[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
IMDbPro

When Knighthood Was in Flower

  • 1922
  • 2 h
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,5/10
1,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Marion Davies in When Knighthood Was in Flower (1922)
DramaRomance

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaMary Tudor, sister of England's Henry VIII, causes a stir by falling in love with a guardsman below her class.Mary Tudor, sister of England's Henry VIII, causes a stir by falling in love with a guardsman below her class.Mary Tudor, sister of England's Henry VIII, causes a stir by falling in love with a guardsman below her class.

  • Direção
    • Robert G. Vignola
  • Roteiristas
    • Luther Reed
    • Charles Major
    • William LeBaron
  • Artistas
    • Marion Davies
    • Lyn Harding
    • William Norris
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,5/10
    1,2 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Robert G. Vignola
    • Roteiristas
      • Luther Reed
      • Charles Major
      • William LeBaron
    • Artistas
      • Marion Davies
      • Lyn Harding
      • William Norris
    • 11Avaliações de usuários
    • 4Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 1 vitória no total

    Fotos25

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 19
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal30

    Editar
    Marion Davies
    Marion Davies
    • Mary Tudor
    Lyn Harding
    Lyn Harding
    • King Henry VIII
    William Norris
    William Norris
    • King Louis XII
    Forrest Stanley
    Forrest Stanley
    • Charles Brandon
    Pedro de Cordoba
    Pedro de Cordoba
    • Duke of Buckingham
    Ernest Glendinning
    • Sir Edwin Caskoden
    William Powell
    William Powell
    • Francis, Duc d' Angoulême
    • (as William H. Powell)
    Arthur Forrest
    • Cardinal Wolsey
    Macey Harlam
    • The Duc de Longueville
    Johnny Dooley
    • The King's Jester
    William Kent
    • The King's Tailor
    Gustav von Seyffertitz
    Gustav von Seyffertitz
    • Grammont, the Soothsayer
    Charles K. Gerrard
    Charles K. Gerrard
    • Sir Adam Judson
    • (as Charles Gerard)
    George Nash
    George Nash
    • An Adventurer
    Arthur Donaldson
    Arthur Donaldson
    • Sir William Brandon
    Theresa Maxwell Conover
    Theresa Maxwell Conover
    • Queen Catherine
    Flora Finch
    Flora Finch
    • A French Lady-in-Waiting
    Ruth Shepley
    Ruth Shepley
    • Lady Jane Bolingbroke
    • Direção
      • Robert G. Vignola
    • Roteiristas
      • Luther Reed
      • Charles Major
      • William LeBaron
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários11

    6,51.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    7JoeytheBrit

    When Knighthood Was in Flower review

    Marion Davies brings a sense of fun and adventure to the role of Mary Tudor, the younger sister of Henry VIII, who was forced into marrying the ageing French King Louis XII. The entertaining plot revolves around her attempts to avoid the marriage and elope with dashing officer Charles Brandon (Forrest Stanley).. A big hit when it was released - and also the most expensive movie ever made for a while - it is undeservedly overlooked today.
    7springfieldrental

    Hearst's Investment In Mistress Pays Off At Box Office

    By 1922, it was an open secret that one of newspaper's most powerful publishers, William Randolph Hearst, was not only having an affair with one of Hollywood's top actresses, Marion Davies, but actually living with her. One aspect of the relationship raising eyebrows was his current marriage to Millicent Hearst, mother to their five sons. The illicit liaison didn't seem to impair Davies' public career; in fact, her popularity appeared to have thrived on the 'scandal:' she was voted number one actress by theater owners in 1922 for her marque value, bringing in the most viewing customers of any female film star.

    Hearst, a mentor and handler to the actress, produced a number of Davies' movies. One motion picture where he financially went all in on was September 1922's release of "When Knighthood Was In Flower." The actress' role of King Henry VIII's sister forced under a treaty to marry the old French king was a departure from her normal comic ingenue parts. Davies had to display a certain amount of athleticism, not known for her physicality in the past. To prepare for one sword fighting sequence, she spent days learning how to fence. Additionally, her dramatic skills were put to the test when her character falls in love with a commoner, going against what a highly volatile Henry expressedly commanded.

    No expense was too great for Hearst when he underwrote the film's production based on a 1898 best selling novel by Charles Major. The newspaper mogul was a stickler for authenticity: he constructed a large-scale medieval village complete with elaborate costumes for his hundreds of extras. For the short scene in the beginning where Davies arrives at King Henry's abode, he had built in Bridgeport, CT, a replica of a 16th-century boat. In all, Hearst spent a record $1.5 million on 'Knighthood,' including the most expensive marketing campaign ever seen in cinema to that time. He rented 650 billboards throughout New York prior to the film's release as well as 300 subway advertising sites. Souvenir books were sold by the thousands, and a huge electric sign with dazzling lights was set up in busy Times Square.

    Hearst knew how to sell product, and to prove it, "When Knighthood Was In Flower" was a beneficiary of his pre-publicity campaign. The movie became the second highest box office winner for 1922, trailing only Douglas Fairbanks' 'Robin Hood.' The movie also earned praise with film critics, with even one British art dealer effusive about the motion picture, commenting it's "the most stupendous reproduction of Henry the Eighth court life that has ever been achieved - a marvelous piece of artistry."
    7bkoganbing

    Awe inspiring spectacle for its time

    I was quite impressed with the restoration of Marion Davies's breakout picture When Knighthood Was In Flower. For its time the film is quite lavish and an awe inspiring spectacle. I wouldn't be surprised if William Randolph Hearst made sure that Paramount had whatever financing it needed to bring his Marion's breakout film to the big screen. The only thing that surprised me was that he didn't get Cecil B. DeMille to direct. But more than likely DeMille did not want to be second guessed by WR Hearst.

    With or without DeMille this film is the definition of spectacle. Many of you have probably seen the Disney classic film The Sword And The Rose made during the 50s that starred Richard Todd as Charles Brandon and Glynis Johns as Mary Tudor with James Robertson Justice as Henry VIII. Marion Davies is Mary Tudor, sister of Henry VIII and a pawn in the power play game of medieval Europe.

    Lyn Harding is Henry VIII and this is back in the day before he became changing wives like underwear and beheading a pair of them. He's married to Catherine of Aragon aunt of the Hapsburg Emperor Charles V whose many titles also included King of Spain and ruler of the Netherlands as well as all that German and Eastern European territory. Henry VIII thought that if he could get sister Mary hitched to the aged Louis XII of France he'd have things all sewed up alliance wise.

    But Mary has a mind of her own. Marion Davies catches one look at Charles Brandon at jousting tournament and she decides this is the guy I want and I don't care if he's not noble.

    The long forgotten Forrest Stanley is Charles Brandon. I'm sure WR Hearst didn't want a leading man getting all the attention in Marion's film. Time and the coming of sound have erased our memories of most of the cast. But William Powell plays Francis I of France who succeeded Louis XII when he died. This was Powell's second film and he's properly sinister as Francis. Not that Francis was any more or less bad than any of the other monarchs of the day including Henry VIII in real life. But Powell in his silent years played swarthy sinister villains and Francis I is done in the best Snidely Whiplash tradition.

    Historically accurate its not. Anne Boleyn makes a brief appearance here as a girl Henry VIII was beginning to check out. Anne was a mere 13 when all this action is taking place and was not drawing Henry's or anyone else's attention yet.

    It's been remarked that Davies's strong suit was a gift for comedy and she has a great old time fleeing from the king with her lover and going to a tavern in male drag. She has a great old time in this part of the film, you could tell Davies was enjoying herself.

    I'm glad this film is now restored and we can see both Marion Davies and William Powell in their salad days.
    5ArtVandelayImporterExporter

    Now I know why Marion Davies was resented

    Knights in Flowery Dresses is a masterfully costumed and filmed romp through the Court of the Crimson King. But it proves that as far back as 1922 William Randolph Hearst was spending lavish amounts of money trying to prove to the world Marion Davies could act.

    Don't get me wrong. Davies was a gifted physical comic actress and mimic. When she's allowed to display those talents in movies, the movies are hugely entertaining. When Daddy Warbucks puts her in costume dramas, her complete lack of talent as a dramatic actor shines through.

    I mean, if this is a drama, Davies doesn't act like she's in one. And if it's a comedy it's very unfunny. I know for sure it's not an epic because it barely leaves the castle.

    Although the set design is elaborate and expensive, the film failed to hold my interest. Except for King Henry VIII's eyes, which appear to be made of chunks of coal. Very creepy.
    7raskimono

    The Marion Davies show

    What can be said about at the time the most expensive movie ever made with cost an estimated at $1.8 million. The pet project of the famous media magnate William Hearst, it is the tale of a woman, sister who defies all royal conventions, especially one; she falls in love with a commoner - Knight Charles Brandon - while bethrothed not of her choice, of course, to King louis XII of France. Action ensues as the forces of tradition conspire to keep them apart. The sets are very good and Marion davies is extremely good. When I watch a silent movie and I wish to hear what the actor is saying, then the performance is classic. Everyone else is adequate and passable. The director who isn't very good throws in a lot of gothic subtext and an unusual editing style of what I'll term "flash cutting" is used. Cinematography is especially wonderful. Deeper meanings or detailing beyond the obvious social strata innuities and foresight castigations of a by-gone era, is pitifully missing. Entertaining yes, action-packed - agreed but a bit quaint, unlike Robin Hood released around the same time but which holds up much better. (It alsao looks as if it cost more; it did not). But Garbo, Shearer and Dietrich did this too and theirs are better. Worth watching but watch out for sappiness in many moments. Just as a note, this movie was the biggest hit of the 1922-23 movie season, ahead of Robin Hood and Safety last.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Nanook, o Esquimó
    7,6
    Nanook, o Esquimó
    Aves Sem Ninho
    7,3
    Aves Sem Ninho
    Eva no Trono
    6,7
    Eva no Trono
    Vento e Areia
    8,0
    Vento e Areia
    O Grande Desfile
    7,9
    O Grande Desfile
    Moinho Vermelho
    6,8
    Moinho Vermelho
    Sherlock Holmes
    5,7
    Sherlock Holmes
    Uma Alma Livre
    6,6
    Uma Alma Livre
    Salomé
    6,6
    Salomé
    The Dare-Devil
    6,2
    The Dare-Devil
    Asas
    7,5
    Asas
    Little Old New York
    6,3
    Little Old New York

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Marion Davies's gowns were the exact reproductions of those worn by Mary Tudor.
    • Erros de gravação
      Francis was Louis's son-in-law and first cousin once removed, not his nephew.
    • Citações

      Mary Tudor: Jane, Jane, how lucky you are not to be a Princess... and for sale!

    • Conexões
      Edited into Experiência Americana: Citizen Hearst: Part 2 (2021)
    • Trilhas sonoras
      The Marion Davies March
      Music by Victor Herbert

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 15 de setembro de 1922 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idiomas
      • Nenhum
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Då ridderskapet stod i blom
    • Locações de filme
      • Paramount Studios, Astoria, Queens, Nova Iorque, Nova Iorque, EUA(Studio)
    • Empresa de produção
      • Cosmopolitan Productions
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • US$ 1.500.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      • 2 h(120 min)
    • Cor
      • Black and White
    • Mixagem de som
      • Silent
    • Proporção
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.