the cruelties of the reformatory and Kelly be rectified.

That reformatory brickyard is stacked to the skies and unlike anything I've seen. Should the mountainous stacks tumble, I doubt the boy stackers would ever be found. The movie's an interesting antique (1932) where O'Brien gets to show his fast-talking specialty as a pretentious bootlegger. But the real focus is Durkin, a likable kid, maybe too much so for the toughened last part. Sorry to say Davis's role looks like an add-on as O'Brien's conscionable girlfriend, and one that also gets a woman into a mainly male cast. It's still early in her career, but already Davis has that hard-eyed stare. And catch that toe-the-line stare-at-the-wall punishment misbehaving boys have to go through. That too is unlike anything I've seen.

Anyway, most of the runtime occurs inside the reformatory, minus the two top-billed players. Apparently, Durkin didn't have that same name recognition even though he gets the screen time. Too bad he died at such a young age and with so much to live for. His scenes with Junior Coughlin are unusually tender and moving, and dare-I-say, almost homo-erotic. All in all, the movie's in the prison-reform wave that occupied much of Hollywood at the time- e.g. Hell's Highway (1932); I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932). Despite the many passing decades, the hour still holds interest, so shouldn't be passed up

The reviews for this film posted here (quite a large number) reflect badly not on the movie, over 90 years old now, but on the submitters. They take a high-handed tone as if the movie had been shot recently, reflecting/comparing it to current budgets, techniques, sensibilities. I'd hate to see their reactions to silent films, only four or five years earlier than this one.

Silent Era Pathos was a formidable approach to movie making a hundred years ago, from Chaplin to Borzage, and a surefire way of captivating an audience. The simplicity of "Hell's House" in aiming for pathos is its strength, not a weakness, and its lack of flashiness (in camerawork or other techniques) is because it's not an All-Star big-budget picture or a musical extravaganza.

I truly enjoyed this simplicity, the unaffected performance by Junior, who resembles a young Sean Penn. The immense charisma bursting from stars Pat O'Brien (perfectly cast as the glad-handing con man) and just starting out Bette Davis balances the downbeat subject matter. Director/story writer Howard Higgin makes his point on prison reform -reform school subset here - without sensationalism, while obviously today's audience is looking for an exploitation movie approach a la Reefer Madness.

One sidelight: the young Bette Davis is a dead ringer (no pun intended) for current porn starlet Chloe Cherry, an amazing resemblance I hadn't noted even after seeing dozens of Cherry's videos, probably because in my mind's eye I imagine Davis with her iconic look years later in her career. Chloe's star quality has served her well, as she is one of the rare actresses to make a name for herself in the mainstream (via "Euphoria" and social media) after being pigeonholed in the still-looked down upon porn industry.

I love the homo-erotic nature of this film, especially because of the time it was made. Unfortunately Bette Davis does not have a big part, though it is still important. What this boy goes through just because he is naive is a tragedy. This film is hard to find but I recommend searching for it. The story is original and daring. The loss of innocence is heartbreaking and must be seen for yourself.