The Lost Jungle

This is not a bad little serial. It has few of the standard serial cliches that bug me, especially not the cliffhanger endings that end up happening completely differently at the start of the next episode (watch the original Captain America serial to see a LOT of that).

Clyde Beatty is a nice enough guy, though obviously not an actor...but then few of the real-life celebrities that did movies and serials in the 30's & 40's were (Red Grange, Frank Hawks, Sammy Baugh...though Houdini pulled it off back in 1919). There are a lot of animal action shots, which is a pleasure to watch. Clyde has this stupid hypnotic eye power over the beasts at a couple of points in the story, but those moments are easily ignored.

All in all a nice little serial...fun, good locations, good guys, bad guys, wild animals, lost treasure...sounds good to me!

I'm not going to criticize the movie. There isn't that much to talk about. It has good animal actions scenes which were probably pretty astonishing at the time. Clyde Beatty isn't exactly a matinée idol. He's a little slight and not particularly good looking. But that's OK. He's the man in that lion cage. We know that when he can't take the time away from his lions to tend to his girlfriend, he will end up on an island with her and have to save the day. Someone said earlier that it is a history lesson. The scenes at the circus are of another day, especially the kids who hang around. I didn't realize that even back in the thirties, they sailed on three masted schooners. It looked like something out of 1860. I guess that's the stock footage they had. No wonder the thing got wrecked. They're always talking about fixing her up. There's even a dirigible. It tells us a little about male female relationships at the time, a kind of giggly silliness. But if you don't take it too seriously, you can have fun watching it.

This is an adventure film. Some action with the animals and a man whipping the animals but that's about it. Why is this film considered Science Fiction I'll never know because it's far from it -- not one ounce of Sci-Fi within the film, not unless the ship/boat is suppose to be Sci-Fi. It's also a Romance with the animal trainer and the girl he rescues.

Anyway, the film is quite dull, it's got a couple of cute moments, some beautiful animals and a couple of dorky characters. There is also an animal trainer/tamer that mainly (pretends to) whips them.

I have no way of knowing how these animals were treated on and off the sets but I doubt they were treated all that well - but I don't know for sure.

There's not much to see nor much else to say about this one.

3/10

Evidently, I watched a different version. This was also released in the same year and under the same title as a 68-minute feature version of the serial by Mascot Pictures Corporation. It is incorporated in the 50 movie pack Sci-Fi collection.

Plenty of animal training scenes staring at the Hogenbeck-Wallace Animals. Clyde the benevolent and gentle animal trainer is too naive about human nature to realize that one of his men Sharkey (Warner Richmond) tries to kill him every time he turns around, and too preoccupied to realize he must marry Ruth Robinson (Cecilia Parker) or lose her to a South Seas trip planned by her father.

While Clyde is busy playing with his felines, Ruth and her father Capt. Robinson (Edward LeSaint) are shipwrecked on an uncharted island of Kamor with lions, tigers, bears, and more unscrupulous beasts, oh my. Ruth gives Clyde the bird. I mean she sends him a cable by carrier pigeon.

Clyde to the rescue on a new airship. Lightning strikes in a storm and you guess it Dirigible Victory splits up. Sharkey bails like a rat leaving a sinking ship, with the only parachute. What are their chances of getting lost on the same island? What is worse, Sharkey is lurking somewhere and up to his nefarious plots.

Will Clyde become "tiger chow" and who will get the girl?

Plenty of animal action for the day, scary beasts, and a guy keeping them in check (long before the use of CGI or camera tricks). If a person couldn't get to the circus back in the day or were a big fan of the circus, this would definitely appeal to the wild side for younger folks. I couldn't see kids getting into it these days, but surely would've been a treat on the big screen then. Directing is alright, as there were a few points where the limits of special effects needed decent camera work and visual storytelling.

The scripting was pretty awful, very basic to the point of illogical/unemotional. Plot is extraordinarily thin and convenient. I think this is why it would target a young audience, probably more so the males. Between us, I think Ruth could've done much better. Here's a man (hero) obsessed with his work and 'oh by the way, I love you babe' should be a serious red flag. Characters are static, almost caricature like a Laurel & Hardy bit.

Take it or leave it with this film. If you've got time then there may be some interesting things to watch.